Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is anold revision of this page, as edited byAcalamari(talk |contribs) at09:01, 19 November 2024(Desysop request (Fastily): Done). The present address (URL) is apermanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from thecurrent revision.Revision as of 09:01, 19 November 2024 byAcalamari(talk |contribs)(Desysop request (Fastily): Done)
Notices of interest to bureaucrats

Administrators
Bureaucrats
AdE/RfX participants
History & statistics
Useful pages
Wikipedia's centralizeddiscussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see thedashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards seeformal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
    Bureaucrat tasks

    Bureaucrats' noticeboard archives
    1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
    11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20
    21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30
    31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40
    41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50
    51


    This page has archives. Sections older than7 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III.
    To contact bureaucrats to alert them of an urgent issue, please post below.
    For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.
    You may usethis tool to locate recently active bureaucrats.
    Click here to add a new section
    Shortcuts

    TheBureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to theBureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Pleasestart a new section for each topic.

    This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remaincivil, and remember toassume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.

    If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired",please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.

    To request that your administrator status be removed,initiate a new section below.

    Crat tasks
    RfAs1
    RfBs0
    OverdueRfBs0
    OverdueRfAs0
    BRFAs11
    Approved BRFAs0
    Requests foradminship andbureaucratshipupdate
    RfA candidateSONS %StatusEnding (UTC)Time leftDups?Report
    Rjjiii10200100Open18:50, 1 November 20255 days, 10 hoursnoreport
    iconIt is08:22:11 onOctober 27, 2025, according to the server's time and date.


    Wikipedia:Administrator recall/Fastily has been closed as successful

    This is to note that the recall petitionWikipedia:Administrator recall/Fastily had received 25 signatures so was closed by an editor as successful. PerWP:RECALL,The bureaucrats are responsible for ensuring that an RRfA is started within a reasonable time frame. If this does not happen, they may remove the administrator privileges at their discretion.

    So a crat should probably be in touch with Fastily for next steps and/or when they start an RRFA after this.Soni (talk)06:51, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    No need. I'm aware of what my options are thanks. -Fastily07:39, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Just noting here (i.e. cross-posting) that I am not overly thrilled with the phrase "closed as successful" and havestarted a discussion about the matter on recall's talk page.Primefac (talk)13:12, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm still of the opinion that we shouldn't be pre-emptively closing these, and that there's not consensus to do so, unless the person the recall discussion is about has requested it. It can be valuable to see whether there are going to be a significant number of signers when deciding whether to give up the tools or run again.Hey man im josh (talk)15:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree with you, and this is being discussed atWikipedia:Administrator recall/Reworkshop#Closing a petition although there is opposition to asking the question at the RFC with @The leaky cauldron asserting that there does not need to be a formal consensus to endorse the BOLD change to the policy that stated discussions should be closed immediately upon reaching 25 signatures.Thryduulf (talk)16:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Thryduulf andHey man im josh: I'm 'theleekycauldron', with three 'e's and no spaces, and I didn't oppose that question. I explicitlysupported rephrasing the question to emphasize the "delay after threshold reached" option.theleekycauldron (talk • she/her)19:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Change to admin policy

    Note to bureaucrats thatthis RfC was closed with a consensus for Option 2, so the Administrator policy has been changed/clarified. The relevant passage fromWP:Administrators is below with removals struck through and additions underlined.

    • Over five years since administrative tools were last used. In the case of removal due to inactivity,for any administrator who does not have a logged administrator action in five years, bureaucrats should not restore administrator access upon request.This applies to all former administrators

    If there are any clarifications needed let me know. —Ganesha811 (talk)15:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Ganesha811, you should also updateWikipedia:Bureaucrats#Restoration_of_permissions. --WOSlinker (talk)18:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Done. —Ganesha811 (talk)18:27, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for making the change and informing us.Lee Vilenski(talkcontribs)18:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Desysop request (Fastily)

    Following the outcome ofWikipedia:Administrator recall/Fastily, I am electing to resign. I will not be seeking reconfirmation, thanks. -Fastily08:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you for your service.Ymblanter (talk)08:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for your service. Particurly after performing over 646668 admin actions including over 635368 deletions.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk)08:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for all the work you have done as an admin. I have often seen your contributions in my watchlist and truly appreciated them. –DreamRimmer(talk)08:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Done Echo the above. Good luck, Fastily.Acalamari09:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard&oldid=1258369062"
    Categories:
    Hidden categories:

    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp