Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Ruin theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Theory in actuarial science and applied probability
"Risk theory" redirects here. For another use, seeTirpitz Plan.

Inactuarial science andapplied probability,ruin theory (sometimesrisk theory[1] orcollective risk theory) uses mathematical models to describe an insurer's vulnerability to insolvency/ruin. In such models key quantities of interest are the probability of ruin, distribution of surplus immediately prior to ruin and deficit at time of ruin.

Classical model

[edit]
A sample path of compound Poisson risk process

The theoretical foundation of ruin theory, known as the Cramér–Lundberg model (or classical compound-Poisson risk model, classical risk process[2] or Poisson risk process) was introduced in 1903 by the Swedish actuaryFilip Lundberg.[3] Lundberg's work was republished in the 1930s byHarald Cramér.[4]

The model describes an insurance company who experiences two opposing cash flows: incoming cash premiums and outgoing claims. Premiums arrive a constant ratec>0{\textstyle c>0} from customers and claims arrive according to aPoisson processNt{\displaystyle N_{t}} with intensityλ{\textstyle \lambda } and areindependent and identically distributed non-negative random variablesξi{\displaystyle \xi _{i}} with distributionF{\textstyle F} and meanμ{\textstyle \mu } (they form acompound Poisson process). So for an insurer who starts with initial surplusx{\textstyle x}, the aggregate assetsXt{\displaystyle X_{t}} are given by:[5]

Xt=x+cti=1Ntξi for t0.{\displaystyle X_{t}=x+ct-\sum _{i=1}^{N_{t}}\xi _{i}\quad {\text{ for t}}\geq 0.}

The central object of the model is to investigate the probability that the insurer's surplus level eventually falls below zero (making the firm bankrupt). This quantity, called the probability of ultimate ruin, is defined as

ψ(x)=Px{τ<}{\displaystyle \psi (x)=\mathbb {P} ^{x}\{\tau <\infty \}},

where the time of ruin isτ=inf{t>0:X(t)<0}{\displaystyle \tau =\inf\{t>0\,:\,X(t)<0\}} with the convention thatinf={\displaystyle \inf \varnothing =\infty }. This can be computed exactly using thePollaczek–Khinchine formula as[6] (the ruin function here is equivalent to the tail function of the stationary distribution of waiting time in anM/G/1 queue[7])

ψ(x)=(1λμc)n=0(λμc)n(1Fln(x)){\displaystyle \psi (x)=\left(1-{\frac {\lambda \mu }{c}}\right)\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }\left({\frac {\lambda \mu }{c}}\right)^{n}(1-F_{l}^{\ast n}(x))}

whereFl{\displaystyle F_{l}} is the transform of the tail distribution ofF{\displaystyle F},

Fl(x)=1μ0x(1F(u))du{\displaystyle F_{l}(x)={\frac {1}{\mu }}\int _{0}^{x}\left(1-F(u)\right){\text{d}}u}

andn{\displaystyle \cdot ^{\ast n}} denotes then{\displaystyle n}-foldconvolution.In the case where the claim sizes are exponentially distributed, this simplifies to[7]

ψ(x)=λμce(1μλc)x.{\displaystyle \psi (x)={\frac {\lambda \mu }{c}}e^{-\left({\frac {1}{\mu }}-{\frac {\lambda }{c}}\right)x}.}

Sparre Andersen model

[edit]

E. Sparre Andersen extended the classical model in 1957[8] by allowing claim inter-arrival times to have arbitrary distribution functions.[9]

Xt=x+cti=1Ntξi for t0,{\displaystyle X_{t}=x+ct-\sum _{i=1}^{N_{t}}\xi _{i}\quad {\text{ for }}t\geq 0,}

where the claim number process(Nt)t0{\displaystyle (N_{t})_{t\geq 0}} is arenewal process and(ξi)iN{\displaystyle (\xi _{i})_{i\in \mathbb {N} }} are independent and identically distributed random variables. The model furthermore assumes thatξi>0{\displaystyle \xi _{i}>0} almost surely and that(Nt)t0{\displaystyle (N_{t})_{t\geq 0}} and(ξi)iN{\displaystyle (\xi _{i})_{i\in \mathbb {N} }} are independent. The model is also known as the renewal risk model.

Expected discounted penalty function

[edit]

Michael R. Powers[10] and Gerber and Shiu[11] analyzed the behavior of the insurer's surplus through theexpected discounted penalty function, which is commonly referred to as Gerber-Shiu function in the ruin literature and named after actuarial scientistsElias S.W. Shiu andHans-Ulrich Gerber. It is arguable whether the function should have been called Powers-Gerber-Shiu function due to the contribution of Powers.[10]

InPowers' notation, this is defined as

m(x)=Ex[eδτKτ]{\displaystyle m(x)=\mathbb {E} ^{x}[e^{-\delta \tau }K_{\tau }]},

whereδ{\displaystyle \delta } is the discounting force of interest,Kτ{\displaystyle K_{\tau }} is a general penalty function reflecting the economic costs to the insurer at the time of ruin, and the expectationEx{\displaystyle \mathbb {E} ^{x}} corresponds to the probability measurePx{\displaystyle \mathbb {P} ^{x}}. The function is called expected discounted cost of insolvency by Powers.[10]

In Gerber and Shiu's notation, it is given as

m(x)=Ex[eδτw(Xτ,Xτ)I(τ<)]{\displaystyle m(x)=\mathbb {E} ^{x}[e^{-\delta \tau }w(X_{\tau -},X_{\tau })\mathbb {I} (\tau <\infty )]},

whereδ{\displaystyle \delta } is the discounting force of interest andw(Xτ,Xτ){\displaystyle w(X_{\tau -},X_{\tau })} is a penalty function capturing the economic costs to the insurer at the time of ruin (assumed to depend on the surplus prior to ruinXτ{\displaystyle X_{\tau -}} and the deficit at ruinXτ{\displaystyle X_{\tau }}), and the expectationEx{\displaystyle \mathbb {E} ^{x}} corresponds to the probability measurePx{\displaystyle \mathbb {P} ^{x}}. Here the indicator functionI(τ<){\displaystyle \mathbb {I} (\tau <\infty )} emphasizes that the penalty is exercised only when ruin occurs.

It is quite intuitive to interpret the expected discounted penalty function. Since the function measures the actuarial present value of the penalty that occurs atτ{\displaystyle \tau }, the penalty function is multiplied by the discounting factoreδτ{\displaystyle e^{-\delta \tau }}, and then averaged over the probability distribution of the waiting time toτ{\displaystyle \tau }. While Gerber and Shiu[11] applied this function to the classical compound-Poisson model, Powers[10] argued that an insurer's surplus is better modeled by a family of diffusion processes.

There are a great variety of ruin-related quantities that fall into the category of the expected discounted penalty function.

Special caseMathematical representationChoice of penalty function
Probability of ultimate ruinPx{τ<}{\displaystyle \mathbb {P} ^{x}\{\tau <\infty \}}δ=0,w(x1,x2)=1{\displaystyle \delta =0,w(x_{1},x_{2})=1}
Joint (defective) distribution of surplus and deficitPx{Xτ<x,Xτ<y}{\displaystyle \mathbb {P} ^{x}\{X_{\tau -}<x,X_{\tau }<y\}}δ=0,w(x1,x2)=I(x1<x,x2<y){\displaystyle \delta =0,w(x_{1},x_{2})=\mathbb {I} (x_{1}<x,x_{2}<y)}
Defective distribution of claim causing ruinPx{XτXτ<z}{\displaystyle \mathbb {P} ^{x}\{X_{\tau -}-X_{\tau }<z\}}δ=0,w(x1,x2)=I(x1+x2<z){\displaystyle \delta =0,w(x_{1},x_{2})=\mathbb {I} (x_{1}+x_{2}<z)}
Trivariate Laplace transform of time, surplus and deficitEx[eδτsXτzXτ]{\displaystyle \mathbb {E} ^{x}[e^{-\delta \tau -sX_{\tau -}-zX_{\tau }}]}w(x1,x2)=esx1zx2{\displaystyle w(x_{1},x_{2})=e^{-sx_{1}-zx_{2}}}
Joint moments of surplus and deficitEx[XτjXτk]{\displaystyle \mathbb {E} ^{x}[X_{\tau -}^{j}X_{\tau }^{k}]}δ=0,w(x1,x2)=x1jx2k{\displaystyle \delta =0,w(x_{1},x_{2})=x_{1}^{j}x_{2}^{k}}

Other finance-related quantities belonging to the class of the expected discounted penalty function include the perpetual American put option,[12] the contingent claim at optimal exercise time, and more.

Recent developments

[edit]
  • Compound-Poisson risk model with constant interest
  • Compound-Poisson risk model with stochastic interest
  • Brownian-motion risk model
  • General diffusion-process model
  • Markov-modulated risk model
  • Accident probability factor (APF) calculator – risk analysis model (@SBH)

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Embrechts, P.;Klüppelberg, C.; Mikosch, T. (1997). "1 Risk Theory".Modelling Extremal Events. Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability. Vol. 33. p. 21.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33483-2_2.ISBN 978-3-540-60931-5.
  2. ^Delbaen, F.; Haezendonck, J. (1987). "Classical risk theory in an economic environment".Insurance: Mathematics and Economics.6 (2): 85.doi:10.1016/0167-6687(87)90019-9.
  3. ^Lundberg, F. (1903) Approximerad Framställning av Sannolikehetsfunktionen, Återförsäkering av Kollektivrisker, Almqvist & Wiksell, Uppsala.
  4. ^Blom, G. (1987)."Harald Cramer 1893-1985".The Annals of Statistics.15 (4):1335–1350.doi:10.1214/aos/1176350596.JSTOR 2241677.
  5. ^Kyprianou, A. E. (2006). "Lévy Processes and Applications".Introductory Lectures on Fluctuations of Lévy Processes with Applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 1–32.doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31343-4_1.ISBN 978-3-540-31342-7.
  6. ^Huzak, Miljenko; Perman, Mihael; Šikić, Hrvoje;Vondraček, Zoran (2004). "Ruin Probabilities for Competing Claim Processes".Journal of Applied Probability.41 (3).Applied Probability Trust:679–690.doi:10.1239/jap/1091543418.JSTOR 4141346.S2CID 14499808.
  7. ^abRolski, Tomasz; Schmidli, Hanspeter; Schmidt, Volker; Teugels, Jozef (2008). "Risk Processes".Stochastic Processes for Insurance & Finance. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. pp. 147–204.doi:10.1002/9780470317044.ch5.ISBN 9780470317044.
  8. ^Andersen, E. Sparre. "On the collective theory of risk in case of contagion between claims."Transactions of the XVth International Congress of Actuaries. Vol. 2. No. 6. 1957.
  9. ^Thorin, Olof. "Some comments on the Sparre Andersen model in the risk theory"The ASTIN bulletin: international journal for actuarial studies in non-life insurance and risk theory (1974): 104.
  10. ^abcdPowers, M. R. (1995). "A theory of risk, return and solvency".Insurance: Mathematics and Economics.17 (2):101–118.doi:10.1016/0167-6687(95)00006-E.
  11. ^abGerber, H. U.; Shiu, E. S. W. (1998). "On the Time Value of Ruin".North American Actuarial Journal.2:48–72.doi:10.1080/10920277.1998.10595671.S2CID 59054002.
  12. ^Gerber, H.U.; Shiu, E.S.W. (1997)."From ruin theory to option pricing"(PDF).AFIR Colloquium, Cairns, Australia 1997.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Gerber, H.U. (1979).An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory. Philadelphia: S.S. Heubner Foundation Monograph Series 8.
  • Asmussen S., Albrecher H. (2010).Ruin Probabilities, 2nd Edition. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.
Discrete time
Continuous time
Both
Fields and other
Time series models
Financial models
Actuarial models
Queueing models
Properties
Limit theorems
Inequalities
Tools
Disciplines
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruin_theory&oldid=1240427877"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp