The termsocial in regard to media suggests platforms enable communal activity. Social media helps people connect and build networks.[6] Users access social media through web-based or mobile applications. These interactive platforms allow individuals, communities, businesses, and organizations to share, co-create, discuss, participate in, and modify user-generated or self-curated content.[7][5][1] Social media is used to share memories, form friendships, build communities and learn.[8] They may be used to promote people, companies, products, and ideas.[8] Social media can be used to consume, publish, or share news.
Social media outlets differ fromold media (e.g.newspapers,TV, andradio broadcasting) in many ways, including quality,[9]reach,frequency, usability, relevancy, and permanence.[10] Social media outlets operate in adialogic transmission system (many sources to many receivers) while traditional media operate under amonologic transmission model (one source to many receivers). For instance, a newspaper is delivered to many subscribers, and a radio station broadcasts the same programs to a city.[11]
Social media has been criticized for a range of negative impacts on children and teenagers, including exposure to inappropriate content, exploitation by adults, sleep problems, attention problems, feelings of exclusion, and various mental health maladies.[12][13] Social media has also received criticism as worseningpolitical polarization and underminingdemocracy, exacerbated byplatform capture by vested interests,[14][15] with journalistMaria Ressa deeming it "toxic sludge" for increasing distrust among members of society.[16] Major news outlets often have strong controls in place to avoid and fix false claims, but social media's unique qualities bring viral content with little to no oversight. "Algorithms that track user engagement to prioritize what is shown tend to favor content that spurs negative emotions like anger and outrage. Overall, most online misinformation originates from a small minority of "superspreaders," but social media amplifies their reach and influence."[17]
ThePLATO system was launched in 1960 at theUniversity of Illinois and subsequently commercially marketed byControl Data Corporation. It offered early forms of social media features with innovations such as Notes, PLATO's message-forum application; TERM-talk, its instant-messaging feature;Talkomatic, perhaps the firstonline chat room; News Report, acrowdsourced onlinenewspaper, and blog and Access Lists, enabling the owner of a note file or other application to limit access to a certain set of users, for example, only friends, classmates, or co-workers.[18]
A precursor of the electronicbulletin board system (BBS), known asCommunity Memory, appeared by 1973. Mainstream BBSs arrived with the Computer Bulletin Board System in Chicago, which launched on February 16, 1978. Before long, most major US cities had more than one BBS, running onTRS-80,Apple II,Atari 8-bit computers,IBM PC,Commodore 64,Sinclair, and others.CompuServe,Prodigy, andAOL were three of the largest BBS companies and were the first to migrate to the Internet in the 1990s. Between the mid-1980s and the mid-1990s, BBSes numbered in the tens of thousands inNorth America alone.[21] Message forums were the signature BBS phenomenon throughout the 1980s and early 1990s.
A bulletin board system menu, featuringopinion polls and a "Who's been on today?" query
In 1991,Tim Berners-Lee integratedHTMLhypertext software with the Internet, creating theWorld Wide Web. This breakthrough led to an explosion ofblogs,list servers, andemail services. Message forums migrated to the web, and evolved intoInternet forums, supported by cheaper access as well as the ability to handle far more people simultaneously.
These early text-based systems expanded to include images and video in the 21st century, aided bydigital cameras andcamera phones.[22]
SixDegrees, launched in 1997, is often regarded as the first social media site.
The evolution of online services progressed from serving as channels for networked communication to becoming interactive platforms for networked social interaction with the advent ofWeb 2.0.[6]
Social media started in the mid-1990s with the invention of platforms likeClassmates.com, andSixDegrees.com.[23] While instant messaging and chat clients existed at the time, SixDegrees was unique as it was the first online service designed for people to connect using their actual names instead of anonymously. It boasted features like profiles, friends lists, and school affiliations, making it "the very first social networking site".[23][24] The platform's name was inspired by the "six degrees of separation" concept, which suggests that every person on the planet is just six connections away from everyone else.[25]
Research from 2015 reported that globally, users spent 22% of their online time on social networks,[29] likely fueled by the availability of smartphones.[30] As of 2023, as many as 4.76 billion people used social media[31] some 59% of the global population.
Social networks formed by connections between profiles,[2][5] such as followers, groups, and lists.
In 2019,Merriam-Webster defined social media as "forms of electronic communication (such as websites for social networking and microblogging) through which users create online communities to share information, ideas, personal messages, and other content (such as videos)."[32]
TheNational Institute of Standards and Technology defines it as "Forms of electronic communications, including websites and applications, that enable users to create and share content or to participate in social networking."[33]
Mobile social media refers to the use of social media onmobile devices such assmartphones andtablets. It is distinguished by its ubiquity, since users no longer have to be at a desk in order to participate on acomputer. Mobile services can usethe user's location to offerinformation, connections, or services relevant to that location.
According toAndreas Kaplan, mobile social media activities fall among four types:[35]
Space-timers (location and time-sensitive): Exchange of messages with relevance for a specific location at a specific point in time (posting about a traffic jam)
Space-locators (only location sensitive): Posts/messages with relevance for a specific location, read later by others (e.g. a restaurant review)
Quick-timers (only time sensitive): Transfer of traditional social mediamobile apps to increase immediacy (e.g. posting status updates)
Slow-timers (neither location nor time sensitive): Transfer of traditional social media applications to mobile devices (e.g. watching a video)
Certaincontent, has the potential to spreadvirally, an analogy for the wayviral infections spread contagiously from individual to individual.Viral videos are one example. One user spreads a post across theirnetwork, which leads those users to follow suit. A post from a relatively unknown user can reach vast numbers of people within hours. Virality is not guaranteed; few posts make the transition.
Viral marketing campaigns are particularly attractive tobusinesses because they can achieve widespread advertising coverage at a fraction of the cost of traditional marketing campaigns.Nonprofit organizations andactivists may also attempt to spread content virally.
Social media sites provide specific functionality to help users re-share content, such asX's andFacebook's "like" option.[36]
Bots are automated programs that operate on theinternet.[37] They automate many communication tasks. This has led to the creation of an industry of bot providers.[38]
Chatbots andsocial bots are programmed to mimic human interactions such as liking, commenting, and following.[39] Bots have also been developed to facilitatesocial media marketing.[40] Bots have led themarketing industry into an analytical crisis, as bots make it difficult to differentiate between human interactions and bot interactions.[41] Some bots violate platforms'terms of use, which can result in bans and campaigns to eliminate bots categorically.[42] Bots may even pose as real people to avoid prohibitions.[43]
'Cyborgs'—either bot-assisted humans or human-assisted bots[43]—are used for both legitimate and illegitimate purposes, from spreadingfake news to creatingmarketing buzz.[44][45][46] A human writes a post content and the bot posts it a specific time. In other cases, cyborgs spreadfake news.[43] Cyborgs may work assock puppets, where one human pretends to be someone else, or operates multiple accounts, each pretending to be a person.
A multitude ofUnited States patents are related to social media, and their numbers are growing, albeit unevenly. For example, there were 897 patents in Q3 2024 and 1,674 in Q2. And even in Q3, the U.S. share of all social media patent applications was 50% of all patent applications, with second-placed China at 18%.[47] As of 2020[update], over 5000 social media patent applications had been published in the United States.[48] Only slightly over 100 patents had been issued.[49]
As an instance oftechnological convergence, various social media platforms adapted functionality beyond their original scope, increasingly overlapping with each other.
Examples are the social hub siteFacebook launching an integratedvideo platform in May 2007,[50] andInstagram, whose original scope was low-resolution photo sharing, introducing the ability to share quarter-minute 640×640 pixel videos[51] (later extended to a minute with increased resolution). Instagram later implementedstories (short videos self-destructing after 24 hours), a concept popularized bySnapchat, as well asIGTV, for seekable videos.[52] Stories were then adopted byYouTube.[53]
X, whose original scope was text-based microblogging, later adopted photo sharing,[54] then video sharing,[55][56] then a media studio for business users, after YouTube's Creator Studio.[57]
The discussion platformReddit added an integratedimage hoster replacing the external image sharing platformImgur,[58] and then an internal video hosting service,[59] followed by image galleries (multiple images in a single post), known from Imgur.[60] Imgur implemented video sharing.[61][62]
YouTube rolled out a Community feature, for sharing text-only posts andpolls.[63]
According toStatista, it is estimated that, in 2022, around 3.96 billion people were using social media globally. This number is up from 3.6 billion in 2020.[64]
A 2009 study suggested that individual differences may help explain who uses social media:extraversion andopenness have a positive relationship with social media, whileemotional stability has a negative sloping relationship with social media.[67] A 2015 study reported that people with a highersocial comparison orientation appear to use social media more heavily than people with low social comparison orientation.[68]
Common Sense Media reported that children under age 13 in the United States usesocial networking services although many social media sites require users to be 13 or older.[69] In 2017, the firm conducted a survey of parents of children from birth to age 8 and reported that 4% of children at this age used social media sites such asInstagram,Snapchat, or (now-defunct)Musical.ly "often" or "sometimes".[70] Their 2019 survey surveyed Americans ages 8–16 and reported that about 31% of children ages 8–12 use social media.[71] In that survey, teens aged 16–18 were asked when they started using social media. the median age was 14, although 28% said they started to use it before reaching 13.
Social media played a role in communication during theCOVID-19 pandemic.[72] In June 2020, a survey byCartoon Network and theCyberbullying Research Center surveyed Americanstweens (ages 9–12) and reported that the most popular application wasYouTube (67%).[73] (as age increased, tweens were more likely to have used social media apps and games.) Similarly, Common Sense Media's 2020 survey of Americans ages 13–18 reported that YouTube was the most popular (used by 86% of 13- to 18-year-olds).[74] As children aged, they increasingly utilized social media services and often used YouTube to consume content.
Apps used by U.S. tweens (ages 9–12), 2019–2020[73]: 39–42
While adults were using social media before theCOVID-19 pandemic, more started using it to stay socially connected and to get pandemic updates.
"Social media have become popularly use to seek for medical information and have fascinated the general public to collect information regarding corona virus pandemics in various perspectives. During these days, people are forced to stay at home and the social media have connected and supported awareness and pandemic updates."[75]
Healthcare workers and systems became more aware of social media as a place people were getting health information:
"During the COVID-19 pandemic, social media use has accelerated to the point of becoming a ubiquitous part of modern healthcare systems."[76]
This also led to the spread ofdisinformation. On December 11, 2020, theCDC put out a "Call to Action: Managing theInfodemic".[77] Some healthcare organizations used hashtags as interventions and published articles on theirTwitter data:[78]
"Promotion of the joint usage of #PedsICU and #COVID19 throughout the international pediatric critical care community in tweets relevant to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pediatric critical care."[78]
However others in the medical community were concerned about social media addiction, as it became an increasingly important context and therefore "source of social validation and reinforcement" and were unsure whether increased social media use was harmful.[79]
Social media has been used extensivelyin civil and criminal investigations.[82] It has also been used to search for missing persons.[83] Police departments often make use of official social media accounts to engage with the public, publicize police activity, and burnish law enforcement's image;[84][85] conversely, video footage of citizen-documentedpolice brutality and othermisconduct has sometimes been posted to social media.[85]
In the United States,U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement identifies and track individuals via social media, and has apprehended some people via social media-based sting operations.[86]U.S. Customs and Border Protection (also known as CBP) and theUnited States Department of Homeland Security use social media data as influencing factors during thevisa process, and monitor individuals after they have entered the country.[87] CBP officers have also been documented performing searches of electronics and social media behavior at the border, searching both citizens and non-citizens without first obtaining a warrant.[87]
As social media gained momentum among the younger generations, governments began using it to improve their image, especially among the youth. In January 2021, Egyptian authorities were reported to be usingInstagram influencers as part of its media ambassadors program. The program was designed to revampEgypt's image and to counter the bad press Egypt had received because of the country'shuman rights record.Saudi Arabia and theUnited Arab Emirates participated in similar programs.[88] Similarly,Dubai has extensively relied on social media and influencers to promote tourism. However, Dubai laws have kept these influencers within limits to not offend the authorities, or to criticize the city, politics or religion. The content of these foreign influencers is controlled to make sure that nothing portrays Dubai in a negative light.[89]
Many businesses use social media formarketing,branding,[90]advertising, communication,sales promotions, informalemployee-learning/organizational development, competitive analysis, recruiting, relationship management/loyalty programs,[35] ande-Commerce. Companies usesocial-media monitoring tools to monitor, track, and analyze conversations to aid in their marketing, sales and other programs. Tools range from free, basic applications to subscription-based, tools. Social media offers information on industry trends. Within the finance industry, companies use social media as a tool for analyzing market sentiment. These range from marketing financial products, market trends, and as a tool to identify insider trading.[91] To exploit these opportunities, businesses need guidelines for use on each platform.[3]
Business use of social media is complicated by the fact that the business does not fully control its social media presence. Instead, it makes its case by participating in the "conversation".[92] Business uses social media[93] on a customer-organizational level; and an intra-organizational level.
Social media can encourage entrepreneurship and innovation, by highlighting successes, and by easing access to resources that might not otherwise be readily available/known.[94]
Social media marketing can help promote a product or service and establish connections with customers. Social media marketing can be divided into paid media, earned media, and owned media.[95] Using paid social media firms run advertising on a social media platform. Earned social media appears when firms do something that impressesstakeholders and they spontaneously post content about it. Owned social media is the platform markets itself by creating/promoting content to its users.[96]
Primary uses are to createbrand awareness, engage customers by conversation (e.g., customers provide feedback on the firm) and providing access tocustomer service.[97] Social media's peer-to-peer communication shifts power from the organization to consumers, since consumer content is widely visible and not controlled by the company.[98]
Social media personalities, often referred to as "influencers", are Internet celebrities who aresponsored by marketers to promote products and companies online. Research reports that theseendorsements attract the attention of users who have not settled on which products/services to buy,[99] especiallyyounger consumers.[100] The practice of harnessing influencers to market or promote a product or service to their following is commonly referred to asinfluencer marketing.
In 2013, the United KingdomAdvertising Standards Authority (ASA) began advising celebrities to make it clear whether they had been paid to recommend a product or service by using the hashtag #spon or #ad when endorsing. The USFederal Trade Commission issued similar guidelines.[101]
Social media platforms also enabletargeting specific audiences with advertising. Users of social media can share, and comment on the advertisement, turning passive consumers into active promoters and even producers.[102] Targeting requires extra effort by advertisers to understand how to reach the right users.[3] Companies can use humor (such asshitposting) to poke fun at competitors.[103] Advertising can even inspirefanart which can engage new audiences.[104][105]Hashtags (such as #ejuice and #eliquid) are one way to target interested users.[106]
User content can triggerpeer effects, increasing consumer interest even without influencer involvement. A 2012 study focused on this communication reported that communication among peers can affect purchase intentions: direct impact through encouragingconformity, and an indirect impact by increasing product engagement. This study claimed that peer communication about a product increased product engagement.[107]
Dounoucos et al. reported thatTwitter use by candidates was unprecedented during theUS 2016 election.[110][111] The public increased its reliance on social-media sites for political information.[110] In theEuropean Union, social media amplified political messages.[112] Foreign-originated social-media campaigns attempt to influence political opinion in another country.[113][114]
Social media was influential in theArab Spring in 2011.[115][116][117][118] However, debate persists about the extent to which social media facilitated this.[119] Activists have used social media to report the abuse ofhuman rights in Bahrain. They publicized the brutality of government authorities, who they claimed weredetaining,torturing and threatening individuals. Conversely, Bahrain's government used social media to track and target activists. The government stripped citizenship from over 1,000 activists as punishment.[120]
Militant groups use social media as an organizing and recruiting tool.[121]Islamic State (also known as ISIS) used social media. In 2014, #AllEyesonISIS went viral on ArabicX.[122][123]
State-sponsored Internet propaganda isInternet manipulation andpropaganda that is sponsored by astate. States have used the Internet, particularly social media to influence elections, sow distrust in institutions, spread rumors, spreaddisinformation, typically usingbots to create and spread contact. Propaganda is used internally to control populations, and externally to influence other societies.
Social media use in hiring refers to the examination by employers ofjob applicants' (public) social media profiles as part of thehiring assessment. For example, the vast majority ofFortune 500 companies use social media as a tool to screen prospective employees and as a tool for talent acquisition.[124]
This practice raises ethical questions. Employers and recruiters note that they have access only to information that applicants choose to make public. Many Western-European countries restrict employer's use of social media in the workplace. States including Arkansas, California, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin protect applicants and employees from surrendering usernames and passwords for social media accounts.[citation needed] Use of social media has caused significant problems for some applicants who are active on social media. A 2013 survey of 17,000 young people in six countries found that one in ten people aged 16 to 34 claimed to have been rejected for a job because of social media activity.[125][126]
Social media services have been reported to affectdeception in resumes. While these services do not affect deception frequency, it does increase deception about interests and hobbies.[citation needed]
Scientists use social media to share their scientific knowledge and research on platforms such asResearchGate,LinkedIn,Facebook,X, andAcademia.edu.[127] The most common platforms are X and blogs. The use of social media reportedly has improved the interaction between scientists, reporters, and the general public.[citation needed] Over 495,000 opinions were shared on X related to science between September 1, 2010, and August 31, 2011.[128] Science related blogs respond to and motivate public interest in learning, following, and discussing science. Posts can be written quickly and allow the reader to interact in real time with authors.[129] One study in the context of climate change reported that climate scientists and scientific institutions played a minimal role inonline debate, exceeded bynongovernmental organizations.[130]
Academicians use social media activity to assessacademic publications,[131] to measure public sentiment,[132] identify influencer accounts,[133] or crowdsource ideas or solutions.[134] Social media such as Facebook, X are also combined to predict elections via sentiment analysis.[135] Additional social media (e.g. YouTube,Google Trends) can be combined to reach a wider segment of the voting population, minimise media-specific bias, and inexpensively estimate electoral predictions which are on average half of a percentage point off the real vote share.[136]
In some places, students have been forced to surrender their social media passwords to school administrators.[137] Few laws protect student's social media privacy. Organizations such as theACLU call for more privacy protection. They urge students who are pressured to give up their account information to resist.[138]
Colleges and universities may access applicants' internet services including social media profiles as part of their admissions process. According toKaplan, Inc, a corporation that provides higher education preparation, in 2012 27% of admissions officers usedGoogle to learn more about an applicant, with 26% checkingFacebook.[139] Students whose social media pages include questionable material may be disqualified from admission processes.
