This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

EnglandLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofEngland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. Warwickshire This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage ofWarwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit theproject page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project'stalk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire ??? This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale.

Administrators, is it felt that this matter is suitable for a work of encyclopedic nature. A senrtence has ben aded to the article with a link to a national newspaper report of the time. Views became very heated on both sides of the argument of this case and as in most cases I'm not sure the newspaper article covers all of the aspects and options open to both parties at various stages of a lentghy litigation process. I was aware of this case and decided not to mention it as I felt that it is not really the place here to cover the legal arguments in a fair and objective way to both sides. I have not removed the referemnce but thought I would open the argument up and see if a policy existed on this type of entry.Argrogan (talk)17:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onAston Cantlow. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20120719065753/http://www.chancelrepair.org/2.html tohttp://www.chancelrepair.org/2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)01:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class England-related articles
• Low-importance England-related articles
• WikiProject England pages
• Start-Class WikiProject Warwickshire articles
• Unknown-importance WikiProject Warwickshire articles
• WikiProject Warwickshire articles