Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Sanskritisation (linguistics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromSanskritisation (language))
For the sociological process in which lower-caste people imitate upper-caste customs, seeSanskritisation (sociology).
Sanskrit influence on other languages
Manipravalam, a heavily Sanskritised style ofTamil, written inTamil-Grantha script.

Sanskritisation is the process of introducing features fromSanskrit, such asvocabulary andgrammar, into other languages.[1] It is sometimes associated with the "Hinduisation" of a linguistic community.[2][3] Many languages throughoutSouth Asia andSoutheast Asia were greatly influenced by Sanskrit (or its descendant languages, thePrakrits and modern-dayIndo-Aryan languages) historically.[4][5][6]

Sanskritisation often stands in opposition to thePersianisation orEnglishisation of a language within South Asia,[7][8] as occurs with theHindustani language, which in its Sanskritised, Persianised, and English-influenced registers becomesHindi,Urdu, andHinglish/Urdish respectively.[9][10][11][12] Support for Sanskritisation in South Asia runs highest amongHindu nationalists.[13]

Sanskritization of the names of people and places is also commonplace in India.[14][15][16]

History

[edit]

Ancient era

[edit]
This section is an excerpt fromSanskrit § Influence on other languages.[edit]
For nearly 2,000 years, Sanskrit was the language of a cultural order that exerted influence across South Asia,Inner Asia, Southeast Asia, and to a certain extent East Asia.[17] A significant form of post-Vedic Sanskrit is found in the Sanskrit ofIndian epic poetry—theRamayana andMahabharata. The deviations fromPāṇini in the epics are generally considered to be on account of interference fromPrakrits, or innovations, and not because they are pre-Paninian.[18] Traditional Sanskrit scholars call such deviationsārṣa (आर्ष), meaning 'of theṛṣis', the traditional title for the ancient authors. In some contexts, there are also more "prakritisms" (borrowings from common speech) than in Classical Sanskrit proper.Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit is a literary language heavily influenced by theMiddle Indo-Aryan languages, based on early Buddhist Prakrit texts which subsequently assimilated to the Classical Sanskrit standard in varying degrees.[19]

Modern era

[edit]
See also:Hindi–Urdu controversy andHindi § Sanskrit

During the medieval era, the Indian languages had taken in a lot of Perso-Arabic influences as a result of Muslim invasions, particularly in thenorthwestern subcontinent;[20] colonial-era education policies,religious nationalism, and the influence of some of the more Sanskritised Indian languages played a role in Hindus and Muslims increasingly separating in terms of their linguistic influences,[21] with Hindus tending towards the usage of Sanskrit words and theBrahmicDevanagari script for writingHindi & Muslims opting for a morePerso-Arabic vocabulary &NastaliqArabic script for writingUrdu.[22][23][24]

Since the 1947Partition of India, the Indian government, which at one point considered making Sanskrit the national language, instead has sought to further Sanskritise Hindi,[25] considering it to be easier for Indians to learn,[26] and as a way of distancing Hindi from the Urdu spoken in the newly formed country of Pakistan (though Urdu continues to have official status in several Indian states, such asUttar Pradesh).[27][28] Sanskrit has been used to formnew words to describe modern concepts and technologies in several South Asian languages by formingcalques based on English words.[29][23][30] In addition, Sanskrit words that have been nativised into other languages have been mixed with words from other language families, such as theDravidian languages, to form new words.[31]

Cultural debates have emerged over how much Sanskrit should appear in Hindi and how acceptable Persian and English influences should be,[32][33] withHindu nationalists favouring Sanskritised Hindi,[34] opposing Urdu in part because of its association withIslam,[35] and someboycotting the Hindi-languageBollywood film industry for featuring too much Urdu and English vocabulary in its movies.[36][37]

De-Sanskritisation

[edit]
This section is an excerpt fromDe-Sanskritisation § Linguistics.[edit]

Thede-Sanskritisation of Tamil started during the 1950s by followers ofDravidianism.[38] These attempts at "de-sanskritization" came to see the language having altered to remove a lot of the Sanskrit borrowing.[39]

