Aerosol spray is a type of dispensing system which creates anaerosol mist of liquid particles. It comprises a can or bottle that contains a payload, and a propellant under pressure. When the container's valve is opened, the payload is forced out of a small opening and emerges as an aerosol or mist.
The concepts of aerosol probably go as far back as 1790.[1] The first aerosol spray can patent was granted inOslo in 1927 toErik Rotheim, a Norwegian chemical engineer,[1][2] and a United States patent was granted for the invention in 1931.[3] The patent rights were sold to a United States company for 100,000Norwegian kroner.[4] The Norwegian Postal Service,Posten Norge, celebrated the invention by issuing a stamp in 1998.
In 1939, American Julian S. Kahn received a patent for a disposable spray can,[5][6] but the product remained largely undeveloped. Kahn's idea was to mix cream and a propellant from two sources to make whipped cream at home—not a true aerosol in that sense. Moreover, in 1949, he disclaimed his first four claims, which were the foundation of his following patent claims.
It was not until 1941 that the aerosol spray can was first put to effective use by AmericansLyle Goodhue and William Sullivan of theUnited States Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, who are credited as the inventors of the modern spray can.[7][8] Their design of a refillable spray can, dubbed theaerosol bomb orbug bomb, is the ancestor of many commercial spray products. It was a hand-sized steel can charged with a liquefied gas under 75 pounds of pressure and a product to be expelled as a mist or a foam.[9] A public-service patent was issued on the invention and assigned to theSecretary of Agriculture for the free use of the people of the United States.[10] Pressurized by liquefied gas, which gave it propellant qualities, the small, portable can enabled soldiers to defend themselves againstmalaria-carryingmosquitoes by spraying insidetents and airplanes in thePacific duringWorld War II.[11] Goodhue and Sullivan received the first Erik Rotheim Gold Medal from the Federation of European Aerosol Associations on August 28, 1970, in Oslo, Norway in recognition of their early patents and subsequent pioneering work with aerosol sprays.
In 1948, three companies were granted licenses by the United States government to manufacture aerosol sprays. Two of the three companies, Chase Products Company and Claire Manufacturing, continue to manufacture aerosol sprays. The "crimp-on valve", used to control the spray in low-pressure aerosol sprays was developed in 1949 byBronx machine shop proprietorRobert H. Abplanalp.[8][12]
In 1974, Drs.Frank Sherwood Rowland andMario J. Molina proposed thatchlorofluorocarbons, used as propellants in aerosol sprays, contributed to the depletion of Earth'sozone layer.[13] In response to this theory, theU.S. Congress passed amendments to theClean Air Act in 1977 authorizing theEnvironmental Protection Agency to regulate the presence of CFCs in the atmosphere.[14] TheUnited Nations Environment Programme called for ozone layer research that same year, and, in 1981, authorized a global framework convention on ozone layer protection.[15] In 1985,Joe Farman,Brian G. Gardiner, andJon Shanklin published the first scientific paper detailing the hole in the ozone layer.[16] That same year, theVienna Convention was signed in response to the UN's authorization. Two years later, theMontreal Protocol, which regulated the production of CFCs was formally signed. It came into effect in 1989.[15] The U.S. formally phased out CFCs in 1995.[17]
If aerosol cans were simply filled withcompressed gas, it would either need to be at a dangerously high pressure and require specialpressure vessel design (like ingas cylinders), or the amount of payload in the can would be small, and rapidly deplete.Usually, the gas is thevapor of a liquid withboiling point slightly lower thanroom temperature. This means that inside the pressurized can, the vapor can exist inequilibrium with its bulk liquid at a pressure that is higher thanatmospheric pressure (and able to expel the payload), but not dangerously high. As gas escapes, it is immediately replaced by evaporating liquid. Since the propellant exists in liquid form in the can, it should bemiscible with the payload or dissolved in the payload. Ingas dusters andfreeze sprays, the payload itself acts as the propellant. The propellant in a gas duster can is not "compressed air" as sometimes assumed, but usually ahaloalkane.
Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) were once often used as propellants,[18] but since theMontreal Protocol came into force in 1989, they have been replaced in nearly every country due to the negative effects CFCs have on Earth'sozone layer. The most common replacements of CFCs are mixtures of volatilehydrocarbons, typicallypropane, n-butane andisobutane.[19]Dimethyl ether (DME) andmethyl ethyl ether are also used. All these have the disadvantage of beingflammable.Nitrous oxide andcarbon dioxide are also used as propellants to deliver foodstuffs (for example,whipped cream andcooking spray). Medicinal aerosols such asasthma inhalers usehydrofluoroalkanes (HFA): eitherHFA 134a (1,1,1,2,-tetrafluoroethane) orHFA 227 (1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane) or combinations of the two. More recently, liquidhydrofluoroolefin (HFO) propellants have become more widely adopted in aerosol systems due to their relatively low vapor pressure, lowglobal warming potential (GWP), and nonflammability.[20]
Liquid aerosol propellant filling machines require additional precautions, such as being mounted externally to the production warehouse in a gas house. Liquid aerosol propellant machines are typically constructed to comply with ATEX Zone II/2G regulations (classification Zone 1).[21]
Modern aerosol spray products have three major parts: the can, the valve and the actuator or button. The can is most commonly lacqueredtinplate (steel with a layer of tin) and may be made of two or three pieces of metalcrimped together.Aluminium cans are also common and are generally used for products that are more expensive or intended to have a more premium appearance, such as personal care products. The valve is crimped to the inside rim of the can, and the design of this component is important in determining the spray rate. The actuator is depressed by the user to open the valve; a spring closes the valve again when it is released. The shape and size of the nozzle in the actuator controls the aerosolized particle size and the spread of the aerosol spray.[22]
True aerosol sprays release their propellant during use.[2][3] Some non-propellant alternatives include various spray bottles, squeeze bottles, and Bag on Valve (BoV) or Bag in Can (BiC) compressed gas aerosol systems.
Packaging that uses a piston barrier system byCCL Industries or EarthSafe byCrown Holdings is often selected for highlyviscous products such as post-foaminghair gels, thickcreams andlotions,food spreads and industrial products andsealants. The main benefit of this system is that it eliminates gas permeation and assures separation of the product from the propellant, maintaining the purity and integrity of the formulation throughout its consumer lifespan. The piston barrier system also provides a consistent flow rate with minimal product retention.
Another type of dispensing system is the bag-in-can (or BOV, bag-on-valve technology) system where the product is separated from the pressurizing agent with a hermetically sealed, multi-layered laminated pouch, which maintains complete formulation integrity so only pure product is dispensed.[23] Among its many benefits, the bag-in-can system extends a product's shelf life, is suitable for all-attitude, (360-degree) dispensing, quiet and non-chilling discharge. One key performance difference relative to true aerosol systems is that traditional BoV dispensing pressures, BoVs pressurized solely by pressurized gas) drops as the product is dispensed. This bag-in-can system is used in the packaging of pharmaceutical, industrial, household, pet care and other products that require complete separation between the product and the propellant or require near complete evacuation of thin to viscous formulations.
A later development is the 2K (two component) aerosol spray, with a main component stored in a main chamber, and a second component stored in an accessory container. When an applicator activates the 2K aerosol by breaking the accessory container, the two components mix. The 2K aerosol can is advantageous for delivery of reactive mixtures; for example, a 2K reactive mixture can use lowmolecular weightmonomer,oligomer, andfunctionalized low molecularpolymer to make a finalcross-linked high molecular weight polymer. A 2K aerosol can increase solid contents and deliver high-performance polymer products, such ascurablepaints,foams, andadhesives.
Aerosol cans have three main areas of health concern:
In the United States, non-empty aerosol cans are consideredhazardous waste,[26] but are still considered "recyclable when empty" in US curbside recycling programs.[29]
Aerosol products in the European Union must comply with health and safety regulations as set out in Directive 75/324/EEC.[30] which established the "reversed epsilon" mark.[a] This marking is required for aerosol products over 50ml.[31] The same marking is also used in the United Kingdom, although theUKCA marking is planned to replace it inGreat Britain.[32]
Sprayboksens far er norsk;Erik Rotheim fant opp aerosolflasken, sprayboksen, på 1920-tallet. I 1927 tok han patent på oppfinnelsen. [...] og patentet ble etterhvert solgt til et amerikansk selskap for 100 000 kroner. | The Father of the Spraybox is Norwegian;Erik Rotheim invented the aerosol bottle, the spray box, in the 1920s. In 1927, he patented the invention. [...] the patent was eventually sold to a US company for NOK 100,000. |
Freon chemical compounds in household refrigerators, air-cooling systems and asaDDT carrier in aerosolinsect bombs have been found to be more effective in extinguishing fires than carbon dioxide.