"One survey in July 2017, by the American Association of College Registrars and Admissions Officers, reported that 11 percent of respondents said they had refused to admit an applicant based on social media content. This includes 8 percent of public institutions, where the First Amendment applies. The survey reported that 30 percent of institutions acknowledged reviewing the personal social media accounts of applicants at least some of the time."[140]
Social media comments and images have been used in court cases including employment law, child custody/child support, and disability claims. After anApple employee criticized his employer onFacebook, he was fired. When the former employee sued Apple for unfair dismissal, the court, after examining the employee's Facebook posts, reported in favor of Apple, stating that the posts breached Apple's policies.[141] After a couple broke up, the man posted song lyrics "that talked about fantasies of killing the rapper's ex-wife" and made threats. A court reported him guilty.[141][clarification needed] In a disability claims case, a woman who fell at work claimed that she was permanently injured; the employer used her social media posts to counter her claims.[141][additional citation(s) needed]
Courts do not always admit social media evidence, in part, because screenshots can be faked or tampered with.[142] Judges may consideremojis into account to assess statements made on social media; in one Michigan case where a person alleged that another person had defamed them in an online comment, the judge disagreed, noting that an emoji after the comment that indicated that it was a joke.[142] In a 2014 case in Ontario against a police officer regarding alleged assault of a protester during the G20 summit, the court rejected the Crown's application to use a digital photo of the protest that was anonymously posted online, because it included nometadata verifying its provenance.[142][additional citation(s) needed]
On April 9, 2024, theSpirit Lake Tribe in North Dakota andMenominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin have sued social media companies (Meta Platforms-Facebook, Instagram; Snapchat,TikTok, YouTube, and Google) companies accused of 'deliberate misconduct'. Their lawsuit describes "a sophisticated and intentional effort that has caused a continuing, substantial, and longterm burden to the Tribe and its members," leaving scarce resources for education, cultural preservation and other social programs.[143] These social media lawsuits are one of several legal actions brought against social media giants. Independently, 33 state attorneys general, including South Dakota's, sued the same defendants for targeting teens with allegedly poor content, they allege. The defendants have said they are launching new safety tools and features to protect younger users.[144][additional citation(s) needed] Currently, eight US states (Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ohio, and Tennessee) have enacted legislation that either bans minors from obtaining social media accounts outright and/or requires minors of certain ages to obtain parental consent in order to open accounts.[145]
Social media as a news source is defined as the use of online social media platforms such asInstagram,TikTok, andFacebook rather than the use oftraditional media platforms like the newspaper or live TV to obtain news. Television had just begun to turn a nation of people who oncelistened to media content intowatchers of media content between the 1950s and the 1980s when the popularity of social media had also began creating a nation of mediacontent creators. Almost half of Americans use social media as a news source, according to the Pew Research Center.[146] As social media's role in news consumption grows, questions have emerged about its impact on knowledge, the formation of echo chambers, and the effectiveness of fact-checking efforts in combating misinformation.
Social media platforms allowuser-generated content[147][148] and sharing content within one's own virtual network.[149][147] Using social media as a news source allows users to engage with news in a variety of ways including:
Using social media as a news source has become an increasingly more popular way for people of all age groups to obtain current and important information. Just like many other new forms of technology there are going to be pros and cons. There are ways that social media positively affects the world of news and journalism but it is important to acknowledge that there are also ways in which social media has a negative effect on the news. With this accessibility, people now have more ways to consume false news, biased news, and even disturbing content.
In 2019, thePew Research Center created a poll that reported Americans are wary about the ways that social media sites share news and certain content.[150] This wariness of accuracy grew as awareness that social media sites could be exploited by bad actors who concoct false narratives and fake news.[151]
Social media are used to socialize with friends and family[152] pursue romance and flirt,[152] but not all social needs can be fulfilled by social media.[153] For example, a 2003 article reported that lonely individuals are more likely to use the Internet for emotional support than others.[154] A 2018 survey from Common Sense Media reported that 40% of American teens ages 13–17 thought that social media was "extremely" or "very" important for them to connect with their friends.[155] The same survey reported that 33% of teens said social media was extremely or very important to conduct meaningful conversations with close friends, and 23% of teens said social media was extremely or very important to document and share their lives.[155] A 2020 Gallup poll reported that 53% of adult social media users in the United States thought that social media was a very or moderately important way to keep in touch with people during theCOVID-19 pandemic.[156]
InAlone TogetherSherry Turkle considered how people confuse social media usage with authentic communication.[157] She claimed that people act differently online and are less concerned about hurting others' feelings. Some online encounters can cause stress and anxiety, due to the difficulty purging online posts, fear of getting hacked, or of universities and employers exploring social media pages. Turkle speculated that many people prefer texting to face-to-face communication, which can contribute to loneliness.[157] Surveys from 2019 reported evidence among teens in the United States[155] and Mexico.[158] Some researchers reported that exchanges that involved direct communication and reciprocal messages correlated with less loneliness.[159]
In social media "stalking" or "creeping" refers to looking at someone's "timeline, status updates,tweets, and online bios" to find information about them and their activities.[160] A sub-category of creeping is creeping ex-partners after a breakup.[161]
Catfishing (creating a false identity) allows bad actors to exploit the lonely.[162]
Self-presentation theory proposes that people consciously manage theirself-image or identity related information in social contexts.[163] One aspect of social media is the time invested in customizing a personal profile.[164] Some users segment their audiences based on the image they want to present, and the use of multiple pseudonymous accounts on the same platform offers that opportunity.[165]
A 2016 study reported that teenage girls manipulate their self-presentation on social media to appear beautiful as viewed by their peers.[166] Teenage girls attempt to earn regard and acceptance (likes, comments, and shares). When this does not go well, self-confidence and self-satisfaction can decline.[166] A 2018 survey of American teens ages 13–17 by Common Sense Media reported that 45% said likes are at least somewhat important, and 26% at least somewhat agreed that they feel bad about themselves if nobody responds to their photos.[155] Some evidence suggests that perceived rejection may lead to emotional pain,[167] and could lead some[ambiguous] to resort to online bullying.[168] According to a 2016 study, users' reward circuits in their brains are more active when their photos are liked by more peers.[169]
A 2016 review concluded that social media can trigger a negative feedback loop of viewing and uploading photos, self-comparison, disappointment, and disordered body perception when social success is not achieved.[170] A 2016 study reported that Pinterest is directly associated with disordered dieting behavior.[171]
People portray themselves on social media in the most appealing way;[166] however, upon seeing one person's curated persona, other people may question why their own lives are not as exciting or fulfilling. A 2017 study reported that problematic social media use (i.e., feeling addicted to social media) was related to lower life satisfaction and self-esteem.[172] Studies have reported that social media comparisons can have dire effects on physical and mental health.[173][174] In one study, women reported that social media was the most influential source of their body image satisfaction; while men reported them as the second biggest factor.[citation needed] Another study in 2021 reported that 87% of women and 65% of men compared themselves to others on social media.[175]
While monitoring the lives of celebrities long predates social media, the ease and immediacy of direct comparisons of pictures and stories with one's own may increase their impact.[citation needed]
Efforts to combat such negative effects focused promotingbody positivity. In a related study, women aged 18–30 were reported posts that contained side-by-side images of women in the same clothes and setting, but one image was enhanced for Instagram, while the other was an unedited, "realistic" version. Women who participated in this experiment reported a decrease in body dissatisfaction.[176]
Social media can offer a support system for adolescent health, because it allows them to mobilize around health issues that they deem relevant.[177] For example, in a clinical study among adolescent patients undergoingobesity treatment, participants' claimed that social media allowed them to access personalizedweight-loss content as well as social support among other adolescents with obesity.[178][179]
While social media can provide health information, it typically has no mechanism for ensuring the quality of that information.[179] TheNational Eating Disorders Association reported a high correlation between weight loss content and disorderly eating among women who have been influenced by inaccurate content.[179][180]Health literacy offers skills to allow users to spot/avoid such content. Efforts by governments and public health organizations to advance health literacy reportedly achieved limited success.[181] The role of parents and caregivers who proactively approach their children with ongoing guidance and open discussions on the benefits and difficulties they may encounter online, demonstrate some reductions in overall anxiety and depression among adolescents.[182]
Social media such aspro-anorexia sites reportedly increase risk of harm by reinforcing damaging health-related behaviors through social media, especially among adolescents.[183][184][185]
During the coronavirus pandemic, inaccurate information from all sides spread widely via social media.[186] Topics subject to distortion included treatments, avoiding infection, vaccination, and public policy. Simultaneously, governments and others influenced social media platforms to suppress both accurate and inaccurate information in support of public policy.[187] Heavier social media use was reportedly associated with more acceptance of conspiracy theories, leading to worse mental health[188] and less compliance with public health recommendations.[189]
Social media platforms can serve as a breeding ground for addiction-related behaviors, with studies report that excessive use can lead to addiction-like symptoms. These symptoms include compulsive checking, mood modification, and withdrawal when not using social media, which can result in decreased face-to-face social interactions and contribute to the deterioration of interpersonal relationships and a sense of loneliness.[190]
Cyberbullying (cyberharassment or online bullying/harassment) is a form ofbullying orharassment usingelectronic means. Since the 2000s, it has become increasingly common, especially among teenagers andadolescents, due to young people's increased use of social media.[191] Related issues include online/internet harassment andtrolling. In 2015, according to cyberbullying statistics from the i-Safe Foundation, over half of adolescents and teens had been bullied online, and about the same number had engaged in cyberbullying.[192] Both the bully and the victim are negatively affected, and the intensity, duration, and frequency of bullying are three aspects that increase the negative effects on both of them.[193]
A 2017 study reported on a link between sleep disturbance and the use of social media. It concluded that blue light from computer/phone displays—and the frequency rather than the duration of time spent, predicted disturbed sleep, termed "obsessive 'checking'".[194] The association between social media use and sleep disturbance has clinical ramifications for young adults.[195] A recent study reported that people in the highest quartile for weekly social media use experienced the most sleep disturbance. The median number of minutes of social media use per day was 61. Females were more likely to experience high levels of sleep disturbance.[196] Many teenagers suffer from sleep deprivation from long hours at night on their phones, and this left them tired and unfocused in school.[197] A 2011 study reported that time spent on Facebook was negatively associated withGPA, but the association with sleep disturbance was not established.[198]
One studied effect of social media is 'Facebook depression', which affects adolescents who spend too much time on social media.[8] This may lead to reclusiveness, which can increase loneliness and low self-esteem.[8] Social media curates content to encourage users to keep scrolling.[195] Studies report children's self-esteem is positively affected by positive comments and negatively affected by negative or lack of comments. This affected self-perception.[199] A 2017 study of almost 6,000 adolescent students reported that those who self-reported addiction-like symptoms of social media use were more likely to report low self-esteem and high levels of depressive symptoms.[200]
A second emotional effect is social media burnout, defined as ambivalence, emotional exhaustion, anddepersonalization. Ambivalence is confusion about the benefits from using social media. Emotional exhaustion is stress from using social media. Depersonalization is emotional detachment from social media. The three burnout factors negatively influence the likelihood of continuing on social media.[201]
A third emotional effect is "fear of missing out" (FOMO), which is the "pervasive apprehension that others might be having rewarding experiences from which one is absent."[202] It is associated with increased scrutiny of friends on social media.[202]
Social media can also offer support asTwitter has done for the medical community.[203] X facilitated academic discussion among health professionals and students, while providing a supportive community for these individuals by and allowing members to support each other through likes, comments, and posts.[204] Access to social media offered a way to keep older adults connected, after the deaths of partners and geographical distance between friends and loved ones.[205] In March 2025, a Pakistani man killed aWhatsApp group admin in anger after being removed from the chat.[206]
Since the rise of social media, there have been numerous cases of individuals being influenced towards committing suicide orself-harm through their use of social media, and even of individuals arranging to broadcast suicide attempts, some successful, on social media. Researchers have studiedsocial media and suicide to determine what, if any, risks social media poses in terms of suicide, and to identify methods of mitigating such risks, if they exist. The search for a correlation has not yet uncovered a clear answer.
Media criticSiva Vaidhyanathan refers to social media as 'anti-social media' in reference to its negative impacts including on loneliness and political polarization.[207]Audrey Tang also uses the term antisocial in reference to its impact on democracy.[208]
Thedigital divide is unequal access to and effective use ofdigital technology, encompassing four interrelated dimensions: motivational, material, skills, and usage access.[209]
The digital divide worsens inequality inaccess to information and resources. In theInformation Age, people without access to theInternet and other technology are at a disadvantage, for they are less able toconnect with others, find and apply for jobs, shop, and learn.[210][211][212][213]
People living in poverty, ininsecure housing or who arehomeless, elderly people, and thoseliving in rural communities may have limited access to the Internet; in contrast, urbanmiddle class people have easy access to the Internet. Another divide is between producers and consumers of Internet content,[214][215] which could be a result of educational disparities.[216] While social media use varies across age groups, a US 2010 study reported no racial divide.[217]
Many critics point to studies showing social media algorithms elevate more partisan and inflammatory content.[218][219] Because ofrecommendation algorithms that filter and display news content that matches users' political preferences, one potential impact is an increase inpolitical polarization due toselective exposure. Political polarization is the divergence of political attitudes towardsideological extremes. Selective exposure occurs when an individual favors information that supports their beliefs and avoids information that conflicts with them.[220]Jonathan Haidt compared the impact of social media to theTower of Babel and the chaos it unleashed as a result.[221][222][13]
Aviv Ovadya argues that these algorithms incentivize the creation of divisive content in addition to promoting existing divisive content,[223] but could be designed to reduce polarization instead.[224] In 2017, Facebook gave its new emoji reactions five times the weight in its algorithms as its like button, which data scientists at the company in 2019 confirmed had disproportionately boosted toxicity, misinformation and low-quality news.[225] Some popular ideas for how to combat selective exposure have had no or opposite impacts.[226][227][223] Some advocate formedia literacy as a solution.[228] Others argue that less social media,[220] or morelocal journalism[229][230][231] could help address political polarization.
A 2018 study reported that social media increases the power of stereotypes.[232] Stereotypes can have both negative and positive connotations. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, youth were accused of responsibility for spreading the disease.[233] Elderly people get stereotyped as lacking knowledge of proper behavior on social media.[234] Social media platforms usually amplify these stereotypes by reinforcing age-based biases through certain algorithms as well as user-generated content. Unfortunately, these stereotypes contribute to social divide and negatively impact the way users interact online.[235]
Social media has affected the way youth communicate, by introducing new forms of language.[237] Novel acronyms save time, as illustrated by "LOL", which is the ubiquitous shortcut for "laugh out loud".
Thehashtag was created to simplify searching for information and to allow users to highlight topics of interest in the hope of attracting the attention of others. Hashtags can be used to advocate for a movement, mark content for future use, and allow other users to contribute to a discussion.[238]
For some young people, social media and texting have largely replaced in person communications, made worse by pandemic isolation, delaying the development of conversation and other social skills.[239]
What is socially acceptable is now heavily based on social media.[240] TheAmerican Academy of Pediatrics reported that bullying, the making of non-inclusive friend groups, and sexual experimentation have increased cyberbullying, privacy issues, and sending sexual images or messages.Sexting andrevenge porn became rampant, particularly among minors, with legal implications and resulting trauma risk.[241][242][243][244] However, adolescents can learn basic social and technical skills online.[245] Social media, can strengthen relationships just by keeping in touch, making more friends, and engaging in community activities.[8]
In July 2014, in response toWikiLeaks' release of a secret suppression order made by theVictorian Supreme Court, media lawyers were quoted in theAustralian media to the effect that "anyone who tweets a link to the WikiLeaks report, posts it on Facebook, or shares it in any way online could also face charges".[246]
In November 2024, the federal government passed theOnline Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024 introduced by theAlbanese government, banning people under the age of 16 from using most social media platforms, which would come into effect in December 2025.[247] Presented by Minister for CommunicationsMichelle Rowland, the bill was created as an attempt at reducing social media harms for young people and responding to the concerns of parents.[248] The stated penalty for breach of the new laws on the part of social media platforms was a financial penalty ofAU$49.5million.[248][247] The ban would apply to many major social media platforms, includingTikTok,Instagram,Snapchat andTwitter, but would exempt platforms deemed to meet educational or health needs of people under 16, includingYouTube andGoogle Classroom.[248] Supporters of the ban included the advocacy group 36 Months[249] and media corporationNews Corp Australia which ran a campaign titledLet Them Be Kids,[247] whilst opposers expressed concern that the ban could cause isolation amongst teenagers belonging to marginalised groups such as theLGBTQ, community or migrant, andculturally diverse backgrounds,[250] and that the ban could stifle creativity and freedom of expression amongst young people.[251]
On 27 July 2020, in Egypt, two women were sentenced to two years of imprisonment for postingTikTok videos, which the government claimed as "violating family values".[252]
In the2014 Thai coup d'état, the public was explicitly instructed not to 'share' or 'like' dissenting views on social media or face prison.[citation needed]
Historically, platforms were responsible for moderating the content that they presented. They set rules for what was allowable, decided which content to promote and which to ignore. The US enacted theCommunications Decency Act in 1996.Section 230 of that act exempted internet platforms from legal liability for content authored by third parties.
