Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:2009 Australian Open

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In the newsA news item involving 2009 Australian Open was featured on Wikipedia'sMain Page in theIn the news section on 1 February 2009.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconAustralia:SportsLow‑importanceiconicon
WikiProject icon2009 Australian Open is within the scope ofWikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage ofAustralia andAustralia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit theproject page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byWikiProject Australian sports (assessed asLow-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article?Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at theNational Library of Australia.
Note icon
TheWikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email tohelp@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
WikiProject iconTennisMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate totennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
TennisTo-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

> The coolest Australian Open was in 1986, when the maximum temperature averaged just 22.5 degrees Celsius, 3.5 degrees below normal.[5][6]

There was no Australian open in 1986, please correct.

Proposed new structure

[edit]

Almost all tournament articles to date employ day-by-day structure. Though this structure is informative while tournament is in progress, it suffers from several problems includingWP:SUMMARY andWP:LENGTH once details on all the days are expanded and detailed. There is also unnecessary details on matches held every day in the tournament which, albeit significant in terms of all the matches held that day, are not significant in terms of perspective of whole tournament. In light of these issues I am proposing a new structure to be applied at the end of the tournament wherein the article presents a more systematic and concise view of the tournament and is drives away the monotonous approach seen in case of day-by day summaries. I believe that this new structure would also help in promoting article to GA/FA status.

A significant part of this structure relies on expansion of sub-articles as well. Information on list of seeds, individual seeds departure/defeat should be included only in these sub-articles and not the main article. The main article, to the maximum extent possible, should be free from statistics or other such details.

Proposed structure


Tournament

[edit]

Details about the tournament itself such as: edition, venue, details about stadiums, details on type of court, number of fields (i.e Singles, Doubles etc.)

Players

[edit]

Details on structure of tournament, number of players entered, direct entries, qualifiers, wild cards, seeds etc. Plus information on major withdrawals prior to the tournament.

Events

[edit]

Men's singles

[edit]

Link to sub-article
Detailing information on Men's singles section of tournament. Emphasis given more towards late round matches i.e. Quarters, Semis, Final etc. Emphasis also on noted matches based on length (e.g. Muller vs. Lopez in first round), past winners/top seeds (Hewitt vs. Gonzalez), etc. Length limited to three paragraphs. Details on seed defeats etc. to be left for the sub-article.

Women's singles

[edit]

Link to sub-article
Structure same as that of Men's singles.

Men's doubles

[edit]

Link to sub-article
Primary structure similar to that of Men's singles. Length reduced to maximum two paragraphs.

Women's doubles

[edit]

Link to sub-article
Structure same as Men's doubles

Mixed doubles

[edit]

Link to sub-article
Structure same as Men's doubles

Boy's singles

[edit]

Link to sub-article
Primary structure same as that of Men's singles. Length reduced to one paragraph.

Girls' singles

[edit]

Link to sub-article
Structure same as Boy's singles.

Boy's doubles

[edit]

Link to sub-article
Structure same as Boy's singles

Girls' doubles

[edit]

Link to sub-article
Structure same as Boy's singles

Wheelchair events

[edit]

Link to sub-article
Only information detailing winners. Limit to one paragraph

Other notable details

[edit]

Post-tournament reactions

[edit]

I'd like to hear thoughts on this proposed change.LeaveSleaves16:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this new structure, and think it should be used for all tournamentsespecially the Grand Slams, where it seems like it can do the most good.—Precedingunsigned comment added byAlonsornunez (talkcontribs)19:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Na Li?

[edit]

Shouldn't it be "Li Na"? We don't callYao Ming "Ming Yao". –HowardtheDuck08:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Serena Williams

[edit]

It should be noted that Serena Williams did not "retain" her title, as the article says. She was not the defending women's singles champion. Last year's champion was Maria Sharapova. Serena was the champion in 2003, 2005, and 2007. This sentence should be edited to reflect this. Possible choices could be "regained" or "recaptured". "Retain" implies that she kept her title from last year, which is not the case. Thank you!Raffy85 (talk)10:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs to be rewritten to be more encyclopedic

[edit]

There is way too much uncited and unencyclopedic commentary, e.g., "breezed" through his match.Tennis expert (talk)11:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Matches on Arenas!

[edit]

Template to Use!

[edit]

Day # (# January)

[edit]
  • Seeds out:
    • Men's Singles:
    • Women's Singles:
    • Men’s Doubles:
    • Women’s Doubles:
    • Mixed Doubles:
Matches on main courts
Matches onRod Laver Arena
EventWinnerLoserScore
[[]] vs [[]]
[[]] vs [[]]
[[]] vs [[]]
[[]] vs [[]]
[[]] vs [[]]
Matches onHisense Arena
EventWinnerLoserScore
[[]] vs [[]]
[[]] vs [[]]
[[]] vs [[]]
[[]] vs [[]]
Matches onMargaret Court Arena
EventWinnerLoserScore
[[]] vs [[]]
[[]] vs [[]]
[[]] vs [[]]
[[]] vs [[]]
[[]] vs [[]]
Colored Background Means Night Matches

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 33 external links on2009 Australian Open. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)10:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2009_Australian_Open&oldid=1196539836"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp