Major-GeneralThe Honourable Sir Edward Pakenham GCB
Member of theIrish Parliament forLongford Borough
In office 1799–1800
Preceded by	Thomas Pakenham
Succeeded by	Thomas Pakenham
Personal details
Born	Edward Michael Pakenham (1778-03-19)19 March 1778 Pakenham Hall, County Westmeath, Ireland
Died	8 January 1815(1815-01-08) (aged 36) St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana, U.S.
Resting place	St. Etchen's Church,Killucan 53°30′49.5″N7°08′40.3″W / 53.513750°N 7.144528°W /53.513750; -7.144528
Nationality	Irish/British
Relations	The Duke of Wellington (brother-in-law) The Duchess of Wellington (sister)
Parents	The Baron Longford Lady Catherine Pakenham
Civilian awards	Knights Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath
Military service
Allegiance	United Kingdom
Branch/service	British Army
Years of service	1794–1815
Rank	Major-General
Battles/wars	Irish Rebellion of 1798 Napoleonic Wars Copenhagen Expedition Peninsular War War of 1812 Battle of New Orleans †
Military awards	Army Gold Cross

Major-GeneralSir Edward Michael Pakenham,GCB (19 March 1778 – 8 January 1815) was aBritish Army officer and politician.^[1] He was the son ofthe Baron Longford and the brother-in-law ofthe Duke of Wellington, with whom he served in thePeninsular War. During theWar of 1812, he was the commander of British forces attempting to take the Southern port of New Orleans (1814–15). On 8 January 1815, Pakenham waskilled in action while leading his men at theBattle of New Orleans.^[2]

Pakenham was born at Pakenham Hall (present-dayTullynally Castle) inCounty Westmeath, Ireland, toEdward Pakenham, 2nd Baron Longford, and his wife Catherine Rowley. He was educated atThe Royal School, Armagh. His family purchased his commission as a lieutenant in the92nd Regiment of Foot when he was only sixteen.

Between 1799 and 1800, Pakenham also representedLongford Borough in theIrish House of Commons.

Pakenham served with the23rd Light Dragoons against the French inIreland during the1798 Rebellion and later inNova Scotia,Barbados, andSaint Croix. He led his men in an attack onSaint Lucia in 1803, where he was wounded. He also fought in theDanish campaign at theBattle of Copenhagen (1807) and inMartinique against theFrench Empire, where he received another wounding. In 1806, his sisterCatherine marriedArthur Wellesley, the futureDuke of Wellington.

Pakenham, as adjutant-general, joined his well known in-law, the Duke of Wellington, in the Peninsular War. He commanded a regiment in theBattle of Bussaco in 1810 and in 1811 fought in theBattle of Fuentes de Onoro to defend the besieged fortress ofAlmeida, helping to secure a British victory. In 1812 he was praised for his performance atSalamanca in which he commanded the Third Division and hammered onto the flank of the extended French line. He also received theArmy Gold Cross and clasps for the battles of Martinique, Busaco, Fuentes de Oñoro, Salamanca, Pyrenees, Nivelle, Nive, Orthez, and Toulouse.

In September 1814, Pakenham, having been promoted to the rank of major general, accepted an offer to replace GeneralRobert Ross as commander of the British North American army, after Ross was killed during the skirmishing prior to theBattle of North Point near Baltimore.

In August 1814, Vice Admiral Cochrane had finally convinced theAdmiralty that a campaign against New Orleans would weaken American resolve against Canada, and hasten a successful end to the war.^[a] TheRoyal Navy had begun the Louisiana Campaign to captureNew Orleans.

In the winter of 1814, the British had the objective of gaining control of the entrance of the Mississippi, and to challenge the legality of the Louisiana Purchase.^[4] To this end, an expeditionary force of about 8,000 troops under General Edward Pakenham had arrived in the Gulf Coast, to attack New Orleans.^[5]

A general ceasefire had already been declared by theTreaty of Ghent, signed on 24 December 1814, but as peace was not yet ratified in Washington as required by the treaty, the two nations were still formally at war. The news of the treaty did not reach the combatants until February, several weeks after the battle.^[b]

On Christmas Day, Pakenham arrived on the battlefield. He ordered areconnaissance-in-force on 28 December against the earthworks. The reconnaissance-in-force was designed to test Line Jackson and see how well-defended it was, and if any section of the line was weak the British would take advantage of the situation, break through, and call for thousands of more soldiers to smash through the defences. Pakenham inexplicably decided to withdraw all the soldiers after seeing the left side of his reconnaissance-in-force collapsing and retreating in panic.^[7]

