Simko Shikak سمکۆی شکاک Simkoyê Şikak | |
|---|---|
 A portrait of Simko Shikak | |
| Born | 1887 (1887) |
| Died | July 30, 1930(1930-07-30) (aged 42–43) |
| Cause of death | Ambush |
| Battles / wars | |
| Relations | Amar Khan Shikak (uncle or cousin),Jafar Agha (older brother) |
| Signature | .png) |
Ismail Agha Shikak (Kurdish:ئیسماعیل ئاغا شکاک,Îsmaîl Axayê Şikak), also known asSimko (Kurdish:سمکۆ,Simko; 1887–1930), was aKurdish chieftain of theShekak tribe. He was a warlord who controlled significant land and led thousands of Kurdish rebels who defeated theQajar andPahlavi armies on several occasions. He had also fought against theOttomans and other foreign troops in Iran. He also led ethnic conflicts ofAssyrians andAzerbaijanis. In 1930, he was assassinated by the government ofPahlavi Iran.
Simko was born in 1887 inChahriq-e Olya,Chahriq Rural District,Salmas County, to Mohammad Agha Shikak, the son of Ismail Agha, who was the leader of the Awdoyi clan of the Shikak tribe. Ismail Agha died in 1816.[1][2] The Shekak played a prominent role in local politics, occupying the districts ofSomay,Baradost,Qotur, andChahriq.[3] His brother,Jafar Agha, later became leader of the tribe. In 1904, Qajar official Nizam-ol-Saltaneh invited Jafar Agha to Tabriz for negotiations, and swore on the Quran that he would not be harmed. However, it had been a trap, and Jafar Agha was killed by Iranian authorities in Tabriz.[4][3] In 1907, his father, Mohammad Agha Shekak, went to personally askAbdul Hamid II for revenge against Iran, although he was imprisoned in Istanbul and died in prison.[5]
Simko became the leader of the Shekak tribe in 1905 after the death of his elder brotherJafar Agha.[6]
Simko was married to the daughter of Seyyed Taha, the grandson of Sheikh Ubeydullah, who was also a Kurdish nationalist who was actively campaigning for the unification ofIranian Kurdistan andTurkish Kurdistan in an independent state.[7][8]
Kurdish nationalism was first introduced to Iranian Kurds during the reign ofAbdul Hamid II, where the Ottoman Empire made several attempts to annex Iranian Kurdistan while encouraging nationalism to convince Iranian Kurds to the rest of the Kurds, who lived in the Ottoman Empire. TheYoung Turk Revolution did not change the policy. The Ottomans briefly controlled Iranian Kurdistan on two occasions, in 1906 and World War I.[9]
In 1906, the Ottomans capturedMahabad relatively easily due to the Kurds being Sunni. In 1908, a group of Kurdish nationalists approached the Russian consulate in Urmia and asked for assistance in expelling the Ottomans. Simko was the most prominent figure who approached the consulate. The presence of Ottoman troops in Iranian Kurdistan had challenged the powerful status of Simko, while the Kurds were divided into Pro-Ottoman and Anti-Ottoman factions. Simko visited the Russian consulate in Urmia again in 1911 and visited Russia in 1912.[10] Simko attacked the Ottomans and caused significant damage.Illarion Vorontsov-Dashkov often gave Simko rank promotions, which the Ottomans protested toSergey Sazonov, but achieved nothing as the Russian consul inVan stated that Simko "is someone that we need and we should support him, since his hatred toward the Turks is without limit. And that benefits us."[11] According to British travelogue C.J. Edmonds, who interviewed Simko in October 1922, Simko hated Turks more than he hated Persians.[12] In 1913, Simko andAbdurrezak Bedirkhan established the first Kurdish school in Iran in Maku and asked the Russian Vice-Consul Chirkov in Urmia for support, which he gave. Simko gathered 29 children aged between 8 and 10, and assigned 40 of his men as guards. Simko had personally handwritten a letter of gratitude to the Russian Czar. In 1914, they attempted to open another school in Khoy but were opposed by the Iranian government. Abdurrezak Bedirkhan notably supported the Cyrillicisation of the Kurdish alphabet and saw Russian influence as better than Arabic, Turkish, or Persian. Simko and Bedirkhan fell out after Bedirkhan wanted to turn the newly established cultural house into an anti-Ottoman pro-Russian political party, with Simko opposing, claiming that killing a few Ottoman soldiers would not benefit the Kurds as much as the school would.[13] In March 1914, Simko Shikak participated in theBitlis uprising against the Ottomans, having sent support westwards to the Kurdish rebels.[14] In May 1914, he attended a meeting withAbdürrezzak Bedir Khan.[6] Simko claimed that "only a fool" could not see the need for foreign support for the Kurdish nationalist movement.[15] InWorld War I, the Russians were expelled from the region after the Ottomans captured Urmia and Tabriz in December 1914. Simko then became an Ottoman ally and massacred hundreds of Armenians and Assyrians. However, when the Ottomans requested help against the British, Simko refused. The Russians returned shortly after and briefly imprisoned Simko inTbilisi, after which he returned to Iran, again a Russian ally. When the Russians withdrew in 1917, Simko became a British ally, which meant having to tolerate Assyrians and Armenians, whom he despised. He frequently changed sides as he was willing to ally with anyone who benefitted the Kurds. However, Simko was paranoid and believed that the Assyrians wanted to establish a state in Kurdish lands and ethnically cleanse the Kurds. The alliance did not last long, as Simko invitedShimun XIX Benyamin, the secular and religious leader of the Assyrians, for negotiations in March 1918, where Mar Shimun and the majority of his delegation were killed and butchered. Simko sided with the Ottomans when they invaded Iran in summer 1918.[16][17] Several historians, as well as Lady Surma, the sister or Mar Shimun, claimed that the Iranian government had organized the assassination of Mar Shimun, with Simko only having acted as the executioner. Others claimed that the Ottomans had paid him to kill Mar Shimun. However, there is no evidence that support these claims.[18] Jointly with theOttoman Army he organized the massacre inHaftevan in February 1915 during which 700–800Armenians andAssyrians were murdered.[19]
During the Ottoman withdrawal from the South Caucasus after World War I, many ethnic Kurdish soldiers and officers deserted from the Ottoman army and joined Simko, inspired by his nationalist goals. Despite deserting, they had brought the Ottoman equipment with them to Iran. They were paid generously by Simko and formed the bulk of the Kurdish rebels in Iran.[17]
In 1918, theSimko Shikak revolt began, aimed at establishing an independent Kurdish state. Nearing the 1920s, Simko grew increasingly nationalist. However, Simko was primarily considered a tribal leader, as he lived in a time where Kurds primarily gave their allegiance to their tribe and had no concept of unity for a national cause.[20] Simko lacked administration, which made him less successful than his contemporariesMohammad Khiabani andMirza Kuchik Khan. Simko was a pioneer of Kurdish nationalism and was among the first to attempt to unite Kurds of various tribal affiliation for a national cause. His failure was primarily due to the lack of nationalism among Kurds. However, Kurdish nationalism rapidly grew during thePahlavi era in Iran, which also coincided with the Kemalist era in Turkey where Kurdish nationalism was also growing. Eventually,Qazi Muhammad successfully united various Kurdish tribes and established theRepublic of Mahabad.[21][22] Qazi Muhammad's father was a close friend of Simko and accompanied him throughout the battles.[23] Before the Republic of Mahabad, Simko had made Mahabad his capital.[24] Many of the veterans of the Simko Shikak revolt participated in the Republic of Mahabad, includingAmar Khan Shikak who succeeded Simko as tribe leader.[25]
During theBattle of Charah, after the murder of Mar Shimun, theAssyrians under the command ofMalik Khoshaba andPetros Elia of Baz attacked thefortress in Charah in which Simko was decisively defeated and fled to Khoy.[26] The deputy governor of Azerbaijan, Mokarram-ol-Molk, devised a plan to assassinate Simko with a gift box that had a bomb inside. In May 1919, the bomb was assembled by an Armenian expert in Khoy and sent to Simko disguised as a package ofconfections. When the package reached Simko, his young son brought it inside, believing it was a gift. Simko immediately knew what it was and threw it far away as he tightly grabbed his son and got on the floor. They both survived, although the bombing killed Simko's younger brother, Ali Agha Shikak, as well as many Kurdish troops. Simko vowed revenge and began taxing non-Kurds living between Salmas and Khoy and intensifying the attacks on Assyrian and Azerbaijani communities. Simko demanded that whoever sent the package be handed over. Although Mokarram-ol-Molk was the one who planned it, he blamed it on three people who had no part in it but were disliked by both the Iranian government and Simko. One of the accused men was Jahangir Mirza, a Qajar prince who owned many schools in Khoy. One of the schools, named Cyrus, was captured by Simko after he killed Mar Shimun. Simko lived in the school for a period of time, and on one occasion, Jahangir Mirza attempted to evict Simko from the school but failed. Simko felt humiliated and continued to hold resentment. In June, the three men were escorted to Simko by thirteenQaradaghi tribesmen. The three men and all the Qaradaghi tribesmen had their limbs cut off and were thrown from the roof of Simko's palace. He targeted the Qaradaghi tribesmen as revenge for his brother Jafar Agha, who was killed by a Qaradaghi chief in 1905.[27]
.png)
By summer 1918, Simko had established his authority in the region west ofLake Urmia.[28] In 1919, Simko sent a letter to the British civil commissioner of Iraq, demanding Kurdish independence.[29] Also in 1919, Yusuf Adl Mukarram ul-Molk, the governor of Iranian Azerbaijan, devised a plot to kill Simko by sending him a present with a bomb hidden in it.[30] At this time, government inTehran tried to reach an agreement with Simko on the basis of limited Kurdishautonomy.[31] Simko and his tribe, well-known as robbers and plunderers, specifically targeted Assyrian and Azerbaijani communities.[11] Simko Shikak and his elder brother Jafar Agha did not loot indiscriminately, as the poor Kurds tended to have positive views of them, whereas the Assyrians and Azerbaijanis feared them.[32] In 1919, Simko gave refuge to the family of Mahmud Barzinji when they fled to Iran.[33]
In December 1919, the multi-ethnic parts of West Azerbaijan province were extremely dangerous and riddled with ethnic violence. The cities ofSalmas,Urmia, andKhoy, all made up of Kurds, Azerbaijanis, and Assyrians, saw the worst of tensions. The Kurds had the advantage, and there were telegrams of pleas from Azerbaijanis and Assyrians who grew increasingly worried. Later, Simko Shikak announced his planned invasion ofLakestan, namelySoltan Ahmad andQarah Qeshlaq, both of which were inhabited entirely by ethnicAzerbaijanis.[34] Lakestan is near Salmas, and its residents were either cattle breeders, farmers, or chiefs.[35][36] In Lakestan, around 8,700 Azerbaijani locals prepared to confront Simko, although over 340 did not have weapons.[34] Simko had nearly 4,000 Kurdish soldiers. On Friday, 19 December, the Kurds besieged the area, and the fighting lasted for two hours before the Kurds entered the city from all sides and began looting and pillaging.[37] In the telegram that survivors of Lakestan sent to Tabriz, they claimed that 3,500 Azerbaijanis had died, with 2,000 of them being directly killed by Simko and the other 1,500 of them being frozen to death while trying to escape. The events created a strong shock in Tabriz.[38][39][40] The Iranian Army later deployed to Lakestan and retook the region. In nearby settlements, during and after the Lakestan massacres, Kurds clashed with Azerbaijanis and Assyrians.[38] Iran later reached a deal with Simko to stop his attacks, although he began attacking again shortly after.[41] Immediately after, Simko led the invasion ofUrmia, where the Kurds captured the city and massacred Assyrians and Azerbaijanis.[42]
In 1920, Simko told an American missionary "here I am living at the top of my mountain, my people eating grass, and no one about us but the false Russians, the false Turks and the false Persians. How can my voice reach Paris? You must carry my appeal. We need help and we look especially to America."[43]
On October 7, 1921, Simko led the invasion of Mahabad, where 200 Iranian soldiers were killed and 150 were injured, and the city fell under Kurdish control. Afterwards, Simko's men entered the hospitals in the city and cut the throats of the wounded Iranian soldiers seeking treatment. Simko then advanced towards Iranian forces led by Qaradaghi tribe leader Amir Arshad.[44][45] After the humiliation at Mahabad, the Iranian prime minister, Qavam al-Saltaneh, had ordered the governor of Azerbaijan to support Amir Arshad, also known as Sam Khan, who was a Qaradaghi tribal leader of theHajialilu tribe, as the commander of a new force created to defeat Simko. In autumn 1920, the Hajialilu tribe gave refuge to Armenian fighters fleeing the Ottoman Empire, significantly increasing the weaponry of Amir Arshad. The Iranian government aimed to use a "loyal" tribal leader to fight a "disloyal" one. By late October 1921, the Qaradaghi tribesmen and the Iranian gendarmerie were at Sharafkhaneh and Khoy, respectively, and planned to push towards Salmas, the stronghold of Simko. However, Simko was aware, and had actually surprised Amir Arshad inAlma Saray,Tasuj. The Qaradaghi tribesmen were stunned and instantly fled, losing 200 men. Amir Arshad himself had panicked and fled before being killed by his own fighters. After defeating the Qaradaghi tribesmen, Simko defeated the Iranian gendarmerie led by Swedish Colonel Lundberg, which retreated to Khoy.[46] Immediately after, Simko and the Turkish government cut ties and armed clashes broke out between them.[44]
The authority of Simko was recognized by a growing amount of Kurdish tribes. In addition to the Shikak, Simko was supported by the Herki, Mamash, Mangur, Dehbokri, Piran, Zarza, Gewrik, Feyzullabegi, Pizhdar, and the smaller tribes around Baneh. He was also supported by tribes in Hawraman and even Luristan. His authority was centered in Mahabad, although he did not live there, and his stronghold was his hometown of Chehriq. When he captured Mahabad in 1921, his fighters looted and pillaged the city. Unlike in Dilman or Urmia earlier, the victims in Mahabad were Kurds.[47] Furthermore, American missionaries were also robbed and killed.[45] The Kurdish victims were robbed but generally left alive, whereas the Azerbaijani victims were killed without exception.[48][49] After capturing Mahabad, Simko added "Partisan of the Independence of Kurdistan" to his signature and began publishing a newspaper in Kurdish and Persian. It was unknown whether the newspaper was called Kurd or Independent Kurdistan. He made Mahabad his capital. As early as October 20, M. Saunders, the British intelligence attache in Iran, wrote that Mahabad was not under the control of Simko but under local Kurds who were more willing to cooperate with the Iranian government. Afterwards, the Iranian government captured the city until Simko captured it again. Control over the city repeatedly changed until the Iranian government captured it in August 1922.[50][51]
Simko had organized a strong Kurdish army which was much stronger than Iranian government forces. Since the central government could not control his activities, he continued to expand the area under his control and by 1922, cities ofBaneh andSardasht were under his administration.[52] In theBattle of Sari Taj in 1922, Simko's forces could not resist the Iranian Army's onslaught in the region ofSalmas and were finally defeated and the castle of Chari was occupied. The strength of the Iranian Army force dispatched against Simko was 10,000 soldiers.[53] In 1922, Turkey assisted the Iranian army against Simko.[12] After the defeat of Simko,Reza Shah began a repressive campaign toward non-Persian minorities.[54]
On January 8, 1923, Simko visited theKingdom of Kurdistan and met withMahmud Barzanji. Simko was welcomed with a military parade, and the day of his visit was made a national holiday.[55]
After Reza Khan came to power in 1921, he began a campaign against Simko and all other tribal leaders across Iran. By 1924, Simko, severely weakened, had surrendered and was pardoned byReza Khan. When Reza Khan becameReza Shah in 1925, Simko pledged eternal loyalty to him and theIranian state.[54][56] Turkey was concerned about Simko joining the Sheikh Said revolt with Iranian support.[54][57] In 1926, Simko allied with theHerki andBegzada tribes, regained leadership of the Shekak tribe, and began another revolt.[54][58] Shortly after,Iranian forces were dispatched fromUrmia,Sharafkhaneh andKhoy, and defeated Simko. Simko fled to the Turkish frontier where he was arrested. After his release, he returned to Iran. Simko, having lost much power and influence, took minor part in the 1928-1929 revolt led by Mullah Khalil of the Mangur tribe in Mahabad against Reza Shah, which had Kurdish nationalist motives and was provoked by Reza Shah banning the hijab. The revolt was suppressed.[59] It was known that Simko died inOshnaviyeh on June 21, 1930, although there were two conflicting reports, with one claiming that he was killed in battle with Iranian forces, and another claiming that he was killed unsuspectingly as he was sitting with Iranian officials in negotiations, similarly to how his brother Jafar Agha was killed, and to how he killed Mar Shimun.[54]
Simko's revolts are seen by some as an attempt by a powerful tribal chief to establish his personal authority over the central government throughout theregion.[54] Ideologically, he was staunchly nationalist and supported the establishment of a united and independent Kurdish state.[60] Simko was primarily interested inplunder and often lacked administrative organization.[54] The French journalist and researcherChris Kutschera claimed that Kurds generally spoke negatively about Simko, a view regarded as justified by the political scientist Abbas Manafy, while some prominent Kurdish figures nevertheless considered him the founder of Kurdish nationalism. Simko's actions gave the Kurds a bad reputation for being looters, robbers, and killers. According to Manafy, Simko was manipulated by the Russians and the British as a means to secure oil concessions from Iran, while his struggle did not follow any clear revolutionary ideology and conflicted with national liberation movements that opposed major colonial powers, making him more of an agent to carry out foreign imperial objectives rather than promoting genuine freedom, and he did not even see the basic indications that the British and Russians were only taking advantage of him.[61]
Islamic historian Kamal Soleimani claimed that Simko was indeed a Kurdish nationalist, born in a region fraught with ethnic and religious tensions, and was well aware of the politics of the region. Soleimani questioned why a regular tribe leader would take part in establishing the first Kurdish school in Iran, make Kurdish the official language in the area he controlled, and wrote a Kurdish newspaper, adding that Simko could have used Persian as Kurdish was not standardized and its literacy rate was far worse than that of Persian. Soleimani stated that Simko's actions being motivated by Kurdish nationalism did not make them ethical, but nevertheless still nationalist.[62] Soleimani added that critics of Simko very often painted him as a tribal leader with no nationalist aspirations, which he claimed originated from the Pahlavi government and Iranian state historiography painting all tribal based revolts across Iran as merely tribal revolts with personal motives, to delegitimize the revolts. He also added that Iranian historians almost without exception mirrored the official state narrative and avoided using firsthand sources from Kurds. He stated that Simko himself made Kurdish nationalist statements and thatHasan Arfa, the Iranian head of military intelligence who led most of the campaign against Simko, himself confirmed that the fight against Simko was beyond tribal.[63] Soleimani claimed that at the cost of human suffering, Simko helped bolster Kurdish nationalism in Iran, linking its effects to the Republic of Mahabad established shortly after.[64] Soleimani also claimed that in addition to denying the Kurdish nationalism of Simko, the Iranian narrative also painted Simko as "uneducated". Soleimani cited allies and enemies of Simko who described him as intelligent, and added that in addition to various Kurdish dialects, Simko spoke Persian, Azeri, and Russian, and that he had a piano in his house which he learned to play in Russia, and also enjoyed theatre and cinema. Soleimani claimed thatAhmad Kasravi criticized the "uneducated" Simko for seeking a Kurdish state, yet did not question the nationalism of Reza Shah who was also reported to have lacked a formal education.[65] It was well known that Kurds loved Jafar Agha and his rule over the region.[66]
According to the BritishanthropologistRichard Tapper, by 1913 Simko had both nationalist and personal goals which were inseparable.[67]
In the words of ArmenianKurdologist andIranologistGarnik Asatrian:[68]
In the recent period of Kurdish history, a crucial point is defining the nature of the rebellions from the end of the 19th and up to the 20th century―fromSheikh Ubaydullah’s revolt to Simko’s (Simitko) mutiny. The overall labelling of these events as manifestations of the Kurdish national-liberation struggle against Turkish or Iranian suppressors is an essential element of the Kurdish identity-makers’ ideology. (...) With the Kurdish conglomeration, as I said above, far from being a homogeneous entity―either ethnically, culturally, or linguistically (...)―the basic component of the national doctrine of the Kurdish identity-makers has always remained the idea of the unified image of one nation, endowed respectively with one language and one culture. The chimerical idea of this imagined unity has become further the fundament of Kurdish identity-making, resulting in the creation of fantastic ethnic and cultural prehistory, perversion of historical facts, falsification of linguistic data, etc.
On the other hand,Reza Shah's military victory over Simko andTurkic tribal leaders initiated a repressive era toward non-Persian minorities.[54] In a nationalistic perspective, Simko's revolt is described as an attempt to build a Kurdish tribal alliance in support of independence.[22] According to Kamal Soleimani, Simko Shikak can be located "within the confines of Kurdish ethno-nationalism".[69] According to the political scientist Hamid Ahmadi:[70]
Though Reza Shah’s armed confrontation with tribal leaders in different parts of Iran was interpreted as an example of ethnic conflict and ethnic suppression by the Iranian state, the fact is that it was more a conflict between the modern state and traditional socio-political structure of pre-modern era and had less to do with the question of ethnicity and ethnic conflict. While someMarxist political activists (see Nābdel 1977) and ethno-nationalist intellectuals of different Iranian groups (Ghassemlou 1965; Hosseinbor 1984; Asgharzadeh 2007) have introduced this confrontation as a result of Reza Shah’s ethnocentric policies, no valid documents have been presented to prove this argument. Recent documentary studies (Borzū’ī 1999; Zand-Moqaddam 1992; Jalālī 2001) convincingly show that Reza Shah’s confrontation with BaluchDust Mohammad Khan, Kurdish Simko and ArabSheikh Khaz‘al have merely been the manifestation of state-tribe antagonism and nothing else. (...) While the Kurdish ethno-nationalist authors and commentators have tried to construct the image of a nationalist hero out of him, the local Kurdish primary sources reflect just the opposite, showing he was widely hated by many ordinary and peasant Kurds who suffered his brutal suppression of Kurdish settlements and villages.
