Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Schwerdt site

Coordinates:42°40′00″N86°00′00″W / 42.66667°N 86.00000°W /42.66667; -86.00000
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archaeological site in Michigan, United States
Schwerdt site
Schwerdt site is located in Michigan
Schwerdt site
Location inMichigan
Show map of Michigan
Schwerdt site is located in the United States
Schwerdt site
Location in United States
Show map of the United States
LocationKalamazoo River near Saugatuck, Michigan
Coordinates42°40′00″N86°00′00″W / 42.66667°N 86.00000°W /42.66667; -86.00000
Area3 acres (1.2 ha)

TheSchwerdt site (20AE127) is located on theKalamazoo River inAllegan County, Michigan. It is classified as a single-component Berrien phase site dating to the lateprehistoric period (c.1400–1600 A.D.).[1] The Berrien phase is associated with thelate Woodland but also has someUpper Mississippian influences.[2]

History of archaeological investigations

[edit]

The site was identified through an archaeological survey byWestern Michigan University in 1976. Excavations were conducted under the auspices of Western Michigan University in 1977 and 1979.[3]

Results of 1977 and 1979 excavations

[edit]

The excavations yielded features, prehistoric artifacts, animal bone, and plant remains.[4]

Features

[edit]

A total of 46 features were uncovered at the site, of which 35 were distinctive deep roasting pits. The remains ofAmerican Lotus roots were found in 14 of the roasting pits, usually in conjunction withsturgeon bone.[5] Similar pits have been found at two nearby sites on theKalamazoo River, Elam and Allegan Dam.[6]

Animal bone

[edit]

Most of the bone found was from thelake sturgeon.[7] There were also twoblack bearcraniums found near the tops of two features, both with theirmandibles removed.[8] A bear cranium was found under similar conditions at theBell site inWisconsin, and the researchers at that site suggested it may be evidence of the prehistoric to early historic practice ofbear ceremonialism.[9]

Artifacts

[edit]

Artifacts recovered from the site included prehistoric pottery andlithics (stone tools). The majority of the stone tools were small triangular Madison points (aka “arrowheads”).[10] Madison points are commonly associated with lateprehistoric (late Woodland) occupations in the EasternUnited States.[11]

Pottery types

[edit]

Almost all of the pottery found at the site belonged to the late prehistoric Berrien Phase as described at theMoccasin Bluff site, a site on theSt. Joseph River inBerrien County,Michigan about 70 miles (110 km) south of Schwerdt.[12]

The pottery types identified / defined at Schwerdt closely match the types reported atMoccasin Bluff:

  • Moccasin Bluff modified lip (6 vessels)[13][14] – characterized by grit tempering, smoothed-overcordmarked surfaces, and a folded or crimped lip with cordwrapped stick impression or fingernail impressions on the lip. This type has been identified at theMoccasin Bluff and Ada sites inMichigan, and the Brems site inIndiana.[15] Time period: Late Prehistoric. Cultural Affiliation: Late Woodland.
  • Moccasin Bluff impressed exterior lip (19 vessels)[16][17] – characterized by grit tempering, smoothed-overcordmarked surfaces and distinctive finger-impressed patterns on the lip. This type has been reported from Brems andMoccasin Bluff.[18] Time period: Late Prehistoric. Cultural Affiliation: Late Woodland.
  • Moccasin Bluff plain modified lip (10 vessels)[19][20] – characterized by grit tempering, smooth surface and modified/notched lip treatment. This specific type is known only from Schwerdt andMoccasin Bluff. However it may have some relationship to Langford Ware, first noted at the Fisher site inIllinois, which is also grit tempered with similar attributes.[21] Time period: Late Prehistoric. Cultural Affiliation: Late Woodland.
  • Schwerdt scalloped (20 vessels)[22] – characterized by grit tempering,cordmarked or smoothed-over cordmarked surface, and a distinctive scalloped lip. This type is the Schwerdt equivalent of Moccasin Bluff Scalloped described from theMoccasin Bluff site.[23] At Schwerdt it is sub-divided into 2 groups based on small differences in the type and application of the scalloping. This type has been noted at the Hacklander, Elam andDumaw Creek sites inMichigan.[24] At Dumaw Creek the pottery was associated withEuropean trade goods, indicating this latePrehistoric type was still being made in the earlyHistoric Period.[25] it was suggested by the researchers that it was the product of anAlgonkian-speaking tribe, probably either thePotawatomi orSauk tribes.[26] Time period: Late Prehistoric to Early Historic. Prehistoric Cultural Affiliation: Late Woodland. Historic cultural affiliation: possibly Potawatomi or Sauk.
  • Huber ware (12 vessels)[27] – characterized by shell tempering and plain surfaces. This ware was first noted at the Huber site inIllinois and has also been reported from Oak Forest, Anker, Zimmerman, Hoxie Farm and Palos sites in Illinois; Griesmer and Brems in Indiana; and Wymer andMoccasin Bluff in Michigan.[28][29][30] AtMoccasin Bluff it is called Berrien Ware.[31] At Schwerdt, this ware is divided into 4 categories: Schwerdt Group 1-Huber Bold (1 vessel), Schwerdt Group 2-modified lip (3 vessels), Schwerdt Group 3-plain square lip (3 vessels) and Schwerdt Group 4-miniature vessels (5 vessels). Huber ware was found in association withEuropean trade goods at Oak Forest and Palos, indicating this latePrehistoric pottery type was still being made in the earlyHistoric period.[32] TheMiami tribe was known to be present in the southernLake Michigan region, so they could have been the creators of this pottery type.[33] Time period: Late Prehistoric to Early Historic. Prehistoric Cultural Affiliation:Oneota Aspect, possibly Orr focus.[34] Historic cultural affiliation: unknown, possibly Miami.

Significance

[edit]

Schwerdt has been interpreted as a single component 15th century seasonal encampment.[35] It has been radiocarbon-dated to c. 1445-1450 A.D.[36] There are no permanent structures and no indication of any agricultural activity. The presence ofsturgeon bone andAmerican lotus root suggests spring-early summer occupation, based on the annual spring sturgeon migration.[37] Based on this information, it has been suggested that the site represents one stop on a seasonal round that would also include a semi-permanent, agricultural village.[38]

References

[edit]
  1. ^McAllister, Paul W. (1980).The Schwerdt Site (20AE127) Ceramics: A Berrien Phase Ceramic Assemblage in Allegan County, Michigan (Masters thesis). Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University. p. 23.
  2. ^Bettarel, Robert Louis & Smith, Hale G. (1973).The Moccasin Bluff Site and the Woodland Cultures of Southwestern Michigan. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. p. 153.
  3. ^McAllister (1980), p. 4.
  4. ^McAllister (1980), p. 17.
  5. ^McAllister (1980), p. 12.
  6. ^McAllister (1980), p. 13.
  7. ^Higgins, Michael J. (1980).An Analysis of the Faunal Remains from the Schwerdt Site, a Late Prehistoric Encampment in Allegan County, Michigan (Masters thesis). Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University. p. 19.
  8. ^Higgins (1980), pp. 25–29.
  9. ^Wittry, Warren L. (1963). "The Bell Site, Wn9, An Early Historic Fox Village".Wisconsin Archaeologist.44: 6.
  10. ^McAllister (1980), p. 20.
  11. ^Bettarel & Smith (1973), p. 120.
  12. ^McAllister (1980), p. 23.
  13. ^McAllister (1980), pp. 35–39.
  14. ^Bettarel & Smith (1973), pp. 56–61.
  15. ^McAllister (1980), pp. 35–39.
  16. ^McAllister (1980), pp. 39–43.
  17. ^Bettarel & Smith (1973), pp. 61–62.
  18. ^McAllister (1980), pp. 39–43.
  19. ^McAllister (1980), pp. 49–57.
  20. ^Bettarel & Smith (1973), pp. 63–65.
  21. ^McAllister (1980), p. 52.
  22. ^McAllister (1980), pp. 44–49.
  23. ^Bettarel & Smith (1973), p. 66.
  24. ^McAllister (1980), p. 46.
  25. ^Quimby, George Irving (1966). "The Dumaw Creek Site: a Seventeenth Century Prehistoric Indian Village and Cemetery in Oceana County, Michigan".Fieldiana.56 (1):64–72.
  26. ^Quimby (1966), p. 88.
  27. ^McAllister (1980), pp. 57–66.
  28. ^McAllister (1980), p. 60.
  29. ^Bluhm, Elaine A. & Liss, Allen (1961).The Anker Site, in Chicago Area Archaeology. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois. pp. 104–106.
  30. ^Bluhm, Elaine A. & Fenner, Gloria J. (1961).The Oak Forest Site, in Chicago Area Archaeology. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois. p. 145.
  31. ^Bettarel & Smith (1973), pp. 66–69.
  32. ^Bettarel & Smith (1973), p. 117.
  33. ^Bettarel & Smith (1973), p. 148.
  34. ^McAllister (1980), p. 61.
  35. ^McAllister (1980), p. 23.
  36. ^McAllister (1980), p. 21.
  37. ^McAllister (1980), p. 19.
  38. ^Higgins (1980), pp. 54–56.
Middle
Mississippian
American Bottom
and Upper Mississippi
Lower Ohio River and
Confluence area
Middle Ohio River
Tennessee and
Cumberland
Central and Lower
Mississippi
South Appalachian
Mississippian
Fort Walton culture
Pensacola culture
Plaquemine
Mississippian
Caddoan
Mississippian
Upper Mississippian
cultures
Oneota
Fort Ancient culture
Culture
Agriculture
Artwork
Languages
Religion
Archaeological
cultures
Archaeological
sites
Human
remains
Miscellaneous
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Schwerdt_site&oldid=1263116530"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp