Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Siege of Constantinople (626)

Coordinates:41°0′44.06″N28°58′33.67″E / 41.0122389°N 28.9760194°E /41.0122389; 28.9760194
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Part of Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628 & the Avar–Byzantine Wars
For other sieges of the city, seelist of sieges of Constantinople.
Avar–Persian siege of Constantinople
Part ofByzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628 and theAvar–Byzantine Wars

Depiction of the siege from theChronicle ofConstantine Manasses
DateJune–July 626
Location41°0′44.06″N28°58′33.67″E / 41.0122389°N 28.9760194°E /41.0122389; 28.9760194
ResultByzantine victory
Territorial
changes
TheByzantines successfully re-captureAnatolia in 626.
Belligerents
Sassanid Empire
Avar Khaganate
Sclaveni
Byzantine Empire
Commanders and leaders
Bayan III
Shahrbaraz
Kardarigan
PatriarchSergius
MagisterBonus
Theodore
Strength

George of Pisidia:
80,000 troops[1]

  • 30,000 from vanguard

Theodore Synkellos:
Less than 8,000 troops, outnumbered 10+ to 1
Modern estimates:
15,000 troops[2]

  • 12,000 cavalrymen
  • 1,000–2,000 palace guards
  • sailors
Siege of Constantinople (626) is located in Istanbul
Siege of Constantinople (626)
Location within Istanbul
Show map of Istanbul
Siege of Constantinople (626) is located in Mediterranean
Siege of Constantinople (626)
Siege of Constantinople (626) (Mediterranean)
Show map of Mediterranean
Siege of Constantinople (626) is located in Black Sea
Siege of Constantinople (626)
Siege of Constantinople (626) (Black Sea)
Show map of Black Sea

Thesiege of Constantinople in 626 by theSassanid Persians andAvars, aided by large numbers of alliedSlavs, ended in a strategic victory for theByzantines. The failure of the siege saved the empire from collapse, and, combined with other victories achieved by EmperorHeraclius (r. 610–641) the previous year and in 627, enabled Byzantium to regain its territories and end the destructiveRoman–Persian Wars by enforcing a treaty with bordersstatus quo c. 590.

Background

[edit]
Main article:Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628

In 602,Phocas overthrew EmperorMaurice (r. 582–602). According to the later sources, his reign was marked by atrocities and administrative incompetence.[3] The new emperor's mismanagement left the Byzantine Empire vulnerable and unstable when theSassanid kingKhosrau II (r. 590–628) invaded, using the coup as a pretext for war as Khosrau II was personally close to Maurice, who had helped him return to his throne afterBahram Chobin's revolt. Initially, the Sassanid invasion was successful, with the Byzantines being driven into theAnatolian heartland. Later, Phocas was overthrown by the son of the thenExarch ofCarthage, Heraclius.[3] Heraclius started active warfare and personally led his army into the battle, but the situation deteriorated and the Byzantine empire lost all itsNear East possessions along withEgypt. Despite several counter-offensives intoMesopotamia, Heraclius was unable to stop his Persian enemies from laying siege to his capital where fromChalcedon they were able to launch their attack. From 14 to 15 May 626, riots in Constantinople against John Seismos[a] occurred because he wanted to cancel the bread rations of thescholae or imperial guards and raise the cost of bread from 3 to 8follis. He did this to conserve government resources, but he was removed. However, there were further disturbances in the city.[5]

Siege

[edit]

Khosrau, seeing that a decisive counterattack was needed to defeat the Byzantines, recruited two new armies from all the able men, including foreigners.[6]Shahin was entrusted with 50,000 men and stayed in Mesopotamia andArmenia to prevent Heraclius from invading Persia; a smaller army underShahrbaraz slipped through Heraclius' flanks and bee-lined forChalcedon across theBosphorus from Constantinople. Khosrau also coordinated with the Khagan of theAvars so as to launch a coordinated attack on Constantinople from both European and Asiatic sides.[7] The Persian army stationed themselves at Chalcedon, while the Avars placed themselves on the European side of Constantinople and probably destroyed theAqueduct of Valens.[8] Because of theByzantine navy's control of the Bosphorus strait, however, the Persians could not send troops to the European side to aid their ally.[9] This reduced the effectiveness of the siege, because the Persians were formidable insiege warfare.[b][10] Furthermore, the Persians and Avars had difficulties communicating across the guarded Bosphorus—though undoubtedly, there was some communication between the two forces.[7][11]

The defense of Constantinople was under the command of PatriarchSergius and the patricianBonus.[12] Upon hearing the news, Heraclius split his army into three parts; although he judged that the capital was relatively safe, he still sent some reinforcements to Constantinople to boost the morale of the defenders.[12] Another part of the army was under the command of his brother Theodore and was sent to deal with Shahin, while the third and smallest part would remain under his own control, intending to raid the Persian heartland.[3]

On 29 June 626, a coordinated assault on the walls began. Inside the walls, some 12,000 well-trained Byzantine cavalry troops (presumably dismounted) defended the city against the forces of some 80,000Avars andSclaveni who were determined to remove all Roman imperial rule over Europe.[6] However, it was only when the Avars began moving forward heavy siege equipment towards theTheodosian Walls that their intention to lay a siege became clear. Despite continuous bombardment for a month, morale was high inside the walls of Constantinople because ofPatriarch Sergius' religious fervor and his processions along the wall with an icon, which could be theicon of theVirgin Mary, inspiring the belief that the Byzantines were under divine protection.[13][14] Furthermore, the patriarch's cries for religious zeal among the peasantry around Constantinople was made ever more effective by the fact that they were facingheathens.[13] Consequently, every assault became a doomed effort. When the Avar-Slavic fleet and the Persian fleet were sunk in two different naval engagements, the attackers panicked and fled, abandoning the siege, apparently under the belief thatdivine intervention had won the day for Byzantium.[13]

On 7 August, a fleet of Persian rafts ferrying troops across the Bosphorus were surrounded and destroyed by Byzantine ships. The Slavs under the Avars attempted to attack the sea walls from across theGolden Horn, while the main Avar host attacked the land walls. Patrician Bonus' galleys rammed and destroyed the Slavic boats; the Avar land assault from 6 August to the 7th also failed.[15] With the news that Theodore had decisively triumphed over Shahin (supposedly leading Shahin to die from depression), the Avars retreated to the Balkan hinterland within two days, never to seriously threaten Constantinople again. Even though the army ofShahrbaraz was still encamped at Chalcedon, the threat to Constantinople was over.[12][13] In thanks for the lifting of the siege and the supposed divine protection of the Virgin Mary, a new proemium for the celebratedAkathist Hymn was written by an unknown author, possibly Patriarch Sergius orGeorge of Pisidia.[16][17][18]

Aftermath

[edit]
Map of the environs of Constantinople in Byzantine times

The loss in the siege came just after news had reached them of yet another Byzantine victory, where Heraclius's brotherTheodore scored well against the Persian generalShahin.[13] Furthermore, after the emperor showedShahrbaraz intercepted letters from Khosrau ordering the Persian general's death, the latter switched to Heraclius' side.[19] Shahrbaraz then moved his army to northernSyria, where he could easily decide to support either Khosrau or Heraclius at a moment's notice. Still, with the neutralization of Khosrau's most skilled general, Heraclius deprived his enemy of some of his best and most experienced troops, while securing his flanks prior to his invasion of Persia.[20] In the next year, Heraclius led an invasion into Mesopotamia once again, defeating another Persian army atNineveh. Afterwards, he marched on toCtesiphon, where anarchy reigned, allowing Heraclius to extract ever more favorable terms as one Persian king was overthrown by another. Eventually, the Persians were obliged to withdraw all armed forces and returnEgypt, theLevant and whatever imperial territories of Mesopotamia andArmenia were in Roman hands at the time of an earlier peace treaty inc. 595. The war was over; neither the Persians nor the Byzantines would cross swords again until theArab-Islamic invasion broke the power of both empires.

Assessment

[edit]

The siege of 626 failed because the Avars did not have the patience or technology to conquer the city. Though the Persians were experts in siege warfare, thewalls of Constantinople proved to defend easily against the siege towers and engines, amongst the reasons being that the former could not move their siege equipment to the European side of the Bosphorus (which was heavily guarded), where their Avar and Slavic allies were initially stationed. Furthermore, the Persians and Slavs did not have a strong enough naval presence in the Mediterranean to ignore the sea walls and establish a channel of communication. The lack of supplies for the Avars eventually caused them to abandon the siege.[21]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^It is unknown what position John Seismos held, but there is some indication that he held an important position. He may have been a city prefect.[4]
  2. ^According to theStrategikon ofEmperor Maurice[10]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Hurbanič, Martin (2019).The Avar Siege of Constantinople in 626. Springer. p. 135.ISBN 978-3030166847.
  2. ^Hurbanič, Martin (2019).The Avar Siege of Constantinople in 626. Springer. pp. 163–164.ISBN 978-3030166847.
  3. ^abcNorwich 1997, p. 90.
  4. ^Anonymous 1989, p. 169, fn. 456.
  5. ^Kaegi 2003, p. 133.
  6. ^abNorwich 1997, p. 92.
  7. ^abOman 1893, p. 210.
  8. ^Treadgold 1997, p. 297.
  9. ^Kaegi 2003, pp. 133, 140.
  10. ^abDodgeon, Lieu & Greatrex 2002, pp. 179–181.
  11. ^Kaegi 2003, p. 134.
  12. ^abcOman 1893, p. 211.
  13. ^abcdeNorwich 1997, p. 93.
  14. ^Kaegi 2003, p. 136.
  15. ^Kaegi 2003, p. 137.
  16. ^Kimball 2010, p. 176.
  17. ^Ekonomou 2007, p. 285.
  18. ^Gambero 1999, p. 338.
  19. ^Kaegi 2003, p. 148.
  20. ^Kaegi 2003, p. 151.
  21. ^Kaegi 2003, p. 140.

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Authority control databases: NationalEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Siege_of_Constantinople_(626)&oldid=1297780517"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp