Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Sir John Rushout, 4th Baronet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
British army officer and politician (1685–1775)

Sir John Rushout
Member of Parliament
forMalmesbury
In office
1713–1722
Preceded byThomas Farrington
Joseph Addison
Succeeded byGiles Earle
John Fermor
Member of Parliament
forEvesham
In office
1722–1768
Preceded byJohn Deacle
John Rudge
Succeeded byGeorge Durant
John Rushout
Personal details
Born6 February 1685
England
Died2 February 1775 (aged 89)
England
SpouseLady Anne Compton
Military service
AllegianceEngland
Great Britain
Branch/serviceEnglish Army
British Army
Years of servicec. 1698–1712
RankCaptain

CaptainSir John Rushout, 4th Baronet,PC (6 February 1685 – 2 February 1775) was a British army officer andWhig politician who representedMalmesbury andEvesham in theHouse of Commons of Great Britain from 1713 to 1768. A supporter ofWilliam Pulteney and opponent ofRobert Walpole, he was briefly part of theshort-lived ministry. Rushout wasFather of the House from 1762 until 1768.

Early life and army career

[edit]

John Rushout was the fourth son ofSir James Rushout, 1st Baronet and his wife, Alice Pitt, the daughter of Edmund Pitt. His elder brotherJames succeeded to the baronetcy on the death of his father.[1] He graduated fromEton College in 1698 and joined theEnglish Army. He was acornet in theRoyal Horse Guards in 1705 and was promoted to lieutenant in 1706. In 1710, he became captain. On the death of his nephew, the third baronet, on 21 September 1711 he succeeded to thebaronetcy and most of the family's estates in Worcestershire. He resigned hisBritish Army commission in January 1712 which he later claimed was to pre-empt his dismissal under the Duke of Ormond's policy of weeding out Whig officers in order to defeat the Hanoverian succession.[2] In 1729, he married Lady Anne Compton, the sixth daughter ofGeorge Compton, 4th Earl of Northampton in 1729.[1]

Political career

[edit]
Portrait of Rushout byJohn Smibert

Rushout was elected at aby-election on 20 April 1713 as WhigMember of Parliament forMalmesbury, with the support ofLord Wharton. He voted against the French commerce bill on 18 June 1713. At the1713 British general election, he stood without success at Evesham, but was returned unopposed for Malmesbury again. He voted against the expulsion of Richard Steele on 18 March 1714 and acted as a teller for the Whig side on the Harwich election petition on 16 July 1714.[2]

At the1715 British general election, Rushout was returned again as MP for Malmesbury. He voted against the septennial bill, but for the repeal of the Occasional Conformity and Schism Acts. He was absent from the vote on thePeerage Bill. At the1722 British general election, he was returned for both Malmesbury andEvesham. However he was unseated on petition at Malmesbury on 13 December 1722, and so took up his seat at Evesham. He initiated the House of Commons inquiry into the Atterbury plot, and in 1725 sponsored the complaint leading to Lord Macclesfield's impeachment.[2]

He then followed his friend,William Pulteney, into opposition. He spoke against a vote of credit on 25 March 1726, and introduced a bill against election bribery on 27 April which was lost in the House of Lords after being passed in the Commons. He was returned as MP for Evesham at the1727 British general election and was a lieutenant to Pulteney, playing a leading role in the Whig opposition. He acted as Pulteney's second in his duel with Lord Hervey in 1731. He chaired a select committee of the House of Commons, whose report led to the passing of the Molasses Act. During theexcise bill crisis in 1733 he was put down as secretary at war in the list of a new ministry prepared by the opposition leaders.[2]

At the1734 British general election, he was returned again for Evesham. He spoke in favour of increasing the allowance toFrederick, Prince of Wales on 22 February 1737. It was said he was a frequent and boring speaker, with a trick of always putting out one leg and looking at it while speaking. At the1741 British general election, he was returned again as MP for Evesham.[3]

On the fall of Walpole in 1742, Rushout, withSamuel Sandys, andPhillips Gybbon became Pulteney's representatives on the new Treasury board, where they combined to outvote the first lord, Wilmington. He was elected to the secret committee of enquiry into theWalpole ministry, but defendedJohn Scrope, the secretary of the Treasury, for refusing to give evidence. When Pelham replaced Wilmington, under a compromise, Rushout was appointedTreasurer of the Navy in 1743 and was made aPrivy Counsellor in 1744.

However, he was turned out of office with most of Bath's followers in 1744. He spoke against the Queen of Hungary's subsidy on 18 February 1745 with the intention of sowing dissensions between the Old Whigs and the Government's new allies. He also refused to make any payments from the sums standing in his account as treasurer of the navy, thus holding up payments, for 8 or 9 months, to all the seamen who had not received their pay up to the date of his dismissal.

When Bath and Granville made their abortive attempt to form what became known as the "short-lived ministry" in February 1746, he was expected to be appointedLeader of the House of Commons, but Pulteney's attempt to form a government collapsed before Rushout could be offered the position. He was returned at Evesham at the1747 British general election and joined the Leicester House party. He was put down to have a peerage and the pay office when the Prince came to the throne. After Frederick's death in 1751 he attached himself to Newcastle in the hopes of a peerage .[3]

At the1754 British general election, Rushout was returned head of the poll for Evesham after a contest. At the1761 British general election, he stood together with his son, and after another hard contest they were both returned. He became the longest standing member (Father of the House) in 1762. In the debates on Wilkes's privilege in November 1763, he spoke against theGrenville ministry, and voted against them in the division on general warrants in February 1764. He opposed the repeal of the cider duty, despite representing a cider producing county. He became less regular in his attendance and retired on account of age at the1768 British general election.[4]

Death and legacy

[edit]

Rushout died on 2 February 1775 leaving a son and two daughters. He was succeeded in the baronetcy by his sonJohn.[1]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcCokayne, George Edward, ed. (1903),Complete Baronetage volume 3 (1649–1664), vol. 3, Exeter: William Pollard and Co, retrieved9 October 2018
  2. ^abcd"RUSHOUT, Sir John, 4th Bt. (1685–1775), of Northwick Park, Worcs". History of Parliament Online (1690–1715). Retrieved17 May 2019.
  3. ^ab"RUSHOUT, Sir John, 4th Bt. (1685–1775), of Northwick Park, Worcs". History of Parliament Online. Retrieved18 August 2018.
  4. ^"RUSHOUT, Sir John, 4th Bt. (1685–1775), of Northwick Park, Glos". History of Parliament Online (1754–1790). Retrieved2 March 2019.

Sources

[edit]
Parliament of Great Britain
Preceded byMember of Parliament forMalmesbury
1713–1722
With:Joseph Addison to 1719
Fleetwood Dormer 1719 – March 1722
Viscount Hillsborough from March 1722
Succeeded by
Preceded byMember of Parliament forEvesham
1722–1768
With:John Rudge to 1734
William Taylor 1734–1741
Edward Rudge 1741–1754
John Porter 1754–1756
Edward Rudge 1756–1761
John Rushout from 1761
Succeeded by
Preceded byFather of the House
1762–1768
Succeeded by
Baronetage of England
Preceded byBaronet
(of Milnst)
1711–1775
Succeeded by
International
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sir_John_Rushout,_4th_Baronet&oldid=1304834545"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp