Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Steenrod algebra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromSteenrod operation)
Algebraic topology

Inalgebraic topology, aSteenrod algebra was defined byHenri Cartan (1955) to be the algebra of stablecohomology operations for modp{\displaystyle p}cohomology.

For a givenprime numberp{\displaystyle p}, the Steenrod algebraAp{\displaystyle A_{p}} is the gradedHopf algebra over thefieldFp{\displaystyle \mathbb {F} _{p}} of orderp{\displaystyle p}, consisting of all stable cohomology operations for modp{\displaystyle p} cohomology. It is generated by theSteenrod squares introduced by Norman Steenrod (1947) forp=2{\displaystyle p=2}, and by theSteenrod reducedp{\displaystyle p}th powers introduced in Steenrod (1953a,1953b) and theBockstein homomorphism forp>2{\displaystyle p>2}.

The term "Steenrod algebra" is also sometimes used for the algebra of cohomology operations of ageneralized cohomology theory.

Cohomology operations

[edit]
Main article:Cohomology operation

A cohomology operation is anatural transformation between cohomologyfunctors. For example, if we take cohomology with coefficients in aringR{\displaystyle R}, thecup product squaring operation yields a family of cohomology operations:

Hn(X;R)H2n(X;R){\displaystyle H^{n}(X;R)\to H^{2n}(X;R)}
xxx.{\displaystyle x\mapsto x\smile x.}

Cohomology operations need not be homomorphisms of graded rings; see the Cartan formula below.

These operations do not commute withsuspension—that is, they are unstable. (This is because ifY{\displaystyle Y} is a suspension of a spaceX{\displaystyle X}, the cup product on the cohomology ofY{\displaystyle Y} is trivial.) Steenrod constructed stable operations

Sqi:Hn(X;Z/2)Hn+i(X;Z/2){\displaystyle Sq^{i}\colon H^{n}(X;\mathbb {Z} /2)\to H^{n+i}(X;\mathbb {Z} /2)}

for alli{\displaystyle i} greater than zero. The notationSq{\displaystyle Sq} and their name, the Steenrod squares, comes from the fact thatSqn{\displaystyle Sq^{n}} restricted to classes of degreen{\displaystyle n} is the cup square. There are analogous operations for odd primary coefficients, usually denotedPi{\displaystyle P^{i}} and called the reducedp{\displaystyle p}-th power operations:

Pi:Hn(X;Z/p)Hn+2i(p1)(X;Z/p){\displaystyle P^{i}\colon H^{n}(X;\mathbb {Z} /p)\to H^{n+2i(p-1)}(X;\mathbb {Z} /p)}

TheSqi{\displaystyle Sq^{i}} generate a connected graded algebra overZ/2{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /2}, where the multiplication is given by composition of operations. This is the mod 2 Steenrod algebra. In the casep>2{\displaystyle p>2}, the modp{\displaystyle p} Steenrod algebra is generated by thePi{\displaystyle P^{i}} and theBockstein operationβ{\displaystyle \beta } associated to theshort exact sequence

0Z/pZ/p2Z/p0{\displaystyle 0\to \mathbb {Z} /p\to \mathbb {Z} /p^{2}\to \mathbb {Z} /p\to 0}.

In the casep=2{\displaystyle p=2}, the Bockstein element isSq1{\displaystyle Sq^{1}} and the reducedp{\displaystyle p}-th powerPi{\displaystyle P^{i}} isSq2i{\displaystyle Sq^{2i}}.

As a cohomology ring

[edit]

We can summarize the properties of the Steenrod operations as generators in the cohomology ring ofEilenberg–Maclane spectra

Ap=HFp(HFp){\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}_{p}=H\mathbb {F} _{p}^{*}(H\mathbb {F} _{p})},

since there is anisomorphism

HFp(HFp)=k=0limn(Hn+k(K(Fp,n);Fp)){\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}H\mathbb {F} _{p}^{*}(H\mathbb {F} _{p})&=\bigoplus _{k=0}^{\infty }{\underset {\leftarrow n}{\text{lim}}}\left(H^{n+k}(K(\mathbb {F} _{p},n);\mathbb {F} _{p})\right)\end{aligned}}}

giving a direct sum decomposition of all possible cohomology operations with coefficients inFp{\displaystyle \mathbb {F} _{p}}. Note the inverse limit of cohomology groups appears because it is a computation in thestable range of cohomology groups of Eilenberg–Maclane spaces. This result[1] was originally computed[2] byCartan (1954–1955, p. 7) andSerre (1953).

Note there is a dual characterization[3] using homology for thedual Steenrod algebra.

Remark about generalizing to generalized cohomology theories

[edit]

It should be observed if the Eilenberg–Maclane spectrumHFp{\displaystyle H\mathbb {F} _{p}} is replaced by an arbitrary spectrumE{\displaystyle E}, then there are many challenges for studying the cohomology ringE(E){\displaystyle E^{*}(E)}. In this case, the generalized dual Steenrod algebraE(E){\displaystyle E_{*}(E)} should be considered instead because it has much better properties and can be tractably studied in many cases (such asKO,KU,MO,MU,MSp,S,HFp{\displaystyle KO,KU,MO,MU,MSp,\mathbb {S} ,H\mathbb {F} _{p}}).[4] In fact, thesering spectra are commutative and theπ(E){\displaystyle \pi _{*}(E)} bimodulesE(E){\displaystyle E_{*}(E)} are flat. In this case, these is a canonical coaction ofE(E){\displaystyle E_{*}(E)} onE(X){\displaystyle E_{*}(X)} for any spaceX{\displaystyle X}, such that this action behaves well with respect to the stable homotopy category, i.e., there is an isomorphismE(E)π(E)E(X)[S,EEX]{\displaystyle E_{*}(E)\otimes _{\pi _{*}(E)}E_{*}(X)\to [\mathbb {S} ,E\wedge E\wedge X]_{*}} hence we can use the unit the ring spectrumE{\displaystyle E}η:SE{\displaystyle \eta :\mathbb {S} \to E} to get a coaction ofE(E){\displaystyle E_{*}(E)} onE(X){\displaystyle E_{*}(X)}.

Axiomatic characterization

[edit]

Norman Steenrod and David B. A. Epstein (1962) showed that the Steenrod squaresSqn:HmHm+n{\displaystyle Sq^{n}\colon H^{m}\to H^{m+n}} are characterized by the following 5 axioms:

  1. Naturality:Sqn:Hm(X;Z/2)Hm+n(X;Z/2){\displaystyle Sq^{n}\colon H^{m}(X;\mathbb {Z} /2)\to H^{m+n}(X;\mathbb {Z} /2)} is an additive homomorphism and is natural with respect to anyf:XY{\displaystyle f\colon X\to Y}, sof(Sqn(x))=Sqn(f(x)){\displaystyle f^{*}(Sq^{n}(x))=Sq^{n}(f^{*}(x))}.
  2. Sq0{\displaystyle Sq^{0}} is the identity homomorphism.
  3. Sqn(x)=xx{\displaystyle Sq^{n}(x)=x\smile x} forxHn(X;Z/2){\displaystyle x\in H^{n}(X;\mathbb {Z} /2)}.
  4. Ifn>deg(x){\displaystyle n>\deg(x)} thenSqn(x)=0{\displaystyle Sq^{n}(x)=0}
  5. Cartan Formula:Sqn(xy)=i+j=n(Sqix)(Sqjy){\displaystyle Sq^{n}(x\smile y)=\sum _{i+j=n}(Sq^{i}x)\smile (Sq^{j}y)}

In addition the Steenrod squares have the following properties:

Similarly the following axioms characterize the reducedp{\displaystyle p}-th powers forp>2{\displaystyle p>2}.

  1. Naturality:Pn:Hm(X,Z/pZ)Hm+2n(p1)(X,Z/pZ){\displaystyle P^{n}\colon H^{m}(X,\mathbb {Z} /p\mathbb {Z} )\to H^{m+2n(p-1)}(X,\mathbb {Z} /p\mathbb {Z} )} is an additive homomorphism and natural.
  2. P0{\displaystyle P^{0}} is the identity homomorphism.
  3. Pn{\displaystyle P^{n}} is the cupp{\displaystyle p}-th power on classes of degree2n{\displaystyle 2n}.
  4. If2n>deg(x){\displaystyle 2n>\deg(x)} thenPn(x)=0{\displaystyle P^{n}(x)=0}
  5. Cartan Formula:Pn(xy)=i+j=n(Pix)(Pjy){\displaystyle P^{n}(x\smile y)=\sum _{i+j=n}(P^{i}x)\smile (P^{j}y)}

As before, the reducedp-th powers also satisfy the Adem relations and commute with the suspension and boundary operators.

