Talk:Anjana Chaudhari
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedStub-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Here is no reference , no notability , not an important person plz prove notability and give reference. --Jayanta Nath (talk)05:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
—Precedingunsigned comment added by122.169.2.178 (talk)11:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
chitrodipura
near mehsana 8 km
sagbai mataji nu mandir famous
sivji mandir kashi vishvanath akhado—Precedingunsigned comment added by59.95.223.152 (talk)13:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Sikh History or advanced user/editor,
I want to make a change to the part that says "anjana chaudhari is a backward class", the reference that they provide is a private book from a private author. My source is the official "National Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993 (Act No. 27 of 1993) (Database Searching)" of INDIA. THIS and i repeat ONLY THIS is the source which is true and legitimate. According to this source there is no such listing in the Gujarat section for "Anjana, Chaudhari, Chaudhary, Patidar, Patel, etc". The link for this page is "http://ncbc.nic.in/backward-classes/gujarat.pdf ". The main website is "http://ncbc.nic.in/ ", which is a GOVERNMENT OF INDIA website. I simply want to remove that link which states Anjana Chaudhari is a Other Backward Caste because it is simply false (I have the official source to prove it).
Now i ask you, how may i go about doing this? Because every-time i try to make a edit and change to the page it somehow gets reverted even though the changes are cited and explained!
This is a bit frustrating at this point. I have been at this for months now...
--Rjp2490 (talk)08:12, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
BUT THIS IS NOT JUST ANY WEBSITE. IT IS A GOVERNMENT WEBSITE. THE TOPIC DISCUSSED "OTHER BACKWARD CASTES" IS MADE BY THE GOVERNMENT NOT ANY ORDINARY AUTHOR OF A BOOK!
--Rjp2490 (talk) 23:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)--Rjp2490 (talk)23:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks--SH10:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you keep deleting and undoing the proper changes? You have no idea what your doing and the claims your making. Who are you to correct me? I have plenty of references i can prove my point with. Don't touch the article.— Precedingunsigned comment added byRjp2490 (talk •contribs)04:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dear User SikhHistory,
You undid my last edit when i correctly cited a valid source.
I'm new to wikipedia, my apologizes. And i'm not sure if this is the way im supposed to leave a message either. But, i want to say that even according to the wiki article for Anjana Chaudhari, "Another way of writing this classes' name are Chaudrari of Hindu Anjana, Chaudhari or Hindu Aanjana, Chaudhari or Aanjana, Aanjana Patel, Aanjana Patidar, Aanjana Desai, Aanjana Kanbi, Chaudhari Patel, Chaudhari Patidar". Therefore, my cited source was correct as it referred to "Anjana Patel" which is a term interchangeable with "Anjana Chaudhari". Is it not?— Precedingunsigned comment added byRjp2490 (talk •contribs)04:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello SikhHistory, Why must you undo changes when all changes are explained and also cited? There is no major change in my last edit other than removeing "other backward caste". This change is cited and explained.— Precedingunsigned comment added byRjp2490 (talk •contribs)04:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)—Precedingunsigned comment added by75.45.111.235 (talk)[reply]
Dear Sikh History or advanced user/editor,
I want to make a change to the part that says "anjana chaudhari is a backward class", the reference that they provide is a private book from a private author. My source is the official "National Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993 (Act No. 27 of 1993) (Database Searching)" of INDIA. THIS and i repeat ONLY THIS is the source which is true and legitimate. According to this source there is no such listing in the Gujarat section for "Anjana, Chaudhari, Chaudhary, Patidar, Patel, etc". The link for this page is "http://ncbc.nic.in/backward-classes/gujarat.pdf ". The main website is "http://ncbc.nic.in/ ", which is a GOVERNMENT OF INDIA website. I simply want to remove that link which states Anjana Chaudhari is a Other Backward Caste because it is simply false (I have the official source to prove it).
Now i ask you, how may i go about doing this? Because every-time i try to make a edit and change to the page it somehow gets reverted even though the changes are cited and explained![1]
This is a bit frustrating at this point. I have been at this for months now...
THE ABOVE IS THE MESSAGE I POSTED FOR YOU TO SEE IN THE DISCUSSION PAGE OF THE "ANJANA CHAUDHARI" WIKI PAGE.
PLEASE REPLY TO IT AND HELP ME MAKE THE CHANGES THE CORRECT WAY.
THANK YOU
--Rjp2490 (talk)08:22, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
References
Can you please look at the change i made to Anjana Chaudhari Page. Does it NOW look correct??? Please give me a reply on my User:Rjp2490 page.
--Rjp2490 (talk)02:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Anjana Chaudhari is a Hindu Kurmi caste found in Gujarat and nighbouring states.source:cencus of india 1921 volume 8 bombay presidencyPart 1 page 184.114.31.172.135 (talk)10:58, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide areliable source if appropriate.Morneo06 (talk)13:19, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]This is Hindu Kurmi(kanabi)CasteRefer census of india 1921 volume 8 part 1 page 180 to 185.Also refer census of india 1931 where first time chaudhari appeared instead of kanabi.......in 1931 census full detail given about anjana kanabi.......In 1931 census kadva and leva kanabi wrote patidar while anjana kanbi wrote chaudhari.......There are many books where anjana refered as kanabi like mahajati patidar by devendra patel;kanbi kshatriya patidaro ka itihas by mangubhai patel and many more.......There are many gazzetes by bombay government in british period where clearly told about anjana kanbi.....so show truth not falseness...........Akakakalal (talk)16:50, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For God sake stop playing with history and at least don't misrepresent the facts, around 3 lakh Muslims were killed in Jammu and you are trying to eye wash major war crimes of dogra crime.Aadam Bezaar (talk)17:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Anjana Chaudhary are not Jat, so kindly update it. Anjana Chaudhary are "Kulbi Chaudhary" and "Kulbi Patel" but not jat.117.228.77.79 (talk)19:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: please providereliable sources that support the change you want to be made.ScottishFinnishRadish (talk)20:12, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply] | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Anjana Chaudhari is NOT an ST caste. Anjana Chaudhari are classified as OBC in Gujarat. Wrong information in this page about Anjana Chaudhari. This is an insult to the Anjana Chaudhari caste. Wikipedia must correct this information as soon as possible.Surta (talk)15:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: please providereliable sources that support the change you want to be made.MadGuy7023 (talk)17:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]they are jats. this is proven by dna results. and their gotras are similar. their physical features are similar and anjana chaudharies are said to be migrated from north45.120.121.66 (talk)11:48, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