TheHela Havula movement advocated de-Sanskritisation of theSinhala language.[40]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Ramaswamy, Sumathi (1999)."Sanskrit for the Nation".Modern Asian Studies.33 (2):339–381.doi:10.1017/S0026749X99003273.ISSN 1469-8099.S2CID 145240374.
  2. ^"Hindi/Urdu/Hindustani in the Metropolises: Visual (and Other) Impressions".Defining the Indefinable: Delimiting Hindi. Peter Lang. 2014.doi:10.3726/978-3-653-03566-7/18.ISBN 9783631647745. Retrieved2023-10-29.
  3. ^Punnoose, Reenu, and Muhammed Haneefa. "Problematising Hindi as the'Self'and English as the'Other'."Economic & Political Weekly 53.7 (2018).
  4. ^Chakraborty, Shibashis."The Role of Specific Grammar for Interpretation in Sanskrit".Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 9 (2) (2021): 107-187.
  5. ^Burrow, Thomas (2001).The Sanskrit Language. Motilal Banarsidass Publ.ISBN 978-81-208-1767-8.
  6. ^Bronkhorst, Johannes (2010-01-01)."The spread of Sanskrit".From Turfan to Ajanta. Festschrift for Dieter Schlingloff on the Occasion of His Eightieth Birthday.
  7. ^Bolton, Kingsley; Kachru, Braj B. (2006).World Englishes: Critical Concepts in Linguistics. Taylor & Francis.ISBN 978-0-415-31507-4.
  8. ^Calabrese, Rita; Chambers, J. K.; Leitner, Gerhard (2015-10-13).Variation and Change in Postcolonial Contexts. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.ISBN 978-1-4438-8493-8.
  9. ^Coleman, Julie (10 January 2014).Global English Slang: Methodologies and Perspectives. Routledge. p. 130.ISBN 978-1-317-93476-9.Within India, however, other regional forms exist, all denoting a mixing of English with indigenous languages.Bonglish (derived from the slang termBong 'a Bengali') orBenglish refers to 'a mixture of Bengali and English',Gunglish orGujlish 'Gujarati + English',Kanglish 'Kannada + English',Manglish 'Malayalam + English',Marlish 'Marathi + English',Tamlish orTanglish 'Tamil + English' andUrdish 'Urdu + English'. These terms are found in texts on regional variations of Indian English, usually in complaint-tradition discussions of failing standards of language purity.
  10. ^Tull, Herman (2011)."Language in South Asia. Edited by Braj B. Kachru, Yamuna Kachru, and S. N. Sridhar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. xxiv, 608 pp. $120.99 (cloth); $50.00 (paper)".The Journal of Asian Studies.70 (1):279–280.doi:10.1017/s002191181000361x.ISSN 0021-9118.S2CID 163424137.
  11. ^Kachru, Yamuna (2006)."Mixers lyricing in Hinglish: blending and fusion in Indian pop culture".World Englishes.25 (2):223–233.doi:10.1111/j.0083-2919.2006.00461.x.ISSN 0883-2919.
  12. ^Kachru, Braj B. (1994)."Englishization and contact linguistics".World Englishes.13 (2):135–154.doi:10.1111/j.1467-971X.1994.tb00303.x.ISSN 0883-2919.
  13. ^Fishman, Joshua A.; García, Ofelia (2010).Handbook of Language & Ethnic Identity. Oxford University Press.ISBN 978-0-19-539245-6.
  14. ^Staal, J. F. (1963)."Sanskrit and Sanskritization".The Journal of Asian Studies.22 (3):261–275.doi:10.2307/2050186.ISSN 0021-9118.JSTOR 2050186.
  15. ^Shah, A.M. (2005)."Sanskritisation Revisited".Sociological Bulletin.54 (2):238–249.ISSN 0038-0229.JSTOR 23620499.
  16. ^Kapur, Anu (2019),"Sanskritization of place names",Mapping Place Names of India, Routledge India, pp. 78–87,doi:10.4324/9780429057687-4,ISBN 978-0-429-05768-7, retrieved2023-10-30
  17. ^Pollock 2001.
  18. ^Oberlies 2003, pp. xxvii–xxix.
  19. ^Edgerton, Franklin (2004).Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit grammar and dictionary. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.ISBN 978-81-215-1110-0.
  20. ^Kachru, Braj B.; Kachru, Yamuna; Sridhar, S. N. (2008-03-27).Language in South Asia. Cambridge University Press.ISBN 978-1-139-46550-2.
  21. ^Bhatia, Tej K. (1987).A History of the Hindi Grammatical Tradition: Hindi-Hindustani Grammar, Grammarrians, History and Problems. BRILL.ISBN 978-90-04-07924-3.
  22. ^Rai, Alok (1995)."Making a Difference: Hindi, 1880-1930".Annual of Urdu Studies.
  23. ^abGanpat Teli, M.Phil."Revisiting the Making of Hindi as a ‘National’ Language", M.Phil.
  24. ^Das, Sisir Kumar (1978),Standardisation of Hindi and Bengali, Pacific Linguistics, retrieved2023-10-29
  25. ^Ludden, David (1996).Contesting the Nation: Religion, Community, and the Politics of Democracy in India. University of Pennsylvania Press.ISBN 978-0-8122-1585-4.
  26. ^McCartney, Patrick."The sanitising power of spoken Sanskrit".Himāl South Asian (2014).
  27. ^Benedikter, Thomas (2009).Language Policy and Linguistic Minorities in India: An Appraisal of the Linguistic Rights of Minorities in India. LIT Verlag Münster. p. 82.ISBN 978-3-643-10231-7.
  28. ^Nijhawan, Shobna (2018-07-03)."Defining the Indefinable: Delimiting Hindi".South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies.41 (3):702–704.doi:10.1080/00856401.2018.1489763.ISSN 0085-6401.S2CID 149573096.
  29. ^Hock, Hans Henrich (1992)."A note on English and modern Sanskrit".World Englishes.11 (2–3):163–171.doi:10.1111/j.1467-971X.1992.tb00061.x.ISSN 0883-2919.
  30. ^D'Souza, Jean (1987)."English in India's language modernization".World Englishes.6 (1):63–70.doi:10.1111/j.1467-971X.1987.tb00177.x.ISSN 0883-2919.
  31. ^"Crowd-sourced Technical Texts can help Revitalise Indian Languages".ResearchGate.
  32. ^"India's War on Urdu".thediplomat.com. Retrieved2023-10-29.
  33. ^Yamuna Kachru."Corpus planning for modernization: Sanskritization and Englishization of Hindi".Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, Vol. 19, No. 1, Spring 1989, pages 153-164
  34. ^Sau, Ranjit (1999)."From Sanskritisation to Hindi-Isation and Hindu-Isation: The 13th Lok Sabha".Economic and Political Weekly.34 (42/43):2979–2983.ISSN 0012-9976.JSTOR 4408522.
  35. ^"The curious case of Urdu".Frontline. 2022-05-16. Retrieved2023-10-29.
  36. ^"Is the Hindu Nationalist 'Boycott Bollywood' Campaign Impacting the Box Office?".thediplomat.com. Retrieved2023-10-27.
  37. ^"The siege of Bollywood".The Economist.ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved2023-10-27.
  38. ^Sekar, R. (1992).The Sabarimalai Pilgrimage and Ayyappan Cultus. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. p. 92.ISBN 978-81-208-1056-3. Retrieved2024-10-05.
  39. ^Indian Political Science Association (1971).The Indian Journal of Political Science. The Indian journal of political science. Indian Political Science Association. p. 39. Retrieved2024-10-05.
  40. ^Henry, J.W. (2022).Ravana's Kingdom: The Ramayana and Sri Lankan History from Below. Oxford University Press. p. 17.ISBN 978-0-19-763630-5. Retrieved2024-10-06.

Sources

[edit]
  • Oberlies, Thomas (2003).A Grammar of Epic Sanskrit. Berlin New York: Walter de Gruyter.ISBN 978-3-11-014448-2.
  • Pollock, Sheldon (2001). "The Death of Sanskrit".Comparative Studies in Society and History.43 (2). Cambridge University Press:392–426.JSTOR 2696659.S2CID 35550166.
Influence zone
Mode of spread
Language
Scripts
Writings
Current usage
Modern status
Donor languages
Influenced languages
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sanskritisation_(linguistics)&oldid=1321251907"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp