Hello andwelcome toWikipedia. Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Gohere.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain aneutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about aliving person to any Wikipedia page and followWikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should bereferenced with multiplereliable sources.
• Noedit warring orabuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use theSandbox todo so.
• Do not add troublesome content to anyarticle, such as:copyrighted text,libel,advertising orpromotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP beingblocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia isnot a forum.

TheWikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see thehelp pages, add a question to thevillage pump or ask me onmy talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!NinjaRobotPirate (talk)03:25, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mNinjaRobotPirate. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide areliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like toinclude a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look atreferencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you.NinjaRobotPirate (talk)03:26, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted asvandalism and have beenreverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, pleasecite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article'stalk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use yoursandbox. Thank you.NinjaRobotPirate (talk)05:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing sourced content to something that directly contradicts the source.NinjaRobotPirate (talk)05:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue tovandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did atRugrats Go Wild, you may beblocked from editing.NinjaRobotPirate (talk)03:13, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now Look Here, NinjaRobotPirate! You are the one who is distributive editing on the same articles. Because the Paramount Pictures on Rugrats Go Wild article is not a production company, and Nickelodeon Movies on Several Movies is not a distribution. I will do the same thing to you if you're messing with the movies. Now put the companies back where is goes!Gareth Carraway (talk)14:45, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Meant to say, Disruptive.Gareth Carraway (talk)14:46, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now Look Here, MrRobotPirate! You are the one who is distributive editing on the same articles. Because the Paramount Pictures is not a production company, and Nickelodeon Movies is not a distribution. I will do the same thing to you if you're messing with the movies. Now put the companies back where is goes!Gareth Carraway (talk)14:42, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is written according to whatreliable sources say. If they call a company a production company, that's what Wikipedia says. If they says that a company distributed the film, that's what Wikipedia says. Your own personal beliefs are irrelevant. On Wikipedia, this is calledoriginal research, and it's forbidden. If you continue to change sourced content to text not found in the sources, you'll simply be blocked.NinjaRobotPirate (talk)11:05, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well is Completely False, because Paramount Pictures and Nickelodeon Movies cannot be Production Companies and Distribution at the same articles. Because Wikipedia should have fixed it like I did. It's oddly for us, because I will do the same thing to you if you're messing with the movies, like I said. How do you like that, huh.Gareth Carraway (talk)09:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Meant to say, Change the Source back to where it was, or you will be simply blocked for you.Gareth Carraway (talk)09:59, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time youdisrupt Wikipedia, as you did atHotel for Dogs (film).NinjaRobotPirate (talk)17:59, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you lost your mind about what I mean, you completely messed up the companies on that article, I Told you a Million times. Nickelodeon Movies Is Not a Distribution, also for Cold Springs Pictures.Gareth Carraway (talk)20:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are Completely delusional you stupid Rival, I will have you blocked by Wikipedia for messing with me and the Articles.Gareth Carraway (talk)20:18, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There, I Fixed it, Do not mess this article again, I MEAN IT!!!Gareth Carraway (talk)22:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.NinjaRobotPirate (talk)04:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You Idiot, With all due respect. You know how the Articles gets fixed by a good user. Every user always fixing the Articles by puting the companies back that where they belong like everything else!Gareth Carraway (talk)05:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gareth Carraway,

You could very well be blocked. It would benefit you to come toWP:ANI and state, calmly, your side of this dispute with no name-calling. Participating in a discussion is better than ranting on your talk page if you would like this dispute resolved.Liz^Read!Talk!05:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But I wasn't even talking to you Liz, I was Talking to NinjaRobotPirate! I'm so sorry about that, though! It's just that I was trying to fix the Articles.Gareth Carraway (talk)06:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That Does It, I have had it! You are completely TERMINATED!!!Gareth Carraway (talk)03:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked from editing for a period of1 week for makingpersonal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read theguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ^Complex/_Rational21:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I encourage you to reflect on some of the comments above and pay particular attention to Wikipedia's policies onverifiability andpersonal attacks. The reason some of your edits have been challenged or reverted is that they were not supported by reliable sources or appeared to present information contradictory to said sources. Furthermore, name-calling, shouting, and threats aredisruptive behaviors and are detrimental to collaboration, which is a fundamental aspect of resolving content issues and ensuring Wikipedia articles satisfy various quality standards. I hope you can be collegial withNinjaRobotPirate, and once your block expires, concentrate on fixing the articles in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.^Complex/_Rational22:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will, but not placing the companies in the wrong places in those articles. And I Mean It!Gareth Carraway (talk)21:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before I lose my mind!Gareth Carraway (talk)02:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But deal me in.Gareth Carraway (talk)09:48, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did toSpirit: Stallion of the Cimarron, without giving a valid reason for the removal in theedit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has beenreverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use yoursandbox for that. Thank you.Geraldo Perez (talk)05:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What, You Didn't see any Articles that it said Distributed by DreamWorks Distribution, unless you put the DreamWorks Pictures on the Production Company.Gareth Carraway (talk)05:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]