
Thesecond-term curse is the perceived tendency of second termU.S. presidents to be less successful than their first terms.[1][2]
According to the curse, the second terms of U.S. presidents have usually been plagued by a major scandal, policy inertia, some sort of catastrophe, or other problems.[3][4][5] There have been twenty-one U.S. presidents who have served a second term,[6] each of whom has faced difficulties attributed to the curse.[citation needed] The legend behind the second-term curse is that afterFranklin D. Roosevelt broke thede facto second term limit by running for third and fourth terms, the ghost ofGeorge Washington might have put a curse on any president who seeks a second term.[4][5] This legend notwithstanding, several presidents who served prior to this, including Washington and Roosevelt themselves, were plagued by problems in their second term more serious than in their first.[2]
Whether this perceived tendency is real is a subject of dispute: for example, political statisticianNate Silver, after analyzingpresidential approval ratings forHarry S. Truman throughBarack Obama, did find that approval ratings were lower on average during second terms, but he also found a variety of other reasons to explain those ratings, such asregression toward the mean, and he concluded that "the idea of the second-term curse is sloppy as an analytical concept".[7] In addition, political writerMichael Barone cited several presidents who had successful second terms, and wrote that "second-term problems resulted more often from the failure to adjust to changed circumstances and unanticipated challenges".[2] Conversely, a 2013 report inThe Economist has said that the existence of the second-term curse is supported by data. The report stated that each of the eleven second terms served from the beginning of theTheodore Roosevelt administration to the end of theGeorge W. Bush administration were less economically prosperous than their respective president's first term, save for the second terms of Truman,Ronald Reagan, andBill Clinton.[8] However, these findings could be due to the effect ofsurvivorship bias; presidents who are elected for a second term are more likely to have had a good first term, making their second term look worse by comparison.
| President | Second term | Attributed event(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| George Washington | 1793–1797 |
| |
| Thomas Jefferson | 1805–1809 | ||
| James Madison | 1813–1817 | Burning of Washington[2] | |
| James Monroe | 1821–1825 | Congressional rejection of his anti-slavery efforts[6] | |
| Andrew Jackson | 1833–1837 | Events in theBank War which laid the groundwork for thePanic of 1837[10] | |
| Abraham Lincoln | 1865 | His assassination[11] | |
| Ulysses S. Grant | 1873–1877 |
| |
| Grover Cleveland | 1893–1897[note 1] |
| |
| William McKinley | 1901 | His assassination[2] | |
| Theodore Roosevelt | 1905–1909[note 2] | The U.S. economy was not as strong as it was during his first term.[8] | |
| Woodrow Wilson | 1917–1921 |
| |
| Calvin Coolidge | 1925–1929[note 2] | The U.S. economy was not as strong as it was during his first term.[8] | |
| Franklin D. Roosevelt | 1937–1941 |
| |
| Harry S. Truman | 1949–1953[note 2] |
| |
| Dwight D. Eisenhower | 1957–1961 |
| |
| Lyndon B. Johnson | 1965–1969[note 2] |
| |
| Richard Nixon | 1973–1974[note 3] |
| |
| Ronald Reagan | 1985–1989 | Iran–Contra affair[1][4] | |
| Bill Clinton | 1997–2001 |
| |
| George W. Bush | 2005–2009 | ||
| Barack Obama | 2013–2017 | ||
My view, then, is that the idea of the second-term curse is sloppy as an analytical concept. There is certainly a historical tendency for presidents who earn a second term to become less popular — but some of this reflects reversion to the mean. And some recent presidents have overcome the supposed curse and actually become more popular on average during their second terms.