Aśramaṇa (Sanskrit:श्रमण,Sanskrit pronunciation:[ɕrɐmɐɳɐ];Pali:𑀲𑀫𑀡,romanized: samaṇa;Chinese:沙門;pinyin:shāmén;Vietnamese:sa môn;Khmer:សាម៉ាណា;Lao:ສາມານາ;Thai:สระมะนะ) is a person "who labours, toils, or exerts themselves for some higher or religious purpose"[1][2] or "seeker, or ascetic, one who performs acts of austerity".[3][4][5][6] The śramaṇa tradition includes primarilyJainism,[7]Buddhism,[8] and others such as theĀjīvika.[9][10]
The śramaṇa religions became popular in the circles ofmendicants fromgreater Magadha that led to the development of spiritual practices,[11] as well as the popular concepts in all majorIndian religions such assaṃsāra (the cycle of birth and death) andmoksha (liberation from that cycle).[12][note 1]
The Śramaṇic traditions have a diverse range of beliefs, ranging from accepting or denying the concept ofSoul,fatalism to free will, idealization of extreme asceticism to that of family life, renunciation, strictahimsa (non-violence) and vegetarianism to permissibility of violence and meat-eating.[13][14]
.jpg)
 | This article'sfactual accuracy isdisputed. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements arereliably sourced.(December 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
According to Olivelle and Crangle, the earliest known explicit use of the term śramaṇa is found in section 2.7 of theTaittiriyaAranyaka, a layer within theYajurveda (~1000 BCE, a scripture of Hinduism). It mentionsśramaṇaRishis and celibateRishis.[15][16]
According to Jain, only two references tośramaṇa are found in the Vedic literature, one in verse 4.3.22 of theBrihadaranyaka Upanishad (7th-6th cent. BCE). It refers to aśramaṇa as belonging to a class of mendicant, but it is not clear if this was a member of a non-Vedic order as described in the much later Pali-canon.[17][18]
The word śramaṇa is postulated to be derived from the verbal rootśram, meaning "to exert effort, labor or to perform austerity".[3] The history of wandering monks in ancient India is partly untraceable. The term 'parivrajaka' was perhaps applicable to all the peripatetic monks of India, such as those found in Buddhism, Jainism and Brahmanism.[19]
Theśramaṇa refers to a variety ofrenunciate ascetic traditions from the middle of the 1st millennium BCE.[10] The śramaṇas were individual, experiential and free-form traditions.[10] The term "śramaṇas" is used sometimes to contrast them with "Brahmins" in terms of their religious models.[10] However, in the early texts, some pre-dating 3rd-century BCE rulerAshoka, the Brahmana and Śramaṇa are neither distinct nor opposed. The distinction, according to Olivelle, in later Indian literature "may have been a later semantic development possibly influenced by the appropriation of the latter term [Sramana] by Buddhism and Jainism".[20] Part of the śramaṇa tradition retained their distinct identity from Hinduism by rejecting theepistemic authority of theVedas, while a part of the śramaṇa tradition became part of Hinduism as one stage in theAshrama dharma, that is as renunciatesannyasins.[10][21]
Buddhist commentaries associate the word's etymology with the quieting (samita) of evil (pāpa) as in the following phrase from the 3rd century BCEDhammapada, verse 265:samitattā pāpānaŋ ʻsamaṇoʼ ti pavuccati ("someone who has pacified evil is calledsamaṇa").[note 2]
The first usage of the term śramaṇa in Jain literature is found in the earliest Jain texts, theSutrakritanga, composed after the 2nd century BCE,[22] and theĀcārāṅga Sūtra, which may have originated as an oral tradition after Mahavira's death but was principally compiled and heavily edited in its current form by AcharyaDevardhigani Kshamashraman, c. 454 CE.[23][24][25] According toJohannes Bronkhorst:
Mainly on linguistic grounds, it has been argued that theĀcārāṅga Sūtra, theSūtrakṛtāṅga Sūtra, and theUttarādhyayana Sūtra are among the oldest texts in the canon. This does not guarantee that they actually date from the time of Mahāvīra, nor even from the centuries immediately following his death, nor does it guarantee that all parts of these texts were composed simultaneously.[26]
The term sramana is also found in the earliest Digambara Jain text,Mulachara, composed around 150 CE.[27] Digambaras maintain that the original Ācārāṅga Sūtra is lost, and Mulachara is the closest to the original teachings of Mahavira.[28]
Palisamaṇa has been suggested as the ultimate origin of the wordEvenkiсама̄н (samān) "shaman", possibly viaMiddle Chinese orTocharian B; however, the etymology of this word, which is also found in otherTungusic languages, is controversial (seeShamanism § Etymology).
Severalśramaṇa movements are known to have existed in India before the 6th century BCE (pre-Buddha, pre-Mahavira), and these influenced both theāstika and nāstika traditions of Indian philosophy.[29][30][page needed] Martin Wiltshire states that the Śramaṇa tradition evolved in India over two phases, namely Paccekabuddha and Savaka phases, the former being the tradition of individual ascetic and latter of disciples, and that Buddhism and Jainism ultimately emerged from these as sectarian manifestations.[31] These traditions drew upon already established Brahmanical concepts, states Wiltshire, to communicate their own distinct doctrines.[32] Reginald Ray concurs that Śramaṇa movements already existed and were established traditions in pre-6th century BCE India, but disagrees with Wiltshire that they were nonsectarian before the arrival of Buddha.[29]
According to theJain Agamas and the BuddhistPāli Canon, there were other śramaṇa leaders at the time of Buddha.[33][note 3] In theMahāparinibbāna Sutta (DN 16), a śramaṇa named Subhadda mentions:
...those ascetics, samaṇa and Brahmins who have orders and followings, who are teachers, well-known and famous as founders of schools, and popularly regarded as saints, likePūraṇa Kassapa,Makkhali Gosāla,Ajita Kesakambalī,Pakudha Kaccāyana,Sanjaya Belatthiputta and Nigaṇṭha Nātaputta (Mahavira)...
— Digha Nikaya, 16[34]
| This article'sfactual accuracy isdisputed. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements arereliably sourced.(January 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The traditional view of scholars in the field, represented for example byGovind Chandra Pande in his 1957 study on the origins of Buddhism, is that Śramaṇa began as a "distinct and separate cultural and religious" tradition fromVedic religion.[35] However, this claim is disputed by several Indologists and Sanskrit scholars such asPatrick Olivelle.
Patrick Olivelle, a professor of Indology and known for his translations of major ancient Sanskrit works, states in his 1993 study that contrary to some representations, the original Śramaṇa tradition was a part of the Vedic one.[36] He writes,
Sramana in that context obviously means a person who is in the habit of performing srama. Far from separating these seers from the vedic ritual tradition, therefore, śramaṇa places them right at the center of that tradition. Those who see them [Sramana seers] as non-Brahmanical, anti-Brahmanical, or even non-Aryan precursors of later sectarian ascetics are drawing conclusions that far outstrip the available evidence.[36]
According to Olivelle, and other scholars such as Edward Crangle, the concept of Śramaṇa exists in the earlyBrahmanical literature.[15][16] The term is used in an adjectival sense for sages who lived a special way of life that the Vedic culture considered extraordinary. However, Vedic literature does not provide details of that life.[37] The term did not imply any opposition to either Brahmins or householders. In all likelihood states Olivelle, during the Vedic era, neither did the Śramaṇa concept refer to an identifiable class, nor to ascetic groups as it does in later Indian literature.[38]
The concept of renunciation and monk-like lifestyle is found in Vedic literature, with terms such asyatis,rishis, and śramaṇas.[39][40] The Vedic literature from pre-1000 BCE era, mentionsMuni (मुनि, monks, mendicants, holy man).[41]Rig Veda, for example, in Book 10 Chapter 136, mentions mendicants as those withkēśin (केशिन्, long-haired) andmala clothes (मल, dirty, soil-colored, yellow, orange, saffron) engaged in the affairs ofmananat (mind, meditation).[42]
He with the long loose locks (of hair) supports Agni, and moisture, heaven, and earth; He is all sky to look upon: he with long hair is called this light.
TheMunis, girdled with the wind, wear garments of soil hue; They, following the wind's swift course, go where the Gods have gone before.
