Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Taṇhā

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Concept in Buddhism, referring to thirst, craving, desire, longing, greed
Translations of
taṇhā
Englishthirst, craving, desire, etc.
Sanskrittṛ́ṣṇā (Dev: तृष्णा)
Palitaṇhā
Bengaliটান (Tan)
Burmeseတဏှာ
(MLCTS:tən̥à)
Chinese貪愛 / 贪爱
(Pinyin:tānài)
Indonesiannafsu, nafsu kahausan, nafsu keinginan, keserakahan, ketamakan
Japanese渇愛
(Rōmaji:katsu ai)
Khmerតណ្ហា
(UNGEGN:tânha)
Korean갈애
(RR:gal-ae)
Sinhalaතණ්හාව,තෘෂ්ණාව
Tibetanསྲེད་པ་
(Wylie: sred pa;
THL: sepa
)
Tagalogtanha
Thaiตัณหา
(IPA: tan-hăː)
Vietnameseái
Glossary of Buddhism
Part ofa series on
Buddhism
Part ofTheravāda Abhidhamma
52Cetasikas
Theravāda Buddhism
14 unwholesome(akusala)
 The 12 Nidānas: 
Ignorance
Formations
Consciousness
Name & Form
Six Sense Bases
Contact
Feeling
Craving
Clinging
Becoming
Birth
Old Age & Death
 
See also:Five hindrances andAsava

Taṇhā (fromPāli;Sanskrit:तृष्णा,romanizedtṛ́ṣṇāSanskrit pronunciation:[tr̩ʂɳaː]) is an important concept in Buddhism, referring to "thirst,desire, longing, greed", either physical or mental.[1][2] It is typically translated as craving,[3] and is of three types:kāma-taṇhā (craving for sensual pleasures),bhava-taṇhā (craving for existence), andvibhava-taṇhā (craving for non-existence).[4][5]

Taṇhā appears in theFour Noble Truths, whereintaṇhā arises with, or exists together with,dukkha (dissatisfaction, "standing unstable") and the cycle ofrepeated birth, becoming and death (saṃsāra).[1][2][4]

In theTheravādaAbhidhamma teachings,taṇhā is equivalent to themental factorlobha (attachment).[6]

Etymology and meaning

[edit]

Taṇhā is aPali word, derived from theVedic Sanskrit wordtṛ́ṣṇā (तृष्णा), which originates from theProto-Indo-Iranian*tŕ̥šnas, which is related to the roottarś- (thirst, desire, wish), ultimately descending fromProto-Indo-European*ters- (dry).

The word has the followingIndo-European cognates:Avestantaršna (thirst),Ancient Greektérsomai (to dry),Lithuaniantroškimas (thirst, desire),Gothicþaursus (dry),Old High Germandurst (thirst),Englishthirst.[1] The word appears numerous times in theSamhita layer of theRigveda, dated to the 2nd millennium BCE, such as in hymns 1.7.11, 1.16.5, 3.9.3, 6.15.5, 7.3.4 and 10.91.7.[7] It also appears in other Vedas, wherein the meaning of the word is "thirst, thirsting for, longing for, craving for, desiring, eager greediness, and suffering from thirst".[7]

Relation todukkha

[edit]

In the second of theFour Noble Truths, the Buddha identifiedtaṇhā as arising together withdukkha (unease, "standing unstable").[8]

Taṇhā, statesWalpola Rahula, or "thirst, desire, greed, craving" is what manifests as suffering and rebirths.[9] However, adds Rahula, it is not the first cause nor the only cause ofdukkha orsaṃsāra, because the origination of everything is relative and dependent on something else.[9] The Pali canons of Buddhism assert other defilements and impurities (kilesā,sāsavā dhammā), in addition to taṇhā, as the cause of Dukkha.Taṇhā nevertheless, is always listed first, and considered the principal, all-pervading and "the most palpable and immediate cause" ofdukkha, states Rahula.[9]

Taṇhā, states Peter Harvey, is the key origin ofdukkha in Buddhism.[5] It reflects a mental state of craving. Greater the craving, more is the frustration because the world is always changing and innately unsatisfactory; craving also brings about pain through conflict and quarrels between individuals, which are all a state ofdukkha.[5] It is suchtaṇhā that leads to rebirth and endlesssaṃsāra, stated Buddha as the second reality, and it is marked by three types of craving: sensory, being or non-existence.[10] In Buddhist philosophy, there are right view and wrong view. The wrong views ultimately trace back totaṇhā, but it also asserts that "ordinary right view" such as giving and donations to monks, is also a form of clinging.[11] The end oftaṇhā occurs when a person has accepted the "transcendent right view" through insight intoimpermanence andnon-self.[11]

Both appropriate and inappropriate tendencies, states Stephen Laumakis, are linked to the fires oftaṇhā, and these produce fruits ofkamma thereby rebirths.[12] Quenching and blowing out these fires completely, is the path to final release fromdukkha andsaṃsāra, in Buddhism.[12] The Pali texts, states David Webster, repeatedly recommend that one must destroytaṇhā completely, and this destruction is necessary fornirvāṇa.[13]

