_and_INS_Vikramaditya_(R33)_during_joint_exercise.jpg)
STOBAR (acronym forshort take-off but arrested recovery orshort take-off, barrier-arrested recovery) is anaval aviation system used for thetakeoff and landing offixed-wing aircraft from theflight deck of anaircraft carrier, where aircrafttake off under their ownengine power like aconventionally launched aircraft, often via abowski-jump toassist takeoff, but usearresting gears at theaft-deck to decelerate the aircraft uponlanding. The STOBAR system can launch and recover ordinary fixed-wingnavalised aircraft unlike the more specializedshort take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) systems, and is simpler and less expensive to build than the more sophisticatedcatapult-assisted takeoff but arrested recovery (CATOBAR) systems, which usecatapults to help accelerate aircraft, but cannot launch heavier aircraft like the latter. As of 2018[update], STOBAR aircraft carriers have been used widely onRussian,Chinese andIndian Navy aircraft carriers.
Compared to CATOBAR, STOBAR is less expensive to develop. It is easier to operate than a CATOBAR configuration, which requires large number of operators to launch the aircraft. The lack of any moving parts in a ski-jump makes it less expensive to maintain than a catapult.[1][2] It does not require any additional system to generate force required to launch the aircraft, unlike CATOBAR where an external force is needed to be generated either fromsteam catapult[3] orElectromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS)[4] to launch the aircraft.
One major limitation of STOBAR configuration is that it only works withfighter aircraft that have a highthrust-to-weight ratio such asSu-33 orMiG-29K and thus limits the kind of aircraft that can be operated from the carrier. It is not known[who?] what restrictions ski-jump takeoff implies on maximal aircraft weight. According to some sources, in order to become airborne, the aircraft may be required to limit its weaponry and fuel package in order to reduce the launch weight of the aircraft.[1][5] However, according to other sources,[6] theSuper Hornet can take-off from a ski-jump with a significant weapons load. Using ski-jump can limit the ability to conduct sorties faster on STOBAR aircraft carrier.[7] STOBAR carriers must maintain a speed of 20–30 kn (37–56 km/h) in order to generate wind speed required on deck which is essential for conducting aircraft launch operations.[8]
As of November 2025, three countries currently operate STOBAR-type carriers; Russia, India and China have built a STOBAR ship for operation, while both India and China have procured STOBAR ships that were built by Russia and have had them converted for their own use.
| Class | Image | Origin | No. of ships | Propulsion | Displacement | Operator | Aircraft carried | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kuznetsov |  | Soviet Union | 1 | Steam turbine | 58,000 tons | Russian Navy | ||
| 1 | People's Liberation Army Navy | |||||||
| Kiev (INSVikramaditya) |  | Soviet Union | 1 | Steam turbine | 45,500 tons | Indian Navy | Built as STOVL carrier and converted to STOBAR | |
| Shandong |  | China | 1 | Steam turbine | 70,000 tons | People's Liberation Army Navy |
| UpgradedKuznetsov type design, first aircraft carrier built in China |
| Vikrant |  | India | 1 | Gas turbine | 45,000 tonnes | Indian Navy | First aircraft carrier built in India[13] |
In our simulation, we discovered that not only could the Super Hornet take-off from a ski-jump, but could do so with a significant weapons load.