Talk:1976 Argentine coup d'état
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to the1976 Argentine coup d'état article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "1976 Argentine coup d'état" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(November 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia'sMain Page in theOn this day section onMarch 24, 2011 andMarch 24, 2012. |
 | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There seems almost more detail about the American response to the coup than about the coup itself. This hardly seems NPOV.86.139.15.170 (talk)14:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The coup was not an actual military conflict, there were not two armies fighting a battle. It was just a display of force and a military operation. Thus, the infobox{{operational plan}} is better for this case than{{Infobox military conflict}}. The terrorist bands did not play any role during the coup, and even welcomed it.Cambalachero (talk)13:36, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between11 January 2023 and1 May 2023. Further details are availableon the course page. Student editor(s):LAstudygroup23 (article contribs). Peer reviewers:Cow-e123,Case.w.b..
— Assignment last updated byKatherine.Holt (talk)16:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There seems to be very little focus on the role of the media in the coup, as well as the explanation of Peron's loss of power, which together would provide a better background context. Also the prelude to the coup could use a few more citationsLAstudygroup23 (talk)14:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The dates, the names of some of the principals, that's about it.2001:56A:70E6:2D00:892C:E70C:8B7E:2E6D (talk)11:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The statement "The coup was planned and executed within the framework of Operation Condor, a clandestine system of coordination between Latin American countries promoted by the United States, as part of the national security doctrine, which installed dictatorships in Latin America in order to maintain U.S. influence in those countries during the Cold War." currently has the "Citation needed" tag. Obviously, this is quite the serious claim -- so someone needs to add a citation. If the claim cannot be supported it should be removed.2600:1005:A022:3C2D:A9F5:87E8:2E9D:7077 (talk)05:00, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article was in grammatical disarray, so bad as to refer to Isabel with a male pronoun.~2025-34565-53 (talk)15:57, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