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." (47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1)).
— US Congress, Communications Decency Act Section 230
In 2024, legislation was enacted inFlorida requiring social media companies to verify the age of people with accounts, and to prohibit holding an account for people aged under 14, and between 14 and 16 in the absence of parental approval.[253][254]
TheEuropean Union initially took a similar approach.[255] However, in 2020, theEuropean Commission presented two legislative proposals: TheDigital Services Act (DSA) and theDigital Markets Act (DMA). Both proposals were enacted in July 2022. The DSA entered into force on 17 February 2024, the DMA in March 2024.[256] This legislation can be summarized in the following four objectives, articulated byMEPs:
"What is illegal offline must also be illegal online".[255]
"Very large online platforms" must therefore, among other things
delete illegal content (propaganda, election interference, hate crimes and online harms such as harassment and child abuse) and better protect fundamental rights
redesign their systems to ensure a "high level of privacy, security and protection of minors", by prohibiting advertising based on personal data, designing recommender systems to minimize risks for children and demonstrating this to theEuropean Commission via a risk assessment, and
not use sensitive personal data such as race, gender and religion to target advertising.[257]
Violators could face a complete ban in Europe or fines of up to 6% of global sales. Such content moderation requires extensive investment by platform providers.[258] Enforcement resources may not be sufficient to ensure compliance.[259]
The DSA allows a country to require information to be deleted that is illegal only in that jurisdiction. According to Patrick Breyer from theGerman Pirate Party, a problem could arise from the Hungarian government requesting a video to be deleted that is critical of Victor Orban, as he foresaw the potential for such determinations to be applied EU-wide.[260]
2018 Nobel LaureatePaul Romer[261] advocated taxing negative externalities of social media platforms.[258] Similar to a carbon tax – negative social effects could be compensated for by a financial levy on the platforms.[262] Assuming that the tax did not deter the actions that produced the externalities, the revenue raised could be used to address them. However, consensus has yet to emerge on how to measure or mitigate the harms, nor to craft a tax, .
Another proposal is to invokecompetition law.[263] The idea is to restrict the platforms' market power by controlling mergersex ante and tightening the law. This would be achieved through a supranational enforcement mechanism and the deterrent effect of high fines.
In a 2024 opinion piece, Megan Moreno and Jenny Radesky, professors of pediatrics, wrote about the need for "nuanced" policy.[264] They regarded access which is contingent upon parental consent as harmful. They commented that a focus on increasing age restrictions "may serve to distract from making sure platforms are following guidelines and best practices for all ages".[265]
In June 2024, US Surgeon GeneralVivek Murthy called for social media platforms to contain a warning about the impact they have on the mental health of young people.[266]
The business model of most social media platforms is based on selling slots to advertisers. Platforms provide access to data about each user, which allows them to deliver ads that are individually relevant to them. This strongly incents platforms to arrange their content so that users view as much content as possible, increasing the number of ads that they see. Platforms such as X add paid user subscriptions in part to reduce their dependence on advertising revenues.[267]
The enormous reach and impact of social media has naturally led to a stream of criticism, debate, and controversy. Criticisms include platform capabilities, content moderation and reliability,[268] impact on concentration, mental health,[269] content ownership, and the meaning of interactions, and poor cross-platforminteroperability,[270] decrease in face-to-face interactions,cyberbullying,sexual predation, particularly of children, andchild pornography.[271][272]
In 2007Andrew Keen wrote, "Out of this anarchy, it suddenly became clear that what was governing the infinite monkeys now inputting away on the Internet was the law of digital Darwinism, the survival of the loudest and most opinionated. Under these rules, the only way to intellectually prevail is by infinite filibustering."[273]
Social media has become a regular source of news and information. A 2021 Pew Research Center poll reported roughly 70% of users regularly get news from social media,[4] despite the presence offake news and misinformation. Platforms typically do not take responsibility for content accuracy, and many do not vet content at all, although in some cases, content the platform finds problematic is deleted or access to it is reduced.[274][275][276] Content distribution algorithms otherwise typically ignore substance, responding instead to the contents' virality.
In 2018, researchers reported that fake news spread almost 70% faster than truthful news on X.[7] Social media bots on social media increase the reach of both true and false content and if wielded by bad actors misinformation can reach many more users.[10] Some platforms attempt to discover and block bots, with limited success.[11] Fake news seems to receive more user engagement, possibly because it is relatively novel, engaging users' curiosity and increasing spread.[30] Fake news often propagates in the immediate aftermath of an event, before conventional media are prepared to publish.[25][21]
Social media mining is the process of obtaining data fromuser-generated content on social media in order to extract actionable patterns, form conclusions about users, and act upon the information. Mining supports targeting advertising to users or academic research. The term is an analogy to the process ofmining for minerals. Mining companies sift through raw ore to find the valuable minerals; likewise, social media mining sifts through social media data in order to discern patterns and trends about matters such as social media usage, online behaviour, content sharing, connections between individuals, buying behaviour. These patterns and trends are of interest to companies, governments and not-for-profit organizations, as such organizations can use the analyses for tasks such as design strategies, introduce programs, products, processes or services.
Users may not understand how platforms use their data.[280] Users tend to click throughTerms of Use agreements without reading them, leading to ethical questions about whether platforms adequately protect users' privacy.
During the2016 United States presidential election, Facebook allowedCambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm linked to theTrump campaign, to analyze the data of an estimated 87 million Facebook users to profile voters, creating controversy when this was revealed.[281]
Canadian journalistMalcolm Gladwell considers the role of social media in revolutions and protests to be overstated. He concluded that while social media makes it easier foractivists to express themselves, that expression likely has no impact beyond social media. What he called "high-risk activism" involves strong relationships, coordination, commitment, high risks, and sacrifice.[282] Gladwell claimed that social media are built around weak ties and argues that "social networks are effective at increasing participation—by lessening the level of motivation that participation requires."[282] According to him, "Facebook activism succeeds not by motivating people to make a real sacrifice, but by motivating them to do the things that people do when they are not motivated enough to make a real sacrifice."[282]
Disputing Gladwell's theory, a 2018 survey reported that people who are politically expressive on social media are more likely to participate in offline political activity.[283]
Social media content is generated by users. However, content ownership is defined by the Terms of Service to which users agree. Platforms control access to the content, and may make it available to third parties.[284]
Although platform's terms differ, generally they all give permission to utilize users' copyrighted works at the platform's discretion.[285]
After its acquisition by Facebook in 2012, Instagram revealed it intended to use content in ads without seeking permission from or paying its users.[286][287] It then reversed these changes, with then-CEOKevin Systrom promising to update the terms of service.[288][289]
Privacy rights advocates warn users about the collection of their personal data. Information is captured without the user's knowingconsent. Data may be applied to law enforcement or other governmental purposes.[290][284] Information may be offered for third party use.
Young people are prone to sharing personal information that can attract predators.[291]
While social media users claim to want to keep their data private, their behavior does not reflect that concern, as many users expose significant personal data on their profiles.
In addition, platforms collect data on user behaviors that are not part of their personal profiles. This data is made available to third parties for purposes that include targeted advertising.[292]
A 2014Pew Research Center survey reported that 91% of Americans "agree" or "strongly agree" that people have lost control over how personal information is collected and used. Some 80% of social media users said they were concerned about advertisers and businesses accessing the data they share on social media platforms, and 64% said the government should do more to regulate advertisers.[293] In 2019, UK legislators criticized Facebook for not protecting certain aspects of user data.[294]
In 2019 thePentagon issued guidance to the military, Coast Guard and other government agencies that identified "the potential risk associated with using the TikTok app and directs appropriate action for employees to take in order to safeguard their personal information."[295] As a result, the military, Coast Guard,Transportation Security Administration, andDepartment of Homeland Security banned the installation and use of TikTok on government devices.[296]
In 2020 The US government attempted to banTikTok andWeChat from the States over national security concerns. However, a federal court blocked the move.[297] In 2024, the US Congress passed a law directing TikTok's parent companyByteDance to divest the service or see the service banned from operating in the US. The company sued, challenging the constitutionality of the ban.[298] The ban was upheld as constitutional.[citation needed]
Internet addiction disorder (IAD) is characterized by excessive or poorly controlled preoccupations, urges, or behaviors regarding computer use and Internet access that lead to impairment or distress.[299] Young people are at particular risk of developing internet addiction disorder,[300] with case studies highlighting students whose academic performance declines as they spend more time online.[301] Some experience health consequences from loss of sleep[302] as they stay up to continuescrolling, chatting, and gaming.[303]
Excessive Internet use is not recognized as a disorder by theAmerican Psychiatric Association'sDSM-5 or theWorld Health Organization'sICD-11.[304] However,gaming disorder appears in the ICD-11.[305] Controversy around the diagnosis includes whether the disorder is a separate clinical entity, or a manifestation of underlying psychiatric disorders. Definitions are not standardized or agreed upon, complicating the development of evidence-based recommendations.
Many different theoretical models have been developed and employed for many years in order to better explain predisposing factors to this disorder. Models such as the cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet have been used to explain IAD for more than 20 years. Newer models, such as the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution model, have been developed more recently and are starting to be applied in more clinical studies.[306]
In 2011 the term "Facebook addiction disorder" (FAD) emerged.[307] FAD is characterized by compulsive use ofFacebook. A 2017 study investigated a correlation between excessive use andnarcissism, reporting "FAD was significantly positively related to the personality trait narcissism and to negative mental health variables (depression,anxiety, andstress symptoms)".[308][309]
In 2020, the documentaryThe Social Dilemma, reported concerns of mental health experts and former employees of social media companies over social media's pursuit of addictive use. For example, when a user has not visited Facebook for some time, the platform varies its notifications, attempting to lure them back. It also raises concerns about the correlation between social media use and child and teen suicidality.[310]
Additionally in 2020, studies have shown that there has been an increase in the prevalence of IAD since theCOVID-19 pandemic.[311] Studies highlighting the possible relationship between COVID-19 and IAD have looked at how forced isolation and its associated stress may have led to higher usage levels of the Internet.[311]
Turning off social media notifications may help reduce social media use.[312] For some users, changes in web browsing can be helpful in compensating for self-regulatory problems. For instance, a study involving 157 online learners onmassive open online courses examined the impact of such an intervention. The study reported that providing support in self-regulation was associated with a reduction in time spent online, particularly on entertainment.[313]
Research suggests that social media platforms trigger a cycle of compulsive behavior, which reinforces addictive patterns and makes it harder for individuals to break the cycle.[314]
Various lawsuits have been brought regarding social media addiction, such as the Multi-District Litigation alleging harms caused by social media addiction on young users.[315]
Whether to restrict the use of phones and social media among young people has been debated since smartphones became ubiquitous.[316] A study of Americans aged 12–15, reported that teenagers who used social media over three hours/day doubled their risk of negative mental health outcomes, including depression and anxiety.[317] Platforms have not tuned their algorithms to prevent young people from viewing inappropriate content. A 2023 study of Australian youth reported that 57% had seen disturbingly violent content, while nearly half had regular exposure to sexual images.[318] Further, youth are prone to misuse social media forcyberbullying.[319]
As result, phones have been banned from some schools, and some schools in the US have blocked social media websites.[320]
Intense discussions are taking place regarding the imposition of certain restrictions on children's access to social media. It is argued that using social media at a young age brings with it many problems. For example, according to a survey conducted byOfcom, the media regulator in the UK, 22% of children aged 8–17 lie about being over 18 on social media. According to a system implemented in Norway, more than half of nine-year-olds and the vast majority of 12-year-olds spend time on social media. A series of measures have begun to be taken across Europe to prevent the risks caused by such problems. The countries that have taken concrete steps in this regard are Norway and France. Since June 2023, France has started requiring social media platforms to verify the ages of their users and to obtain parental consent for those under the age of 15. In Norway, there is a minimum age requirement of 13 to access social media. The Online Safety Law in the UK has given social media platforms until mid-2025 to strengthen theirage verification systems.[321]
Social media often features in political struggles. In some countries,Internet police orsecret police monitor or control citizens' use of social media. For example, in 2013 some social media was banned inTurkey after the TaksimGezi Park protests. Both X and YouTube were temporarily suspended in the country by a court's decision. A law granted immunity to Telecommunications Directorate (TİB) personnel. The TİB was also given the authority to block access to specific websites without a court order.[322] Yet TİB's 2014 blocking ofX was ruled by the constitutional court to violate free speech.[323]
Internet censorship iscensorship, which is the suppression ofspeech, public communication, and otherinformation, that is suppressed information in what accessed, published, or viewed on theInternet.
Free speech protections allow little government-mandated Internet content restrictions. However, the Internet is highly regulated, supported by a complex set of legally binding and privately mediated mechanisms.[324]
Gambling,cyber security, and the dangers to children who frequent social media are important ongoing debates. Significant public resistance to proposed content restriction policies has prevented measures used in some other countries from taking hold in the US.[324]
Many government-mandated attempts to regulate content have been barred, often after lengthy legal battles.[325] However, the government has exerted pressure indirectly. With the exception ofchild pornography, content restrictions tend to rely on platforms to remove/suppress content, following state encouragement or the threat of legal action.[326][324]
While the dominant social media platforms are not interoperable, open source protocols such asActivityPub have been adopted by platforms such asMastodon,GNU social,Diaspora, andFriendica. They operate as a loose federation of mostly volunteer-operated servers, called theFediverse.
In December 2019,X CEOJack Dorsey advocated an "open and decentralized standard for social media". He joinedBluesky to bring it to reality.[332]
Deplatforming, also known as no-platforming, is aboycott on an individual or group by removing the platforms used to share their information or ideas.[333] The term is commonly associated with social media.
A number of commentators and experts have argued that social media companies have incentives that to maximize user engagement withsensational, emotive and controversial material that discourages a healthy discourse that democracies depend on.[334] Zack Beauchamp ofVox Media calls it an authoritarian medium because of how it is incentivized to stir up hate and division that benefits aspiring autocrats.[335]The Economist describes social media as vulnerable to manipulation by autocrats.[336] Informed dialogue, a shared sense of reality, mutual consent and participation can all suffer due to the business model of social media.[337]Political polarization can be one byproduct.[338][339][340] This can have implications for the likelihood ofpolitical violence.[341][220]Siva Vaidhyanathan argues for a range of solutions including privacy protections and enforcing anti-trust laws.[207]Andrew Leonard describesPol.is as one possible solution to the divisiveness of traditional discourse on social media that has damaged democracies, citing the use of its algorithm to instead prioritize finding consensus.[342][343]
According toLikeWar: The Weaponization of Social Media,[344] the use of effective social media marketing techniques includes not only celebrities, corporations, and governments, but also extremist groups.[345] The use of social media byISIS andAl-Qaeda has been used to influence public opinion where it operates and gain the attention of sympathizers. Social media platforms and encrypted-messaging applications have been used to recruit members, both locally and internationally.[346] Platforms have endured backlash forallowing this content. Extreme nationalist groups, and more prominently, USright-wing extremists have used similar online tactics. As many traditional social media platforms bannedhate speech, several platforms became popular among right-wing extremists to carry out planning and communication including of events; these application became known as "Alt-tech". Platforms such asTelegram,Parler, andGab were used during theJanuary 6 United States Capitol attack, to coordinate attacks.[347] Members shared tips on how to avoid law enforcement and their plans on carrying out their objectives; some users called for killing law enforcement officers and politicians.[348]
Social media content persists unless the user deletes it. After a user dies, unless the platform is notified, their content remains.[349] Each platform has created guidelines for this situation.[350] In most cases on social media, the platforms require a next-of-kin to prove that the user is deceased, and give them the option of closing the account or maintaining it in a 'legacy' status.
Guidelines for users who have died, by platform[350]
The company works with an immediate family member to deactivate the account. Additionally, X will not give the account to any other person, regardless of the relationship.
Facebook
Users have the option of having their account permanently deleted after death. Users can identify a 'legacy contact' who would take over the account after.
A family member can request that the account be deleted. The family member must identify the account, submit proof of relationship, the user's email address, date of death, a link to the obituary, and the name of the last company the deceased worked for.
Pinterest
Must email the company with the URL of the account along with a death certificate or a link to the obituary, as well as proof of relationship to the deceased.
A representative can close the account, transfer payments from the account to an immediate family member and legal representative of the user's estate, and can provide the data in the account to a family member. All three capabilities require the requestor's government-issued ID or driver's license, the decedent's death certificate, and additional supporting documentation.
^abcdefghijkObar, Jonathan A.; Wildman, Steve (2015). "Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue".Telecommunications Policy.39 (9):745–750.doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.014.SSRN2647377.
^abcdefKaplan, Andreas M.; Haenlein, Michael (January 2010). "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media".Business Horizons.53 (1):59–68.doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003. pp. 64–65:Social Media is a very active and fast-moving domain. What may be up-to-date today could have disappeared from the virtual landscape tomorrow. It is therefore crucial for firms to have a set of guidelines that can be applied to any form of Social Media [...].
^abFuchs, Christian (2017).Social media: a critical introduction (2nd ed.). Los Angeles London New Delhi Singapore Washington DC Melbourne: SAGE.ISBN978-1-4739-6683-3.
^abcdeO'Keeffe, Gwenn Schurgin; Clarke-Pearson, Kathleen; Council on Communications and, Media (April 2011). "The Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents, and Families".Pediatrics.127 (4):800–804.doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0054.PMID21444588.
^Agichtein, Eugene; Castillo, Carlos; Donato, Debora; Gionis, Aristides; Mishne, Gilad (2008)."Finding high-quality content in social media"(PDF).WISDOM – Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining:183–193. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 23 May 2023. Retrieved8 January 2019.
^abTao, Xiaohui; Huang, Wei; Mu, Xiangming; Xie, Haoran (18 November 2016). "Special issue on knowledge management of web social media".Web Intelligence.14 (4):273–274.doi:10.3233/WEB-160343.
^Usher, Nikki (22 June 2021)."From Media Capture to Platform Capture". In Schiffrin, Anya (ed.).Media Capture: How Money, Digital Platforms, and Governments Control the News. Columbia University Press. p. 155-.ISBN978-0-231-54802-1. Retrieved23 October 2025.
^Zaid, Bouziane; Ibahrine, Mohammed; Ben Moussa, Mohamed; Makki, Alaa (9 August 2025). "Shifting Power Dynamics: Media Capture and Platform Dominance in Journalism".Digital Journalism.13 (7):1311–1330.doi:10.1080/21670811.2025.2532509.
^Aichner, Thomas; Jacob, Frank (March 2015). "Measuring the Degree of Corporate Social Media Use".International Journal of Market Research.57 (2):257–276.doi:10.2501/IJMR-2015-018.
^abKaplan, Andreas M. (March–April 2012). "If you love something, let it go mobile: Mobile marketing and mobile social media 4x4".Business Horizons.55 (2):129–139.doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.10.009.
^Ghosh, Rumi (June 2011). "Entropy-based Classification of 'Retweeting' Activity on Twitter".arXiv:1106.0346 [cs.SI].
^Martinez Rodrigo, Salto; Jacques-García, Fausto Abraham (2012). "Development and Implementation of a Chat Bot in a Social Network".2012 Ninth International Conference on Information Technology - New Generations. pp. 751–755.doi:10.1109/ITNG.2012.147.ISBN978-1-4673-0798-7.
^Castronovo, Cristina; Huang, Lei (2012). "Social Media in Alternative Marketing Communication Model".Journal of Marketing Development & Competitivness.6:117–136.
^abcChu, Z.; Gianvecchio, S.; Wang, H.; Jajodia, S. (2012). "Detecting automation of Twitter accounts: Are you a human, bot, or cyborg?".IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.9 (6):811–824.Bibcode:2012ITDSC...9..811C.doi:10.1109/tdsc.2012.75.
^Correa, Teresa; Hinsley, Amber Willard; de Zúñiga, Homero Gil (March 2010). "Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use".Computers in Human Behavior.26 (2):247–253.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003.
^Vogel, Erin A.; Rose, Jason P.; Okdie, Bradley M.; Eckles, Katheryn; Franz, Brittany (2015). "Who compares and despairs? The effect of social comparison orientation on social media use and its outcomes".Personality and Individual Differences.86:249–56.doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.026.
^abPatel, Faiza; Levinson-Waldman, Rachel; Koreh, Raya; DenUyl, Sophia (11 March 2020).Social Media Monitoring (Report). Brennan Center for Justice. pp. 255–57. Retrieved29 August 2022.
^Lugmayr, Artur (2013). "Predicting the Future of Investor Sentiment with Social Media in Stock Exchange Investments: A Basic Framework for the DAX Performance Index".Handbook of Social Media Management. pp. 565–589.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28897-5_33.ISBN978-3-642-28896-8.
^Rutledge, Pamela."Research Survey". The Media Psychology Blog. Archived fromthe original on 4 May 2012. Retrieved24 April 2012.One of the tenets of social media is that you can't control your message, you can only participate in the conversation.
^Meske, Christian; Stieglitz, Stefan (15 January 2014). "Reflektion der wissenschaftlichen Nutzenbetrachtung von Social Software / Reflecting the Scientific Discussion of Benefits Induced by Social Software".I-com.13 (3).doi:10.1515/icom.2014.0015.
^Stephen, Andrew T.; Galak, Jeff (October 2012). "The Effects of Traditional and Social Earned Media on Sales: A Study of a Microlending Marketplace".Journal of Marketing Research.49 (5):624–639.doi:10.1509/jmr.09.0401.
^Chu, Shu-Chuan (September 2011). "Viral Advertising in Social Media: Participation in Facebook Groups and Responses among College-Aged Users".Journal of Interactive Advertising.12 (1):30–43.doi:10.1080/15252019.2011.10722189.
^Nudd, Tim (15 December 2017)."10 Things We Learned About Wendy's Twitter From Its Reddit AMA". Archived fromthe original on 7 February 2025. Retrieved14 January 2026.Q - What's your take on the re-imagining of Wendy as a smug anime girl which spawned tons of fanart? A - Some of the art is cool, but some people obviously take it too far because the internet ruins everything lol.
^Wang, Xia; Yu, Chunling; Wei, Yujie (November 2012). "Social Media Peer Communication and Impacts on Purchase Intentions: A Consumer Socialization Framework".Journal of Interactive Marketing.26 (4):198–208.doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2011.11.004.
^Rainie, Lee;Wellman, Barry (27 April 2012). "The Internet Revolution".Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press (published 2012). p. 71.ISBN978-0-262-30040-7. Retrieved10 January 2021.[...] Witt soon became an active content creator with no intermediary needed. He started blogging in 2003 [...].
^Leyva, Rodolfo (August 2017). "Exploring UK Millennials' Social Media Consumption Patterns and Participation in Elections, Activism, and 'Slacktivism'".Social Science Computer Review.35 (4):462–479.doi:10.1177/0894439316655738.
^abDounoucos, Victoria A.; Hillygus, D. Sunshine; Carlson, Caroline (2019). "The Message and the Medium: An Experimental Evaluation of the Effects of Twitter Commentary on Campaign Messages".Journal of Information Technology and Politics.16 (1):66–76.doi:10.1080/19331681.2019.1572566.
^Richardson, Glenn W. Jr. (21 November 2016).Social Media and Politics: A New Way to Participate in the Political Process. Vol. 1. Praeger.
^Barisione, Mauro; Michailidou, Asimina (2017). "Do We Need to Rethink EU Politics in the Social Media Era? An Introduction to the Volume".Social Media and European Politics. pp. 1–23.doi:10.1057/978-1-137-59890-5_1.ISBN978-1-137-59889-9.
^Rainie & Wellman 2012, p. 207:Social media - Facebook, Twitter, and email - plus mobile phones played a major part in the 'Arab Spring' of protests and rebellions against authoritarian regimes in the Middle East and North Africa throughout 2011. The activity of networked individuals in Tunisia, Egypt, and other states was a prime example of how online content creation and community building, in tandem with offline gatherings and backstage maneuvering, can aid mass mobilizations.
^Guillory, Jamie; Hancock, Jeffrey T. (March 2012). "The Effect of Linkedin on Deception in Resumes".Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.15 (3):135–140.doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0389.PMID22335544.
^Liang, Xuan; Su, Leona Yi-Fan; Yeo, Sara K.; Scheufele, Dietram A.; Brossard, Dominique; Xenos, Michael; Nealey, Paul; Corley, Elizabeth A. (December 2014). "Building Buzz: (Scientists) Communicating Science in New Media Environments".Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly.91 (4):772–791.doi:10.1177/1077699014550092.
^Schäfer, Mike S. (November 2012). "Online communication on climate change and climate politics: a literature review".WIREs Climate Change.3 (6):527–543.Bibcode:2012WIRCC...3..527S.doi:10.1002/wcc.191.
^Howard, Conner; McIntire, Ryan; Anderson, J. Michael; Stewart, Carter; McIntosh, Haddon; Cornwell, James; Barron, Kim (18 September 2023). "The top sports medicine influencers on X (formerly Twitter)".Journal of Sports Sciences.42 (24):2261–2266.doi:10.1080/02640414.2023.2259723.PMID37722817.
^Mondal, Himel; Parvanov, Emil D.; Singla, Rajeev K.; Rayan, Rehab A.; Nawaz, Faisal A.; Ritschl, Valentin; Eibensteiner, Fabian; Siva Sai, Chandragiri; Cenanovic, Merisa; Devkota, Hari Prasad; Hribersek, Mojca; De, Ronita; Klager, Elisabeth; Kletecka-Pulker, Maria; Völkl-Kernstock, Sabine; Khalid, Garba M.; Lordan, Ronan; Găman, Mihnea-Alexandru; Shen, Bairong; Stamm, Tanja; Willschke, Harald; Atanasov, Atanas G. (16 September 2022)."Twitter-based crowdsourcing: What kind of measures can help to end the COVID-19 pandemic faster?".Frontiers in Medicine.9 961360.doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.961360.PMC9523003.PMID36186802.
^Chauhan, Priyavrat; Sharma, Nonita; Sikka, Geeta (February 2021). "The emergence of social media data and sentiment analysis in election prediction".Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.12 (2):2601–2627.doi:10.1007/s12652-020-02423-y.
^abObar, Jonathan A.; Wildman, Steve (2015). "Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue".Telecommunications Policy.39 (9):745–750.doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.014.SSRN2647377.
