Place requests forprotection increases at theBOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check thearchive of requests or, failing that, thepage history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
| Requests for page protection |
|---|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Return to Requests for page protection. Requestaddition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level |
Indefinite extended confirmed protection:Arbitration enforcement –WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits)21:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not a PIA article, and at this point is not a likely attack target (though this could change of course). I would decline.--Ymblanter (talk)21:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity tojustify protection. Very flimsy connection to PIA if at all, disruption not very high.Lectonar (talk)14:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite extended confirmed protection:Arbitration enforcement –WP:ARBPIA.LilianaUwU(talk /contributions)02:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk)18:31, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistentvandalism – This article is attracting purposeful vandalizing from time to time, where someone or someones are changing people's names, changing people's ages, adding uncited ages, plus adding other bits of odd (but wrong) minutiae. I think the most-useful form of protection would be to add confirmed/auto-confirmed protection to this article.Shearonink (talk)03:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Aoidh (talk)17:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days.Xexerss (talk)08:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Aoidh (talk)17:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: Since page protection expired for this subject (who was reported inSeptember 2023 to be the target of a "cyber attack" for misrepresented comments about Hinduism) there has been ongoingdisruptive editing by IP editors.Beccaynr (talk)09:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I would recommend against this request.User:Beccaynr is totally falsifying the comments of the subject by misrepresenting her comments from"September 2023" with those she said in2019 per thecited source. Page does NOT need protection, instead Beccaynr should be reprimanded for his disruption.2402:A00:401:7C3E:4D11:C044:1AD5:F1BC (talk)10:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- IP, you were warned about edit warring and thethree-revert rule[1] at 09:21, 13 November 2023, and continued to revert, after I explained my objection on my user talk page and asked you to discuss this on the article talk page several times. You have made more than three reverts[2] (09:17, 13 November 2023),[3] (09:20, 13 November 2023),[4] (09:49, 13 November 2023),[5] (10:16, 13 November 2023) to restore what two editors, including myself, have said is unsourced content, and I said is contentious content that appears to be contrary toWP:BLP policy. I have since also opened a section on the article talk page. From my view, this article has had a fair amount of disruption related to misrepresented sources over time and I am concerned about the September 2023 context as an ongoing risk of disruption to this article.Beccaynr (talk)11:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- See alsoPhilosopher Divya Dwivedi Among Latest Targets of India’s Right Wing (Protean Magazine, October 2023) - includes discussion of the 2019 controversy the IP has been referring to as a source for what appears to be original research - this apparently is an ongoing issue for the subject of the article.Beccaynr (talk)11:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes you should be reprimanded for the edit war you have carried out. It was completely useless!
- You don't have to be "concerned about the September 2023 context as an ongoing risk of disruption to this article" whenever someone makes a new edit to this article.
- Just because you have seen some other editors adding poor content to this page before, it still does not mean that you get the right to impose yourWP:OWNERSHIP on this page. 12:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- I am asking for administrator help because this article is within two CTOP areas and was previously protected in September 2023. From my view, the persistent addition of unsourced contentious content, over BLP policy objections, is part of the ongoing disruptive editing that has continued since the page protection expired.Beccaynr (talk)13:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Then you are clearly talking about a different article.2402:A00:401:7C3E:4D11:C044:1AD5:F1BC (talk)13:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Considerthe edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possibleedit-warring by one or two users. Seems rather self evident by this exchange.Lectonar (talk)13:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]- Since I had started here, I wasn't sure if AN3 was necessary, and I was thinking page protection was the gentlest dispute resolution to encourage talk page discussion.Beccaynr (talk)13:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't like to cut off one side only from discussion by a protection which affects only them, and I rarely have seen that protection gets people to the talk page. It's either full protection, or more direct intervention, like noticeboards.Lectonar (talk)14:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Temperory Semi-Protection: High level of IP vandalism and vandalism by new ids again and again as soon as the previous protection expired.Imsaneikigai (talk)11:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentsockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive edits from blocked sockpuppet IPs. PingingUser:Drmies.Bgsu98(Talk)13:29, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentvandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing.𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk)14:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistentvandalism. --Minorax«¦talk¦»15:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s)blocked. –Favonian (talk)16:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection:User request within own user space.•Cyberwolf•talk?15:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: High level of vandalism in the last days. It results in them adding by copy/paste a lot of protected material to WP and forcing WP admins to mask their modifs, thus making everyone lose time.AgisdeSparte (talk)17:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I just realized I was in the wrong place. Sorry for that really :(AgisdeSparte (talk)17:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism.Kansas Bear (talk)17:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Favonian (talk)17:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism.Kansas Bear (talk)17:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Favonian (talk)17:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism.Kansas Bear (talk)17:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Favonian (talk)17:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentvandalism – Repeated attempts by IP-hopping editor to prematurely close this AFD.MrOllie (talk)17:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism.Kansas Bear (talk)17:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Favonian (talk)17:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism.Kansas Bear (talk)17:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Favonian (talk)17:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition ofunsourced or poorly sourced content.Mike Allen17:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism.Kansas Bear (talk)17:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Favonian (talk)17:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentvandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing.𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk)17:55, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Aoidh (talk)18:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: High level of unconstructive edits by IPs (mostly block-evading sockpuppets)[6][7], edit warring[8] and sockpuppetry[9].Skitash (talk)18:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Aoidh (talk)18:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: Pretty much all IP edits in the last few years are POV pushing. Delaunay is now designated as French artist, which is how reliable sources outside of Russia and Ukraine describe her. However, we constantly have Ukrainian POV pushers, which change this to Ukrainian artist, and Russian POV pushers who change it to Russian-French artist. The topic has been designated as contentious by ArbCom, and we also haveWP:RUSUKR prohibiting such edits to non extended confirmed users.Ymblanter (talk)18:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentvandalism – multiple anonymous users vandalizing/adding joke names of management positions.Funnyfarmofdoom(talk to me)18:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Ymblanter (talk)18:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]