| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to the11th Massachusetts Battery article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| It is requested that animage orphotograph of11th Massachusetts Battery beincluded in this article toimprove its quality. Please replace this template with a more specificmedia request template where possible. TheFree Image Search Tool orOpenverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images onFlickr and other websites. | Upload |
Just a quick explanation about why I erroneously tagged this article. The citation style on this article isn't quite in the standard style, and I had not personally encountered it elsewhere. In a typical article, the reflist is in a section named 'References' with the bibliography being in a subsection of that called 'Sources'. The notes section, if it exists at all, is used primarily for providing commentary on the text, where including it in the article itself would interrupt the flow of the paragraph or otherwise disrupt the text. Look atJohn Adams, a featured article, for an example of what I mean. However, your comment about the Harvard style prompted me to read up on it, and I discoveredWP:CITESHORT. Apparently, Wikipedia does allow this alternate citation style in certain circumstances. You learn something new every day, I guess. Cheers. --PuzzledvegetableIs it teatime already? 18:29, 22 June 2020 (UTC) + minor spelling fix --PuzzledvegetableIs it teatime already?18:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]