 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Social organization" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(March 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
_-_The_Noun_Project_-_black.svg)
Insociology, asocial organization is a pattern ofrelationships between and amongindividuals andgroups.[1][2] Characteristics of social organization can include qualities such as sexual composition, spatiotemporal cohesion,leadership,structure, division of labor, communication systems, and so on.[3][4]
Because of these characteristics of social organization, people can monitor their everyday work and involvement in other activities that are controlled forms of human interaction. These interactions include: affiliation, collective resources, substitutability of individuals and recorded control. These interactions come together to constitute common features in basic social units such as family, enterprises, clubs, states, etc. These are social organizations.[5]
Common examples of modern social organizations aregovernment agencies,[6][7]NGOs, andcorporations.[8][9]
 | This articleis written like apersonal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Pleasehelp improve it by rewriting it in anencyclopedic style.(August 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Social organizations happen in everyday life. Many people belong to various social structures—institutional and informal. These include clubs, professional organizations, and religious institutions.[10] To have a sense of identity with the social organization, being closer to one another helps build a sense of community.[11] While organizations link many like-minded people, it can also cause a separation with others not in their organization due to the differences in thought. Social organizations are structured to where there is a hierarchical system.[12] A hierarchical structure in social groups influences the way a group is structured and how likely it is that the group remains together.
Four other interactions can also determine if the group stays together. A group must have a strong affiliation within itself. To be affiliated with an organization means having a connection and acceptance in that group. Affiliation means an obligation to come back to that organization. To be affiliated with an organization, it must know and recognize that you are a member. The organization gains power through the collective resources of these affiliations. Often affiliates have something invested in these resources that motivate them to continue to make the organization better. On the other hand, the organization must keep in mind thesubstitutability of these individuals. While the organization needs the affiliates and the resources to survive, it also must be able to replace leaving individuals to keep the organization going. Because of all these characteristics, it can often be difficult to be organized within the organization. This is where recorded control comes in, as writing things down makes them more clear and organized.[5]
| This articleis written like apersonal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Pleasehelp improve it by rewriting it in anencyclopedic style.(August 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Social organizations within society are constantly changing.[13] Smaller scale social organizations in society include groups forming from common interests and conversations. Social organizations are created constantly and with time change.[citation needed]
Smaller scaled social organizations include many everyday groups that people would not even think have these characteristics. These small social organizations can include things such as bands, clubs, or even sports teams. Within all of these small scaled groups, they contain the same characteristics as a large scale organization would. While these small social organizations do not have nearly as many people as large scale ones, they still interact and function in similar ways.
Looking at a common small organization, a school sports team, it is easy to see how it can be a social organization. The members of the team all have the same goals, which is to win, and they all work together to accomplish that common goal. It is also clear to see the structure in the team. While everyone has the same goal in mind[citation needed], they have different roles, or positions, that play a part to get there. To achieve their goal they must be united.
In large-scale organizations, there is always some extent of bureaucracy. Having bureaucracy includes: a set of rules, specializations, and a hierarchical system. This allows for these larger sized organizations to try maximize efficiency. Large-scaled organizations also come with making sure managerial control is right. Typically, the impersonal authority approach is used. This is when the position of power is detached and impersonal with the other members of the organization. This is done to make sure that things run smoothly and the social organization stays the best it can be.[14]
A big social organization that most people are somewhat familiar with is ahospital. Within the hospital are small social organization—for example, the nursing staff and the surgery team. These smaller organizations work closer together to accomplish more for their area, which in turn makes the hospital more successful and long lasting. As a whole, the hospital contains all the characteristics of being a social organization. In a hospital, there are various relationships between all of the members of the staff and also with the patients. This is a main reason that a hospital is a social organization. There is also division of labor, structure, cohesiveness, and communication systems. To operate to the utmost effectiveness, a hospital needs to contain all of the characteristics of a social organization because that is what makes it strong. Without one of these things, it would be difficult for this organization to run.[citation needed]
Although the assumption that many organizations run better with bureaucracy and a hierarchical system with management, there are other factors that can prove that wrong. These factors are whether or not the organization isparallel orinterdependent. To be parallel in an organization means that each department or section does not depend on the other in order to do its job. To be Interdependent means that you do depend on others to get the job done. If an organization is parallel, the hierarchical structure would not be necessary and would not be as effect as it would in an interdependent organization. Because of all the different sub-structures in parallel organizations (the different departments), it would be hard for hierarchical management to be in charge due to the different jobs. On the other hand, an interdependent organization would be easier to manage that way due to the cohesiveness throughout each department in the organization.[14]
 | This section'sfactual accuracy isdisputed. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements arereliably sourced.(February 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Societies can be organized throughindividualistic orcollectivist means, which can have implications foreconomic growth, legal and political institutions and effectiveness and social relations. This is based on the premise that the organization of society is a reflection of its cultural, historical, social, political and economic processes which therefore govern interaction.
Collectivist or individualist orientations may exist within a broader diverse society.[15]
In collectivism, the core unit is the collective group.[16] Individuals are seen as fundamentally connected through relationships and through being a part of a group.[16] In this context, groups are defined as networks of interpersonal relationships.[17] The collectivist orientation emphasizes collective identity and collective agency, and values tend to prioritize the collective more than the individual.[15] Psychologically, collectivism increases the likelihood of including, relating, and assimilating information.[16]
Collectivist social organization may be horizontal or vertical.[16] In horizontal models, social structures stress relationships withincommunities rather than asocial hierarchy between them.[citation needed]
This kind of system has been largely attributed to cultures with strong religious,ethnic, orfamilial group ties.[citation needed]
An individualist orientation emphasizes individuals through individual self-identity, individual agency, and values that tend to prioritize individuals over collectives.[15] Psychologically, individualist orientations increase the probability of contrasting, pulling apart, and separating information, rather than integrating or assimilating.[16]
Most research on individualism has centred United States, Germany, and the Netherlands.[16][18][dubious –discuss] Most research on collectivism comes from East Asia.[16]
European data has predominantly come from Germany and the Netherlands.[16] Scandinavian countries (which have a moreegalitarian culture), southern Europe, and Eastern Europe are not represented in this data.[16] Africa, West Asia, and Latin American countries are not represented in research.[16] The literature does not include or represent countries with Islamic culture or countries where there is within-group conflict.[16]
| This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.(August 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
One type of collectivism is racial collectivism, or race collectivism.[citation needed] Racial collectivism is a form of social organization based onrace orethnic lines as opposed to other factors such aspolitical orclass affiliated collectivism.[citation needed] Examples of societies that have attempted, historically had, or still have a racial collectivist structure, at least in part, includeNazism andNazi Germany,racial segregation in the United States (especially prior to thecivil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s),Apartheid in South Africa,White Zimbabweans, thecaste system of India, and many other nations and regions of the world.[citation needed]
Social organizations may be seen in digital spaces, and online communities show patterns of how people would react in social networking situations.[19] The technology allows people to use the constructed social organizations as a way to engage with one another without having to physically be in the same place.
Looking at social organization online is a different way to think about it and a little challenging to connect the characteristics. While the characteristics of social organization are not completely the same for online organizations, they can be connected and talked about in a different context to make the cohesiveness between the two apparent. Online, there are various forms of communication and ways that people connect. Again, this allows them to talk and share common interests (which is what makes them a social organization) and be a part of the organization without having to physically be with the other members. Although these online social organization do not take place in person, they still function as social organization because of the relationships within the group and the goal to keep the communities going.