The hymn uses the termvātaraśana (वातरशन) which means "girdled with wind".[43][20] Some scholars have interpreted this to mean "sky-clad, naked monk" and therefore a synonym forDigambara (a Jainism sect). However, other scholars state that this could not be the correct interpretation because it is inconsistent with the words that immediately follow, "wearing soil-hued garments". The context likely means that the poet is describing the "munis" as moving like the wind, their garments pressed by the wind. According to Olivelle, it is unlikely that thevātaraśana implies a class within the Vedic context.[44]
The Vedic society, states Olivelle, contained many people whose roots were non-Aryan who must have influenced the Aryan classes. However, it is difficult to identify and isolate these influences,[45] in part because the vedic culture not only developed from influences but also from its inner dynamism and socio-economic developments.[46]
According to Indian anthropologistRamaprasad Chanda the origins of Sramanism back to pre-Vedic and pre-Aryan cultures, particularly those practicing magic. He posited that the practice of asceticism could be linked to the initiatory phases of seclusion and abstinence observed by shamans.[47]
According to Bronkhorst, the sramana culture arose in "Greater Magadha," which was Indo-Aryan, but not Vedic. In this culture,Kshatriyas were placed higher than Brahmins, and it rejected Vedic authority and rituals.[48][49]
| Views of the six heretical teachers | |
|---|---|
| The views of sixśramaṇa in the Pāli Canon, known as thesix heretical teachers, based on theSāmaññaphala Sutta.[50] | |
| Pūraṇa Kassapa | |
| Amoralism (akiriyavāda;natthikavāda) | There is no reward or punishment for either good or bad deeds. |
| Makkhali Gośāla (Ājīvika) | |
| Fatalism (ahetukavāda;niyativāda) | We are powerless; suffering is pre-destined. |
| Ajita Kesakambalī (Charvaka) | |
| Materialism (ucchedavāda;natthikavāda) | Live happily; with death, all is annihilated. |
| Pakudha Kaccāyana | |
| Eternalism and categoricalism(sassatavāda;sattakāyavāda) | Matter, pleasure, pain and the soul are eternal and do not interact. |
| Mahavira (Jainism) | |
| Restraint (mahāvrata) | Be endowed with, cleansed by, and suffused with [merely] the avoidance of all evil.[51] |
| Sañjaya Belaṭṭhiputta (Ajñana) | |
| Agnosticism (amarāvikkhepavāda) | "I don't think so. I don't think in that way or otherwise. I don't think not or not not." Suspension of judgement. |
Pande attributes the origin of Buddhism, not entirely to the Buddha, but to a "great religious ferment" towards the end of the Vedic period when the Brahmanic and Sramanic traditions intermingled.[35]
The Buddhist text of theSamaññaphala Sutta identifies six pre-Buddhist śrāmana schools, identifying them by their leader. These six schools are represented in the text to have diverse philosophies, which according toPadmanabh Jaini, may be "a biased picture and does not give a true picture" of the Sramanic schools rivaling with Buddhism,[52][53]
These pre-Buddhist śrāmana movements were organizedSanghagani (orders of monks and ascetics), according to the BuddhistSamaññaphala Sutta. The six leaders above are described as aSanghi (head of the order),Ganacariyo (teacher),Cirapabbajito (recluse),Yasassi and Neto (of repute and well known).[58]
Jain literature too mentions Pūraṇa Kassapa, Makkhali Gosāla and Sañjaya Belaṭṭhaputta.[note 4] During the life of Buddha, Mahavira and the Buddha were leaders of their śramaṇa orders. Nigaṇṭha Nātaputta refers to Mahāvīra.[note 5]
According to Pande, Jainas were the same as the Niganthas mentioned in the Buddhist texts, and they were a well established sect when Buddha began preaching. He states that "Jainas" appear to have belonged to the non-Vedic Munis and Sramanas who may have been ultimately connected with pre-Vedic civilization".[59] The śramaṇa system is believed by a majority of Jaina scholars to have been of independent origin and not a protest movement of any kind, were led by Jaina thinkers, and were pre-Buddhist and pre-Vedic.[60]
Some scholars posit that theIndus Valley civilisation symbols may be related to later Jain statues, and the bull icon may have a connection toRishabhanatha.[61][62][63] According to Dundas, outside of the Jain tradition, historians date the Mahavira as about contemporaneous with theBuddha in the 5th-century BCE, and accordingly the historicalParshvanatha, based on the c. 250-year gap, is placed in 8th or 7th century BCE.[64]
| People of thePāli Canon | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This sectionrelies largely or entirely on asingle source. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please helpimprove this article byintroducing citations to additional sources. Find sources: "Śramaṇa" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(April 2024) |
It was as a śramaṇa that the Buddha left his father's palace and practised austerities.[65]Gautama Buddha, after fasting nearly to death by starvation, regarded extreme austerities and self-mortification as useless or unnecessary in attaining enlightenment, recommending instead a "Middle Way" between the extremes of hedonism and self-mortification.[66]Devadatta, a cousin of Gautama, caused a split in the Buddhistsangha by demanding more rigorous practices.[67]
The Buddhist movement chose a moderate ascetic lifestyle.[66] This was in contrast to Jains, who continued the tradition of stronger austerity, such as fasting and giving away all property including clothes and thus going naked, emphasizing that complete dedication to spirituality includes turning away from material possessions and any cause for evilkarma.[66] The moderate ascetic precepts, states Collins, likely appealed to more people and widened the base of people wanting to become Buddhists.[66] Buddhism also developed a code for interaction of world-pursuinglay people and world-denyingBuddhist monastic communities, which encouraged continued relationship between the two.[66] Collins states, for example, that two rules of thevinaya (monastic code) were that a person could not join a monastic community without parent's permission, and that at least one son remained with each family to care for that family.[66] Buddhism also combined the continuing interaction, such as giving alms to renunciants, in terms of merit gained for good rebirth and good karma by the lay people. This code played a historic role in its growth, and provided a means for reliable alms (food, clothing) and social support for Buddhism.[66]
Randall Collins states that Buddhism was more a reform movement within the educated religious classes, composed mostly ofBrahmins, rather than a rival movement from outside these classes.[68] In early Buddhism, the largest number of monastics were originally brahmins, and virtually all were recruited from the two upper classes of society – brahmins andkshatriyas.[68][note 6]
Ājīvika was founded in the 5th century BCE byMakkhali Gosala, as a śramaṇa movement and a major rival ofearly Buddhism andJainism.[69] Ājīvikas were organised renunciates who formed discrete communities.[70]
The Ājīvikas reached the height of their prominence in the late 1st millennium BCE, then declined, yet continued to exist in south India until the 14th century CE, as evidenced by inscriptions found in southern India.[55][71] Ancient texts of Buddhism and Jainism mention a city in the first millennium BCE named Savatthi (SanskritŚravasti) as the hub of the Ājīvikas; it was located in what is now theNorth Indian state ofUttar Pradesh. In later part of the common era, inscriptions suggests that the Ājīvikas had a significant presence in theSouth Indian state ofKarnataka and the Kolar district ofTamil Nadu.[71]
Original scriptures of the Ājīvika school of philosophy once existed, but these are unavailable and probably lost. Their theories are extracted from mentions of Ājīvikas in the secondary sources of ancient Indian literature.[72] Scholars question whether Ājīvika philosophy has been fairly and completely summarized in these secondary sources, written by ancient Buddhist and Jaina scholars, who represented competing and adversarial philosophies to Ājīvikas.[73]
According to the 2nd century CE textAshokavadana, the Mauryan emperorBindusara was a patron of the Ajivikas, and it reached its peak of popularity during this time.Ashokavadana also mentions that Bindusara's sonAshoka converted to Buddhism, became enraged at a picture that depicted Buddha in negative light, and issued an order to kill all the Ajivikas inPundravardhana. Around 18,000 followers of the Ajivika sect were executed as a result of this order.[74][75]
Jaina texts mention separation and conflict between Mahavira and Gosala, accusation of contemptuous comments, and an occasion where the Jaina and Ajivika monastic orders "came to blows".[76] However, given the texts alleging conflict and portraying Ajivikas and Gosala in negative light were written centuries after the incident by their śramaṇa opponents, and given the versions in Buddhist and Jaina texts are different, the reliability of these stories, states Basham, is questionable.[77]
| Part ofa series on |
| Jainism |
|---|
|
Ethics Ethics of Jainism
|
Major sects |
Jainism derives its philosophy from the teachings and lives of the twenty-fourTirthankaras, of whomMahavira was the last.AcharyasUmaswati,Kundakunda,Haribhadra,Yaśovijaya Gaṇi and others further developed and reorganizedJain philosophy in its present form. The distinguishing features of Jain philosophy are its belief in the independent existence of soul and matter, predominance ofkarma,the denial of a creative and omnipotent God, belief in aneternal and uncreated universe, a strong emphasis onnonviolence, an accent onanekantavada and morality and ethics based onliberation of the soul. The Jain philosophy of anekantavada andsyādvāda, which posits that the truth or reality is perceived differently from different points of view, and that no single point of view is the complete truth, have made very important contributions to ancientIndian philosophy, especially in the areas of skepticism and relativity.[78]
Jain monastics are known as śramaṇas while lay practitioners are calledśrāvakas. The religion or code of conduct of the monks is known as the śramaṇa dharma. Jain canons likeĀcārāṅga Sūtra[79] and other later texts contain many references to Sramanas.
