Shakespeare's editors were essential in the development of the modern practice of producing printed books and the evolution oftextual criticism.
The 17th-centuryfolio collections of the plays ofWilliam Shakespeare did not have editors in the modern sense of the term. In the best understanding of contemporary consensus scholarship, the plays to be included in theFirst Folio (1623) were gathered together or "compiled" byJohn Heminges andHenry Condell, two long-time colleagues of Shakespeare in theKing's Men. The play manuscripts may have beenproofread and prepared for printing byEdward Knight, the "book-keeper" or prompter of the company. The task ofproofreading and correcting the actual printed pages of the Folio was left to thecompositors and printers in the print-shop, yielding the uneven and often defective text that is the First Folio.
In the 18th century, however, interested individuals made the first concerted efforts to bring order to the tangle of textual difficulties that the Folios of the previous century presented. The list below gives the date of each edition of Shakespeare's plays, the editor, the format of the collection, and pertinent specific information.
1709–10,Nicholas Rowe;octavo, 7 volumes. Rowe was the first person to attempt a clean and fully comprehensible text of the plays; but he depended upon a copy of the Fourth Folio and made generallyconjectural emendations. He also added full stage directions (he was a playwright himself) and full lists ofDramatis personae, and wrote the first biographical sketch of the poet.
1725,Alexander Pope;quarto, 6 volumes. Pope was the first to attempt a collation of the quarto texts of the plays, yet he produced what was basically a reprint of Rowe that added little of value.
1733,Lewis Theobald; octavo, 7 volumes. Theobald has been called "the first Shakespeare scholar";[1] he carried forward the task of collating the quartos, and began the study of Shakespeare's sources and the order of the plays' composition. (SeeChronology of Shakespeare's plays.)
1744,Thomas Hanmer; quarto, 6 volumes. Hanmer relied on Theobald's text, and made guesswork corrections. His edition was reprinted in1770.
1747,William Warburton; octavo, 8 volumes. Warburton built upon Pope's edition; indeed, Warburton placed Pope's name before his own on the title pages of his edition. In his preface, Warburton wrote that his friend Pope "was desirous I should give a new Edition of this Poet, as he thought it might contribute to put a stop to a prevailing folly of altering the Text of celebrated Authors without Talents or Judgment. And he was willing thathis Edition should be melted down intomine, as it would, he said, afford him (so great is the modesty of an ingenuous temper) a fit opportunity of confessing his Mistakes." The phrase "without Talents or Judgment" refers to Theobold and Hanmer. However, Warburton did allow, rather begrudgingly, some corrections put forward by Theobold and Hanmer: "For the rest, all the Corrections which these two Editors have made on anyreasonable Foundation, are here admitted into the Text; and carefully assigned to their respective Authors. A piece of Justice which theOxford Editor never did; and which theOther was not always scrupulous in observing towards me."[2]
In1748 Thomas Edwards published hisSupplement to Warburton's Edition of Shakespeare, in later editions calledThe Canons of Criticism – a satirical but spot-on analysis of Warburton's editorial emendations, some of which are truly silly.[3] Samuel Johnson had this to say: "Soon after Edwards'sCanons of Criticism came out, Johnson was dining at Tonson the Bookseller's, with Hayman the Painter and some more company. Hayman related to Sir Joshua Reynolds, that the conversation having turned upon Edwards's book, the gentlemen praised it much, and Johnson allowed its merit. But when they went farther, and appeared to put that authour upon a level with Warburton, "Nay, (said Johnson,) he has given him some smart hits to be sure; but there is no proportion between the two men; they must not be named together. A fly, Sir, may sting a stately horse and make him wince; but one is but an insect, and the other is a horse still."[4]
1765,Samuel Johnson,The Plays of William Shakespeare; octavo, 8 volumes. Johnson in turn relied upon Warburton; his edition is noteworthy mainly for its famous Preface, and for its notes, which are a partial variorum of those of earlier editors.
1773,George Steevens; octavo, 10 volumes. Steevens employed Johnson's text, but continued Capell's trend of adding new material. Steevens revised and re-issued his edition in1778; in1780 Edmond Malone added another 2 volumes that contained Shakespeare's non-dramatic poems and other material.Isaac Reed revised the Steevens edition again in 1785, and Steevens himself produced one final, 15-volume revision in1793.
The early 19th century saw the firstVariorum editions of Shakespeare's works, editions that collated and synthesized the efforts of the editors of the previous century:
1803, the First Variorum edition, edited byIsaac Reed; 21 volumes.
1813, the Second Variorum, a reprint of the First; 21 volumes.
These massive editions laid the foundation for modern textual scholarship on Shakespeare's works, and by extension on works of literature in general. In the 19th century the text, drawn primarily from Malone and Steevens, was "monumentalized"[6] in the Cambridge edition (1863–66) and its single-volume companion, the Globe edition (1864). It was followed by the New Cambridge edition in 1921, and all modern standard editions inherit primarily from this edition.[6]
As for the personalities involved: some of these men were friends, like Steevens, Reed, and Malone; acquaintances called them the Shakespeare Gang. Others nourished spirits of competitiveness and resentment. Pope made Theobald the first hero ofThe Dunciad. Warburton belittled Rowe's "Account of the Life" of Shakespeare – but he reprinted it in his own edition, without change or improvement. Despite his friendship with Malone and Reed, Steevens was famous for his irascibility; in notes to his 1793 edition of Shakespeare, he concocted obscene interpretations of some passages and attributed those readings to people he didn't like.[7]
The next major edition, the Cambridge Shakespeare (1863–66), moved away from the practice of a single editor following his own sometimes capricious instincts and judgments. The first volume of the Cambridge Shakespeare was edited byWilliam George Clark and John Glover, and the subsequent eight volumes by Clark andWilliam Aldis Wright. Clark and Wright also produced the single-volume Globe Shakespeare (1864) using their Cambridge texts; together, these became the standard for the remainder of the century.
The most radical edition in the twentieth century was theOxford Shakespeare, prepared under the general editorship ofStanley Wells andGary Taylor. It aims to present the texts as they were originally performed, which results in numerous controversial choices, including presenting multiple texts ofKing Lear, a text ofHamlet in which the scenes presumably cut by Shakespeare are relegated to an appendix, and an emphasis on the collaborative nature of several of the plays.
^Warburton, William (1747).The Works of Shakespear. London: J. & P. Knapton; S. Birt; T. Longman & T. Shewell; and others. pp. title page, xix, & xiii.
^Boswell, James (1807). Malone, Edmond (ed.).The Life of Samuel Johnson. London: T. Cadell & W. Davies. p. 207, note 7.
^Not the famousBoswell, the biographer of Johnson, but rather his third son (1778–1822): Michael Dobson and Stanley Wells:The Oxford Companion to Shakespeare. OUP 2001. p. 52.