Adem relations

[edit]

The Adem relations forp=2{\displaystyle p=2} were conjectured byWen-tsün Wu (1952) and established byJosé Adem (1952). They are given by

SqiSqj=k=0i/2(jk1i2k)Sqi+jkSqk{\displaystyle Sq^{i}Sq^{j}=\sum _{k=0}^{\lfloor i/2\rfloor }{j-k-1 \choose i-2k}Sq^{i+j-k}Sq^{k}}

for alli,j>0{\displaystyle i,j>0} such thati<2j{\displaystyle i<2j}. (The binomial coefficients are to be interpreted mod 2.) The Adem relations allow one to write an arbitrary composition of Steenrod squares as a sum of Serre–Cartan basis elements.

For oddp{\displaystyle p} the Adem relations are

PaPb=i(1)a+i((p1)(bi)1api)Pa+biPi{\displaystyle P^{a}P^{b}=\sum _{i}(-1)^{a+i}{(p-1)(b-i)-1 \choose a-pi}P^{a+b-i}P^{i}}

fora<pb and

PaβPb=i(1)a+i((p1)(bi)api)βPa+biPi+i(1)a+i+1((p1)(bi)1api1)Pa+biβPi{\displaystyle P^{a}\beta P^{b}=\sum _{i}(-1)^{a+i}{(p-1)(b-i) \choose a-pi}\beta P^{a+b-i}P^{i}+\sum _{i}(-1)^{a+i+1}{(p-1)(b-i)-1 \choose a-pi-1}P^{a+b-i}\beta P^{i}}

forapb{\displaystyle a\leq pb}.

Bullett–Macdonald identities

[edit]

Shaun R. Bullett and Ian G. Macdonald (1982) reformulated the Adem relations as the following identities.

Forp=2{\displaystyle p=2} put

P(t)=i0tiSqi{\displaystyle P(t)=\sum _{i\geq 0}t^{i}{\text{Sq}}^{i}}

then the Adem relations are equivalent to

P(s2+st)P(t2)=P(t2+st)P(s2){\displaystyle P(s^{2}+st)\cdot P(t^{2})=P(t^{2}+st)\cdot P(s^{2})}

Forp>2{\displaystyle p>2} put

P(t)=i0tiPi{\displaystyle P(t)=\sum _{i\geq 0}t^{i}{\text{P}}^{i}}

then the Adem relations are equivalent to the statement that

(1+sAdβ)P(tp+tp1s++tsp1)P(sp){\displaystyle (1+s\operatorname {Ad} \beta )P(t^{p}+t^{p-1}s+\cdots +ts^{p-1})P(s^{p})}

is symmetric ins{\displaystyle s} andt{\displaystyle t}. Hereβ{\displaystyle \beta } is the Bockstein operation and(Adβ)P=βPPβ{\displaystyle (\operatorname {Ad} \beta )P=\beta P-P\beta }.

Geometric interpretation

[edit]

There is a nice straightforward geometric interpretation of the Steenrod squares using manifolds representing cohomology classes. SupposeX{\displaystyle X} is a smooth manifold and consider a cohomology classαH(X){\displaystyle \alpha \in H^{*}(X)} represented geometrically as a smooth submanifoldf:YX{\displaystyle f\colon Y\hookrightarrow X}. Cohomologically, if we let1=[Y]H0(Y){\displaystyle 1=[Y]\in H^{0}(Y)} represent the fundamental class ofY{\displaystyle Y} then thepushforward map

f(1)=α{\displaystyle f_{*}(1)=\alpha }

gives a representation ofα{\displaystyle \alpha }. In addition, associated to this immersion is a real vector bundle call the normal bundleνY/XY{\displaystyle \nu _{Y/X}\to Y}. The Steenrod squares ofα{\displaystyle \alpha } can now be understood — they are the pushforward of theStiefel–Whitney class of the normal bundle

Sqi(α)=f(wi(νY/X)),{\displaystyle Sq^{i}(\alpha )=f_{*}(w_{i}(\nu _{Y/X})),}

which gives a geometric reason for why the Steenrod products eventually vanish. Note that because the Steenrod maps are group homomorphisms, if we have a classβ{\displaystyle \beta } which can be represented as a sum

β=α1++αn,{\displaystyle \beta =\alpha _{1}+\cdots +\alpha _{n},}

where theαk{\displaystyle \alpha _{k}} are represented as manifolds, we can interpret the squares of the classes as sums of the pushforwards of the normal bundles of their underlying smooth manifolds, i.e.,

Sqi(β)=k=1nf(wi(νYk/X)).{\displaystyle Sq^{i}(\beta )=\sum _{k=1}^{n}f_{*}(w_{i}(\nu _{Y_{k}/X})).}

Also, this equivalence is strongly related to theWu formula.

