TheNorthrop T-38 Talon is a two-seat,twinjetsupersonicjet trainer designed and produced by the American aircraft manufacturerNorthrop Corporation. It was the world's first supersonic trainer as well as the most produced.
The T-38 can be traced back to 1952 and Northrop'sN-102 Fang andN-156 fighter aircraft projects. During the mid-1950s, Northrop officials decided to adapt the N-156 to suit a recently issued general operating requirement by theUnited States Air Force (USAF) for a supersonic trainer to replace theLockheed T-33. The bid was successful, in no small part due to its lower lifecycle cost comparisons to competing aircraft, and the company received an initial order to build three prototypes. The first of these, designatedYT-38, made itsmaiden flight on 10 April 1959. The T-38 was introduced to USAF service on 17 March 1961.
The USAF is the largest operator of the T-38. Additional operators of the T-38 includeNASA and theUnited States Navy.U.S. Naval Test Pilot School in Patuxent River, Maryland, is the principal US Navy operator. Other T-38s were previously used by the US Navy fordissimilar air combat training until replaced by the similar Northrop F-5 Tiger II. Pilots of otherNATO nations have commonly flown the T-38 during joint training programs with American pilots.[1] The T-38 remains in service as of 2025[update] with several air forces. As of 2025[update], the T-38 has been in service for over 60 years with the USAF, its original operator.
In September 2018, USAF announced the possible replacement of the Talon by theBoeing–Saab T-7 Red Hawk, by 2034, if a planned initial low rate production, of the T-7A occurred by 2026, dependent on congressional approval, and aircraft are received, evaluated, and receive Initial Operating Capability, by the USAF, in 2027.[2]
A T-38C assigned to the 416th Flight Test Squadron, 412th Test Wing, Air Force Test Center, flies over the Mojave desert near Edwards AFB, CaliforniaAir-to-air right side view of a USAF T-38 Talon aircraft from 560th Flying Training Squadron, Randolph AFB, Texas, as his lead performs a left pitchoutA T-38C cockpitTwo T-38 chase planes followSpace ShuttleColumbia as it lands at Northrop Strip inWhite Sands, New Mexico, ending its missionSTS-3.NASA Dryden's T-38 in flight overCuddeback Dry Lake in Southern CaliforniaPicture of the formation leader, taken from the backseat of a T38C, of the 479th Fighter Training Group, Moody AFB, Georgia, 2006A T-38 inPortuguese Air Force colours atAir Base No. 11 (BA11 – Beja)U.S. Air Force 25th Flying Training Squadron instructor pilot and his student walk to a T-38A to begin flight training at Vance Air Force Base, Oklahoma, November 1997.AnX-15 in flight attached to a B-52 mother ship, with a T-38 chase plane, 1961A T-38 takes off from Edwards Air Force Base with only one engine during single-engine takeoff testing, to evaluate recommended speeds for takeoff if an engine fails.
In 1952, Northrop began work on a fighter project, theN-102 Fang, withshoulder-mounteddelta wing and a single engine.[3] The proposedGeneral Electric J79 engine, weighing nearly two tons, meant the resulting aircraft would be large and expensive.[4][5] During 1953, representatives fromGeneral Electric Aviation's newly created Small Aircraft Engine Department showed Northrop a relatively compact engine, around 400 lb (0.18 ton) installed weight, capable of 2,500 lb of thrust. Upon seeing the engine, Northrop VP-EngineeringEdgar Schmued saw the possibility of reversing the trend toward the large fighters.[5]
Schmued and chief engineer Welko Gasich decided on a small, twin-engined "hot-rod" fighter, theN-156. Northrop launched its N-156 project in 1954, aiming for a small, supersonic fighter jet capable of operating from the US Navy'sescort carriers.[5] When the Navy chose not to pursue equipping its fleets in such a fashion, favoring large fleet carriers instead, Northrop opted to continue work on the N-156 using in-house funding. It was instead recast as a lightweight fighter, referred to as theN-156F, that was primarily aimed at the export market.[5]
In the mid-1950s, the USAF issued a general operating requirement for a supersonic trainer, seeking to retire its 1940s-eraLockheed T-33s for an aircraft better suited to training pilots to fly its high speed fighter aircraft.[5] Northrop officials decided to adapt the N-156 to this competition. The only other candidate was the two-seat version of theNorth American F-100 Super Sabre. Although the F-100 was not considered the ideal candidate for a training aircraft (it is not capable of recovering from a spin),[6] NAA was still considered the favorite in the competition due to that company's favored-contractor status with the USAF, but Northrop officials presented lifecycle cost comparisons that proved to be highly persuasive amongst USAF officials.[7] Accordingly, Northrop was awarded an initial contract in June 1956 to produce three prototypes, designatedYT-38.[7]
The type was quickly adopted. The first production examples were delivered in 1961, entering service on 17 March 1961, complementing theCessna T-37 Tweet primary jet trainer. When production ended in 1972, 1,187 T-38s had been built, plus two N-156T prototypes. Since its introduction, an estimated 50,000 military pilots have trained on this aircraft. The USAF remains one of the few armed flying forces using dedicated supersonic final trainers, as most, such as the US Navy, use high-subsonic trainers.[9]
During 1962, the T-38 set absolute time-to-climb records for 3,000, 6,000, 9,000, and 12,000 meters, beating the records for those altitudes set by the F-104 in December 1958. TheF-4 Phantom beat the T-38's records less than a month later.
The majority of T-38s built were of theT-38A variant. The USAF had a small number of aircraft converted for weapons training, designatedAT-38B, which were fitted with a gunsight and could carry a gun pod, rockets, or bombs on a centerline pylon. By the end of September 2017, 503 T-38s were still operational with the USAF,[10] while many more remained in operation around the world.
Most of the USAF's aircraft, T-38A and AT-38B, have been converted to the T-38C through an avionics upgrade program. Improvements include the addition of ahead-up display,global satellite positioning,inertial navigation system, andtraffic collision avoidance system. Most aircraft have received a propulsion modification to improve low-altitude engine thrust. Around a third of the fleet, those that experience more severe usage, are currently undergoing structural replacements and upgrades, as well as receiving new wings, to extend their service life to 2029.[11]
The fighter version of the N-156 was selected for the USMilitary Assistance Program and produced as theF-5 Freedom Fighter. Many of these have since reverted to a weapons-training role, as various air forces have introduced newer types into service. The F-5G was an advanced single-engined variant later renamed theF-20 Tigershark. In 2018, the Iranian Air Force announced that an outwardly similar aircraft, named theKowsar, had been constructed within Iran.[12][13][14]
The Northrop T-38 Talon is of a conventional configuration, with a small, low-mounted, long-chord wing, a single vertical stabilizer, andtricycle undercarriage. The cockpit accommodates a student pilot and instructor in atandem seating arrangement. The flight controls werehydraulically-powered and lacked manual reversion, and thus the aircraft would be unflyable in the event of both engines failing mid-flight.[7]
Its handling was relatively conventional and viceless. While it was originally considered to be too easy to fly compared with frontline fighters of the 1960s, by the twenty-first century, it had become regarded as the most challenging aircraft in the USAF's inventory.[15] The aircraft's nimble performance earned it the nickname "white rocket". It had been considered by trainee pilots to be a somewhat unforgiving aircraft from an aerodynamic standpoint.[16]
The T-38 can be visually distinguished from both the F-5B and F-5F, which are also derived from the N-156, by the wings. The wing of the T-38 meets the fuselage straight and ends square, while the F-5 hasleading edge extensions near the wing roots and wingtip launch rails forair-to-air missiles. The wings of both the T-38 and the F-5 family use conventional skin over spar-rib structure.[17] The T-38's wings were originally designed to withstand 7.33-G loads and for a fatigue life of 4,000 flight hours. This proved sufficient for the majority of the training syllabus, but was a major limiting factor when the aircraft was used for aggressive dogfighting-style maneuvering. Incidents of wing tips separating mid-flight were reported. Northrop resolved this via the installation of new wings with thickened skins.[11]
Throughout the development process, a strict weight control regime was exercised by the design team.[7] This was one reason for the T-38's relative simplicity; only basic systems for navigation and communication were provided. No fuel was housed within the wings while no provision for external stores was made.[7] The aircraft's twinGeneral Electric J85-5Aturbojet engines were accommodated within the fuselage to exert less drag and produce fewer aerodynamic disturbances. The J85-5A engine, despite generating up to 3,850 lb of static thrust, was relatively compact and lightweight for the era, weighing less than 600 pounds.[5] Air was supplied to the engines via intakes at thewing roots. A twin-engine arrangement had been pursued to provide a greater margin of safety.[7]
Various design decisions were taken and features were incorporated to simplify the T-38 and make it as easy to maintain as possible.[7] To avoid removing the vertical fin while changing an engine, the fin was attached directly to the keel structure between the engines, and instead detaching the horizontal stabilizer along with the entire aft shell of the fuselage that surrounds the engines, which could be removed relatively easily via undoing several fasteners that hold the fuselage shell together and disconnecting two push rods that connect the pilot's control stick to the horizontal stabilizer's hydraulic actuators.[7]
To avoid having to break and reconnect multiple hydraulic lines during an engine swap, designers mounted the hydraulic pump and other accessory drives on the fuselage which joined to the engine by a shortdriveshaft. Several internal check valves prevented a loss of hydraulic fluid.[7] The engines hung from rails on either side of the central keel. This design enabled ground crews to remove and replace an engine in roughly one hour.[7]
The USAFStrategic Air Command (SAC) had T-38s in service from 1978 until SAC's 1991 inactivation. These aircraft were used to enhance the career development of bomber and tanker copilots through the Accelerated Copilot Enrichment Program. They were later used as proficiency aircraft for allB-52,B-1,Lockheed SR-71,U-2,Boeing KC-135, andKC-10 pilots. SAC's successors, theAir Combat Command (ACC) and theAir Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) retain T-38s as proficiency aircraft for U-2 pilots and B-2 pilots, respectively.[9]
After graduating from basic flying on theCessna T-37 Tweet, pilots were trained on more advanced aspects, including supersonic flight, blind flying, formation flight, handlingstalls, single-engine flight procedures, low speed flight, and landing techniques.[16] Prior to the USAF ceasing the practice of trainees flying within icy conditions, the T-38's engines were prone to being damaged by ingesting ice. The relatively small engine intakes are also known to be problematic when flown at low speeds under 'hot and high' conditions.[19]
The landing gear's brakes have been criticised for being relatively weak, one of several factors that necessitates care while landing. Several incidents, including fatalities, have occurred due to imprecise management of the throttles and air speed during landing attempts.[19] Despite these factors, the T-38 has been regarded as a relatively safe trainer aircraft even into the twenty-first century. Between 1961 and 2005, the fleet has cumulatively flown 25 million hours, during which 150 of the 1,187 T-38s built between 1961 and 1972 were recorded as lost, resulting in 45 deaths.[11]
Boeing andSaab offered a new-technology design powered by theGeneral Electric F404 turbofan engine. TheBoeing/Saab bid first flew in December 2016. It was declared the winner of the T-X competition in September 2018.[22]
NASA operates a fleet of 32 T-38 trainers.[23] The fleet is typically used to train itsastronauts and as achase plane. NASA's fleet is housed primarily atEllington Field inHouston, Texas. NASA's internal projections showed the number of operational jet trainers falling to 16 by 2015. The agency spends $25–30 million annually to fly and maintain the T-38s.[24]
In 1966, two Project Gemini astronauts,Elliot See andCharles Bassett, died when their T-38hit the roof of aMcDonnell Douglas fabrication building atLambert Field in St. Louis. Visibility was poor, but a later investigation concluded that the cause of the crash was likely pilot error.[25]
Seven privately owned T-38s are in the U.S.[23]Boeing owns two T-38s, which are used as chase planes.[23] Thornton Corporation owns two T-38s, and theNational Test Pilot School owns one T-38.[23] Two others are in private ownership.[23]
YT-38: Prototypes, two built with YJ85-GE-1 engines, later designated YT-38A and four pre-production aircraft with YJ-85-GE-5 engines, later designated T-38A.[27]
T-38A: Two-seat advanced training aircraft, production model, 1,139 built.[27]
T-38A(N): Two-seat astronaut training version for NASA. See T-38N below.
DT-38A: A number of US Navy T-38As were converted into drone directors.
