| Criminal law |
|---|
| Elements |
| Scope of criminalliability |
| Severity of offense |
|
| Inchoate offenses |
| Offense against the person |
|
| Sexual offenses |
| Crimes against property |
| Crimes against justice |
| Crimes against the public |
| Crimes against animals |
| Crimes against the state |
| Defenses to liability |
| Other common-law areas |
| Portals |

Asummary offence orpetty offence is aviolation in somecommon law jurisdictions that can be proceeded against summarily,[1][2][3] without the right to ajury trial and/orindictment (required for anindictable offence).[4]
InCanada, summary offences are referred to assummary conviction offences.[5] As in other jurisdictions, summary conviction offences are considered less serious than indictable offences because they are punishable by shorter prison sentences and smaller fines. Section 787 of theCriminal Code specifies that unless another punishment is provided for by law, the maximum penalty for a summary conviction offence is a sentence of 2 years less a day of imprisonment, a fine of $5,000 or both.
As a matter of practical effect, some common differences between summary conviction and indictable offences are provided below.
In Hong Kong, trials for summary offences are heard in one of the territory'sMagistrates' Courts, unless the defendant is accused with otherindictable offence(s). Typical examples for summary offences in Hong Kong include possession of a simulatedbomb, drunkenness, taking photographs in courts,careless driving and pretending to be apublic officer.[11]
UnderNew Zealand law, summary offences are covered by the Summary Offences Act 1981,[12] and include offences that resembleforgery,fraud,nuisance, as well as offences against public order. It also covers some aspects ofsearch,arrest andjurisdiction, as well as regulating the sale ofspray paint.
In relation toEngland and Wales, the expression "summary trial" means a trial in themagistrates' court. In such proceedings there is no jury; the appointed judge, or a panel of three lay magistrates, decides the guilt or innocence of the accused. Each summary offence is specified by statute which describes the (usually minor) offence and the judge to hear it. A summary procedure can result in a summary conviction.[13] A "summary offence" is one which, if charged to an adult, can only be tried by summary procedure.[14] Similar procedures are also used in Scotland.
Certain offences that may be tried in a Crown Court (by jury) may be required to be tried summarily if the value involved is small; such offences are still consideredeither way offences, so are not thereby "summary offences" in the meaning of that term defined by statute. Contrariwise, certain summary offences may in certain circumstances be tried on indictment along with other offences that are themselves indictable; they do not thereby become "indictable offences" or "either way offences" but remain "summary offences", though tried by jury.[14]
SirWilliam Blackstone, in hisCommentaries on the Laws of England (1765–1769), described summary offences thus:
By asummary proceeding I mean principally such as is directed by several acts of parliament (for the common law is a stranger to it, unless in the case of contempts) for the conviction of offenders, and the inflicting of certain penalties created by those acts of parliament. In these there is no intervention of a jury, but the party accused is acquitted or condemned by the suffrage of such person only, as the statute has appointed for his judge. An institution designed professedly for the greater ease of the subject, by doing him speedy justice, and by not harassing the freeholders with frequent and troublesome attendances to try every minute offence. But it has of late been so far extended, as, if a check be not timely given, to threaten the disuse of our admirable and truly English trial by jury, unless only in capital cases.
In theUnited Kingdom, trials for summary offences are heard in one of a number of types of lower court. ForEngland and Wales this is theMagistrates' Court. InScotland, it is theSheriff Court orJustice of the peace court, depending on the offence (the latter being primarily for the most minor of offences).Northern Ireland has its ownMagistrates' Court system.
In United Statesfederal andstate law, "there are certain minor or petty offenses that may be proceeded against summarily, and without a jury".[15][16][4] These can include criminal and civil citations, where a person may be charged with a criminal or non-criminal infraction without the need of a physical arrest, such as in cases of non-violent fineable violations, crimes that carry little incarceration time, or non-criminal acts such as speeding.[17] Any crime that is punishable by the controlling law for more than six months ofimprisonment must have some means for a jury trial.[2] Some states, such asCalifornia, provide that alldefendants are entitled to a jury trial (irrespective of the nature of their offenses).[18] In any case, for summary criminal offenses in the United States, convictions can still show as such on a criminal record.[19][20]
Contempt of court is considered aprerogative of the court, as "the requirement of a jury does not apply to contempts committed in disobedience of any lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command entered in any suit or action brought or prosecuted in the name of, or on behalf of, the United States".[21] There have been criticisms over the practice. In particular,Supreme Court JusticeHugo Black wrote in a 1964 dissent: "It is high time, in my judgment, to wipe out root and branch the judge-invented and judge-maintained notion that judges can try criminal contempt cases without a jury."[22]
InPennsylvania, for example, alldefendants charged withmisdemeanors enjoy a right to counsel regardless of the sentence imposed,only those charged with 'summary offenses' (violations not technically considered crimes and punishable by no more than 90 days' imprisonment, ... may receive a suspended sentence uncounseled. (Typical 'summary offenses' in Pennsylvania include the failure to return a library book within 30 days... and fishing on a Sunday ...(citations omitted) (emphasis added).
InPennsylvania, for example, alldefendants charged withmisdemeanors enjoy a right to counsel regardless of the sentence imposed, only those charged with 'summary offenses' (violations not technically considered crimes and punishable by no more than 90 days' imprisonment, ... may receive a suspended sentence uncounseled. (Typical 'summary offenses' in Pennsylvania include the failure to return a library book within 30 days... and fishing on a Sunday ...(citations omitted).
During a hearing on remand, Adefemi acknowledged several other convictions and arrests, including the circumstances surrounding Georgia Citation Number 0129, under which Adefemi received a citation for a weapons violation.