One verse of theĀcāranga sūtra defines a good śramaṇa:
Disregarding (all calamities) he lives together with clever monks, insensitive to pain and pleasure, not hurting the movable and immovable (beings), not killing, bearing all: so is described the great sage, a good Sramana.[80]
The chapter on renunciation contains a śramaṇa vow of non-possession:
I shall become a śramaṇa who owns no house, no property, no sons, no cattle, who eats what others give him; I shall commit no sinful action; Master, I renounce to accept anything that has not been given.' Having taken such vows, (a mendicant) should not, on entering a village or free town, take himself, or induce others to take, or allow others to take, what has not been given.[81]
TheĀcāranga Sūtra gives three names of Mahavira, the twenty fourthTirthankara, one of which wasŚramaṇa:
The Venerable ascetic Mahavira belonged to theKasyapagotra. His three names have thus been recorded by tradition: by his parents he was calledVardhamana, because he is devoid of love and hate; (he is called) Sramana (i.e. ascetic), because he sustains dreadful dangers and fears, the noble nakedness, and the miseries of the world; the name Venerable AsceticMahavira has been given to him by the gods.[82]
Another Jain canon,Sūtrakrtanga[83] describes the śramaṇa as an ascetic who has takenMahavrata, the five great vows:
He is a Śramaṇa for this reason that he is not hampered by any obstacles, that he is free from desires, (abstaining from) property, killing, telling lies, and sexual intercourse; (and from) wrath, pride, deceit, greed, love, and hate: thus giving up every passion that involves him in sin, (such as) killing of beings. (Such a man) deserves the name of a Śramaṇa, who subdues (moreover) his senses, is well qualified (for his task), and abandons his body.[84]
TheSūtrakrtanga records that prince,Ardraka, who became disciple to Mahavira, arguing with other heretical teachers, toldMakkhali Gosala the qualities of śramaṇas:
He who (teaches) the great vows (of monks) and the five small vows (of the laity 3), the five Âsravas and the stoppage of the Âsravas, and control, who avoids Karman in this blessed life of Śramaṇas, him I call a Śramaṇa.[85]
Buddha initially practiced severe austerities, fasting himself nearly to death of starvation. However, he later considered extreme austerities and self-mortification as unnecessary and recommended a "Middle Way" between the extremes of hedonism and self-mortification.[66][86]
The Brahmajāla Sutta mentions many śramaṇas with whom Buddha disagreed.[87] For example, in contrast to Sramanic Jains whose philosophical premise includes the existence of anAtman (self, soul) in every being, Buddhist philosophy denies that there is any self or soul.[88][89] This concept calledAnatta (orAnatman) is a part ofThree Marks of existence in Buddhist philosophy, the other two beingDukkha (suffering) andAnicca (impermanence).[88] According to Buddha, states Laumakis, everything lacks inherent existence.[88]Buddhism is atranstheistic philosophy, which is especially concerned withpratītyasamutpāda (dependent origination) andśūnyatā (emptiness or nothingness).[88]
From rock edicts, it is found that both Brahmans as well as śramaṇas enjoyed equal sanctity.[90]
The Ājīvika school is known for itsNiyati doctrine of absolute determinism, the premise that there is no free will, that everything that has happened, is happening and will happen is entirely preordained and a function of cosmic principles.[55][72] Ājīvika considered thekarma doctrine as a fallacy.[71] Ajivikametaphysics included a theory of atoms similar to theVaisheshika school, where everything was composed of atoms, qualities emerged from aggregates of atoms, but the aggregation and nature of these atoms was predetermined by cosmic forces.[91] Ājīvikas were atheists[92] and rejected the epistemic authority of theVedas, but they believed that in every living being there is anātman – a central premise of Hinduism and Jainism as well.[93][94]