GT-38A: Permanently grounded aircraft, often due to flight or ground mishap, converted into ground procedural trainers or aircraft maintenance trainers.
NT-38A: A small number of T-38As were converted into research and test aircraft.
QT-38A: Unmanned target drone aircraft.
AT-38B: Two-seat weapons training aircraft.
T-38C: A T-38A with structural and avionics upgrades.[9]
T-38N: Former USAF T-38As bailed toNASA and T-38As directly assigned to NASA that received an Avionics Upgrade Program (AUP), modernizing communications and navigation systems, replacing outdated avionics, and adding a weather radar, flight management system, altitude alert systems, and modern controls and displays.[29]
ST-38 orN-205: A proposal to be fitted with 3 rocket engines in the 10,000lb thrust range burning hydrogen peroxide and JP-5, capable of Mach 3.2 and a maximum altitude of 200,000 feet (61,000 m) and only requiring modification to 25% of the airframe. It was to be used for training astronauts as part of the ARPS (Aerospace Research Flight School). It was first proposed in May 1958 and then again in 1963, however the Air Force showed no interest and instead selected theNF-104A .[30][31]
T-38 VTOL Proposed vertical takeoff variant with four lift nozzles behind the pilot.[32]
More than 210 aircraft losses and ejections have been documented over the lifetime of the T-38.[40] The USAF has recorded 149 fatalities since operations began in 1960.[41]
19 February 1962 – The first crash of a T-38 occurred, near Webb AFB, Texas. One pilot was killed, and one occupant ejected safely.[42]
31 October 1964 – AstronautTheodore Freeman was killed as a result of a bird strike on a NASA operated T-38.[43][44]
21 May 2009 – One pilot was killed and the other ejected with serious injuries after a rudder malfunction caused the crash of a USAF T38A.[49]
19 July 2013 – The plane went down south of Sheppard Air Force Base at approximately 6:48 a.m., near Pecanway Drive and Horton Lane in Wichita County and the pilots ejected safely with minor injuries.[50]
21 November 2019 – Two pilots killed during a collision while landing.[51]
19 February 2021 – The two-person USAF crew of a T-38 was killed in a landing crash near Montgomery Regional Airport in Alabama. The aircraft was assigned to the USAF 14th Flying Training Wing at Columbus AFB, Mississippi. The crash was later attributed topilot error.[52]
19 November 2021 – Two aircraft collided on approach to Laughlin Air Force base, resulting in the death of one student.[53]
7 November 2022 – A T-38C crashed near Columbus AFB, Mississippi, with one pilot safely ejecting.[54]
61-0825 – On display,U.S. Space & Rocket Center, Huntsville, AL (as N999NA, not original paint scheme). Appeared on Shipping Wars TV Show being transported to Huntsville, AL from NASA Houston.
66-8381 / NASA 901 (N901NA) – Assigned directly toNASA as the second NASA T-38 to be designated as 'NASA 901' and 'N901NA'; on display at Aviation Heritage Park,Bowling Green, Kentucky[77][78]
GT-38A
60-0592 – Dyess Linear Air Park,Dyess AFB, Texas[79]
66-8381 / NASA 901 (N901NA) – Assigned directly to NASA as the second NASA T-38 to be designated as NASA 901 and N901NA; on display at Aviation Heritage Park, Bowling Green, Kentucky
^Sanzani, Matteo (January 17, 2018)."Portugal Retires Alpha Jet".blogbeforeflight.net.Archived from the original on 10 July 2018. Retrieved26 September 2019.
^"T-38s Reborn".Air Forces Monthly. Key Publishing Limited. 19 January 2011.Archived from the original on 30 August 2018. Retrieved30 August 2018.
^"Taiwan Air Power".TaiwanAirPower.org. April 13, 2008.Archived from the original on November 21, 2009. RetrievedAugust 30, 2018.
^Even though this value has been printed in USAF outlets for many years, it is probably incorrect. The T-38 time-to-climb record, set in 1962, was three minutes to 30,000 feet. According to Northrop's Roy Martin (quoted on p. 64 ofAir & Space/Smithsonian, Vol. 20, No. 3 (August/September 2005)), a normal climb at military power – that is, maximum power without afterburner – is around 6,000 feet/minute.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
