Paleoseismology is a related field that usesgeology to infer information regarding past earthquakes. A recording ofEarth's motion as a function of time, created by aseismograph is called aseismogram. Aseismologist is a scientist who works in basic or applied seismology.
In the 17th century,Athanasius Kircher argued that earthquakes were caused by the movement of fire within a system of channels inside the Earth.Martin Lister (1638–1712) andNicolas Lemery (1645–1715) proposed that earthquakes were caused by chemical explosions within the Earth.[4]
TheLisbon earthquake of 1755, coinciding with the general flowering of science inEurope, set in motion intensified scientific attempts to understand the behaviour and causation of earthquakes. The earliest responses include work byJohn Bevis (1757) andJohn Michell (1761). Michell determined that earthquakes originate within the Earth and were waves of movement caused by "shifting masses of rock miles below the surface".[5]
In response to a series of earthquakes nearComrie inScotland in 1839, a committee was formed in theUnited Kingdom in order to produce better detection methods for earthquakes. The outcome of this was the production of one of the first modernseismometers byJames David Forbes, first presented in a report byDavid Milne-Home in 1842.[6] This seismometer was an inverted pendulum, which recorded the measurements of seismic activity through the use of a pencil placed on paper above the pendulum. The designs provided did not prove effective, according to Milne's reports.[6]
From 1857,Robert Mallet laid the foundation of modern instrumental seismology and carried out seismological experiments using explosives. He is also responsible for coining the word "seismology."[7] He is widely considered to be the "Father of Seismology".
In 1889Ernst von Rebeur-Paschwitz recorded the first teleseismic earthquake signal (an earthquake in Japan recorded at Pottsdam Germany).[8]
In 1897,Emil Wiechert's theoretical calculations led him to conclude that theEarth's interior consists of a mantle of silicates, surrounding a core of iron.[9]
In 1906Richard Dixon Oldham identified the separate arrival ofP waves, S waves and surface waves on seismograms and found the first clear evidence that the Earth has a central core.[10]
In 1909,Andrija Mohorovičić, one of the founders of modern seismology,[11][12][13] discovered and defined theMohorovičić discontinuity.[14] Usually referred to as the "Moho discontinuity" or the "Moho," it is the boundary between theEarth'scrust and themantle. It is defined by the distinct change in velocity of seismological waves as they pass through changing densities of rock.[15]
In 1910, after studying the April1906 San Francisco earthquake,Harry Fielding Reid put forward the "elastic rebound theory" which remains the foundation for modern tectonic studies. The development of this theory depended on the considerable progress of earlier independent streams of work on the behavior of elastic materials and in mathematics.[16]
An early scientific study ofaftershocks from a destructive earthquake came after the January1920 Xalapa earthquake. An 80 kg (180 lb) Wiechert seismograph was brought to the Mexican city of Xalapa by rail after the earthquake. The instrument was deployed to record its aftershocks. Data from the seismograph would eventually determine that the mainshock was produced along a shallow crustal fault.[17]
In 1926,Harold Jeffreys was the first to claim, based on his study of earthquake waves, that below the mantle, the core of the Earth is liquid.[18]
By the 1960s, Earth science had developed to the point where a comprehensive theory of the causation of seismic events and geodetic motions had come together in the now well-established theory ofplate tectonics.[21]
Seismogram records showing the three components ofground motion. The red line marks the first arrival of P waves; the green line, the later arrival of S waves.
Seismic waves areelastic waves that propagate in solid or fluid materials. They can be divided intobody waves that travel through the interior of the materials;surface waves that travel along surfaces or interfaces between materials; andnormal modes, a form of standing wave.
There are two types of body waves, pressure waves or primary waves (P waves) andshear or secondary waves (S waves). P waves arelongitudinal waves associated withcompression andexpansion, and involve particle motion parallel to the direction of wave propagation. P waves are always the first waves to appear on a seismogram as they are the waves that travel fastest through solids.S waves aretransverse waves associated with shear, and involve particle motion perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation. S waves travel more slowly than P waves so they appear later than P waves on a seismogram. Because of their low shear strength, fluids cannot support transverse elastic waves, so S waves travel only in solids.[22]
Surface waves are the result of P and S waves interacting with the surface of the Earth. These waves aredispersive, meaning that different frequencies have different velocities. The two main surface wave types areRayleigh waves, which have both compressional and shear motions, andLove waves, which are purely shear. Rayleigh waves result from the interaction of P waves and vertically polarized S waves with the surface and can exist in any solid medium. Love waves are formed by horizontally polarized S waves interacting with the surface, and can only exist if there is a change in the elastic properties with depth in a solid medium, which is always the case in seismological applications. Surface waves travel more slowly than P waves and S waves because they are the result of these waves traveling along indirect paths to interact with Earth's surface. Because they travel along the surface of the Earth, their energy decays less rapidly than body waves (1/distance2 vs. 1/distance3), and thus the shaking caused by surface waves is generally stronger than that of body waves, and the primary surface waves are often thus the largest signals on earthquakeseismograms. Surface waves are strongly excited when their source is close to the surface, as in a shallow earthquake or a near-surface explosion, and are much weaker for deep earthquake sources.[22]
Both body and surface waves are traveling waves; however, large earthquakes can also make the entire Earth "ring" like a resonant bell. This ringing is a mixture ofnormal modes with discrete frequencies and periods of approximately an hour or shorter. Normal-mode motion caused by a very large earthquake can be observed for up to a month after the event.[22] The first observations of normal modes were made in the 1960s as the advent of higher-fidelity instruments coincided with two of the largest earthquakes of the 20th century, the1960 Valdivia earthquake and the1964 Alaska earthquake. Since then, the normal modes of the Earth have given us some of the strongest constraints on the deep structure of the Earth.
Installation for a temporary seismic station, north Iceland highland.
Seismometers are sensors that detect and record the motion of the Earth arising from elastic waves. Seismometers may be deployed at the Earth's surface, in shallow vaults, in boreholes, orunderwater. A complete instrument package that records seismic signals is called aseismograph. Networks of seismographs continuously record ground motions around the world to facilitate the monitoring and analysis of global earthquakes and other sources of seismic activity. Rapid location of earthquakes makestsunami warnings possible because seismic waves travel considerably faster than tsunami waves.
Seismometers also record signals from non-earthquake sources ranging from explosions (nuclear and chemical), to local noise from wind[24] or anthropogenic activities, to incessant signals generated at the ocean floor and coasts induced by ocean waves (the globalmicroseism), tocryospheric events associated with largeicebergs and glaciers. Above-ocean meteor strikes with energies as high as 4.2 × 1013J (equivalent to that released by an explosion of ten kilotons of TNT) have been recorded by seismographs, as have a number of industrial accidents and terrorist bombs and events (a field of study referred to asforensic seismology). A major long-term motivation for the global seismographic monitoring has been for the detection and study ofnuclear testing.
Seismic velocities and boundaries in the interior of theEarth sampled by seismic waves
Because seismic waves commonly propagate efficiently as they interact with the internal structure of the Earth, they provide high-resolution noninvasive methods for studying the planet's interior. One of the earliest important discoveries (suggested byRichard Dixon Oldham in 1906 and definitively shown by Harold Jeffreys in 1926) was that theouter core of the earth is liquid. Since S waves do not pass through liquids, the liquid core causes a "shadow" on the side of the planet opposite the earthquake where no direct S waves are observed. In addition, P waves travel much slower through the outer core than the mantle.
