Talk:2012–2013 Tana River District clashes
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | A news item involving 2012–2013 Tana River District clashes was featured on Wikipedia'sMain Page in theIn the news section on 23 August 2012. |  |
 | It is requested that animage orphotograph of2012–2013 Tana River District clashes beincluded in this article toimprove its quality. Please replace this template with a more specificmedia request template where possible. Wikipedians in Kenya may be able to help! TheFree Image Search Tool orOpenverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images onFlickr and other websites. | Upload |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia'sMain Page in theOn this day section onAugust 22, 2014,August 22, 2015,August 22, 2018,August 22, 2019, andAugust 22, 2024. |
 | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The article reads "... three Pokomo people were killed by members of the Orma community. In return, the Orma people raided Pokomo villages ...".This is clearly a mistake. But it accurately reflects what it says in the source it cites. So I don't know how to put it right.Maproom (talk)10:33, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There might be an error in the infobox as well. "Target: Orma people" vs. "Perpetrators: Pokomo people". Should it be "Targets" or "Perpetrator" to make it consistent? I've changed "Target" to "Targets" for now, but if anyone objects this isn't an edit I'm super-attached to. Cheers,Zaldax (talk)13:05, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind, it appears to be a limitation in the infobox template itself. Oh well. Cheers,Zaldax (talk)13:06, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a bit confused. The article claims 31 people were killed, then goes on to say that "34" of the people killed were killed in whatever particular way, then lists several others who later died. Is it supposed to be 51? I don't think that adds up right, but the article's number seems a bit off right now.dci | TALK02:11, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
