TheStanford Internet Observatory (SIO) was amultidisciplinary program for the study of abuse ininformation technologies, with a focus onsocial media, established in 2019. It is part of the Stanford Cyber Policy Center, a joint initiative of theFreeman Spogli Institute for International Studies andStanford Law School.[1] The program ended in 2024.[2]
Alex Stamos founded the Stanford Internet Observatory in 2019, after leavingFacebook the year before over frustrations that he was not allowed to publish the full account ofRussia's influence operations on the platform in the2016 US Presidential elections.[3]
According to Lauren Coffey ofInside Higher Ed, by 2024 the Stanford Internet Observatory had "published 15 white paper reports, 10 journal articles and garnered more than 5,000 media mentions".[4]
The SIO was the first to out Russian support forTrump online in 2016,[5][6] raised China spying concerns around theClubhouse app in a 2021 report,[7] partnered with theWall Street Journal in a 2023 report on Instagram and onlinechild sexual abuse materials,[8] and developed a curriculum for teaching college students how to handletrust and safety issues on social media platforms.[9]
The Stanford Internet Observatory participated in pre-2020 election research focusing on misinformation about election processes and procedures, resulting in a 2021 report that concluded "The 2020 election demonstrated that actors—both foreign and domestic—remain committed to weaponizing viral false and misleading narratives to undermine confidence in the US electoral system and erode Americans’ faith in our democracy".[10]
SIO co-founded the Election Integrity Partnership along with theUniversity of Washington Center for an Informed Public to identify real-time viral falsehoods about election procedures and outcomes. The partnership worked the 2020 and 2022 election cycles and has since concluded their work.[11][4] The lawsuits, which were eventually dismissed, as well as rhetoric about the research and work, however, resulted in scaled back or shut down research on elections by 2024. Researchers also received threats and online harassment from disinformation about their research.[12][13][14] As of 2024, the Center for an Informed Public continued to work on election misinformation at the University of Washington.[15]
In 2021, SIO launched theJournal of Online Trust and Safety, an open access peer-reviewed journal covering research on how consumer internet services are abused to cause harm and how to prevent those harms.[9][16]
The Stanford Internet Observatory was praised as "the gold-standard organization for determining the veracity of political information circulating online" byThom Hartmann ofThe New Republic.[5]
In 2024, Lauren Coffey ofInside Higher Ed wrote that SIO "served as a research powerhouse with a focus on social media amid growing misinformation".[4]
Joseph Menn ofThe Washington Post wrote "The Stanford Internet Observatory [...] published some of the most influential analysis of the spread of false information on social media during elections."[9]
Disinformation research groups, including the Stanford Internet Observatory, having reported on such topics as the2020 stolen election claims andCOVID-19 vaccine misinformation, had been under attack byGOP resources accusing them of colluding with the US Government and social media outlets of censoring conservative voices. The GOP-ledHouse Judiciary Committee subpoenaed Stanford University for any records or emails with government officials and social media platforms. In May 2023,America First Legal sued SIO and other researchers in Louisiana, aiming to bring down the "censorship-industrial complex". A Texas lawsuit filed by anti-vaccine advocates alleged their social media posts were flagged or removed in what it called mass censorship.[17][6][18]
These legal cases have cost Stanford millions of dollars in legal expenses and have distracted researchers from their work. A Stanford spokesperson said: "Stanford remains deeply concerned about efforts, including lawsuits and congressional investigations, that chill freedom of inquiry and undermine legitimate and much needed academic research — both at Stanford and across academia."[11]
On June 26, 2024, theUS Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Stanford Internet Observatory, and any other groups, communicating with the government with the aim of stemming the spread of falsehoods online.[19]
In June 2024, the Stanford Internet Observatory cut several jobs and several news outlets reported on its dismantling.[9][20][21][11] Leadership includingAlex Stamos, the main fundraiser, had left in November 2023 citing the toll of the political pressure whileRenée DiResta's contract was not renewed in June 2024.[20] The SIO's closure would mark a significant setback for misinformation researchers. Conservative lawmakers had also threatened to cut federal funding to any universities that studypropaganda, while theWashington Post theorized the university also might not want to alienate conservative donors.[9]The New Republic critiqued the Republican efforts as an attempt to prevent fact-checking of GOP lies.[5]
In a statement toPlatformer on June 13, Stanford denied that SIO was being dismantled:
The important work of SIO continues under new leadership... Stanford remains deeply concerned about efforts, including lawsuits and congressional investigations, that chill freedom of inquiry and undermine legitimate and much needed academic research – both at Stanford and across academia.[20]
On June 18, the school said it was not shutting down the project but said that its founding grants were running out and they were seeking new funding.[22]
Some SIO work has more concrete plans to continue under new leadership at Stanford, including work on child safety, The Journal of Online Trust and Safety and the Trust and Safety Research Conference will continue.[9][20]
On June 25, 2024, Renée DiResta penned an op-ed in theNew York Times warning about the vulnerabilities in theupcoming US elections without the Election Integrity Partnership and other research by SIO focused on election misinformation and with greatly reducedtrust and safety teams at many social media companies.[23]
In advance of the 2020 election, the Stanford Internet Observatory, a CITR member, partnered with three other research organizations to form the Election Integrity Partnership. The partnership's purpose was to create "a coalition of research entities who would focus on supporting real-time information exchange" regarding the spread of potentially misleading claims about election processes and procedures.
With misinformation research under fire and social media platforms less willing to factcheck viral posts, 2024 could see a flood of voter fraud lies, making for an even more contentious election than in 2020.