Public controversy over earthquake prediction erupted after Italian authoritiesindicted six seismologists and one government official formanslaughter in connection witha magnitude 6.3 earthquake in L'Aquila, Italy on April 5, 2009.[26] A report inNature stated that the indictment was widely seen in Italy and abroad as being for failing to predict the earthquake and drew condemnation from theAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science and theAmerican Geophysical Union.[26] However, the magazine also indicated that the population of Aquila do not consider the failure to predict the earthquake to be the reason for the indictment, but rather the alleged failure of the scientists to evaluate and communicate risk.[26] The indictment claims that, at a special meeting inL'Aquila the week before the earthquake occurred, scientists and officials were more interested in pacifying the population than providing adequate information about earthquake risk and preparedness.[26]
In locations where a historical record exists it may be used to estimate the timing, location and magnitude of future seismic events. There are several interpretative factors to consider. The epicentres or foci and magnitudes of historical earthquakes are subject to interpretation meaning it is possible that 5–6 Mw earthquakes described in the historical record could be larger events occurring elsewhere that were felt moderately in the populated areas that produced written records. Documentation in the historic period may be sparse or incomplete, and not give a full picture of the geographic scope of an earthquake, or the historical record may only have earthquake records spanning a few centuries, a very short time frame in aseismic cycle.[27][28]
Engineering seismology is the study and application of seismology for engineering purposes.[29] It generally applied to the branch of seismology that deals with the assessment of the seismic hazard of a site or region for the purposes of earthquake engineering. It is, therefore, a link betweenearth science andcivil engineering.[30] There are two principal components of engineering seismology. Firstly, studying earthquake history (e.g. historical[30] and instrumental catalogs[31] of seismicity) andtectonics[32] to assess the earthquakes that could occur in a region and their characteristics and frequency of occurrence. Secondly, studying strong ground motions generated by earthquakes to assess the expected shaking from future earthquakes with similar characteristics. These strong ground motions could either be observations fromaccelerometers or seismometers or those simulated by computers using various techniques,[33] which are then often used to develop ground-motion prediction equations[34] (or ground-motion models)[1]Archived 2023-06-09 at theWayback Machine.
^Needham, Joseph (1959).Science and Civilization in China, Volume 3: Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 626–635.Bibcode:1959scc3.book.....N.
^Udías, Agustín; Arroyo, Alfonso López (2008). "The Lisbon earthquake of 1755 in Spanish contemporary authors". In Mendes-Victor, Luiz A.; Oliveira, Carlos Sousa; Azevedo, João; Ribeiro, Antonio (eds.).The 1755 Lisbon earthquake: revisited. Springer. p. 14.ISBN9781402086090.
^Member of the Royal Academy of Berlin (2012).The History and Philosophy of Earthquakes Accompanied by John Michell's 'conjectures Concerning the Cause, and Observations upon the Ph'nomena of Earthquakes'. Cambridge Univ Pr.ISBN9781108059909.
^Lee, W. H. K.; S. W. Stewart (1989)."Large-Scale Processing and Analysis of Digital Waveform Data from the USGS Central California Microearthquake Network".Observatory seismology: an anniversary symposium on the occasion of the centennial of the University of California at Berkeley seismographic stations. University of California Press. p. 86.ISBN9780520065826. Retrieved2011-10-12.The CUSP (Caltech-USGS Seismic Processing) System consists of on-line real-time earthquake waveform data acquisition routines, coupled with an off-line set of data reduction, timing, and archiving processes. It is a complete system for processing local earthquake data ...
Kanamori, Hiroo (2003).Earthquake prediction: An overview(PDF). International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology. Vol. 81B. International Association of Seismology & Physics of the Earth's Interior. pp. 1205–1216. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2013-10-24.
Schulte, Peter; Laia Alegret; Ignacio Arenillas; José A. Arz; Penny J. Barton; Paul R. Bown; Timothy J. Bralower; Gail L. Christeson; Philippe Claeys; Charles S. Cockell; Gareth S. Collins; Alexander Deutsch; Tamara J. Goldin; Kazuhisa Goto; José M. Grajales-Nishimura; Richard A. F. Grieve; Sean P. S. Gulick; Kirk R. Johnson; Wolfgang Kiessling; Christian Koeberl; David A. Kring; Kenneth G. MacLeod;Takafumi Matsui; Jay Melosh; Alessandro Montanari;Joanna V. Morgan; Clive R. Neal; Douglas J. Nichols; Richard D. Norris; Elisabetta Pierazzo; Greg Ravizza; Mario Rebolledo-Vieyra; Wolf Uwe Reimold; Eric Robin; Tobias Salge; Robert P. Speijer; Arthur R. Sweet; Jaime Urrutia-Fucugauchi; Vivi Vajda; Michael T. Whalen; Pi S. Willumsen (5 March 2010)."The Chicxulub Asteroid Impact and Mass Extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene Boundary".Science.327 (5970):1214–1218.Bibcode:2010Sci...327.1214S.doi:10.1126/science.1177265.ISSN1095-9203.PMID20203042.S2CID2659741. Retrieved5 March 2010.
