Asuicide pact is an agreedplan between two or more individuals to die bysuicide. The plan may be to die together, or separately and closely timed.
InEngland and Wales, a suicide pact is a partial defense, under section 4 of theHomicide Act 1957, which reduces the charge ofmurder tomanslaughter. InNorthern Ireland, this defense is created by section 14 of theCriminal Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 1966 (c. 20) (N.I.).
Suicide pacts are an important concept in thestudy of suicide, and have occurred throughout history, as well as in fiction. An example of this isthe suicide pact betweenRudolf, Crown Prince of Austria andBaroness Mary Vetsera.[1]
Suicide pacts are sometimes contrasted withmass suicides, understood as incidents in which a larger number of people kill themselves together for the same ideological reason, often within a religious, political, military or paramilitary context. "Suicide pact" tends to connote small groups and non-ideological motivations, as do bonding as married or romantic partners, as family members or friends, or even as criminal partners.
InEngland and Wales, suicide pact is a partial defense, under section 4 of theHomicide Act 1957, which reducesmurder tomanslaughter. InNorthern Ireland, this defense is created bysection 14 of theCriminal Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 1966 (c. 20) (N.I.).
One of the first Internet suicides inIsrael occurred in 1997, when Eran Aderet, a 19-year-old soldier, died after expressing a desire to kill himself online, and received detailed instructions on how to accomplish this with anM16 rifle in his possession.[2] Following this case, in 1999, a new Israeli association, SAHAR, sought toprevent suicide by providing supportive conversations and referrals to relevant resources.[3] In 2005, following an increase in the number of Internet suicide cases, the police established a special unit which consists of six police officers and specializes in helping people who communicate online that they want to die by suicide. The unit keeps in contact with forum moderators, who are asked to look out for posts from suicidal users. About 200 cases are detected each year, preventing dozens of suicides.
Following the success of the Israeli model, similar units have been founded inSweden,Germany andFrance.[4]
Although the majority of such Internet-related suicide pacts have occurred inJapan[5][6][7] (where it takes the name ofnetto shinjū, ネット心中), similar incidents have also been reported from other countries includingChina,South Korea,Germany,Australia,Norway, theUnited Kingdom,[8]Canada and theUnited States.
The first known Internet-related suicide pact occurred in February 2000, when one Norwegian man and one Austrian woman plunged 300 metres down the famous cliffPreikestolen, inRogaland county,Norway. Later, a Norwegian woman came forward stating that the Norwegian man had met her on an Internet forum, and planned to die by suicide with her too, but he had instead chosen to go with the Austrian woman. Both victims were in their 20s.[9][10]
Despite the alarmed response of the media, Internet-connected suicide pacts are still relatively rare. Even in Japan, where most of such pacts have occurred, they still represent only 2% of all group suicide-pacts, and less than 0.01% of all suicides combined. However, they have been increasing in the country: 34 deaths from such pacts occurred in 2003; at least 50 are estimated to have occurred in 2004; and 91 deaths occurred in 2005.[11][12][13] One notable example would beHiroshi Maeue, who on March 28, 2007, wassentenced to death byhanging, alleged to have murdered three participants in a suicide pact.[14]
An article published in theBritish Medical Journal in December 2004, by Sundararajan Rajagopal, Consultant Psychiatrist from St. Thomas' Hospital inLondon, highlighted the emergence of the relatively new phenomenon of cybersuicide pacts, addressing it from a psychiatric perspective.[15] Rajagopal commented "The recent suicide pacts in Japan might just be isolated events in a country that has even previously been shown to have the highest rate of suicide pacts. Alternatively, they might herald a new disturbing trend in suicide pacts, with more such incidents, involving strangers meeting over the Internet, becoming increasingly common. If the latter is the case then the epidemiology of suicide pacts is likely to change, with more young people living on their own, who may have died by suicide alone, joining with like-minded suicidal persons to die together".
An article published by theCanterbury Suicide Project[16] makes some notable comparisons between the nature of "traditional" suicide pacts and more recent Internet-related suicide pacts (or, as described in the article, "cyber-based suicide pacts"). It points out that traditionally suicide pacts:
On the other hand, Internet-related suicide pacts are almost the exact opposite:
The article also points out that the trend of Internet-related suicide pacts is changing the way thatmental-health workers need to deal with depressed and/or suicidal young people, advising that it is "prudent for clinicians to ask routinely if young people have been accessing Internet sites, obtaining suicide information from such sites, and talking in suicide chat rooms".
A person who enters into an Internet suicide pact can also be lying intentionally.William Francis Melchert-Dinkel is an example of a person who made multiple Internet suicide pacts, in which he falsely promised to hang himself after the other person died by suicide.[17] Melchert-Dinkel was later convicted of criminally assisting or attempting to assist in two suicides by providing detailed information about a suicide method.[18]