After the failure of this operation Pakenham met with General Keane and Admiral Cochrane that evening for an update on the situation. Pakenham wanted to useChef Menteur Pass as the invasion route, but he was overruled by Admiral Cochrane, who insisted that his boats were providing everything needed.^[8] Admiral Cochrane believed that the veteran British soldiers would easily destroy Jackson's ramshackle army, and he allegedly said that if the army did not do it, his sailors would, and the meeting settled the method and place of the attack.^[9]

The main British army arrived on New Year's Day 1815 and began an artillery bombardment of the American earthworks. The Americans recovered quickly and mobilized their own artillery to fire back at the British artillery. This began an exchange of artillery fire that continued for three hours. After yet another failure to breach Line Jackson Pakenham decided to wait for his entire force of 8,000 men to assemble before continuing his attack.

Pakenham developed a complex plan, dividing his forces into four brigades:

1. Colonel Thornton would land soldiers on the Right Bank of the Mississippi, capture the artillery battery, so the guns could be turned against Jackson's lines.
2. The main assault against the left-centre of the American line on the Left Bank would be undertaken by Major General Gibbs.
3. Light troops would be deployed to breach the right, followed by a Brigade commanded by General Keane, to either exploit the success, or move against the centre.
4. General Lambert and his brigade were in reserve.^[1]

In front of the American line on the Left Bank, there were 600 metres of open ground to be traversed by the British.^[1]

Thornton failed to disembark and capture the battery at the designated time. Pakenham summoned his Assistant Adjutant General (AAG),Major Harry Smith, and informed him Thornton's delayed troops would have no impact upon the main attack on the Left Bank. Smith tried to dissuade him from proceeding, but to no avail. Pakenham decided to continue with the attack, half an hour before daylight,^[10] at 6.20am.^[11]

The 44th Foot, commanded byThomas Mullins, was assigned to lead the assault. They had to pick up the fascines and ladders needed, in order to cross the ditches and scale the earthworks respectively. Mullins was not pleased, viewing the regiment's role as that of aforlorn hope. Perhaps due to his bad temper, he failed to personally locate the ladders and fascines on the evening of the 7th, as Pakenham had ordered him to do.^[12] The officer he assigned, Lieutenant Colonel Johnston, inquired about their location from Captain Emmett, anengineer officer, and reported they were in the advanceredoubt.^[12]

During the night, anadvance battery was set up about 880 yards (800 m) forward of theadvance redoubt.^[13] Mullins, thinking this to be the location of themateriel, passed the advance redoubt and halted the regiment at the battery. Upon discovering his mistake, he sent about 300 of his 427 men back to the redoubt at the double-quick to pick up the fascines and ladders, but it was too late. The other regiments were already advancing behind the 44th, the party of 300 lost formation as they struggled to reach the redoubt, and as day dawned, the attack commenced before the supplies could be brought forward.^[14][15]

The British column had already been disordered by the passage of the 300 returning to the redoubt, and they advanced into a storm of American fire. Without the fascines and ladders, they were unable to scale and storm the American position. Mullins had compromised their attack.^[16]

As Pakenham rallied his troops near the enemy line,grapeshot from USartillery shattered his left knee and killed his horse. As he was helped to his feet by his senioraide-de-camp, MajorDuncan MacDougall, Pakenham was wounded a second time in his right arm. After he mounted MacDougall's horse, more grapeshot ripped through his spine, fatally wounding him, and he was carried off the battlefield on a stretcher. He was 36. His last words were reputed to be telling MacDougall to find GeneralJohn Lambert to tell him to assume command and send forward the reserves.^[17][18][19]

The British attacks on the Left Bank failed in bloody confusion, with Pakenham and Gibbs among the casualties.

The battle ended in defeat for the British.

Wellington had held Pakenham in high regard and was deeply saddened by news of his death, commenting:

We have but one consolation, that he fell as he lived, in the honourable discharge of his duty and distinguished as a soldier and a man. I cannot but regret that he was ever employed on such a service or with such a colleague. The expedition to New Orleans originated with that colleague... The Americans were prepared with an army in a fortified position which still would have been carried, if the duties of others, that is of the Admiral (Sir Alexander Cochrane), had been as well performed as that of he whom we now lament.^[20]

Patterson notes that the plan of attack was not Pakenham's own, yet he conceded to follow it, despite his reservations, and his death prevented him from reformulating a subsequent attack, following the initial failure.^[21]

There is a statue in his memory at the south transept ofSt Paul's Cathedral inLondon.^[22] His body was returned in a cask of rum and buried in the Pakenham family vault in Killucan inCounty Westmeath,Ireland.

The village ofPakenham in Ontario, Canada, named in honour of his role in the War of 1812. The village is located on the CanadianMississippi River which empties into the Ottawa River.

There is also asuburb of Melbourne, Australia, named after him.

In the alternative "British Version" ofJohnny Horton's novelty hit "The Battle of New Orleans," Horton refers to the British being led into battle by Pakenham. As with other 'historic' details of the song, Horton haphazardly styles him as "Colonel Pakeningham" despite his actually being General Pakenham.

Two streets inChalmette, Louisiana, the site of the Battle of New Orleans, are named for Pakenham, Packenham Avenue and Packenham Drive.

• List of knights companion of the Order of the Bath
• List of knights and dames grand cross of the Order of the Bath

• Davis, William C. (2019).The Greatest Fury: The Battle of New Orleans and the Rebirth of America. Dutton Caliber, an imprint of Penguin Random House.ISBN 978-0-39-958522-7.
• Grodzinski, John, ed. (September 2011)."Instructions to Major-General Sir Edward Pakenham for the New Orleans Campaign".The War of 1812 Magazine (16).
• Holmes, Richard (2003).Wellington: The Iron Duke. Harper and Collins.ISBN 978-0-00-713750-3.
• Patterson, Benton Rain (2008).The Generals, Andrew Jackson, Sir Edward Pakenham, and the road to New Orleans. New York: New York University Press.ISBN 978-0-8147-6717-7.
• Porter, Maj Gen Whitworth (1889).History of the Corps of Royal Engineers Vol I. Chatham: The Institution of Royal Engineers.OCLC 35254552.
• Reilly, Robin (1976) [1974],The British at the gates – the New Orleans campaign in the War of 1812, London: Cassell,OCLC 839952
• Remini, Robert V. (1999).The Battle of New Orleans. New York: Penguin Putnam, Inc.ISBN 0-670-88551-7.
• Roosevelt, Theodore (1900).The Naval War of 1812. Vol. II. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press.
• Sinclair, William (1909).Memorials of St Paul's Cathedral. London: Chapman & Hall, Ltd.
• Smith, Gene Allen (2008)."Preventing the "Eggs of Insurrection" from Hatching: The U.S. Navy and Control of the Mississippi River, 1806-1815"(PDF).Northern Mariner. issue Nos. 3-4, (July–October 2008).18 (3–4). The Canadian Nautical Research Society:79–91.doi:10.25071/2561-5467.355.S2CID 247349162. Retrieved19 December 2021.
• Smith, Sir Harry (1903).The autobiography of Lieutenant-General Sir Harry Smith : Baronet of Aliwal on the Sutlej, G.C.B. edited, with the addition of some supplementary chapters, by G.C. Moore Smith. London: John Murray.OCLC 4960058 – via University of Pennsylvania.

• "Edward Michael Pakenham,"A Dictionary of Louisiana Biography, Vol. 2 (1988), p. 627

• Portraits of Edward Pakenham at theNational Portrait Gallery, London
• Works by or about Edward Pakenham at theInternet Archive

• 1778 births
• 1815 deaths
• 18th-century Anglo-Irish people
• 19th-century Anglo-Irish people
• British Army commanders of the Napoleonic Wars
• British Army major generals
• British Army personnel of the War of 1812
• British military personnel killed in the War of 1812
• Irish MPs 1798–1800
• Knights Companion of the Order of the Bath
• Knights Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath
• Members of the Parliament of Ireland (pre-1801) for County Longford constituencies
• Pakenham family
• People educated at The Royal School, Armagh
• Military personnel from County Westmeath
• People of the Irish Rebellion of 1798
• Politicians from County Westmeath
• Recipients of the Army Gold Cross
• Younger sons of barons

• Articles with short description
• Short description is different from Wikidata
• Use British English from February 2021
• All Wikipedia articles written in British English
• Use dmy dates from February 2021
• Pages using gadget WikiMiniAtlas
• National Portrait Gallery (London) person ID same as Wikidata
• Articles with Internet Archive links
• Pages using Sister project links with hidden wikidata