Taṇhā is also identified as the eighth link in thetwelve links of dependent origination. In the context of the twelve links, the emphasis is on the types of craving "that nourish the karmic potency that will produce the next lifetime."[14]

Types

[edit]

The Buddha identified three types oftaṇhā:[9][15][16][a]

  • Kāma-taṇhā (sensual pleasures craving):[5] craving for sense objects which provide pleasant feeling, or craving for sensory pleasures.[16] Walpola Rahula states thattaṇhā includes not only desire for sense-pleasures, wealth and power, but also "desire for, and attachment to, ideas and ideals, views, opinions, theories, conceptions and beliefs (dhamma-taṇhā)."[9]
  • Bhava-taṇhā (craving for being):[5] craving to be something, to unite with an experience.[16] This is ego-related, states Harvey, the seeking of certain identity and desire for certain type of rebirth eternally.[5] Other scholars explain that this type of craving is driven by the wrong view of eternalism (eternal life) and about permanence.[4][17]
  • Vibhava-taṇhā (craving for non-existence):[4] craving not to experience unpleasant things in the current or future life, such as unpleasant people or situations.[5] This sort of craving may include attempts at suicide and self-annihilation, and this only results in furtherrebirth in a worse realm of existence.[5] This type of craving, states Phra Thepyanmongkol, is driven by the wrong view of annihilationism, that there is no rebirth.[17]

Cessation oftaṇhā

[edit]

Thethird noble truth teaches that the cessation oftaṇhā is possible. TheDhammacakkappavattana Sutta states:[18]

Bhikkhus, there is a noble truth about the cessation of suffering. It is the complete fading away and cessation of this craving [taṇhā]; its abandonment and relinquishment; getting free from and being independent of it.

Cessation oftaṇhā can be obtained by following theNoble Eightfold Path. In Theravada Buddhism, the cessation results from the gaining of true insight intoimpermanence andnon-self.[19][20][21] The 'insight meditation' practice of Buddhism, states Kevin Trainor, focuses on gaining "right mindfulness" which entails understanding three marks of existence -dukkha (suffering),anicca (impermanence) andanatta (non-self).[22] The understanding of the reality of non-self, adds Trainor, promotes non-attachment because "if there is no soul, then there is no locus for clinging".[22] Once one comprehends and accepts the non-self doctrine, there are no more desires, i.e.taṇhā ceases.[22]

Taṇhā versuschanda

[edit]

Buddhism categorizes desires as eithertaṇhā orchanda.[23]Chanda literally means "impulse, excitement, will, desire for".[24]

Bahm states thatchanda is "desiring what, and no more than, will be attained", whiletaṇhā is "desiring more than will be attained".[25] However, in early Buddhist texts, adds Bahm, the termchanda includes anxieties and is ambiguous, wherein five kinds ofchanda are described, namely "to seek, to gain, to hoard, to spend and to enjoy".[26] In these early texts, the sense of the wordchanda is the same astaṇhā.[26]

Some writers such as Ajahn Sucitto explainchanda as positive and non-pathological, asserting it to be distinct from negative and pathologicaltaṇhā.[27] Sucitto explains it with examples such as the desire to apply oneself to a positive action such as meditation.[27] In contrast, Rhys Davids and Stede state thatchanda, in Buddhist texts, has both positive and negative connotations; as a vice, for example, the Pali texts associatechanda with "lust, delight in the body" stating it to be a source of misery.[28]

Chanda, states Peter Harvey, can be either wholesome or unwholesome.[5]

Relation to the three poisons

[edit]

Taṇhā (desire) can be related to thethree poisons:[29]

  • Avijjā (avidyā) ormoha (ignorance), the root of the three poisons, is also the basis fortaṇhā.
  • Rāga (attachment) is equivalent tobhava-taṇhā (craving to be) andkāma-taṇhā (sense-craving).
  • Dosa (dveṣa) (aversion) is equivalent tovibhava-taṇhā (craving not to be).

According to Rupert Gethin,taṇhā is related to aversion and ignorance. Craving leads to aversion, anger, cruelty and violence, states Gethin, which are unpleasant states and cause suffering to one who craves. Craving is based on misjudgement, states Gethin, that the world is permanent, unchanging, stable, and reliable.[30]

For example, in thefirst discourse of the Buddha, the Buddha identifiedtaṇhā as the principal cause of suffering. However, his third discourse, theFire Sermon, and other suttas, the Buddha identifies the causes of suffering as the "fires" ofrāga,dosa (dveṣa), andmoha; in theFire Sermon, the Buddha states thatnirvāṇa is obtained by extinguishing these fires.[31]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Pali discourses that use this three-fold typology includeDN 15,DN 22,MN 44,SN 22.22, SN 22.103, SN 22.104, SN 22.105, SN 38.10, SN 39.10, SN 45.170,SN 56.11, SN 56.13 and SN 56.14.

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcThomas William Rhys Davids; William Stede (1921).Pali-English Dictionary. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 294.ISBN 978-81-208-1144-7.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  2. ^abPeter Harvey (1990).An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices. Cambridge University Press. p. 53.ISBN 978-0-521-31333-9.
  3. ^Richard Gombrich; Gananath Obeyesekere (1988).Buddhism Transformed: Religious Change in Sri Lanka. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 246.ISBN 978-81-208-0702-0.
  4. ^abcdPaul Williams; Anthony Tribe; Alexander Wynne (2002).Buddhist Thought: A Complete Introduction to the Indian Tradition. Routledge. pp. 43–44.ISBN 978-1-134-62324-2.
  5. ^abcdefghiHarvey 2013, p. 63.
  6. ^Kheminda, Ashin (2019-09-01).Manual Abhidhamma: Bab 2 Faktor-Faktor-Mental (in Indonesian). Yayasan Dhammavihari.ISBN 978-623-94342-7-4.
  7. ^abMonier Williams, 1964,p. 454, entry for तृष्, "Tṛishṇā", "University of Cologne, Germany
  8. ^Harvey 1990, p. 53.
  9. ^abcdeWalpola Sri Rahula (2007). Kindel Locations 791-809.
  10. ^Harvey 2013, p. 63-64.
  11. ^abHarvey 2013, p. 64-68.
  12. ^abStephen J. Laumakis (2008).An Introduction to Buddhist Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 45–46,56–58.ISBN 978-1-139-46966-1.
  13. ^David Webster (2005).The Philosophy of Desire in the Buddhist Pali Canon. Routledge. pp. 129–130.ISBN 978-0-415-34652-8.
  14. ^Dalai Lama (1992), p. 21. (from the introduction by Jeffry Hopkins)
  15. ^Leifer 1997, p. 98.
  16. ^abcAjahn Sucitto (2010), Kindle Location 943-946
  17. ^abPhra Thepyanmongkol (2012).A Study Guide for Right Practice of the Three Trainings. Wat Luang Phor Sodh. p. 314.ISBN 978-974-401-378-1.
  18. ^Ajahn Sucitto (2010), Kindle Locations 1341-1343
  19. ^Buswell & Gimello 1992, p. 7–8, 83–84.
  20. ^Choong 1999, p. 28–29, Quote: "Seeing (passati) the nature of things as impermanent leads to the removal of the view of self, and so to the realisation of nirvana.".
  21. ^Rahula 2014, p. 51-58.
  22. ^abcKevin Trainor (2004).Buddhism: The Illustrated Guide. Oxford University Press. pp. 74–78.ISBN 978-0-19-517398-7.
  23. ^Smith & Novak 2009, p. 35.
  24. ^Thomas William Rhys Davids; William Stede (1921).Pali-English Dictionary. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 203, 274.ISBN 978-81-208-1144-7.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  25. ^Bahm 1959, pp. 24, 61.
  26. ^abBahm 1959, p. 60.
  27. ^abAjahn Sucitto (2010), Kindle Locations 933-944, quote= Sometimes taṇhā is translated as “desire,” but that gives rise to some crucial misinterpretations with reference to the way of Liberation. As we shall see, some form of desire is essential in order to aspire to, and persist in, cultivating the path out of dukkha. Desire as an eagerness to offer, to commit, to apply oneself to meditation, is calledchanda. It’s a psychological “yes,” a choice, not a pathology. In fact, you could summarize Dhamma training as the transformation of taṇhā into chanda.
  28. ^Rhys Davids and Stede (1921), pp. 275-6,entry for "Chanda"Archived 2015-02-24 at theWayback Machine
  29. ^Loy, David (2003).The great awakening : a Buddhist social theory. Internet Archive. Boston : Wisdom. p. 28.ISBN 978-0-86171-366-0.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)
  30. ^Gethin 1998, pp. 73–74.
  31. ^Harvey 2013, p. 73.

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
  • Philosophy of the Buddha byArchie J. Bahm. Asian Humanities Press. Berkeley, CA: 1993.ISBN 0-87573-025-6.
    • Chapter 5 is about craving, and discusses the difference betweentaṇhā andchanda.
  • Nietzsche and Buddhism: A Study in Nihilism and Ironic Affinities by Robert Morrison. Oxford University Press, 1998.
    • Chapter 10 is a comparison between Nietzsche's Will to Power and Tanha, which gives a very nuanced and positive explanation of the central role taṇhā plays in the Buddhist path.

External links

[edit]
Preceded byTwelve Nidānas
Tṛṣṇā
Succeeded by
   Topics inBuddhism   
Foundations
The Buddha
Bodhisattvas
Disciples
Key concepts
Cosmology
Branches
Practices
Nirvana
Monasticism
Major figures
Texts
Countries
History
Philosophy
Culture
Miscellaneous
Comparison
Lists
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Taṇhā&oldid=1317836867"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp