9 February 2017

• 17:3317:33, 9 February 2017diffhist−191Bre-X→Aftermath: unsourced since 2009, and unrelated to the surrounding text

17 September 2015

• 16:4816:48, 17 September 2015diffhist+120Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback→User:Jess: Add diff to clarify since sigs look the same
• 16:4316:43, 17 September 2015diffhist+336Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer→User:Jess: confirm link
• 16:3616:36, 17 September 2015diffhist+480Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback→User:Jess: Reply

5 September 2015

• 19:3019:30, 5 September 2015diffhist−26Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents→Editor Jytdog's none neutral GMO edits: shorten
• 19:2819:28, 5 September 2015diffhist−23Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents→Editor Jytdog's none neutral GMO edits: shorten
• 19:2719:27, 5 September 2015diffhist+1,000Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents→Editor Jytdog's none neutral GMO edits: Comment
• 03:3403:34, 5 September 2015diffhist−1Talk:Genetically modified food→Sources for positions of advocacy groups: grammar
• 03:3303:33, 5 September 2015diffhist+616Talk:Genetically modified food→Sources for positions of advocacy groups: Reply
• 02:5902:59, 5 September 2015diffhist+4Talk:Watts Up With That?→What the hell is going on? (and convenience break): I'm tired; clean up wording, and shorten
• 02:4802:48, 5 September 2015diffhist+1,032Talk:Watts Up With That?→What the hell is going on? (and convenience break): Reply

4 September 2015

• 20:5720:57, 4 September 2015diffhist+1,093Talk:Watts Up With That?→What the hell is going on? (and convenience break): Reply
• 18:5118:51, 4 September 2015diffhist−94Talk:Watts Up With That?→RfC: Should "Watts Up With That" blog be called "denier"?: shorten
• 18:4718:47, 4 September 2015diffhist+881Talk:Watts Up With That?→RfC: Should "Watts Up With That" blog be called "denier"?: Reply
• 18:1018:10, 4 September 2015diffhist+1,037User talk:DrChrissy→Breach of my topic ban? - Toxicity of glyphosate to wildlife: Reply
• 15:4515:45, 4 September 2015diffhist+1,009User talk:DrChrissy→Breach of my topic ban? - Toxicity of glyphosate to wildlife: Reply - outside perspective
• 15:2415:24, 4 September 2015diffhist+7,161NUser talk:Akarsh a1Welcome to Wikipedia! (TW)current
• 15:2415:24, 4 September 2015diffhist+2Creation mythReverted 1 edit byAkarsh a1 (talk): No, there are many of them, not just one. (TW)

3 September 2015

• 10:4610:46, 3 September 2015diffhist−1,015Samuel SoalReverted 1 edit by120.21.10.48 (talk): Please discuss this on talk, and work with others to form consensus. What source is this material coming from? (TW)

2 September 2015

• 16:4916:49, 2 September 2015diffhist−43Talk:Watts Up With That?→RfC: Should "Watts Up With That" blog be called "denier"?: shorten
• 16:4616:46, 2 September 2015diffhist+869Talk:Watts Up With That?→RfC: Should "Watts Up With That" blog be called "denier"?: Reply - RfC is premature. Please don't ignore the input of others.

1 September 2015

• 15:0515:05, 1 September 2015diffhist+626Talk:Intelligent design→the word theory etc: Reply
• 03:3403:34, 1 September 2015diffhist+64NIts Always Sunny in Philadelphia episodesCreate redirectcurrent
• 03:3403:34, 1 September 2015diffhist+64NIts always sunny in Philadelphia episodesCreate redirectcurrent
• 03:3303:33, 1 September 2015diffhist+64NIts always sunny in philadelphia episodesCreate redirectcurrent
• 03:3303:33, 1 September 2015diffhist+64NIts always sunny episodesCreate redirectcurrent
• 03:3303:33, 1 September 2015diffhist+64NList of Its always sunny episodesCreate redirectcurrent
• 03:3203:32, 1 September 2015diffhist+64NList of Its Always Sunny episodesCreate redirectcurrent
• 03:3203:32, 1 September 2015diffhist+64NList of its always sunny episodesCreate redirectcurrent
• 03:3103:31, 1 September 2015diffhist+50NList of Big Bang episodesCreate redirectcurrent
• 03:3103:31, 1 September 2015diffhist+50NList of Big Bang theory episodesCreate redirectcurrent
• 03:3003:30, 1 September 2015diffhist+50NList of big bang episodesCreate redirectcurrent

31 August 2015

• 14:4114:41, 31 August 2015diffhist+1,143User talk:122.106.113.95General note: Removal of content, blanking onDeity. (TW)
• 14:4114:41, 31 August 2015diffhist+281DeityReverted 1 edit by122.106.113.95 (talk): Content removal with no edit summary. (TW)

30 August 2015

• 10:3110:31, 30 August 2015diffhist+794User talk:TikamasaltilapoptataGeneral note: Unconstructive editing onDiscrimination against atheists. (TW)current
• 10:3010:30, 30 August 2015diffhist+7,181NUser talk:TikamasaltilapoptataWelcome to Wikipedia! (TW)
• 10:3010:30, 30 August 2015diffhist−22mDiscrimination against atheistsReverted 3 edits byTikamasaltilapoptata (talk) to last revision by Wavelength. (TW)
• 10:2810:28, 30 August 2015diffhist−1Talk:Genesis creation narrative→Needs a more neutral tone: Fix indent
• 10:2710:27, 30 August 2015diffhist+433Talk:Genesis creation narrative→Needs a more neutral tone: Reply
• 10:2310:23, 30 August 2015diffhist+297Talk:Immanuel→Not so neutral: Reply
• 00:3500:35, 30 August 2015diffhist−25ImmanuelReverted 2 edits by68.100.116.118: What "experts"? If you mean "the academic consensus is..." thenWP:YESPOV; we should not attribute, and make it seem as though it is controversial. (TW)
• 00:3300:33, 30 August 2015diffhist+1Noah's ArkReverted 1 edit by68.100.116.118 (talk): No, not just "hasn't been found", which implies it's out there but lost. (TW)
• 00:3000:30, 30 August 2015diffhist−92Genesis creation narrativeReverted 2 edits by68.100.116.118 (talk): Rv removal of "creation myth". Please discuss on talk. . (TW)

29 August 2015

• 04:2104:21, 29 August 2015diffhist−22Genesis creation narrativeReverted 3 edits by68.100.116.118 (talk): Not "probably" a Mesopotamian influence, and I'm not sure "creator" is better than "god" in this case. (TW)

28 August 2015

• 19:4319:43, 28 August 2015diffhist−1Michael E. MannReverted 1 edit bySlymgyms (talk): No, this was an allegation, not a 'neutral report', as indicated by our sources which show the allegation was untrue. (TW)
• 19:4219:42, 28 August 2015diffhist0Climatic Research Unit email controversyReverted 1 edit bySlymgyms (talk): ...but you didn't change the part that says "first". Sources seem to indicate this was popularized in this way. (TW)

27 August 2015

• 18:2118:21, 27 August 2015diffhist+630User talk:Mann jess→Intelligent design: Reply
• 12:5112:51, 27 August 2015diffhist+9mPhysics educationReverted 2 edits by75.159.155.89 (talk) to last revision by Yamaguchi先生. (TW)
• 03:5303:53, 27 August 2015diffhist+4Talk:Intelligent design→First line phrasing/cite: grammar. Wrong, to less wrong.
• 03:5203:52, 27 August 2015diffhist+758Talk:Intelligent design→First line phrasing/cite: Reply