^Kaplan, Andreas M.; Haenlein, Michael (January 2010). "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media".Business Horizons.53 (1):59–68.doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
^Wang, Zheng; Tchernev, John M.; Solloway, Tyler (September 2012). "A dynamic longitudinal examination of social media use, needs, and gratifications among college students".Computers in Human Behavior.28 (5):1829–1839.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.001.
^Morahan-Martin, Janet; Schumacher, Phyllis (November 2003). "Loneliness and social uses of the Internet".Computers in Human Behavior.19 (6):659–671.doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00040-2.
^Burke, Moira; Kraut, Robert; Marlow, Cameron (2011). "Social capital on facebook: Differentiating uses and users".Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 571–580.doi:10.1145/1978942.1979023.ISBN978-1-4503-0228-9.
^van der Nagel, Emily (2 September 2017). "From usernames to profiles: the development of pseudonymity in Internet communication".Internet Histories.1 (4):312–331.doi:10.1080/24701475.2017.1389548.
^abcChua, Trudy Hui Hui; Chang, Leanne (February 2016). "Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls' engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media".Computers in Human Behavior.55:190–197.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.011.
^Chen, Gina Masullo (August 2015). "Losing Face on Social Media: Threats to Positive Face Lead to an Indirect Effect on Retaliatory Aggression Through Negative Affect".Communication Research.42 (6):819–838.doi:10.1177/0093650213510937.
^Kowalski, Robin M.; Limber, Susan P.; Agatston, Patricia W. (2012).Cyberbullying: Bullying in the Digital Age. Wiley-Blackwell.[ISBN missing][page needed]
^Holland, Grace; Tiggemann, Marika (June 2016). "A systematic review of the impact of the use of social networking sites on body image and disordered eating outcomes".Body Image.17:100–110.doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.02.008.PMID26995158.
^Hawi, Nazir S.; Samaha, Maya (October 2017). "The Relations Among Social Media Addiction, Self-Esteem, and Life Satisfaction in University Students".Social Science Computer Review.35 (5):576–586.doi:10.1177/0894439316660340.
^Stefanone, Michael A.; Lackaff, Derek; Rosen, Devan (January 2011). "Contingencies of Self-Worth and Social-Networking-Site Behavior".Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.14 (1–2):41–49.doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0049.hdl:2152/41152.PMID21329442.
^Holmberg, Christopher; Berg, Christina; Dahlgren, Jovanna; Lissner, Lauren; Chaplin, John Eric (December 2019). "Health literacy in a complex digital media landscape: Pediatric obesity patients' experiences with online weight, food, and health information".Health Informatics Journal.25 (4):1343–1357.doi:10.1177/1460458218759699.PMID29499615.
^Wilson, Jenny L.; Peebles, Rebecka; Hardy, Kristina K.; Litt, Iris F. (December 2006). "Surfing for Thinness: A Pilot Study of Pro–Eating Disorder Web Site Usage in Adolescents With Eating Disorders".Pediatrics.118 (6):e1635–e1643.doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1133.PMID17142493.
^Ransom, Danielle C.; La Guardia, Jennifer G.; Woody, Erik Z.; Boyd, Jennifer L. (March 2010). "Interpersonal interactions on online forums addressing eating concerns".International Journal of Eating Disorders.43 (2):161–170.doi:10.1002/eat.20629.PMID19308991.
^Junco, Reynol (January 2012). "Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance".Computers in Human Behavior.28 (1):187–198.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026.
^Han, Bo (2018). "Social Media Burnout: Definition, Measurement Instrument, and Why We Care".Journal of Computer Information Systems.58 (2):1–9.doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1208064.
^abPrzybylski, Andrew K.; Murayama, Kou; DeHaan, Cody R.; Gladwell, Valerie (July 2013). "Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out".Computers in Human Behavior.29 (4):1841–1848.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014.
^Fuller, Maren Y.; Allen, Timothy Craig (September 2016). "Let's Have a Tweetup: The Case for Using Twitter Professionally".Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.140 (9):956–957.doi:10.5858/arpa.2016-0172-SA.PMID27195434.
^Cotten, Shelia R.; Schuster, Amy M.; Seifert, Alexander (June 2022). "Social media use and well-being among older adults".Current Opinion in Psychology.45 101293.doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.005.PMID35065352.
^"New study shows just how Facebook's algorithm shapes conservative and liberal bubbles".NPR. 27 July 2023.Still, the research sheds light on how Facebook's algorithm works. The studies found liberals and conservatives live in their own political news bubbles more so than elsewhere online. They also show that changing the platform's algorithm substantially changes what people see and how they behave on the site — even if it didn't affect their beliefs during the three-month period researchers studied...'This is interesting, strong evidence that when it comes to politics, the algorithm is biased towards the extremes,' Edelson said. 'This is genuinely new.'
^abOvadya, Aviv (17 May 2022)."Bridging-Based Ranking".Belfer Center atHarvard University. pp. 3,10–13. Retrieved17 July 2024.Chronological feeds are just 'recency-biased ranking' systems with their own problems...'Choose your own ranking systems' are not quite good enough
^Ovadya, Aviv (17 May 2022)."Bridging-Based Ranking".Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University. pp. 21–23, 28. Retrieved17 July 2024.
^Klepper, David (27 July 2023)."Deep dive into Meta's algorithms shows that America's political polarization has no easy fix".AP News. Retrieved15 July 2024.When they replaced the algorithm with a simple chronological listing of posts from friends — an option Facebook recently made available to users — it had no measurable impact on polarization...Likewise, reducing the content that Facebook users get from accounts with the same ideological alignment had no significant effect on polarization, susceptibility to misinformation or extremist views.
^Mihailidis, Paul; Viotty, Samantha (April 2017). "Spreadable Spectacle in Digital Culture: Civic Expression, Fake News, and the Role of Media Literacies in 'Post-Fact' Society".American Behavioral Scientist.61 (4):441–454.doi:10.1177/0002764217701217.
^Paat, Yok-Fong; Markham, Christine (2 January 2021). "Digital crime, trauma, and abuse: Internet safety and cyber risks for adolescents and emerging adults in the 21 st century".Social Work in Mental Health.19 (1):18–40.doi:10.1080/15332985.2020.1845281.
^Moreno, Megan A.; Radesky, Jenny S. (September 2024). "Benefits and Harms of Proposed Social Media Legislation".JAMA Pediatrics.178 (9):857–858.doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.2380.PMID39037793.
^Flanagin, Andrew J.; Metzger, Miriam J. (April 2007). "The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information".New Media & Society.9 (2):319–342.doi:10.1177/1461444807075015.
^Paul, Jomon Aliyas; Baker, Hope M.; Cochran, Justin Daniel (November 2012). "Effect of online social networking on student academic performance".Computers in Human Behavior.28 (6):2117–2127.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.016.
^Greene-Colozzi, Emily A.; Winters, Georgia M.; Blasko, Brandy; Jeglic, Elizabeth L. (2 October 2020). "Experiences and Perceptions of Online Sexual Solicitation and Grooming of Minors: A Retrospective Report".Journal of Child Sexual Abuse.29 (7):836–854.doi:10.1080/10538712.2020.1801938.PMID33017275.
^Sumbaly, Roshan; Kreps, Jay; Shah, Sam (June 2013)."The big data ecosystem at LinkedIn". Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '13 (Report). SIGMOD '13: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. pp. 1125–1134.doi:10.1145/2463676.2463707.ISBN978-1-4503-2037-5.
^Kwak, Nojin; Lane, Daniel S; Weeks, Brian E; Kim, Dam Hee; Lee, Slgi S; Bachleda, Sarah (April 2018). "Perceptions of Social Media for Politics: Testing the Slacktivism Hypothesis".Human Communication Research.44 (2):197–221.doi:10.1093/hcr/hqx008.
^abJones, Harvey; Soltren, José Hiram (2005)."Facebook: Threats to Privacy"(PDF). MIT Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Lab. Retrieved4 April 2018.
^Tomczyk Ł, Solecki R (July 2019). "Problematic internet use and protective factors related to family and free time activities among young people".Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice.19 (3):1–13.doi:10.12738/estp.2019.3.001 (inactive 1 July 2025).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of July 2025 (link)
^Hou, Yubo, Dan Xiong, Tonglin Jiang, Lily Song, and Qi Wang. "Social Media Addiction: Its Impact, Mediation, and Intervention." Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 13, no. 1 (February 21, 2019).https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2019-1-4.
^Santre, Siriporn (March 2023). "Cyberbullying in adolescents: a literature review".International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health.35 (1):1–7.doi:10.1515/ijamh-2021-0133.PMID35245420.
Aral, Sinan (2020).The Hype Machine: How Social Media Disrupts Our Elections, Our Economy, and Our Health—and How We Must Adapt. Currency.ISBN978-0-525-57451-4.
Hou, Yubo, Dan Xiong, Tonglin Jiang, Lily Song, and Qi Wang. "Social Media Addiction: Its Impact, Mediation, and Intervention". Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 13, no. 1 (February 21, 2019).https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2019-1-4.
![[icon]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aWiki_letter_w_cropped.svg)
