Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Spirit Cave (Thailand)

Coordinates:19°34′04″N98°16′52″E / 19.5678055556°N 98.2810833333°E /19.5678055556; 98.2810833333
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromSpirit Cave, Thailand)
Cave and archaeological site in Thailand
Spirit Cave
ถ้ำผีแมน
Spirit Cave in Thailand
Spirit Cave in Thailand
Spirit Cave
Location in Thailand
Alternative nameTham Phi Maen
LocationPang Mapha district,Mae Hong Son Province, Thailand
Altitude650 m (2,133 ft)
History
PeriodsUpper Paleolithic,Neolithic
CulturesHoabinhian
Site notes
ArchaeologistsChester Gorman
Mae Hong Son Province, Pang Mapha district in red
Map of the Salween watershed

Spirit Cave (Thai:ถ้ำผีแมน,Tham Phii Man) is an archaeological site inPang Mapha district,Mae Hong Son Province, northwesternThailand. It was occupied 12,000 to 7,000 uncalibrated radiocarbon years ago by prehistoric humans of theHoabinhian culture.

Location

[edit]

The site is situated at an elevation of 650 m (2,130 ft) above sea level on a hillside overlooking a small stream. It was excavated in the mid-1960s byChester Gorman. TheSalween River, one of Southeast Asia's longest rivers, flows less than 50 km (31 mi) to the north. Two other significant nearby sites are the Banyan Valley Cave and the Steep Cliff Cave.

Chronology

[edit]

Human presence at the site is documented from theUpper Paleolithic to the earlyNeolithic, but the primary occupation layers represent Hoabinhian hunter-gatherers.[1] Radiocarbon dating of organic resin on some pottery sherds returned Late Neolithic-Bronze ages, at odds with Gorman's claims for the Palaeolithic age of the deposit.[2] Radiocarbon dating of four freshwater crab (Indochinamon sp.) dactyls from Spirit Cave showed that they all date to the Early Holocene, consistent with Gorman's claims of occupation during the Pleistocene–Holocene transition.[3]

Plant domestication

[edit]

Gorman[4] claims that the Spirit Cave included remains of Prunus (almond), Terminalia, Areca (betel), Vicia (broadbean) or Phaseolus, Pisum (pea) orRaphia lagenaria (bottle gourd), Trapa (Chinese water chestnut), Piper (pepper), Madhuca (butternut), Canarium, Aleurites (candle nut), and Cucumis (a cucumber type) in layers dating to around 9,800 to 8,500 years BCE. None of the recovered specimens differed from their wildphenotypes. He suggested that these may have been used as foods,condiments,stimulants, for lighting and that theleguminous plants in particular "point to a very early use ofdomesticated plants".[5] He later wrote[6] that "Whether they are definitely early cultigens remains to be established... What is important, and what we can say definitely, is that the remains indicate the early, quite sophisticated use of particular species which are still culturally important in Southeast Asia".

In 1972 W.G. Solheim, as the director of the project of which Spirit Cave was part, published an article inScientific American discussing the finds from Spirit Cave. While Solheim noted that the specimens may "merely be wild species gathered from the surrounding countryside", he claimed that the inhabitants at Spirit Cave had "an advanced knowledge ofhorticulture". Solheim'schronological chart suggests that "incipientagriculture" began about 20,000 years BCE in Southeast Asia. He also suggests that ceramic technology was invented at 13,000 years BCE although Spirit Cave does not have ceramics evident until after 6,800 years BCE.[7]

Although Solheim concludes that his reconstruction is "largelyhypothetical", hisoverstatement of the results of Gorman's excavation has led to inflated claims ofHoabinhian agriculture. These claims have detracted from the significance of Spirit Cave as a site with well-preserved evidence of humansubsistence and palaeoenvironmental conditions during the Hoabinhian.

Lithics

[edit]

Gorman discussed cultural levels with respect tolithic artifacts and identified two layers at Spirit Cave.[6] Course-grainedquartzite was the most abundant stone found in both layers. The remains included largeunifacially worked pebble cores akasumatraliths, grinding stones, and retouched/utilized flakes.[6] Cultural level two consisted of new types of artifacts including flaked and polished quadrangularadzes and small ground/polished slate knives.[6] He used the findings at Spirit Cave to argue the notion that theHoabinhian culture was a techno-complex due to a response to similar ecological adaptations.[6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Conrad, Cyler; Higham, Charles; Eda, Masaki; Marwick, Ben (14 October 2016)."Palaeoecology and Forager Subsistence Strategies during the Pleistocene – Holocene Transition: A Reinvestigation of the Zooarchaeological Assemblage from Spirit Cave, Mae Hong Son Province, Thailand".Asian Perspectives.55 (1):2–27.ISSN 1535-8283.
  2. ^Lampert, C.D.; Glover, I.C.; Hedges, R.E.M.; Heron, C.P.; Higham, T.F.G.; Stern, B.; Shoocongdej, R.; Thompson, G.B. (March 2003). "Dating resin coating on pottery: the Spirit Cave early ceramic dates revised".Antiquity.77 (295):126–133.doi:10.1017/S0003598X0006141X.
  3. ^Conrad, Cyler; Shoocongdej, Rasmi; Marwick, Ben; White, Joyce C.; Thongcharoenchaikit, Cholawit; Higham, Charles; Feathers, James K.; Tumpeesuwan, Sakboworn; Castillo, Cristina C.; Fuller, Dorian Q.; Jones, Emily Lena (8 October 2021)."Re-evaluating Pleistocene–Holocene occupation of cave sites in north-west Thailand: new radiocarbon and luminescence dating".Antiquity:1–18.doi:10.15184/aqy.2021.44.
  4. ^Gorman C. (1971) TheHoabinhian and After: Subsistence Patterns in Southeast Asia during the LatePleistocene and Early Recent Periods.World Archaeology 2: 300-20
  5. ^Gorman C. (1969) Hoabinhian: A pebble tool complex with early plant associations in Southeast Asia.Science 163: 671-3
  6. ^abcdeGorman C. (1971) The Hoabinhian and After: Subsistence Patterns in Southeast Asia during the Late Pleistocene and Early Recent Periods.World Archaeology 2: 311
  7. ^Solheim, W.G. (1972) An earlier agricultural revolution.Scientific American 226: 34-41

Sources

[edit]
  • Charles Higham (2002).Early Cultures of Mainland Southeast Asia. River Books. pp. 46–49.
Prehistoric cave sites, rock shelters andcave paintings
Austria
Belgium
Bosnia
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Finland
France
Germany
Gibraltar
Greece
Hungary
Italy
Jersey
Kosovo
Luxembourg
Malta
North Macedonia
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Afghanistan
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Cambodia
China
East Timor
Georgia
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Japan
Jordan
Laos
Lebanon
Malaysia
Mongolia
Myanmar
Pakistan
Palestine
Philippines
Sri Lanka
Thailand
Turkmenistan
Turkey
Uzbekistan
Vietnam
Algeria
Botswana
Cameroon
DR Congo
Egypt
Kenya
Lesotho
Libya
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nigeria
Somaliland
South Africa
Tanzania
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Argentina
Aruba
Belize
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Cuba
Curaçao
Dominican Republic
Jamaica
Mexico
Peru
Suriname
United States
Australia
Guam
Hawaii
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Northern Mariana Islands
Papua New Guinea
Samoa
Tuvalu

19°34′04″N98°16′52″E / 19.5678055556°N 98.2810833333°E /19.5678055556; 98.2810833333

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spirit_Cave_(Thailand)&oldid=1253081631"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp