This article was nominated fordeletion on March 11 2012. The result ofthe discussion waskeep.

This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

PharmacologyLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofPharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. ChemicalsLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project ofWikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage ofchemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit theproject page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct) This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to bedefunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs

I completely revamped the page, and added quite a bit of info, mostly from PiHKAL. I also de-stubbed the page because I feel that this is all the information there is on 2C-G (+ homologues). If more comes along it should of course be added, but I doubt any more information will surface. After all, Shulgin's lab is shut down, his group is likely disbanded and this drug will probably never be used on the street due to its extremely long duration :). --Silvem09:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All of the 2D structures do not agree with the 3D structures given in the same article, and this appears to be the case in each of the 2C family individual pages. It appears that the 3,6 analouges are shown, not 2,5. ERP— Precedingunsigned comment added by72.149.241.170 (talk)22:36, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. For one, that's how Shulgin drew it in his books. You are probably unfamiliar with the notation of aryl rings such as this; it is acceptable to have the positions flipped as you describe. Due to single-bond rotation they are the same compound, just displayed differently.flaming()02:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class pharmacology articles
• Low-importance pharmacology articles
• WikiProject Pharmacology articles
• Start-Class chemicals articles
• Low-importance chemicals articles