Inmonotone comparative statics, thesingle-crossing condition orsingle-crossing property refers to a condition where the relationship between two or more functions[note 1] is such that they will only cross once.[1] For example, amean-preserving spread will result in an altered probability distribution whosecumulative distribution function will intersect with the original's only once.
Cumulative distribution functionsF andG satisfy the single-crossing condition if there exists a such that
and
;
that is, function crosses the x-axis at most once, in which case it does so from below.
This property can be extended to two or more variables.[6] Given x and t, for all x'>x, t'>t,
and
.
This condition could be interpreted as saying that for x'>x, the function g(t)=F(x',t)-F(x,t) crosses the horizontal axis at most once, and from below. The condition is not symmetric in the variables (i.e., we cannot switch x and t in the definition; the necessary inequality in the first argument is weak, while the inequality in the second argument is strict).
Insocial choice theory, the single-crossing condition is a condition onpreferences. It is especially useful because utility functions are generally increasing (i.e. the assumption that anagent will prefer or at least consider equivalent two dollars to one dollar is unobjectionable).[7]
Specifically, a set of agents with some unidimensional characteristic and preferences over different policiesq satisfy the single crossing property when the following is true:
If and or if and, then
whereW is the indirect utility function.
An important result extends themedian voter theorem, which states that when voters havesingle peaked preferences, there is amajority-preferred candidate corresponding to the median voter's most preferred policy.[8] With single-crossing preferences, the most preferred policy of the voter with the median value of is the Condorcet winner.[9] In effect, this replaces the unidimensionality of policies with the unidimensionality of voter heterogeneity.[jargon][10] In this context, the single-crossing condition is sometimes referred to as the Gans-Smart condition.[11]
Inmechanism design, the single-crossing condition (often referred to as the Spence-Mirrlees property forMichael Spence andJames Mirrlees, sometimes as the constant-sign assumption[12]) refers to the requirement that the isoutility curves for agents of different types cross only once.[13] This condition guarantees that the transfer in an incentive-compatible direct mechanism can be pinned down by the transfer of the lowest type. This condition is similar to another condition called strict increasing difference (SID).[14] Formally, suppose the agent has a utility function, the SID says we have. The Spence-Mirrlees Property is characterized by.
^Karlin, Samuel (1968).Total positivity. Vol. 1. Stanford University Press.OCLC751230710.
^Diamond, Peter A.; Stiglitz, Joseph E. (1974). "Increases in risk and in risk aversion".Journal of Economic Theory.8 (3). Elsevier:337–360.doi:10.1016/0022-0531(74)90090-8.hdl:1721.1/63799.
^Laffont, Jean-Jacques; Martimort, David (2002).The theory of incentives : the principal-agent model. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. p. 53.ISBN0-691-09183-8.OCLC47990008.
^Laffont, Jean-Jacques; Martimort, David (2002).The theory of incentives : the principal-agent model. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. p. 35.ISBN0-691-09183-8.OCLC47990008.