Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is anold revision of this page, as edited by28bytes(talk |contribs) at07:35, 6 July 2025(Wikipedia:Administrator recall/Bbb23: new section). The present address (URL) is apermanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from thecurrent revision.Revision as of 07:35, 6 July 2025 by28bytes(talk |contribs)(Wikipedia:Administrator recall/Bbb23: new section)
Notices of interest to bureaucrats

Administrators
Bureaucrats
AdE/RfX participants
History & statistics
Useful pages
Wikipedia's centralizeddiscussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see thedashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards seeformal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
    Bureaucrat tasks

    Bureaucrats' noticeboard archives
    1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
    11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20
    21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30
    31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40
    41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50
    51


    This page has archives. Sections older than7 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III.
    To contact bureaucrats to alert them of an urgent issue, please post below.
    For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.
    You may usethis tool to locate recently active bureaucrats.
    Click here to add a new section
    Shortcuts

    TheBureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to theBureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Pleasestart a new section for each topic.

    This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remaincivil, and remember toassume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.

    If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired",please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.

    To request that your administrator status be removed,initiate a new section below.

    Crat tasks
    RfAs1
    RfBs0
    OverdueRfBs0
    OverdueRfAs0
    BRFAs11
    Approved BRFAs0
    Requests foradminship andbureaucratshipupdate
    RfA candidateSONS %StatusEnding (UTC)Time leftDups?Report
    Rjjiii11700100Open18:50, 1 November 20255 days, 1 hournoreport
    iconIt is17:05:05 onOctober 27, 2025, according to the server's time and date.


    Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2025#July 2025

    The followinginactive administrators are being desysoped due toinactivity. Thank you for your service.

    Criteria 1 (total inactivity)
    (none)
    Criteria 2 (100 edits/5-year rule)
    1. Satori Son (talk ·contribs ·blocks ·protections ·deletions ·page moves ·rights ·RfA)
      Last logged admin action: Oct 2020

    2FA Checking

    Hello team. Now thatphab:T265726 has been delivered, you will be able to useSpecial:VerifyOATHForUser. A couple of notes:

    1. Using this tool requires elevated security, meaning you will likely be requested to log back on to use it (don't try it if you aren't somewhere you can log on, or you may be logged out).
    2. Use of this tool is logged
    3. Another user's 2FA enrollment status is considered sensitive, and should not be publicly shared

    When would you ever use this? The primary use case would be if someone applies for interface-admin, you can use this tool to verify they meet the global requirement of being activated for 2FA prior to issuing access. If they do not, you can privately refer them to the enrollment process (WP:2FA locally).

    Best regards, —xaosfluxTalk16:54, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I see that use of this tool is limited to bureaucrats. Are 'crats signatories to theANPDP?Ivanvector (Talk/Edits)16:59, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Not necessarily, however WMF Privacy and Legal determined that this was appropriate. 2FA status isn't quite considered "private", as it does not contain any identifying information. It is sensitive, in that it is security related. —xaosfluxTalk17:01, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I should note that it's covered atwmf:Policy:Wikimedia Foundation Access to Nonpublic Personal Data Policy/Exceptions.Bureaucrats are permitted to access account two-factor authentication (2FA) status to verify whether other users have enabled 2FA prior to being added to groups that require 2FA. Bureaucrats are not covered under the Access to nonpublic personal data policy, but are nonetheless expected to use and disclose account 2FA status only when necessary.EggRoll97(talk)17:16, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    And as far why bureaucrats, the primary use case is in checking before issuing sensitive groups, a task available to that group. (Stewards already use this for global requests). —xaosfluxTalk17:05, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Should we add a link to{{rfplinks}} so that it shows up on this page when used?Primefac (talk)22:29, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Administrator recall/Bbb23

    Per the outcome ofWikipedia:Administrator recall/Bbb23, which closed 30 days ago, I have removed the administrative rights ofUser:Bbb23.28bytes (talk)07:35, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard&oldid=1299048466"
    Categories:
    Hidden categories:

    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp