Movatterモバイル変換

Talk:2006 Football League One play-off final

Page contents not supported in other languages.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2006 Football League One play-off final has been listed as one of theSports and recreation good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so.If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 5, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed
September 19, 2021	Good topic candidate	Promoted
January 24, 2024	Good topic removal candidate	Demoted
Afact from this article appeared on Wikipedia'sMain Page in the"Did you know?" column onMarch 14, 2021. The text of the entry was:Did you know ... thatSwansea City made two appearances at theMillennium Stadium in 2006,winning the Football League Trophy but losingthe Football League One play-off Final?
Current status:Good article

This article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

YorkshireLow‑importance

	Yorkshire portal 2006 Football League One play-off final is within the scope ofWikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide toYorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit theproject page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project'stalk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Low	This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

Football:England /SeasonLow‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofAssociation football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Low	This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported bythe English football task force (assessed asLow-importance).
	This article is supported bythe season article task force.

Removal of categories

[edit]

I have removed this article fromCategory:2006 in London andCategory:Events at Wembley Stadium for the simple reason this match was not played at Wembley or even in London. The newWembley Stadium was not opened until the following year and this match was played at theMillennium Stadium in Cardiff.Dunarc (talk)21:36, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such asthis nomination's talk page,the article's talk page orWikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was:promoted bySL93 (talk) 03:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK toolbox
Reviewer instructions Reviewers' template General discussion Character count Citation bot Copyvio detector Signs of AI writing DYK check Hook length QPQ check

(

)

... thatSwansea City made two appearances at theMillennium Stadium in 2006, winning theFootball League Trophy but losing theFootball League One play-off Final?

Reviewed:Template:Did you know nominations/Change the Subject

5x expanded byThe Rambling Man (talk). Self-nominated at21:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

- article is very well sourced and well written. I assume it is standard practise for football matches to not include inline citations in the Details subsection since it rehashes information from the summary. Ref 7 verifies the earlier matchup. QPQ is good. Expanded AND a Good article as of this morning (wish Transport GANs went that fast)! -Floydian ^τ_¢15:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

GA toolbox
Authorship Citation bot Copyvio detector External links
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions
v t e

This review istranscluded fromTalk:2006 Football League One play-off Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:Usernameunique (talk·contribs)08:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

"Lee Mason (Lancashire)" — Unless I'm missing it, that Lancashire link isn't explained anywhere in the article
No, the BBC source doesn't explain it either. It's just there. It means that's the specific association with which he's affiliated but as the sources don't say that, I can't say much more about it.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Up to you, but the final two sentences of the second paragraph might read more clearly if, instead of going in the order of the shots, you just say that Barnsley made all four of their shots and Swansea City made only three of five.
I prefer to maintain the chronology.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Route to the final

What about a concluding sentence to the first paragraph, along the lines of "The third through sixth teams thus matched off in a two-round tournament to determine the third team that would advance to the Football League Championship"?
Well it's linked to play-offs and it's not really a "tournament", just two semi-finals and a final.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"at theLiberty Stadium" or just "atLiberty Stadium"?]
at "the" is correct.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
when he converted a loose ball — This isn't much detail; it says how he got the ball, not how he scored.
There's not much detail in the source.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Any more details on the red-card foul? And was there a penalty kick as a result?
No more detail and no penalty (presumably the foul took place outside the penalty area).The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Martin Devaney's shot skimmed the Barnsley crossbar andDanny Schofield hit the post for Huddersfield. — When?
The source doesn't have information on the times of missed chances.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"at theGalpharm Stadium" or "atGalpharm Stadium"? There are a number of other of these, but I'll stop mentioning them.
It's fine in BritEng.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

Knight struck the Barnsley post with a shot but he had been deemed offside — So he both missed and was offside?
Correct.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
both Howard andBobby Hassell were shown theyellow card — Why?
It doesn't say why Howard was booked, just that he was, and Hassell was booked for a push, but it seems anomalous to say why one playerwas while not saying why the other player was.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ritchie was sacked in November 2006 — At what point in the season was that?
Three months (or so) in.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

#13 (The Times) — That archive link just leads me to a Wikipedia login page.
How odd. That's just using the tool provided by Wikimedia so perhaps raise a bug report with them? I'll remove the archive info from that for now.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
#13, 16 — Retrieval dates aren't needed for printed matter
Those are online URLs so accessdates don't do any harm.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a big deal, but what you're really citing is the newspaper—the online source is just the conduit through which you can view the paper—and the paper is not going to change no matter what date you access it. --Usernameunique (talk)08:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Understood but I don't see the harm in using accessdates for online versions of paper references.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

The Rambling Man, lots of major issues identified above. Think you're going to have to goWP:TNT on this one. --Usernameunique (talk)08:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Usernameunique thanks for the comments. I'm not sure you started the review properly as this isn't transcluded onto the talk page. Also the2010 Football League One play-off Final GA review comments have been addressed but I don't think you put the reviewon hold. I'll look at the comments here soon.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man, I think a bot normally handles the transclusion—since I only opened the review a couple minutes ago, it probably hasn't run yet. I'm working on the 2010 one right now. --Usernameunique (talk)08:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Usernameunique You haven't put a "status" on either review as far as I can tell so the bots won't do anything at all at this point.The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Usernameunique cheers, I've addressed and/or responded to all the comments above. Thanks for the review!The Rambling Man(Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)08:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man, my pleasure, again. The article looks good; I'll be passing it momentarily, once Legobot runs through again to process the "on hold". One minor comment above. --Usernameunique (talk)08:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2006_Football_League_One_play-off_final&oldid=1203434780"

Categories:

[8]ページ先頭