Theśramaṇa traditions subscribed to diverse philosophies, significantly disagreeing with each other as well as orthodoxIndian philosophy (six schools ofHindu philosophy). The differences ranged from a belief that every individual has a soul (self, atman) to asserting that there is no soul,[89][95] from axiological merit in a frugal ascetic life to that of a hedonistic life, from a belief in rebirth to asserting that there is no rebirth.[96]
A denial of the epistemic authority of the Vedas and Upanishads was one of the several differences between Sramanic philosophies and orthodox Hinduism.[97] Jaini states that while authority of vedas, belief in a creator, path of ritualism and social system of heredity ranks, made up the cornerstones of Brahminical schools, the path of ascetic self-mortification was the main characteristic of all the Sramanic schools.[98][note 7]
In some cases when the Sramanic movements shared the same philosophical concepts, the details varied. In Jainism, for example, Karma is based on materialist element philosophy, where Karma is the fruit of one's action conceived as material particles which stick to a soul and keep it away from natural omniscience.[96] The Buddha conceived Karma as a chain of causality leading to attachment to the material world and hence to rebirth.[96] The Ajivikas were fatalists and elevated Karma as inescapable fate, where a person's life goes through a chain of consequences and rebirths until it reaches its end.[96] Other śramaṇa movements such as those led by Pakkudha Kaccayana and Purana Kashyapa, denied the existence of Karma.[96]
| Ajivika | Buddhism | Charvaka | Jainism | Orthodox schools of Indian philosophy (Brahmanic)[100] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karma | Denies[71][101] | Affirms[96] | Denies[96] | Affirms[96] | Affirms |
| Samsara, Rebirth | Affirms | Affirms[102] | Denies[103] | Affirms[96] | Some school affirm, some not[104] |
| Ascetic life | Affirms | Affirms | Denies[96] | Affirms | Affirms only asSannyasa[105] |
| Rituals,Bhakti | Affirms | Affirms, optional[106] (Pali:Bhatti) | Denies | Affirms, optional[107] | Theistic school: Affirms, optional[108] Others: Deny[109][110] |
| Ahimsa and Vegetarianism | Affirms | Affirms Unclear on meat as food[111] | Strongest proponent of non-violence; vegetarianism to avoid violence against animals[112] | Affirms as highest virtue, butJust War affirmed too; vegetarianism encouraged, but choice left to the Hindu[113][114] | |
| Free will | Denies[55] | Affirms[115] | Affirms | Affirms | Affirms[116] |
| Maya | Affirms[117] | Affirms (prapañca)[118] | Denies | Affirms | Affirms[119][120] |
| Atman (Soul, Self) | Affirms | Denies[89] | Denies[121] | Affirms[95] | Affirms[122] |
| Creator God | Denies | Denies | Denies | Denies | Theistic schools: Affirm[123] Others: Deny[124][125] |
| Epistemology (Pramana) | Pratyakṣa, Anumāṇa, Śabda | Pratyakṣa, Anumāṇa[126][127] | Pratyakṣa[128] | Pratyakṣa, Anumāṇa, Śabda[126] | Various, Vaisheshika (two) to Vedanta (six):[126][129] Pratyakṣa (perception), Anumāṇa (inference), Upamāṇa (comparison and analogy), Arthāpatti (postulation, derivation), Anupalabdi (non-perception, negative/cognitive proof), Śabda (Reliable testimony) |
| Epistemic authority | Denies: Vedas | Affirms: Buddhatext[130] Denies: Vedas | Denies: Vedas | Affirms:Jain Agamas Denies: Vedas | Affirm:Vedas andUpanishads,[note 8] Denies: other texts[130][132] |
| Salvation (Soteriology) | Samsdrasuddhi[133] | Nirvana (realizeŚūnyatā)[134] | Siddha[135] | Moksha, Nirvana, Kaivalya Advaita, Yoga, others:Jivanmukti[136] Dvaita, theistic:Videhamukti | |
| Metaphysics (Ultimate Reality) | Śūnyatā[137][138] | Anekāntavāda[139] | Brahman[140][141] |
The śramaṇa traditions influenced and were influenced by Hinduism and by each other.[12][39] According to some scholars,[12][142] the concept of the cycle of birth and death, the concept ofsamsara and the concept of liberation may quite possibly be from śramaṇa or otherascetic traditions. Obeyesekere[143] suggests that tribal sages in theGanges valley may instead have inspired the ideas of samsara and liberation, just like rebirth ideas that emerged in Africa and Greece. O'Flaherty states that there isn't enough objective evidence to support any of these theories.[144]
It is in the Upanishadic period that Sramanic theories influence the Brahmanical theories.[145] While the concepts ofBrahman andAtman (Soul, Self) can be consistently traced back to pre-Upanishadic layers of Vedic literature, the heterogeneous nature of the Upanishads show infusions of both social and philosophical ideas, pointing to evolution of new doctrines, likely from the Sramanic movements.[146]
Śramaṇa traditions brought concepts of Karma and Samsara as central themes of debate.[96] Śramaṇa views were influential to all schools of Indian philosophies.[147] Concepts, such as karma and reincarnation may have originated in the śramaṇa or the renunciant traditions, and then become mainstream.[148] There are multiple theories of possible origins of concepts such asAhimsa, or non-violence.[61] TheChāndogya Upaniṣad, dated to about the 7th century BCE, in verse 8.15.1, has the earliest evidence for the use of the wordAhimsa in the sense familiar in Hinduism (a code of conduct). It bars violence against "all creatures" (sarvabhuta) and the practitioner of Ahimsa is said to escape from the cycle ofmetempsychosis (CU 8.15.1).[61][149] According to some scholars, such as D. R. Bhandarkar, the Ahimsa dharma of the Sramanas made an impression on the followers of Brahamanism and their law books and practices.[150]
Theories on who influenced whom, in ancient India, remains a matter of scholarly debate, and it is likely that the different philosophies contributed to each other's development. Doniger summarizes the historic interaction between scholars of Vedic Hinduism and Sramanic Buddhism:
There was such constant interaction between Vedism and Buddhism in the early period that it is fruitless to attempt to sort out the earlier source of many doctrines, they lived in one another's pockets, like Picasso and Braque (who, in later years, were unable to say which of them had painted certain paintings from their earlier, shared period).
— Wendy Doniger,[151]
Randall Collins states that "the basic cultural framework for lay society which eventually became Hinduism" was laid down by Buddhism.[68][note 9]
ModernHinduism can be regarded as a combination of Vedic and śramaṇa traditions as it is substantially influenced by both traditions. Among theAstika schools of Hinduism,Vedanta,Samkhya, andYoga philosophies influenced and were influenced by the śramaṇa philosophy. As Geoffrey Samuel notes,
Our best evidence to date suggests that [yogic practice] developed in the same ascetic circles as the early śramaṇa movements (Buddhists, Jainas and Ajivikas), probably in around the sixth and fifth centuries BCE.[152]
Some Brahmins joined the śramaṇa movement such asCānakya andSāriputta.[153] Similarly, according to Jain tradition, a group of eleven Brahmins accepted Jainism and become Mahavira's chief disciples organadharas.[154][note 10]
Patrick Olivelle suggests that the Hinduashrama system of life, created probably around the 4th-century BCE, was an attempt to institutionalize renunciation within the Brahmanical social structure.[105] This system gave complete freedom to adults to choose what they want to do, whether they want to be householders orsannyasins (ascetics), the monastic tradition was a voluntary institution.[105] This voluntary principle, states Olivelle, was the same principle found in Buddhist and Jain monastic orders at that time.[105]
Various possible references to "śramaṇas", with the name more or less distorted, have appeared in ancient Western literature.
Clement of Alexandria makes several mentions of the śramaṇas, both in the context of the Bactrians and the Indians:
Thus philosophy, a thing of the highest utility, flourished in antiquity among the barbarians, shedding its light over the nations. And afterwards it came toGreece. First in its ranks were the prophets of theEgyptians; and theChaldeans among theAssyrians;[155] and theDruids among theGauls; and theSamanaeans among theBactrians ("Σαμαναίοι Βάκτρων"); and the philosophers of theCelts; and theMagi of thePersians, who foretold the Saviour's birth, and came into the land ofJudaea guided by a star. The Indian gymnosophists are also in the number, and the other barbarian philosophers. And of these there are two classes, some of them calledSarmanae ("Σαρμάναι"), andBrahmanae ("Βραχμαναι").[156]
Porphyry extensively describes the habits of the śramaṇas, whom he calls "Samanaeans", in hisOn Abstinence from Animal Food Book IV[1]. He says his information was obtained from "theBabylonianBardesanes, who lived in the times of our fathers, and was familiar with thoseIndians who, together with Damadamis, were sent toCaesar."[citation needed]
For the polity of theIndians being distributed into many parts, there is one tribe among them of men divinely wise, whom theGreeks are accustomed to callGymnosophists. But of these there are two sects, over one of which theBrahmins preside, but over the other the Samanaeans. The race of theBrahmins, however, receive divine wisdom of this kind by succession, in the same manner as the priesthood. But the Samanaeans are elected, and consist of those who wish to possess divine knowledge.[157]
All theBramins originate from one stock; for all of them are derived from one father and one mother. But the Samanaeans are not the offspring of one family, being, as we have said, collected from every nation of Indians. A Bramin, however, is not a subject of any government, nor does he contribute any thing together with others to government.[157]
The Samanaeans are, as we have said, elected. When, however, any one is desirous of being enrolled in their order, he proceeds to the rulers of the city; but abandons the city or village that he inhabited, and the wealth and all the other property that he possessed. Having likewise the superfluities of his body cut off, he receives a garment, and departs to the Samanaeans, but does not return either to his wife or children, if he happens to have any, nor does he pay any attention to them, or think that they at all pertain to him. And, with respect to his children indeed, the king provides what is necessary for them, and the relatives provide for the wife. And such is the life of the Samanaeans. But they live out of the city, and spend the whole day in conversation pertaining to divinity. They have also houses and temples, built by the king, in which they are stewards, who receive a certain emolument from the king, for the purpose of supplying those that dwell in them with nutriment. But their food consists of rice, bread, autumnal fruits, and pot-herbs. And when they enter into their house, the sound of a bell being the signal of their entrance, those that are not Samanaeans depart from it, and the Samanaeans begin immediately to pray.[157]
And with respect to those that are philosophers, among these some dwell on mountains, and others about the river Ganges. And those that live on mountains feed on autumnal fruits, and on cows' milk coagulated with herbs. But those that reside near theGanges, live also on autumnal fruits, which are produced in abundance about that river. The land likewise nearly always bears new fruit, together with much rice, which grows spontaneously, and which they use when there is a deficiency of autumnal fruits. But to taste of any other nutriment, or, in short, to touch animal food, is considered by them as equivalent to extreme impurity and impiety. And this is one of their dogmas. They also worship divinity with piety and purity. They spend the day, and the greater part of the night, in hymns and prayers to the Gods; each of them having a cottage to himself, and living, as much as possible, alone. For the Bramins cannot endure to remain with others, nor to speak much; but when this happens to take place, they afterwards withdraw themselves, and do not speak for many days. They likewise frequently fast.[157]
They are so disposed with respect to death, that they unwillingly endure the whole time of the present life, as a certain servitude to nature, and therefore they hasten to liberate their souls from the bodies [with which they are connected]. Hence, frequently, when they are seen to be well, and are neither oppressed, nor driven to desperation by any evil, they depart from life.[157]
German novelistHermann Hesse, long interested in Eastern, especially Indian, spirituality, wroteSiddhartha, in which the main character becomes a Samana upon leaving his home.
The name "Chaldeans" refers generally to theChaldean people who lived in the land ofBabylonia, and especially to the Chaldean "magi" of Babylon......The "Chaldeans" were the guardians of the sacred science: the astrological knowledge and the divination mixed with religion and magic. They were considered the last representatives of the Babylonian sages......In Classical Antiquity, the name "Chaldeans" primarily stood for the priests of the Babylonian temples. In Hellenistic times, the term "Chaldeos" was synonymous with the words "mathematician" and "astrologer"......TheNeo-Platonists connected theChaldean Oracles with the ancient Chaldeans, obtaining a prestige coming from the East and legitimizing their existence as bearers and successors of an ancient tradition.
 | This articleneeds more completecitations forverification. Please helpadd missing citation information so that sources are clearly identifiable.(May 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)This article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
| Gods | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | |||||
| Branches |
| ||||
| Practices | |||||
| Literature | |||||
| Symbols | |||||
| Ascetics | |||||
| Scholars | |||||
| Community |
| ||||
| Jainism in |
| ||||
| Jainism and | |||||
| Dynasties and empires | |||||
| Related | |||||
| Lists | |||||
| Navboxes | |||||
.svg)