Computations

[edit]

Complex projective spaces

[edit]

On thecomplex projective planeCP2{\displaystyle \mathbf {CP} ^{2}}, there are only the following non-trivial cohomology groups,

H0(CP2)H2(CP2)H4(CP2)Z{\displaystyle H^{0}(\mathbf {CP} ^{2})\cong H^{2}(\mathbf {CP} ^{2})\cong H^{4}(\mathbf {CP} ^{2})\cong \mathbb {Z} },

as can be computed using a cellular decomposition. This implies that the only possible non-trivial Steenrod product isSq2{\displaystyle Sq^{2}} onH2(CP2;Z/2){\displaystyle H^{2}(\mathbf {CP} ^{2};\mathbb {Z} /2)} since it gives thecup product on cohomology. As the cup product structure onH(CP2;Z/2){\displaystyle H^{\ast }(\mathbf {CP} ^{2};\mathbb {Z} /2)} is nontrivial, this square is nontrivial. There is a similar computation on thecomplex projective spaceCP6{\displaystyle \mathbf {CP} ^{6}}, where the only non-trivial squares areSq0{\displaystyle Sq^{0}} and the squaring operationsSq2i{\displaystyle Sq^{2i}} on the cohomology groupsH2i{\displaystyle H^{2i}} representing thecup product. InCP8{\displaystyle \mathbf {CP} ^{8}} the square

Sq2:H4(CP8;Z/2)H6(CP8;Z/2){\displaystyle Sq^{2}\colon H^{4}(\mathbf {CP} ^{8};\mathbb {Z} /2)\to H^{6}(\mathbf {CP} ^{8};\mathbb {Z} /2)}

can be computed using the geometric techniques outlined above and the relation between Chern classes and Stiefel–Whitney classes; note thatf:CP4CP8{\displaystyle f\colon \mathbf {CP} ^{4}\hookrightarrow \mathbf {CP} ^{8}} represents the non-zero class inH4(CP8;Z/2){\displaystyle H^{4}(\mathbf {CP} ^{8};\mathbb {Z} /2)}. It can also be computed directly using the Cartan formula sincex2H4(CP8){\displaystyle x^{2}\in H^{4}(\mathbf {CP} ^{8})} and

Sq2(x2)=Sq0(x)Sq2(x)+Sq1(x)Sq1(x)+Sq2(x)Sq0(x)=0.{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}Sq^{2}(x^{2})&=Sq^{0}(x)\smile Sq^{2}(x)+Sq^{1}(x)\smile Sq^{1}(x)+Sq^{2}(x)\smile Sq^{0}(x)\\&=0.\end{aligned}}}

Infinite Real Projective Space

[edit]

The Steenrod operations for real projective spaces can be readily computed using the formal properties of the Steenrod squares. Recall that

H(RP;Z/2)Z/2[x],{\displaystyle H^{*}(\mathbb {RP} ^{\infty };\mathbb {Z} /2)\cong \mathbb {Z} /2[x],}

wheredeg(x)=1.{\displaystyle \deg(x)=1.} For the operations onH1{\displaystyle H^{1}} we know that

Sq0(x)=xSq1(x)=x2Sqk(x)=0 for any k>1{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}Sq^{0}(x)&=x\\Sq^{1}(x)&=x^{2}\\Sq^{k}(x)&=0&&{\text{ for any }}k>1\end{aligned}}}

The Cartan relation implies that the total square

Sq:=Sq0+Sq1+Sq2+{\displaystyle Sq:=Sq^{0}+Sq^{1}+Sq^{2}+\cdots }

is a ring homomorphism

Sq:H(X)H(X).{\displaystyle Sq\colon H^{*}(X)\to H^{*}(X).}

Hence

Sq(xn)=(Sq(x))n=(x+x2)n=i=0n(ni)xn+i{\displaystyle Sq(x^{n})=(Sq(x))^{n}=(x+x^{2})^{n}=\sum _{i=0}^{n}{n \choose i}x^{n+i}}

Since there is only one degreen+i{\displaystyle n+i} component of the previous sum, we have that

Sqi(xn)=(ni)xn+i.{\displaystyle Sq^{i}(x^{n})={n \choose i}x^{n+i}.}

Construction

[edit]

Suppose thatπ{\displaystyle \pi } is any degreen{\displaystyle n} subgroup of the symmetric group onn{\displaystyle n} points,u{\displaystyle u} a cohomology class inHq(X,B){\displaystyle H^{q}(X,B)},A{\displaystyle A} an abelian group acted on byπ{\displaystyle \pi }, andc{\displaystyle c} a cohomology class inHi(π,A){\displaystyle H_{i}(\pi ,A)}. Steenrod (1953a,1953b) showed how to construct a reduced powerun/c{\displaystyle u^{n}/c} inHnqi(X,(ABB)/π){\displaystyle H^{nq-i}(X,(A\otimes B\otimes \cdots \otimes B)/\pi )}, as follows.

  1. Taking the external product ofu{\displaystyle u} with itselfn{\displaystyle n} times gives an equivariant cocycle onXn{\displaystyle X^{n}} with coefficients inBB{\displaystyle B\otimes \cdots \otimes B}.
  2. ChooseE{\displaystyle E} to be acontractible space on whichπ{\displaystyle \pi } acts freely and an equivariant map fromE×X{\displaystyle E\times X} toXn.{\displaystyle X^{n}.} Pulling backun{\displaystyle u^{n}} by this map gives an equivariant cocycle onE×X{\displaystyle E\times X} and therefore a cocycle ofE/π×X{\displaystyle E/\pi \times X} with coefficients inBB{\displaystyle B\otimes \cdots \otimes B}.
  3. Taking theslant product withc{\displaystyle c} inHi(E/π,A){\displaystyle H_{i}(E/\pi ,A)} gives a cocycle ofX{\displaystyle X} with coefficients inH0(π,ABB){\displaystyle H_{0}(\pi ,A\otimes B\otimes \cdots \otimes B)}.

The Steenrod squares and reduced powers are special cases of this construction whereπ{\displaystyle \pi } is a cyclic group of prime orderp=n{\displaystyle p=n} acting as a cyclic permutation ofn{\displaystyle n} elements, and the groupsA{\displaystyle A} andB{\displaystyle B} are cyclic of orderp{\displaystyle p}, so thatH0(π,ABB){\displaystyle H_{0}(\pi ,A\otimes B\otimes \cdots \otimes B)} is also cyclic of orderp{\displaystyle p}.

Properties of the Steenrod algebra

[edit]

In addition to the axiomatic structure the Steenrod algebra satisfies, it has a number of additional useful properties.

Basis for the Steenrod algebra

[edit]

Jean-Pierre Serre (1953) (forp=2{\displaystyle p=2}) and Henri Cartan (1954,1955) (forp>2{\displaystyle p>2}) described the structure of the Steenrod algebra of stable modp{\displaystyle p} cohomology operations, showing that it is generated by the Bockstein homomorphism together with the Steenrod reduced powers, and the Adem relations generate the ideal of relations between these generators. In particular they found an explicit basis for the Steenrod algebra. This basis relies on a certain notion of admissibility for integer sequences. We say a sequence

i1,i2,,in{\displaystyle i_{1},i_{2},\ldots ,i_{n}}

isadmissible if for eachj{\displaystyle j}, we have thatij2ij+1{\displaystyle i_{j}\geq 2i_{j+1}}. Then the elements

SqI=Sqi1Sqin,{\displaystyle Sq^{I}=Sq^{i_{1}}\cdots Sq^{i_{n}},}

whereI{\displaystyle I} is an admissible sequence, form a basis (the Serre–Cartan basis) for the mod 2 Steenrod algebra, called theadmissible basis. There is a similar basis for the casep>2{\displaystyle p>2} consisting of the elements

SqpI=Sqpi1Sqpin{\displaystyle Sq_{p}^{I}=Sq_{p}^{i_{1}}\cdots Sq_{p}^{i_{n}}},

such that

ijpij+1{\displaystyle i_{j}\geq pi_{j+1}}
ij0,1mod2(p1){\displaystyle i_{j}\equiv 0,1{\bmod {2}}(p-1)}
Sqp2k(p1)=Pk{\displaystyle Sq_{p}^{2k(p-1)}=P^{k}}
Sqp2k(p1)+1=βPk{\displaystyle Sq_{p}^{2k(p-1)+1}=\beta P^{k}}

Hopf algebra structure and the Milnor basis

[edit]

The Steenrod algebra has more structure than a gradedFp{\displaystyle \mathbf {F} _{p}}-algebra. It is also aHopf algebra, so that in particular there is a diagonal orcomultiplication map

ψ:AAA{\displaystyle \psi \colon A\to A\otimes A}

induced by the Cartan formula for the action of the Steenrod algebra on the cup product. This map is easier to describe than the product map, and is given by

ψ(Sqk)=i+j=kSqiSqj{\displaystyle \psi (Sq^{k})=\sum _{i+j=k}Sq^{i}\otimes Sq^{j}}
ψ(Pk)=i+j=kPiPj{\displaystyle \psi (P^{k})=\sum _{i+j=k}P^{i}\otimes P^{j}}
ψ(β)=β1+1β{\displaystyle \psi (\beta )=\beta \otimes 1+1\otimes \beta }.

These formulas imply that the Steenrod algebra isco-commutative.

The linear dual ofψ{\displaystyle \psi } makes the (graded)linear dualA{\displaystyle A_{*}} ofA into an algebra.John Milnor (1958) proved, forp=2{\displaystyle p=2}, thatA{\displaystyle A_{*}} is apolynomial algebra, with one generatorξk{\displaystyle \xi _{k}} of degree2k1{\displaystyle 2^{k}-1}, for everyk, and forp>2{\displaystyle p>2} the dual Steenrod algebraA{\displaystyle A_{*}} is the tensor product of the polynomial algebra in generatorsξk{\displaystyle \xi _{k}} of degree2pk2{\displaystyle 2p^{k}-2}(k1){\displaystyle (k\geq 1)} and the exterior algebra in generators τk of degree2pk1{\displaystyle 2p^{k}-1}(k0){\displaystyle (k\geq 0)}. The monomial basis forA{\displaystyle A_{*}} then gives another choice of basis forA, called the Milnor basis. The dual to the Steenrod algebra is often more convenient to work with, because the multiplication is (super) commutative. The comultiplication forA{\displaystyle A_{*}} is the dual of the product onA; it is given by

ψ(ξn)=i=0nξnipiξi.{\displaystyle \psi (\xi _{n})=\sum _{i=0}^{n}\xi _{n-i}^{p^{i}}\otimes \xi _{i}.} whereξ0=1{\displaystyle \xi _{0}=1}, and
ψ(τn)=τn1+i=0nξnipiτi{\displaystyle \psi (\tau _{n})=\tau _{n}\otimes 1+\sum _{i=0}^{n}\xi _{n-i}^{p^{i}}\otimes \tau _{i}} ifp>2{\displaystyle p>2}.

The onlyprimitive elements ofA{\displaystyle A_{*}} forp=2{\displaystyle p=2} are the elements of the formξ12i{\displaystyle \xi _{1}^{2^{i}}}, and these are dual to theSq2i{\displaystyle Sq^{2^{i}}} (the only indecomposables ofA).

Relation to formal groups

[edit]

Thedual Steenrod algebras are supercommutative Hopf algebras, so their spectra are algebra supergroup schemes. These group schemes are closely related to the automorphisms of 1-dimensional additive formal groups. For example, ifp=2{\displaystyle p=2} then the dual Steenrod algebra is the group scheme of automorphisms of the 1-dimensional additive formal group schemex+y{\displaystyle x+y} that are the identity to first order. These automorphisms are of the form

xx+ξ1x2+ξ2x4+ξ3x8+{\displaystyle x\rightarrow x+\xi _{1}x^{2}+\xi _{2}x^{4}+\xi _{3}x^{8}+\cdots }

Finite sub-Hopf algebras

[edit]

Thep=2{\displaystyle p=2} Steenrod algebra admits a filtration by finite sub-Hopf algebras. AsA2{\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}_{2}} is generated by the elements[5]

Sq2i{\displaystyle Sq^{2^{i}}},

we can form subalgebrasA2(n){\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}_{2}(n)} generated by the Steenrod squares

Sq1,Sq2,,Sq2n{\displaystyle Sq^{1},Sq^{2},\ldots ,Sq^{2^{n}}},

giving the filtration

A2(1)A2(2)A2.{\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}_{2}(1)\subset {\mathcal {A}}_{2}(2)\subset \cdots \subset {\mathcal {A}}_{2}.}

These algebras are significant because they can be used to simplify many Adams spectral sequence computations, such as forπ(ko){\displaystyle \pi _{*}(ko)}, andπ(tmf){\displaystyle \pi _{*}(tmf)}.[6]

Algebraic construction

[edit]

Larry Smith (2007) gave the following algebraic construction of the Steenrod algebra over afinite fieldFq{\displaystyle \mathbb {F} _{q}} of orderq. IfV is avector space overFq{\displaystyle \mathbb {F} _{q}} then writeSV for thesymmetric algebra ofV. There is analgebra homomorphism

{P(x):SV[[x]]SV[[x]]P(x)(v)=v+F(v)x=v+vqxvV{\displaystyle {\begin{cases}P(x)\colon SV[[x]]\to SV[[x]]\\P(x)(v)=v+F(v)x=v+v^{q}x&v\in V\end{cases}}}

whereF is theFrobenius endomorphism ofSV. If we put

P(x)(f)=Pi(f)xip>2{\displaystyle P(x)(f)=\sum P^{i}(f)x^{i}\qquad p>2}

or

P(x)(f)=Sq2i(f)xip=2{\displaystyle P(x)(f)=\sum Sq^{2i}(f)x^{i}\qquad p=2}

forfSV{\displaystyle f\in SV} then ifV is infinite dimensional the elementsPI{\displaystyle P^{I}} generate an algebra isomorphism to the subalgebra of the Steenrod algebra generated by the reducedp′th powers forp odd, or the even Steenrod squaresSq2i{\displaystyle Sq^{2i}} forp=2{\displaystyle p=2}.

Applications

[edit]

Early applications of the Steenrod algebra were calculations byJean-Pierre Serre of some homotopy groups of spheres, using the compatibility of transgressive differentials in the Serre spectral sequence with the Steenrod operations, and the classification byRené Thom of smooth manifolds up to cobordism, through the identification of the graded ring of bordism classes with the homotopy groups of Thom complexes, in a stable range. The latter was refined to the case of oriented manifolds byC. T. C. Wall. A famous application of the Steenrod operations, involving factorizations through secondary cohomology operations associated to appropriate Adem relations, was the solution byJ. Frank Adams of theHopf invariant one problem. One application of the mod 2 Steenrod algebra that is fairly elementary is the following theorem.

Theorem. If there is a mapS2n1Sn{\displaystyle S^{2n-1}\to S^{n}} ofHopf invariant one, thenn is a power of 2.

The proof uses the fact that eachSqk{\displaystyle Sq^{k}} is decomposable fork which is not a power of 2; that is, such an element is a product of squares of strictly smaller degree.

Michael A. Mandell gave a proof of the following theorem by studying the Steenrod algebra (with coefficients in the algebraic closure ofFp{\displaystyle \mathbb {F} _{p}}):

Theorem. Thesingular cochain functor with coefficients in the algebraic closure ofFp{\displaystyle \mathbb {F} _{p}} induces acontravariant equivalence from the homotopy category of connectedp{\displaystyle p}-complete nilpotent spaces of finitep{\displaystyle p}-type to a full subcategory of the homotopy category of [[E{\displaystyle E_{\infty }}-algebras]] with coefficients in the algebraic closure ofFp{\displaystyle \mathbb {F} _{p}}.

Connection to the Adams spectral sequence and the homotopy groups of spheres

[edit]

The cohomology of the Steenrod algebra is theE2{\displaystyle E_{2}} term for the (p-local)Adams spectral sequence, whose abutment is thep-component of the stable homotopy groups of spheres. More specifically, theE2{\displaystyle E_{2}} term of this spectral sequence may be identified as

ExtAs,t(Fp,Fp).{\displaystyle \mathrm {Ext} _{A}^{s,t}(\mathbb {F} _{p},\mathbb {F} _{p}).}

This is what is meant by the aphorism "the cohomology of the Steenrod algebra is an approximation to the stable homotopy groups of spheres."

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^"at.algebraic topology – (Co)homology of the Eilenberg–MacLane spaces K(G,n)".MathOverflow. Retrieved2021-01-15.
  2. ^Adams (1974), p. 277.
  3. ^Adams (1974), p. 279.
  4. ^Adams (1974), p. 280.
  5. ^Mosher & Tangora (2008), p. 47.
  6. ^Ravenel (1986), pp. 63–67.

Pedagogical

[edit]

Motivic setting

[edit]

References

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steenrod_algebra&oldid=1279331262"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp