Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:2005 FA Cup final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2005 FA Cup final has been listed as one of theSports and recreation good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so.If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it.
Good topic star2005 FA Cup final is part of the2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season series, agood topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by theWikipedia community. If you can update or improve it,please do so.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 29, 2016Good article nomineeListed
April 9, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
January 24, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
April 1, 2024Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia'sMain Page in the"Did you know?" column onJuly 12, 2016.
The text of the entry was:Did you know ... that the2005 FA Cup Final wasPatrick Vieira's last match as anArsenal player?
Current status:Good article
This article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconFootball:England /Arsenal /Manchester United /SeasonLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofAssociation football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe English football task force (assessed asMid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe Arsenal task force (assessed asMid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe Manchester United task force (assessed asMid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe season article task force.
WikiProject iconEnglandLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofEngland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

Dead link

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk)01:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review istranscluded fromTalk:2005 FA Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:Yellow Dingo (talk·contribs)13:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


GA review
(seehere for what the criteria are, andhere for what they are not)
  1. It isreasonably well written.
    a(prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b(MoS forlead,layout,word choice,fiction, andlists):
  2. It isfactually accurate andverifiable.
    a(references):
    b(citations toreliable sources):
    c(OR):
    d(copyvio andplagiarism):
  3. It isbroad in its coverage.
    a(major aspects):
    b(focused):
  4. It follows theneutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It isstable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated byimages, where possible and appropriate.
    a(images are tagged and non-free images havefair use rationales):
    b(appropriate use withsuitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

[edit]

1a - the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct

[edit]
Lead
[edit]
  1. At the end of the first paragraph you basically say the same thing twice by writing:...ran out winners after 120 goalless minutes... and...after neither side managed to score in normal and extra time. This needs to bereworded.
    1.  Done
  2. LinkPenalty shoot-out (association football) in first paragraph as that is where the reader will come across the term first.
    1.  Done
  3. LinkExtra-time per above.
    1.  Done
  4. ...won 5–4; Manchester United midfielder Paul Scholes saw...reword to...won 5–4after Manchester United midfielder Paul Scholes saw...
    1.  Done
  5. It isn't good to link to a page with a year as the piped text. "1996" could refer to anything. A way to get around this would be towrite:...game in Cup history since the1996 edition.
    1.  Done
Route to the Final
[edit]
  1. ...drawn randomly out of a hat with the remaining....Is it really drawn out of a hat?
    1.  Done
  2. ...wereaway for the first game....Reword towerethe away team for the first game for clarity.
    1.  Done
Arsenal
[edit]
  1. As both Arsenal and Manchester United were Premier League clubs, they entered the competition in the third round.Remove sentence as unnecessary.
    1.  Done
  2. ...but hit the ball over from six yards. 6 yards needs ametre conversion for us metric folk.
    1.  Done
Pre-match
[edit]
  1. ...2004–05 season.Link should be...2004–05 season.
    1.  Done
  2. ...of Manchester United in the league... "League"should be linked to2004–05 FA Premier League.
    1.  Done
  3. ...of a unique Treble,...No need for "Treble" to be capitalised.
    1. In most media, "the Treble" is referred to with a capital letter to distinguish it as a special achievement. –PeeJay15:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ..most recently against Southampton in2003. A bit like point 5 in the lead section;the link should bein the2003 final
    1.  Done
  5. ...constitutes the Texas Chain Saw Massacre, does it.Link "Texas Chain Sae Massacre" toThe Texas Chain Saw Massacre
    1.  Done
First half
[edit]
  1. ...but the assistant referee ruled...Link "assistant referee" toAssistant referee (association football)
    1.  Done
Second half
[edit]
  1. ...past the Cameroonian full-back...Link "Cameroonian" toCameroon
    1.  Not done This would be a violation ofWP:OVERLINK, in my opinion. –PeeJay15:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ...broke to the United captain...Link "captain" toCaptain (association football)
    1.  Done
Extra time
[edit]
  1. ...awarded for a soft foul by Silvestre...Remove the term "soft" as we can't determine what a "soft" foul is.
    1.  Done
Post match
[edit]
  1. ...by The Guardian showed...LinkThe Guardian
    1.  Done
Aftermath and legacy
[edit]
  1. ...joined Juventus in the...LinkJuventus F.C.
    1.  Done

2a - it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

[edit]
  1. Ref 22 is dead for me
    1. Found an archived version. –PeeJay15:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

[edit]

This article is generally in good shape. I will put iton hold so you can address the above concerns. -Yellow Dingo (talk)14:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@PeeJay2K3 andLemonade51: Ok I'm happy to pass this as a GA; well done! -Yellow Dingo (talk)11:22, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress onTalk:1872 FA Cup Final which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot18:36, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2005_FA_Cup_final&oldid=1216623511"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp