This articlemay betoo long to read and navigate comfortably. Considersplitting content into sub-articles,condensing it, or addingsubheadings. Please discuss this issue on the article'stalk page.(February 2025) |

| Part ofa series on |
| Christian culture |
|---|
| Christianity portal |
Christianity has been intricately intertwined with thehistory and formation of Western society. Throughoutits long history, theChurch has been a major source of social services like schooling and medical care; an inspiration forart,culture andphilosophy; and an influential playerin politics andreligion. In various ways it has sought to affect Western attitudes towardsvice andvirtue in diverse fields. Festivals likeEaster andChristmas are marked as public holidays; theGregorian Calendar has been adopted internationally as thecivil calendar; and the calendar itself is measured from an estimation of the date ofJesus's birth.
The cultural influence of the Church has been vast. Church scholars preservedliteracy inWestern Europe following theFall of the Western Roman Empire.[1] During theMiddle Ages, the Church rose to replace theRoman Empire as the unifying force in Europe. The medievalcathedrals remain among the most iconic architectural feats produced byWestern civilization. Many ofEurope's universities were also founded by the church at that time. Many historians state that universities andcathedral schools were a continuation of the interest in learning promoted by monasteries.[2] The university is generally regarded[3][4] as an institution that has its origin in theMedieval Christian setting, born fromCathedral schools.[5] Many scholars and historians attribute Christianity to having contributed to the rise of theScientific Revolution.[6][7]
TheReformation brought an end to religious unity in the West, but theRenaissance masterpieces produced by Catholic artists likeMichelangelo,Leonardo da Vinci andRaphael remain among the most celebrated works of art ever produced. Similarly, Christiansacred music by composers likePachelbel,Vivaldi,Bach,Handel,Mozart,Haydn,Beethoven,Mendelssohn,Liszt, andVerdi is among the most admiredclassical music in the Western canon.
TheBible andChristian theology have also strongly influenced Western philosophers and political activists.[8] Theteachings of Jesus, such as theParable of the Good Samaritan, are argued by some to be among the most important sources of modern notions of "human rights" and the welfare commonly provided by governments in the West. Long-held Christian teachings on sexuality, marriage, and family life have also been influential and controversial in recent times.[9]: 309 Christianity in general affected the status of women by condemningmarital infidelity,divorce,incest,polygamy,birth control,infanticide (female infants were more likely to be killed), andabortion.[10]: 104 While official Catholic Church teaching[11]: 61 considers women and men to becomplementary (equal and different), some modern "advocates of ordination of women and other feminists" argue that teachings attributed toSt. Paul and those of theFathers of the Church andScholastic theologians advanced the notion of a divinely ordained female inferiority.[12] Nevertheless,women have played prominent roles in Western history through and as part of the church, particularly in education and healthcare, but also as influential theologians and mystics.
Christians have made a myriad of contributions tohuman progress in a broad and diverse range of fields, both historically and in modern times, includingscience and technology,[13][14][15][16][17]medicine,[18]fine arts and architecture,[19][20][21] politics,literatures,[21]music,[21]philanthropy,philosophy,[22][23][24]: 15 ethics,[25]humanism,[26][27][28]theatre and business.[29][30][20][31] According to100 Years of Nobel Prizes, a review of Nobel Prize awards between 1901 and 2000 reveals that (65.4%) ofNobel Prizes Laureates, have identifiedChristianity in its various forms as their religious preference.[32]Eastern Christians (particularlyNestorian Christians) have also contributed to the ArabIslamic Civilization during theUmmayad and theAbbasid periods by translating works ofGreek philosophers toSyriac and afterwards toArabic.[33][34][35] They also excelled in philosophy, science, theology and medicine.[36][37]
Rodney Stark writes that medieval Europe's advances in production methods, navigation, and war technology "can be traced to the unique Christian conviction that progress was a God-given obligation, entailed in the gift of reason. That new technologies and techniques would always be forthcoming was a fundamental article of Christian faith. Hence, no bishops or theologians denounced clocks or sailing ships—although both were condemned on religious grounds in various non-Western societies."[38]
Christianity contributed greatly to the development ofEuropean cultural identity, although some progress originated elsewhere,Romanticism began with the curiosity and passion of thepagan world of old.[39][40] Outside the Western world, Christianity has had an influence and contributed to various cultures, such as in Africa, Central Asia, the Near East, Middle East, East Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Indian subcontinent.[41][42] Scholars and intellectuals have notedChristians have made significant contributions to Arab andIslamic civilization since the introduction ofIslam.[43]

The foundation of canon law is found in its earliest texts and their interpretation in the church fathers' writings. Christianitybegan as a Jewish sect in the mid-1st century arising out of the life and teachings ofJesus of Nazareth. The life of Jesus is recounted in theNew Testament of the Bible, one of the bedrock texts of Western Civilization and inspiration for countless works ofWestern art.[44] Jesus' birth is commemorated in the festival of Christmas, his death during thePaschal Triduum, and his resurrection during Easter. Christmas and Easter remain holidays in many Western nations.
The early followers of Jesus, includingPaul andPeter, carried their new theology concerning Jesus and its ethic throughout the Roman Empire and beyond, sowing the seeds for the development of theCatholic Church, of which Saint Peter is considered the first Pope. Christians sometimesfaced persecution during these early centuries, particularly for their refusal to join inworshiping the emperors. Nevertheless, carried through the synagogues, merchants and missionaries across the known world, Christianity quickly grew in size and influence.[45] Its unique appeal was partly the result of its values and ethics.[46]
TheBible has had a profound influence on Western civilization and on cultures around the globe; it has contributed to the formation ofWestern law,art,texts, and education.[47][48] With a literary tradition spanning two millennia, the Bible is one of the most influential works ever written. From practices ofpersonal hygiene to philosophy and ethics, the Bible has directly and indirectly influenced politics and law, war and peace, sexual morals, marriage and family life,toilet etiquette, letters and learning, the arts, economics, social justice, medical care and more.[49]
The world's first civilizations were Mesopotamiansacred states ruled in the name of a divinity or by rulers who were seen as divine. Rulers, and the priests, soldiers and bureaucrats who carried out their will, were a small minority who kept power by exploiting the many.[50]
If we turn to the roots of our western tradition, we find that in Greek and Roman times not all human life was regarded as inviolable and worthy of protection. Slaves and 'barbarians' did not have a full right to life and human sacrifices and gladiatorial combat were acceptable... Spartan Law required that deformed infants be put to death; for Plato, infanticide is one of the regular institutions of the ideal State; Aristotle regards abortion as a desirable option; and the Stoic philosopher Seneca writes unapologetically: "Unnatural progeny we destroy; we drown even children who at birth are weakly and abnormal... And whilst there were deviations from these views..., it is probably correct to say that such practices...were less proscribed in ancient times. Most historians of western morals agree that the rise of ...Christianity contributed greatly to the general feeling that human life is valuable and worthy of respect.[51]
W.E.H.Lecky gives the now classical account of the sanctity of human life in his history of European morals saying Christianity "formed a new standard, higher than any which then existed in the world...".[52] Christian ethicistDavid P. Gushee says "The justice teachings of Jesus are closely related to a commitment to life's sanctity...".[53]
John Keown, a professor of Christian ethics distinguishes this 'sanctity of life' doctrine from "aquality of life approach, which recognizes only instrumental value in human life, and avitalistic approach, which regards life as an absolute moral value... [Kewon says it is the] sanctity of life approach ... which embeds a presumption in favor of preserving life, but concedes that there are circumstances in which life should not be preserved at all costs", and it is this which provides the solid foundation for law concerning end of life issues.[54]
Rome had a social caste system, with women having "no legal independence and no independent property".[55] Early Christianity, asPliny the Younger explains in his letters to Emperor Trajan, had people from "every age and rank, and both sexes".[56] Pliny reports arresting two slave women who claimed to be 'deaconesses' in the first decade of the second century.[57] There was a rite for the ordination of women deacons in the Roman Pontifical (a liturgical book) up through the 12th century. For women deacons, the oldest rite in the West comes from an eighth-century book, whereas Eastern rites go back to the third century and there are more of them.[58]
The New Testament refers to a number of women in Jesus' inner circle. There are several Gospel accounts of Jesus imparting important teachings to and about women: his meeting with the Samaritan woman at the well, his anointing by Mary of Bethany, his public admiration for a poor widow who donated two copper coins to the Temple in Jerusalem, his stepping to the aid of the woman accused of adultery, his friendship with Mary and Martha the sisters of Lazarus, and the presence of Mary Magdalene, his mother, and the other women as he was crucified. Historian Geoffrey Blainey concludes that "as the standing of women was not high in Palestine, Jesus' kindnesses towards them were not always approved by those who strictly upheld tradition".[59]
According to Christian apologist Tim Keller, it was common in the Greco-Roman world to expose female infants because of the low status of women in society. The church forbade its members to do so. Greco-Roman society saw no value in an unmarried woman, and therefore it was illegal for a widow to go more than two years without remarrying. Christianity did not force widows to marry and supported them financially. Pagan widows lost all control of their husband's estate when they remarried, but the church allowed widows to maintain their husband's estate. Christians did not believe in cohabitation. If a Christian man wanted to live with a woman, the church required marriage, and this gave women legal rights and far greater security. Finally, the pagan double standard of allowing married men to have extramarital sex and mistresses was forbidden. Jesus' teachings on divorce and Paul's advocacy of monogamy began the process of elevating the status of women so that Christian women tended to enjoy greater security and equality than women in surrounding cultures.[60]
In the ancient world, infanticide was not legal but was rarely prosecuted. A broad distinction was popularly made between infanticide and infant exposure, which was widely practiced. Many exposed children died, but many were taken by speculators who raised them to be slaves or prostitutes. It is not possible to ascertain, with any degree of accuracy, what diminution of infanticide resulted from legal efforts against it in the Roman empire. "It may, however, be safely asserted that the publicity of the trade in exposed children became impossible under the influence of Christianity, and that the sense of the seriousness of the crime was very considerably increased."[52]: 31, 32
Emperor Constantine'sEdict of Milan in 313 AD ended the state-sponsored persecution of Christians in the East, and his own conversion to Christianity was a significant turning point in history.[61] In 312, Constantine offered civic toleration to Christians, and through his reign instigated laws and policies in keeping with Christian principles – making Sunday the Sabbath "day of rest" for Roman society (though initially this was only for urban dwellers) and embarking on a church building program. In AD 325, Constantine conferred theFirst Council of Nicaea to gain consensus and unity within Christianity, with a view to establishing it as the religion of the Empire. The population and wealth of the Roman Empire had been shifting east, and around the year 330, Constantine established the city ofConstantinople as a new imperial city which would be the capital of theEastern Roman Empire. The Eastern Patriarch in Constantinople now came to rival the Pope in Rome. Although cultural continuity and interchange would continue between these Eastern and Western Roman Empires, thehistory of Christianity and Western culture took divergent routes, with a finalGreat Schism separatingRoman andEastern Christianity in 1054 AD.
During the fourth century, Christian writing and theology blossomed into a "Golden Age" of literary and scholarly activity unmatched since the days of Virgil and Horace. Many of these works remain influential in politics, law, ethics and other fields. A new genre of literature was also born in the fourth century: church history.[62][63]

The remarkable transformation of Christianity from peripheral sect to major force within the Empire is often held to be a result of the influence held bySt. Ambrose, theBishop of Milan, but this is unlikely.[64]: 60, 63, 131 In April of 390, the Emperor Theodosius I ordered thepunitive massacre of thousands of the citizens ofThessaloniki. In a private letter from Ambrose to Theodosius, sometime in August after this event, Ambrose told Theodosius he cannot be given communion while Theodosius is unrepentant of this terrible act.[65]: 12 [66][67]Wolf Liebeschuetz says records show "Theodosius duly complied and came to church humbly, without his imperial robes, until Christmas, when Ambrose openly readmitted him to communion."[68]: 262
McLynn states that "the encounter at the church door has long been known as a pious fiction."[69]: 291 Daniel Washburn explains that the image of the mitered prelate braced in the door of the cathedral in Milan blocking Theodosius from entering, is a product of the imagination ofTheodoret, a historian of the fifth century who wrote of the events of 390 "using his own ideology to fill the gaps in the historical record."[70]: 215 According toPeter Brown, these events concern personal piety; they do not represent a turning point in history with the State submitting to the Church.[71]: 111 [64]: 63, 64
According to Christian literature of the fourth century, paganism ended by the early to mid—fifth century with everyone either converted or cowed.[72]: 633, 640 Contemporary archaeology, on the other hand, indicates this is not so; paganism continued across the empire, and the end of paganism varied from place to place.[73]: 54 Violence such as temple destructions are attested in some locations, generally in small numbers, and are not spread equally throughout the empire. In most regions away from the imperial court, the end of paganism was, more often, gradual and untraumatic.[73]: 156, 221 [74]: 5, 7, 41
Theodosius reigned (albeit for a brief interim) as the last Emperor of a united Eastern and Western Roman Empire. Between 389 and 391, Theodosius promulgated the Theodosian Decrees, a collection of laws from the time of Constantine including laws against heretics and pagans. In 391 Theodosius blocked the restoration of the paganAltar of Victory to the Roman Senate and then fought againstEugenius, who courted pagan support for his own bid for the imperial throne.[75] Brown says the language of the Theodosian Decrees is "uniformly vehement and the penalties are harsh and frequently horrifying." They may have provided a foundation for similar laws in the High Middle Ages.[72]: 638 However, in antiquity, these laws were not much enforced, and Brown adds that, "In most areas, polytheists were not molested, and, apart from a few ugly incidents of local violence, Jewish communities also enjoyed a century of stable, even privileged, existence."[76]: 643 Contemporary scholars indicate pagans were not wiped out or fully converted by the fifth century as Christian sources claim. Pagans remained throughout the fourth and fifth centuries in sufficient numbers to preserve a broad spectrum of pagan practices into the 6th century and even beyond in some places.[77]: 19
The central bureaucracy of imperial Rome remained in Rome in the sixth century but was replaced in the rest of the empire by German tribal organization and the church.[78]: 67 After thefall of Rome (476) most of the west returned to a subsistence agrarian form of life. What little security there was in this world was largely provided by the Christian church.[79][80] Thepapacy served as a source of authority and continuity at this critical time. In the absence of amagister militum living in Rome, even the control of military matters fell to the pope.
The historianGeoffrey Blainey likened the Catholic Church in its activities during the Middle Ages to an early version of a welfare state: "It conducted hospitals for the old and orphanages for the young; hospices for the sick of all ages; places for thelepers; and hostels or inns where pilgrims could buy a cheap bed and meal". It supplied food to the population during famine and distributed food to the poor. This welfare system the church funded through collecting taxes on a large scale and by owning large farmlands and estates.[81] Thecanon law of the Catholic Church (Latin:jus canonicum)[82] is the system oflaws and legal principles made and enforced by thehierarchical authorities of the Church to regulate its external organization and government and to order and direct the activities of Catholics toward the mission of the Church.[83] It was the first modern Westernlegal system[84] and is the oldest continuously functioning legal system in the West,[85] predating the Europeancommon law andcivil law traditions.
The period between the Fall of Rome (476 C.E.) and the rise of the Carolingian Franks (750 C.E.) is often referred to as the "Dark Ages", however, it could also be designated the "Age of the Monk". This era had a lasting impact on politics and law through Christian ascetics like St. Benedict (480–543), who vowed a life of chastity, obedience and poverty; after rigorous intellectual training and self-denial, Benedictines lived by the "Rule of Benedict:" work and pray. This "Rule" became the foundation of the majority of the thousands of monasteries that spread across what is modern day Europe; "...certainly there will be no demur in recognizing that St. Benedict's Rule has been one of the great facts in the history of western Europe, and that its influence and effects are with us to this day."[79]: intro.

Monasteries were models of productivity and economic resourcefulness teaching their local communities animal husbandry, cheese making, wine making, and various other skills.[86] They were havens for the poor, hospitals, hospices for the dying, and schools. Medical practice was highly important in medieval monasteries, and they are best known for their contributions to medical tradition. They also made advances in sciences such as astronomy.[87] For centuries, nearly all secular leaders were trained by monks because, excepting private tutors who were still, often, monks, it was the only education available.[88]
The formation of these organized bodies of believers distinct from political and familial authority, especially for women, gradually carved out a series of social spaces with some amount of independence thereby revolutionizing social history.[89]
Gregory the Great (c 540–604) administered the church with strict reform. A trained Roman lawyer, administrator, and monk, he represents the shift from the classical to the medieval outlook and was a father of many of the structures of the later Catholic Church. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, he looked upon Church and State as co-operating to form a united whole, which acted in two distinct spheres, ecclesiastical and secular, but by the time of his death, the papacy was the great power in Italy:[90] Gregory was one of the few sovereigns called Great by universal consent. He is known for sending out the first recorded large-scale mission from Rome to convert the then-pagan Anglo-Saxons in England, for his many writings, his administrative skills, and his focus on the welfare of the people.[91][92] He also fought theArian heresy and theDonatists, pacified the Goths, left a famous example of penitence for a crime, revised the liturgy, and influenced music through the development of antiphonal chants.[93]
Pope Gregory the Great made himself in Italy a power stronger than emperor or exarch, and established a political influence which dominated the peninsula for centuries. From this time forth the varied populations of Italy looked to the pope for guidance, and Rome as the papal capital continued to be the centre of the Christian world.

Charlemagne ("Charles the Great" in English) became king of the Franks in 768. He conquered theLow Countries, Saxony, and northern and central Italy, and in 800,Pope Leo III crowned CharlemagneHoly Roman Emperor. Sometimes called the "Father of Europe" and the founder of feudalism, Charlemagne instituted political and judicial reform and led what is sometimes referred to as the Early Renaissance or theChristian Renaissance.[94]Johannes Fried writes that Charlemagne left such a profound impression on his age that traces of it still remain. He promoted education and literacy and subsidized schools, he worked at protecting the poor enacting economic and currency reform; these, along with legal and judicial reforms, created a more lawful and prosperous kingdom. This helped form a group of independent minded warlords into a well-administered empire, with a tradition of working with the Pope, which became the precursor to the nation of France.[95] Fried says, "he was the first king and emperor to seriously enact the legal principle according to which the Pope was beyond the reach of all human justice—a decision that would have major ramifications in the future."[95]: 12

By the late 11th century, beginning with the efforts ofPope Gregory VII, the Church successfully established itself as "an autonomous legal and political ... [entity] within Western Christendom".[96]: 23 For the next three hundred years, the Church held great influence over Western society;[96]: 23 church laws were the single "universal law ... common to jurisdictions and peoples throughout Europe."[96]: 30 With its own court system, the Church retained jurisdiction over many aspects of ordinary life, including education, inheritance, oral promises, oaths, moral crimes, and marriage.[96]: 31 As one of the more powerful institutions of the Middle Ages, Church attitudes were reflected in many secular laws of the time.[97]: 1 The Catholic Church was very powerful, essentially internationalist and democratic in it structures, with its many branches run by the different monastic organizations, each with its own distinct theology and often in disagreement with the others.[98]: 311, 312 [99]: 396
Men of a scholarly bent usually tookHoly Orders and frequently joinedreligious institutes. Those with intellectual, administrative, or diplomatic skill could advance beyond the usual restraints of society. Leading churchmen from faraway lands were accepted in local bishoprics, linking European thought across wide distances. Complexes like theAbbey of Cluny became vibrant centres with dependencies spread throughout Europe. Ordinary people also trekked vast distances onpilgrimages to express their piety and pray at the site ofholy relics.[100]
In the pivotal twelfth century (1100s), Europe began laying the foundation for its gradual transformation from the medieval to the modern.[101]: 154 Feudal lords slowly lost power to the feudal kings as kings began centralizing power into themselves and their nation-state. Kings built their own armies instead of relying on their vassals, thereby taking power from the nobility. The 'state' took over legal practices that had traditionally belonged to local nobles and local church officials; and they began to target minorities.[101]: 4, 5 [102]: 209 According toR.I. Moore and other contemporary scholars, "the growth of secular power and the pursuit of secular interests, constituted the essential context of the developments that led to a persecuting society."[101]: 4, 5 [103]: 8–10 [104]: 224 [105]: xviii This has had a permanent impact on politics and law in multiple ways: through a new rhetoric of exclusion that legitimized persecution based on new attitudes ofstereotyping,stigmatization and evendemonization of the accused; by the creation of new civil laws which included allowing the state to be the defendant and bring charges on its own behalf; the invention of police forces as the arm of state enforcement; the invention of a general taxation, gold coins, and modern banking to pay for it all; and the inquisitions, which werea new legal procedure that allowed the judge to investigate on his own initiative without requiring a victim (other than the state) to press charges.[101]: 4, 90–100, 146, 149, 154 [106]: 97–111
"The exceptional character of persecution in the Latin west since the twelfth century has lain not in the scale or savagery of particular persecutions, ... but in its capacity for sustained long-term growth. The patterns, procedures and rhetoric of persecution, which were established in the twelfth century, have given it the power of infinite and indefinite self-generation and self-renewal."[101]: vi, 155
Eventually, this would lead to the development among the earlyProtestants of the conviction that concepts ofreligious toleration andseparation of church and state were essential.[107]: 3
Christianity in the High Middle Ages had a lasting impact on politics and law through the newly established universities. Canon law emerged from theology and developed independently there.[108]: 255 By the 1200s, both civil and canon law had become a major aspect of ecclesiastical culture, dominating Christian thought.[109]: 382 Most bishops and Popes of this period were trained lawyers rather than theologians, and much Christian thought of this time became little more than an extension of law. In the High Middle Ages, the religion that had begun by decrying the power of law (Romans 7:1)[dubious –discuss] developed the most complex religious law the world has ever seen.[109]: 382 Canon law became a fertile field for those who advocated strong papal power,[108]: 260 andBrian Downing says that a church-centered empire almost became a reality in this era.[110]: 35 However, Downing says the rule of law, established in the Middle Ages, is one of the reasons why Europe eventually developed democracy instead.[110]: 4
Medieval universities were not secular institutions, but they, and some religious orders, were founded with a respect for dialogue and debate, believing good understanding came from viewing something from multiple sides. Because of this, they incorporated reasoned disputation into their system of studies.[111]: xxxiii Accordingly, the universities would hold what was called aquadlibettal where a 'master' would raise a question, students would provide arguments, and those arguments would be assessed and argued. Brian Law says, "Literally anyone could attend, masters and scholars from other schools, all kinds of ecclesiastics and prelates and even civil authorities, all the 'intellectuals' of the time, who were always attracted to skirmishes of this kind, and all of whom had the right to ask questions and oppose arguments."[111]: xxv In a kind of 'Town Hall Meeting' atmosphere, questions could be raised orally by anyone (a quolibet) about literally anything (de quolibet).[111]: xxv
Thomas Aquinas was a master at the University of Paris, twice, and heldquodlibetals. Aquinas interpreted Aristotle on natural law.Alexander Passerin d'Entreves writes that natural law has been assailed for a century and a half, yet it remains an aspect of legal philosophy since much human rights theory is based on it.[112] Aquinas taught that just leadership must work for the "common good". He defines a law as "an ordinance of reason" and that it cannot simply be the will of the legislator and be good law. Aquinas says the primary goal of law is that "good is to be done and pursued and evil avoided."[113]
"The philosophical foundation of the liberal concept of human rights can be found in natural law theories",[114][115] and much thinking on natural law is traced to the thought of the Dominican friar, Thomas Aquinas.[116] Aquinas continues to influence the works of leading political and legal philosophers.[116]
According to Aquinas, every law is ultimately derived from what he calls the 'eternal law': God's ordering of all created things. For Aquinas, a human action is good or bad depending on whether it conforms to reason, and it is this participation in the 'eternal law' by the 'rational creature' that is called 'natural law'. Aquinas said natural law is a fundamental principle that is woven into the fabric of human nature. Secularists, such as Hugo Grotius, later expanded the idea of human rights and built on it.
"...one cannot and need not deny that Human Rights are of Western Origin. It cannot be denied, because they are morally based on the Judeo-Christian tradition and Graeco-Roman philosophy; they were codified in the West over many centuries, they have secured an established position in the national declarations of western democracies, and they have been enshrined in the constitutions of those democracies."[117]
Howard Tumber says, "human rights is not a universal doctrine, but is the descendent of one particular religion (Christianity)." This does not suggest Christianity has been superior in its practice or has not had "its share of human rights abuses".[118]
David Gushee says Christianity has a "tragically mixed legacy" when it comes to the application of its own ethics. He examines three cases of "Christendom divided against itself": the crusades and St. Francis' attempt at peacemaking with Muslims; Spanish conquerors and the killing of indigenous peoples and the protests against it; and the on-again off-again persecution and protection of Jews.[119]
Charles Malik, a Lebanese academic, diplomat, philosopher and theologian was responsible for the drafting and adoption of the 1948Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
According toJennifer Deane, the labelInquisition implies "an institutional coherence and an official unity that never existed in the Middle Ages."[120]: 6 TheMedieval Inquisitions were actually a series of separate inquisitions beginning from around 1184 lasting to the 1230s that were in response to dissidents accused of heresy,[121] while thePapal Inquisition (1230s–1302) was created to restore order disrupted by mob violence against heretics. Heresy was a religious, political, and social issue.[122]: 108, 109 As such, "the first stirrings of violence against dissidents were usually the result of popular resentment."[123]: 189 This led to a breakdown of social order.[122]: 108, 109 In the Late Roman Empire, an inquisitorial system of justice had developed, and that is the system that was revived in the Middle Ages. It used a combined panel of both civil and ecclesiastical representatives with a Bishop, his representative, or a local judge, as inquisitor. Essentially, the church reintroduced Roman law in Europe (in the form of the Inquisition) when it seemed that Germanic law had failed.[124] "The [Medieval] Inquisition was not an organization arbitrarily devised and imposed upon the judicial system by the ambition or fanaticism of the church. It was rather a natural—one may almost say an inevitable—evolution of the forces at work in the thirteenth century."[125]
In 1095,Pope Urban II called for aCrusade to re-take theHoly Land fromMuslim rule.Hugh S. Pyper says "the city [of Jerusalem's] importance is reflected in the fact that early medieval maps place [Jerusalem] at the center of the world."[109]: 338
"By the eleventh century, the Seljuk Turks had conquered [three—quarters of the Christian world]. The holdings of the old Eastern Roman Empire, known to modern historians as the Byzantine Empire, were reduced to little more than Greece. In desperation, the emperor in Constantinople sent word to the Christians of western Europe asking them to aid their brothers and sisters in the East."[126][127]
This was the impetus of the first crusade, however, the "Colossus of the Medieval world was Islam, not Christendom" and despite initial success, these conflicts, which lasted four centuries, ultimately ended in failure for western Christendom.[127]
At the time of the First crusade, there was no clear concept of what a crusade was beyond that of a pilgrimage.[128]: 32 Riley-Smith says the crusades were products of the renewed spirituality of the central Middle Ages as much as they were of political circumstances.[129]: 177 Senior churchmen of this time presented the concept of Christian love to the faithful as the reason to take up arms.[129]: 177 The people had a concern for living thevita apostolica and expressing Christian ideals in active works of charity, exemplified by the new hospitals, the pastoral work of the Augustinians and Premonstratensians, and the service of the friars. Riley-Smith concludes, "The charity of St. Francis may now appeal to us more than that of the crusaders, but both sprang from the same roots."[129]: 180, 190–2 Constable adds that those "scholars who see the crusades as the beginning of European colonialism and expansionism would have surprised people at the time. [Crusaders] would not have denied some selfish aspects... but the predominant emphasis was on the defense and recovery of lands that had once been Christian and on the self-sacrifice, rather than the self-seeking, of the participants."[128]: 15 Riley-Smith also says scholars are turning away from the idea the crusades were materially motivated.[130]
Ideas such as holy war and Christian chivalry, in both thought and culture, continued to evolve gradually from the eleventh to the thirteenth centuries.[102]: 184, 185, 210 This can be traced in expressions of law, traditions, tales, prophecy, and historical narratives, in letters, bulls and poems written during the crusading period.[131]: 715–737
According to political science professorAndrew R. Murphy, concepts of tolerance and intolerance were not starting points for thoughts about relations for any of the various groups involved in or affected by the crusades.[132]: xii–xvii Instead, concepts of tolerance began to grow during the crusades from efforts to define legal limits and the nature of co-existence.[132]: xii Eventually, this would help provide the foundation to the conviction among the earlyProtestants that pioneering the concept ofreligious toleration was necessary.[107]: 3
During the "calamitous" fourteenth century with itsplague,famine andwars, people were thrown into confusion and despair. From its pinnacle of power in the 1200s, the church entered a period of decline, internal conflict, and corruption.[102]: 209–214 According toWalter Ullmann, the church lost "the moral, spiritual and authoritative leadership it had built up in Europe over the centuries of minute, consistent, detailed, dynamic forward-looking work. ... The papacy was now forced to pursue policies which, in substance, aimed at appeasement and were no longer directive, orientating and determinative."[133]: 184
According to Matthews and DeWitt, "The Popes in the fourteenth to the mid-fifteenth century turned their interest to the arts and humanities rather than to pressing moral and spiritual issues. Moreover, they were vitally concerned with the trappings of political power. They plunged into Italian politics...ruling as secular princes in their papal lands. Their worldly interests and blatant political maneuverings only intensified the mounting disapproval of the papacy and provided the church's critics with more examples of the institution's corruption and decline."[102]: 248 As the Church grew more powerful, wealthy, and corrupt, many sought reform. TheDominican andFranciscan Orders were founded, which emphasized poverty and spirituality, and the concept of lay piety developed—theDevotio Moderna or the new devotion—which worked toward the ideal of a pious society of ordinary non-ordained people and, ultimately, to the Reformation and the development of modern concepts of tolerance and religious freedom.[102]: 248–250
In the 13th-century Roman Pontifical, the prayer for ordaining women as deacons was removed, and ordination was re-defined and applied only to male Priests.
Woman-as-witch became a stereotype in the 1400s until it was codified in 1487 by Pope Innocent VIII who declared "most witches are female". "The European witch stereotype embodies two apparent paradoxes: first, it was not produced by the 'barbaric Dark Ages', but during the progressive Renaissance and the early modern period; secondly, Western Christianity did not recognize the reality of witches for centuries, or criminalize them until around 1400."[134] Sociologist Don Swenson says the explanation for this may lay in the nature of medieval society as heirocratic which led to violence and the use of coercion to force conformity. "There has been much debate ... as to how many women were executed ... [and estimates vary wildly, but numbers] small and large do little to portray the horror and dishonor inflicted upon these women. This treatment provides [dramatic] contrast to the respect given to women during the early era of Christianity and in early Europe ..."[135]
Women were in many respects excluded from political and mercantile life; however, some leading churchwomen were exceptions. Medieval abbesses and female superiors of monastic houses were powerful figures whose influence could rival that of male bishops and abbots: "They treated with kings, bishops, and the greatest lords on terms of perfect equality; ... they were present at all great religious and national solemnities, at the dedication of churches, and even, like the queens, took part in the deliberation of the national assemblies ...".[136] The increasing popularity ofdevotion to the Virgin Mary (the mother of Jesus) secured maternal virtue as a central cultural theme of Catholic Europe. Kenneth Clarke wrote that the 'Cult of the Virgin' in the early 12th century "had taught a race of tough and ruthless barbarians the virtues of tenderness and compassion".[137]
In 1054, after centuries of strained relations, theGreat Schism occurred over differences in doctrine, splitting the Christian world between theCatholic Church, centered in Rome and dominant in the West, and theEastern Orthodox Church, centered inConstantinople, capital of the Byzantine Empire.
Relations between the major powers in Western society: the nobility, monarchy and clergy, also sometimes produced conflict. For example, theInvestiture Controversy was one of the most significant conflicts betweenChurch and state in medieval Europe. A series of Popes challenged the authority of monarchies over control of appointments, orinvestitures, of church officials. The Court ofHoly Roman EmperorFrederick II, based in Sicily, experienced tension and rivalry with the Papacy over control of Northern Italy.[138]
In 1302,Pope Boniface VIII (1294–1303) issuedUnam sanctam, a papal bull proclaiming the superiority of the Pope over all secular rulers.Philip IV of France responded by sending an army to arrest the Pope. Boniface fled for his life and died shortly thereafter.[102]: 216 "This episode revealed that the popes were no longer a match for the feudal kings" and showed there had been a marked decline in papal prestige.[102]: 216 [133]: xv George Garnett says the implementation of the papal monarchial idea had led to the loss of prestige, as, the more efficient the papal bureaucratic machine became, the further it alienated the people, and the further it declined.[133]: xv
ThePapacy had its court at Avignon from 1305 to 1378[139] This arose from the conflict between the Italian Papacy and the French crown. TheologianRoger Olson says the church reached its nadir at this time when there were three different men claiming to be the rightful Pope.[140]: 348 [102]: 248
"What the observer of the papacy witnessed in the second half of the thirteenth century was a gradual, though clearly perceptible, decomposition of Europe as a single ecclesiastical unit, and the fragmentation of Europe into independent, autonomous entities which were soon to be called national monarchies or states. This fragmentation heralded the withering away of the papacy as a governing institution operating on a universal scale."[133]: 176
The history of the Inquisition divides into two major parts: "its creation by the medieval papacy in the early thirteenth century, and its transformation between 1478 and 1542 into permanent secular governmental bureaucracies: the Spanish, Portuguese, and Roman Inquisitions...all of which endured into the nineteenth century."[141][142]: 154 The old medieval inquisitions had limited power and influence, whereas the powers of the modern "Holy Tribunal" were extended and enlarged by the power of the state into "one of the most formidable engines of destruction which ever existed."[143]: 343
HistorianHelen Rawlings says, "theSpanish Inquisition was different [from earlier inquisitions] in one fundamental respect: it was responsible to the crown rather than the Pope and was used to consolidate state interest."[144]: 1, 2 It was authorized by the Pope, yet the initial Inquisitors proved so severe that the Pope almost immediately opposed it to no avail.[145]: 52, 53 Early in 1483, the king and queen established a council, theConsejo de la Suprema y General Inquisición [de;eo;es], to govern the inquisition and chose Torquemada to head it as inquisitor general. In October 1483, a papal bull conceded control to the crown. According toJosé Cassanova, the Spanish inquisition became the first truly national, unified and centralized state institution.[146]: 75 After the 1400s, few Spanish inquisitors were from the religious orders.[144]: 2
ThePortuguese Inquisition was also fully controlled by the crown which established a government board, known as the General Council, to oversee it. The Grand Inquisitor, who was chosen by the king, was always a member of the royal family. The first statute ofLimpieza de sangre (purity of blood) appeared in Toledo in 1449 and was later adopted in Portugal as well. Initially, these statutes were condemned by the Church, but in 1555, the highly corrupt Pope Alexander VI approved a 'blood purity' statute for one of the religious orders.[147]: 19 In his history of the Portuguese Inquisition,Giuseppe Marcocci says there is a deep connection between the rise of the Felipes in Portugal, the growth of the inquisition, and the adoption of the statutes of purity of blood which spread and increased and were more concerned with ethnic ancestry than religion.[148]
HistorianT. F. Mayer [it] writes that "theRoman Inquisition operated to serve the papacy's long standing political aims in Naples, Venice and Florence."[149]: 3 Under Paul III and his successor Julius III, and under most of the popes thereafter, the Roman Inquisition's activity was relatively restrained and its command structure was considerably more bureaucratic than those of other inquisitions were.[149]: 2 Where the medieval Inquisition had focused on popular misconceptions which resulted in the disturbance of public order, the Roman Inquisition was concerned with orthodoxy of a more intellectual, academic nature. The Roman Inquisition is probably best known for its condemnation of the difficult and cantankerous Galileo which was more about "bringing Florence to heel" than about heresy.[149]: 5

In the Middle Ages, the Church and the worldly authorities were closely related.Martin Luther separated the religious and the worldly realms in principle (doctrine of the two kingdoms).[150] The believers were obliged to use reason to govern the worldly sphere in an orderly and peaceful way. Luther's doctrine of thepriesthood of all believers upgraded the role of laymen in the church considerably. The members of a congregation had the right to elect a minister and, if necessary, to vote for his dismissal (TreatiseOn the right and authority of a Christian assembly or congregation to judge all doctrines and to call, install and dismiss teachers, as testified in Scripture; 1523).[151] Calvin strengthened this basically democratic approach by including elected laymen (church elders,presbyters) in his representative church government.[152] TheHuguenots added regionalsynods and a national synod, whose members were elected by the congregations, to Calvin's system of church self-government. This system was used by the other Reformed churches.[153]
Politically,John Calvin favoured a mixture of aristocracy and democracy. He appreciated the advantages of democracy: "It is an invaluable gift, if God allows a people to freely elect its own authorities and overlords."[154] Calvin also thought that earthly rulers lose their divine right and must be put down when they rise up against God. To further protect the rights of ordinary people, Calvin suggested separating political powers in a system of checks and balances (separation of powers). 16th-century Calvinists and Lutherans developed a theory of resistance called thedoctrine of the lesser magistrate which was later employed in the U.S. Declaration of Independence. Thus early Protestants resisted politicalabsolutism and paved the way for the rise of modern democracy.[155] Besides England, the Netherlands were, under Calvinist leadership, the freest country in Europe in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. It granted asylum to philosophers likeRené Descartes,Baruch Spinoza andPierre Bayle.Hugo Grotius was able to teach his natural-law theory and a relatively liberal interpretation of the Bible.[156]
Consistent with Calvin's political ideas, Protestants created both the English and the American democracies. In 17th century England, the most important persons and events in this process were theEnglish Civil War,Oliver Cromwell,John Milton,John Locke, theGlorious Revolution, theEnglish Bill of Rights, and theAct of Settlement.[157] Later, the British took their democratic ideals also to their colonies, e.g. Australia, New Zealand, and India. In the 19th and 20th centuries, the British variety of modern-time democracy,constitutional monarchy, was taken over by Protestant-formed Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and the Netherlands as well as the Catholic countries Belgium and Spain. In North America,Plymouth Colony (Pilgrim Fathers; 1620) andMassachusetts Bay Colony (1628) practised democratic self-rule andseparation of powers.[158][159][160][161] TheseCongregationalists were convinced that the democratic form of government was the will of God.[162] TheMayflower Compact was asocial contract.[163][164]
Classics scholarKyle Harper says that for a period of time
"...the triumph of Christianity not only drove profound cultural change, it created a new relationship between sexual morality and society... The legacy of Christianity lies in the dissolution of an ancient system where social and political status, power, andthe transmission of social inequality to the next generation scripted the terms of sexual morality.[165]"
— Kyle Harper, From Shame to Sin: The Christian Transformation of Sexual Morality in Late Antiquity, pages 4 and 7
Both the ancient Greeks and the Romans cared and wrote about sexual morality within categories of good and bad, pure and defiled, and ideal and transgression.[166] But the sexual ethical structures of Roman society were built on status, and sexual modesty meant something different for men than it did for women, and for the well-born, than it did for the poor, and for the free citizen, than it did for the slave—for whom the concepts of honor, shame and sexual modesty could be said to have no meaning at all.[165]: 7 Slaves were not thought to have an interior ethical life because they could go no lower socially and were commonly used sexually; the free and well born were thought to embody social honor and were therefore able to exhibit the fine sense of shame suited to their station. Roman literature indicates the Romans were aware of these dualities.[166]: 12, 20
Shame was a profoundly social concept that was, in ancient Rome, always mediated by gender and status. "It was not enough that a wife merely regulate her sexual behavior in the accepted ways; it was required that her virtue in this area be conspicuous."[166]: 38 Men, on the other hand, were allowed live-in mistresses calledpallake.[167] This, for example, permitted Roman society to find both a husband's control of a wife's sexual behavior a matter of intense importance and at the same time see his own sex with young boys as of little concern.[166]: 12, 20 Christianity sought to establish equal sexual standards for men and women and to protect all the young whether slave or free. This was a transformation in the deep logic of sexual morality.[165]: 6, 7
Early Church Fathers advocated against adultery, polygamy, homosexuality, pederasty, bestiality, prostitution, and incest while advocating for the sanctity of the marriage bed.[96]: 20 The central Christian prohibition against suchporneia, which is a single name for that array of sexual behaviors, "collided with deeply entrenched patterns of Roman permissiveness where the legitimacy of sexual contact was determined primarily by status. St. Paul, whose views became dominant in early Christianity, made the body into a consecrated space, a point of mediation between the individual and the divine. Paul's over-riding sense that gender—rather than status or power or wealth or position—was the prime determinant in the propriety of the sex act was momentous. By boiling the sex act down to the most basic constituents of male and female, Paul was able to describe the sexual culture surrounding him in transformative terms."[165]: 12, 92
Christian sexual ideology is inextricable from its concept of freewill. "In its original form, Christian freewill was a cosmological claim—an argument about the relationship between God's justice and the individual... as Christianity became intermeshed with society, the discussion shifted in revealing ways to the actual psychology of volition and the material constraints on sexual action... The church's acute concern with volition places Christian philosophy in the liveliest currents of imperial Greco-Roman philosophy [where] orthodox Christians offered a radically distinctive version of it."[165]: 14 The Greeks and Romans said our deepest moralities depend on our social position which is given to us by fate. Christianity "preached a liberating message of freedom". It was a revolution in the rules of behavior, but also in the very image of the human being as a sexual being, free, frail and awesomely responsible for one's own self to God alone. "It was a revolution in the nature of society's claims on the moral agent... There are risks in over-estimating the change in old patterns Christianity was able to begin bringing about; but there are risks, too, in underestimating Christianization as a watershed."[165]: 14–18

The teachings of the Church have also been used to "establish [...] the status of women under the law".[97] There has been some debate as to whether the Church has improved the status of women or hindered their progress.

From the beginning of the thirteenth century, the Church formally recognizedmarriage between a freely consenting, baptized man and woman as asacrament—an outward sign communicating a special gift of God's love. TheCouncil of Florence in 1438 gave this definition, following earlier Church statements in 1208, and declared that sexual union was a special participation in the union of Christ in the Church.[168] However, thePuritans, while highly valuing the institution, viewed marriage as a "civil", rather than a "religious" matter, being "under the jurisdiction of the civil courts".[169] This is because they found no biblical precedent for clergy performing marriage ceremonies. Further, marriage was said to be for the "relief ofconcupiscence"[169] as well as any spiritual purpose. During theProtestant Reformation,Martin Luther andJohn Calvin denied thesacramentality of marriage. This unanimity was broken at the1930 Lambeth Conference, the quadrennial meeting of the worldwideAnglican Communion—creating divisions in that denomination.
Catholicism equates premarital sex withfornication and ties it with breaking thesixth commandment ("Thou shalt not commit adultery") in itsCatechism.[170] While sex before marriage was not a taboo in the Anglican Church until theMarriage Act 1753, which for the first time stipulated that everyone in England and Wales had to be married in their parish church"[171] Prior to that time, "marriage began at the time of betrothal, when couples would live and sleep together... The process begun at the time of the Hardwicke Act continued throughout the 1800s, with stigma beginning to attach to illegitimacy."[171]
Scriptures in theNew Testament dealing with sexuality are extensive. Subjects include: theApostolic Decree (Acts 15), sexual immorality, divine love (1 Corinthians 13), mutual self-giving (1 Corinthians 7), bodily membership between Christ and between husband and wife (1 Corinthians 6:15–20) and honor versus dishonor of adultery (Hebrews 13:4).
TheHebrew Bible and its traditional interpretations inJudaism andChristianity have historically affirmed and endorsed apatriarchal andheteronormative approach towardshuman sexuality,[172][173] favouring exclusivelypenetrative vaginal intercourse between men and women within the boundaries ofmarriage over all other forms ofhuman sexual activity,[172][173] includingautoeroticism,masturbation,oral sex,non-penetrative andnon-heterosexual sexual intercourse (all of which have been labeled as "sodomy" at various times).[174] They have believed and taught that such behaviors are forbidden because they are consideredsinful,[172][173] and further compared to or derived from the behavior of the alleged residents ofSodom and Gomorrah.[172][175]
Social structures before and at the dawn of Christianity in theRoman Empire held that women were inferior to men intellectually and physically and were "naturally dependent".[176]Athenian women were legally classified as children regardless of age and were the "legal property of some man at all stages in her life."[10]: 104 Women in the Roman Empire had limited legal rights and could not enter professions. Female infanticide and abortion were practiced by all classes.[10]: 104 In family life, men could have "lovers, prostitutes and concubines" but wives who engaged in extramarital affairs were considered guilty of adultery. It was not rare for pagan women to be married before the age of puberty and then forced to consummate the marriage with her often much older husband. Husbands could divorce their wives at any time simply by telling the wife to leave; wives did not have a similar ability to divorce their husbands.[176]
Early Church Fathers advocated against polygamy, abortion, infanticide, child abuse, homosexuality, transvestism, and incest.[96]: 20 After the Roman Empire adopted Christianity as the official religion, however, the link between Christian teachings and Roman family laws became more clear.[177]: 91
For example, Church teaching heavily influenced the legal concept of marriage.[97]: 1–2 During theGregorian Reform, the Church developed and codified a view of marriage as a sacrament.[96]: 23 In a departure from societal norms, Church law required the consent of both parties before a marriage could be performed[96]: 20–23 and established a minimum age for marriage.[178]: 33 The elevation of marriage to a sacrament also made the union a binding contract, with dissolutions overseen by Church authorities.[96]: 29, 36 Although the Church abandoned tradition to allow women the same rights as men to dissolve a marriage,[96]: 20, 25 in practice, when an accusation of infidelity was made, men were granted dissolutions more frequently than women.[178]: 18
According to historianShulamith Shahar, "[s]ome historians hold that the Church played a considerable part in fostering the inferior status of women in medieval society in general" by providing a "moral justification" for male superiority and by accepting practices such as wife-beating.[178]: 88 "The ecclesiastical conception of the inferior status of women, deriving from Creation, her role in Original Sin and her subjugation to man, provided both direct and indirect justification for her inferior standing in the family and in society in medieval civilization. It was not the Church which induced husbands to beat their wives, but it not only accepted this custom after the event, if it was not carried to excess, but, by proclaiming the superiority of man, also supplied its moral justification." Despite these laws, some women, particularlyabbesses, gained powers that were never available to women in previous Roman or Germanic societies.[178]: 12
Although these teachings emboldened secular authorities to give women fewer rights than men, they also helped form the concept ofchivalry.[97]: 2 Chivalry was influenced by a new Church attitude towards Mary, the mother of Jesus.[178]: 25 This "ambivalence about women's very nature" was shared by most major religions in the Western world.[179]

Christian culture puts notable emphasis on thefamily,[180] and according to the work of scholarsMax Weber,Alan Macfarlane,Steven Ozment,Jack Goody andPeter Laslett, the huge transformation that led to modern marriage in Western democracies was "fueled by the religio-cultural value system provided by elements ofJudaism, earlyChristianity,Roman Catholic canon law and theProtestant Reformation".[181] Historically,extended families were the basic family unit in theCatholic culture andcountries.[182] According to a study by the scholar Joseph Henrich fromHarvard University, the Catholic church "changed extended family ties, as well as values and psychology of individuals in the Western world".[183][184]
MostChristian denominations practiceinfant baptism[185] to enter children into the faith. Some form ofconfirmation ritual occurs when the child has reached theage of reason and voluntarily accepts the religion. Ritualcircumcision is used to markCoptic Christian,[186]Ethiopian Orthodox Christian[187] andEritrean Orthodox infant males as belonging to the faith.[188][189]Circumcision is practiced among many Christian countries and communities;Christian communities inAfrica,[190][191] theAnglosphere countries, the Philippines, the Middle East,[192][193] South Korea andOceania have high circumcision rates,[194] while Christian communities inEurope andSouth America have low circumcision rates.
During the early period ofcapitalism, the rise of a large, commercial middle class, mainly in theProtestant countries ofHolland andEngland, brought about a new family ideology centred around the upbringing of children.Puritanism stressed the importance of individual salvation and concern for the spiritual welfare of children. It became widely recognized that children possess rights on their own behalf. This included the rights of poor children to sustenance, membership in a community, education, and job training. ThePoor Relief Acts in Elizabethan England put responsibility on eachParish to care for all the poor children in the area.[195] And prior to the 20th century, three major branches of Christianity—Catholicism,Orthodoxy andProtestantism[196]—as well as leading Protestant reformersMartin Luther andJohn Calvin generally held a critical perspective ofbirth control.[197]

TheChurch of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints puts notable emphasis on thefamily, and the distinctive concept of a united family which lives and progresses forever is at the core of Latter-day Saint doctrine.[198] Church members are encouraged to marry and have children, and as a result, Latter-day Saint families tend to be larger than average. All sexual activity outside of marriage is considered a serious sin. Allhomosexual activity is considered sinful andsame-sex marriages are not performed or supported by the LDS Church. Latter-day Saint fathers who hold thepriesthood typicallyname and bless their children shortly after birth to formally give the child a name and generate a church record for them.Mormons tend to be very family-oriented and have strong connections across generations and with extended family, reflective of their belief that families can besealed together beyond death.[199]: 59 In the temple, husbands and wives aresealed to each other for eternity. The implication is that other institutional forms, including the church, might disappear, but the family will endure.[200] A 2011 survey of Mormons in the United States showed that family life is very important to Mormons, with family concerns significantly higher than career concerns. Four out of five Mormons believe that being a good parent is one of the most important goals in life, and roughly three out of four Mormons put having a successful marriage in this category.[201][202] Mormons also have a strictlaw of chastity, requiring abstention from sexual relations outside heterosexual marriage and fidelity within marriage.
APew Center study about Religion and Living arrangements around the world in 2019, found that Christians around the world live in somewhat smaller households, on average, than non-Christians (4.5 vs. 5.1 members). 34% of world's Christian population live in two parent families with minor children, while 29% live in household withextended families, 11% live as couples without other family members, 9% live in household with least one child over the age of 18 with one or two parents, 7% live alone, and 6% live insingle parent households.[203] Christians inAsia andPacific,Latin America and theCaribbean,Middle East andNorth Africa, and inSub-Saharan Africa, overwhelmingly live in extended or two parent families with minor children.[203] While more Christians in Europe and North America live alone or as couples without other family members.[203]

Clerical marriage is admitted amongProtestants, including bothAnglicans andLutherans.[204] Some Protestant clergy and theirchildren have played an essential role inliterature,philosophy,science, andeducation inEarly Modern Europe.[205]
ManyEastern Churches (Assyrian Church of the East,Eastern Orthodox,Oriental Orthodox, orEastern Catholic), while allowing married men to be ordained, do not allow clerical marriage after ordination: theirparish priests are often married, but must marry before being ordained to the priesthood. Within the lands of theEastern Christendom, priests' children often became priests and married within their social group, establishing atightly-knit hereditary caste among someEastern Christian communities.[206][207]
TheCatholic Church not only forbids clerical marriage, but generally follows a practice of clerical celibacy, requiring candidates for ordination to be unmarried or widowed. However, this public policy in the Catholic Church has not always been enforced in private.
The Church initially accepted slavery as part of the Greco-Roman social fabric of society, campaigning primarily for humane treatment of slaves but also admonishing slaves to behave appropriately towards their masters.[177]: 171–173 Historian Glenn Sunshine says, "Christians were the first people in history to oppose slavery systematically. Early Christians purchased slaves in the markets simply to set them free. Later, in the seventh century, the Franks..., under the influence of its Christian queen,Bathilde, became the first kingdom in history to begin the process of outlawing slavery. ...In the 1200s, Thomas Aquinas declared slavery a sin. When the African slave trade began in the 1400s, it was condemned numerous times by the papacy."[208]
During the early medieval period, Christians tolerated enslavement of non-Christians. By the end of the medieval period, enslavement of Christians had been mitigated somewhat with the spread ofserfdom within Europe, though outright slavery existed in European colonies in other parts of the world. Several popes issued papal bulls condemning mistreatment of enslaved Native Americans; these were largely ignored. In his 1839 bullIn supremo apostolatus, PopeGregory XVI condemned all forms of slavery; nevertheless some American bishops continued to support slavery for several decades.[209] In this historic Bull, Pope Gregory outlined his summation of the impact of the Church on the ancient institution of slavery, beginning by acknowledging that early Apostles had tolerated slavery but had called on masters to "act well towards their slaves... knowing that the common Master both of themselves and of the slaves is in Heaven, and that with Him there is no distinction of persons". Gregory continued to discuss the involvement of Christians for and against slavery through the ages:[210]
In the process of time, the fog of pagan superstition being more completely dissipated and the manners of barbarous people having been softened, thanks to Faith operating by Charity, it at last comes about that, since several centuries, there are no more slaves in the greater number of Christian nations. But – We say with profound sorrow – there were to be found afterwards among the Faithful men who, shamefully blinded by the desire of sordid gain, in lonely and distant countries, did not hesitate to reduce to slavery Indians, negroes and other wretched peoples, or else, by instituting or developing the trade in those who had been made slaves by others, to favour their unworthy practice. Certainly many Roman Pontiffs of glorious memory, Our Predecessors, did not fail, according to the duties of their charge, to blame severely this way of acting as dangerous for the spiritual welfare of those engaged in the traffic and a shame to the Christian name; they foresaw that as a result of this, the infidel peoples would be more and more strengthened in their hatred of the true Religion.

It was women, primarily Amerindian Christian converts who became the primary supporters of the Latin American Church.[211]: 65 While the Spanish military was known for its ill-treatment of Amerindian men and women, Catholic missionaries are credited with championing all efforts to initiate protective laws for the Indians and fought against their enslavement. This began within 20 years of the discovery of the New World by Europeans in 1492 – in December 1511,Antonio de Montesinos, a Dominican friar, openly rebuked the Spanish rulers ofHispaniola for their "cruelty and tyranny" in dealing with the American natives.[212]: 135 King Ferdinand enacted theLaws of Burgos andValladolid in response. The issue resulted in a crisis of conscience in 16th-century Spain.[213]: 109, 110 Further abuses against the Amerindians committed by Spanish authorities were denounced by Catholic missionaries such asBartolomé de Las Casas andFrancisco de Vitoria which led to debate on the nature of human rights[214]: 287 and the birth of modern international law.[212]: 137 Enforcement of these laws was lax, and some historians blame the Church for not doing enough to liberate the Indians; others point to the Church as the only voice raised on behalf of indigenous peoples.[215]: 45, 52, 53
Slavery and human sacrifice were both part of Latin American culture before the Europeans arrived. Indian slavery was first abolished byPope Paul III in the 1537 bullSublimis Deus which confirmed that "their souls were as immortal as those of Europeans", that Indians were to be regarded as fully human, and they should neither be robbed nor turned into slaves.[213]: 110 While these edicts may have had some beneficial effects, these were limited in scope. European colonies were mainly run by military and royally appointed administrators, whoseldom stopped to consider church teachings when forming policy or enforcing their rule. Even afterindependence, institutionalized prejudice and injustice toward indigenous people continued well into the twentieth century. This has led to the formation ofa number of movements to reassert indigenous peoples' civil rights and culture in modern nation-states.
A catastrophe was wrought upon the Amerindians by contact with Europeans. Old World diseases likesmallpox,measles,malaria and many others spread through Indian populations. "In most of the New World 90 percent or more of the native population was destroyed by wave after wave of previously unknown afflictions. Explorers and colonists did not enter an empty land but rather an emptied one".[176]: 454
Slavery and theslave trade were part of African societies and states which supplied the Arab world with slaves before the arrival of the Europeans.[216]: 221 Several decades prior to discovery of theNew World, in response to serious military threat to Europe posed by Muslims of theOttoman Empire,Pope Nicholas V had granted Portugal the right to subdue Muslims, pagans and other unbelievers in the papal bullDum Diversas (1452).[217]: 65–6 Six years after African slavery was first outlawed by the first major entity to do so, (Great Britain in 1833),Pope Gregory XVI followed in a challenge to Spanish and Portuguese policy, by condemning slavery and the slave trade in the 1839 papal bullIn supremo apostolatus, and approved the ordination of native clergy in the face of government racism.[218]: 221 The United States would eventually outlaw African slavery in 1865, and Brazil in 1888.
Clapham Sect were a group of social reformers associated withClapham in the period from the 1780s to the 1840s. Despite the label "sect", most members remained in theestablished (and dominant)Church of England, which was highly interwoven with offices of state. However, its successors were in many cases outside of the establishedAnglican Church.[219]
By the close of the 19th century, European powers had managed to gain control of most of the African interior.[9] The new rulers introduced cash-based economies which created an enormous demand for literacy and a western education—a demand which for most Africans could only be satisfied by Christian missionaries.[9] Catholic missionaries followed colonial governments into Africa, and built schools, hospitals, monasteries and churches.[9]: 397–410

The influence of the Church on Western letters and learning has been formidable. The ancient texts of the Bible have deeply influenced Western art, literature and culture. For centuries following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire, small monastic communities were practically the only outposts of literacy in Western Europe. In time, the Cathedral schools developed into Europe's earliest universities and the church has established thousands of primary, secondary and tertiary institutions throughout the world in the centuries since. The Church and clergymen have also sought at different times to censor texts and scholars. Thus different schools of opinion exist as to the role and influence of the Church in relation to western letters and learning.
One view, first propounded byEnlightenment philosophers, asserts that the Church's doctrines are entirely superstitious and have hindered the progress of civilization.Communist states have made similar arguments in their education in order to inculcate a negative view of Catholicism (and religion in general) in their citizens. The most famous incidents cited by such critics are the Church's condemnations of the teachings ofCopernicus,Galileo Galilei andJohannes Kepler. Events inChristian Europe, such as the Galileo affair, that were associated with theScientific Revolution and theAge of Enlightenment led some scholars such asJohn William Draper to postulate aconflict thesis, holding that religion and science have been in conflict throughout history. While the conflict thesis remains popular inatheistic and antireligious circles, it has lost favor among most contemporary historians of science.[220]

In opposition to this view, some historians of science, including non-Catholics such asJ.L. Heilbron,[221]A.C. Crombie,David Lindberg,[222]Edward Grant, historian of science Thomas Goldstein,[223] and Ted Davis, have argued that the Church had a significant, positive influence on the development of Western civilization. They hold that, not only did monks save and cultivate the remnants of ancient civilization during the barbarian invasions, but that the Church promoted learning and science through its sponsorship of manyuniversities which, under its leadership, grew rapidly in Europe in the 11th and 12th centuries. Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, and Johannes Kepler all considered themselves Christian. St.Thomas Aquinas, the Church's "model theologian", argued that reason is in harmony with faith, and that reason can contribute to a deeper understanding of revelation, and so encouraged intellectual development.[224] The Church's priest-scientists, many of whom wereJesuits, have been among the leading lights inastronomy,genetics,geomagnetism,meteorology,seismology, andsolar physics, becoming some of the "fathers" of these sciences. Examples include important churchmen such as theAugustinian abbotGregor Mendel (pioneer in the study of genetics), the monkWilliam of Ockham who developedOckham's Razor,Roger Bacon (aFranciscan friar who was one of the early advocates of thescientific method), and Belgian priestGeorges Lemaître (the first to propose theBig Bang theory). Other notable priest scientists have includedAlbertus Magnus,Robert Grosseteste,Nicholas Steno,Francesco Grimaldi,Giambattista Riccioli,Roger Boscovich, andAthanasius Kircher. Even more numerous are Catholic laity involved in science:Henri Becquerel who discoveredradioactivity;Galvani,Volta,Ampere,Marconi, pioneers in electricity andtelecommunications;Lavoisier, "father of modernchemistry";Vesalius, founder of modernhuman anatomy; andCauchy, one of the mathematicians who laid the rigorous foundations ofcalculus.
Most contemporary historians of science agree thatGalileo affair as an exception, with the relationship between science and Christianity, and have corrected numerous false interpretations of the affair.[225][226][227][228] ProfessorNoah J Efron says that "Generations of historians and sociologists have discovered many ways in which Christians, Christian beliefs, and Christian institutions played crucial roles in fashioning the tenets, methods, and institutions of what in time became modern science. They found that some forms of Christianity provided the motivation to study nature systematically..."[229] Virtually all modern scholars and historians agree that Christianity moved many early-modern intellectuals to study nature systematically.[230]
Christian Scholars and Scientists have made noted contributions to science and technology fields,[13][14][15] as well asMedicine,[18] both historically and in modern times. Many well-known historical figures who influenced Western science considered themselves Christian such asCopernicus,[231]Galileo,[232]Kepler,[233]Newton[234] andBoyle.[235] Some scholars and historians attributes Christianity to having contributed to the rise of theScientific Revolution.[7][236][237][238]
According to100 Years of Nobel Prize (2005), a review of Nobel prizes awarded between 1901 and 2000, 65.4% ofNobel Prize Laureates, have identified Christianity in its various forms as their religious preference (423 prizes).[239] Overall, Christians have won a total of 78.3% of all the Nobel Prizes inPeace,[240] 72.5% inChemistry, 65.3% inPhysics,[240] 62% inMedicine,[240] 54% inEconomics[240] and 49.5% of allLiterature awards.[240]

Christianity began as a Jewish sect in the 1st century AD, and from the teachings ofJesus of Nazareth and his early followers. Jesus learned the texts of theHebrew Bible and became an influential wandering preacher. Accounts of his life and teachings appear in theNew Testament of the Bible, one of the bedrock texts of Western Civilization.[44] His orations, including theSermon on the Mount,The Good Samaritan and his declaration against hypocrisy "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" have been deeply influential inWestern literature. Many translations of the Bible exist, including theKing James Bible, which is one of the most admired texts inEnglish literature. The poeticPsalms and other passages of the Hebrew Bible have also been deeply influential in Western Literature and thought. Accounts of the actions of Jesus' early followers are contained within theActs of the Apostles andEpistles written between the early Christian communities – in particular thePauline epistles which are among the earliest extant Christian documents and foundational texts ofChristian theology.
After the death of Jesus, the new sect grew to be the dominant religion of the Roman Empire and the long tradition of Christian scholarship began. When theWestern Roman Empire was starting to disintegrate,St Augustine was Bishop ofHippo Regius.[241] He was aLatin-speaking philosopher and theologian who lived in the RomanAfrica Province. His writings were very influential in the development ofWestern Christianity and he developed the concept of the Church as a spiritualCity of God (ina book of the same name), distinct from the material Earthly City.[242] His bookConfessions, which outlines his sinful youth and conversion to Christianity, is widely considered to be the first autobiography of ever written in the canon ofWestern Literature. Augustine profoundly influenced the coming medieval worldview.[243]

TheByzantine Empire was one of the peaks inChristian history andChristian civilization, andConstantinople remained the leading city of theChristian world in size, wealth, and culture.There was a renewed interest in classical Greek philosophy, as well as an increase in literary output in vernacular Greek.[244]
TheByzantine science played an important role in the transmission ofclassical knowledge to theIslamic world and toRenaissance Italy, and also in the transmission ofIslamic science to Renaissance Italy.[245][246] Many of the most distinguished classical scholars held high office in theEastern Orthodox Church.[247]
TheImperial University of Constantinople sometimes known as theUniversity of the Palace Hall of Magnaura (Greek:Πανδιδακτήριον τῆς Μαγναύρας), was anEastern Roman educational institution that could trace its corporate origins to 425 AD, when the emperorTheodosius II founded thePandidakterion (Medieval Greek:Πανδιδακτήριον).[248] The Pandidakterion was refounded in 1046[249] byConstantine IX Monomachos who created the Departments ofLaw (Διδασκαλεῖον τῶν Νόμων) andPhilosophy (Γυμνάσιον).[250] At the time various economic schools, colleges, polytechnics, libraries and fine arts academies also operated in the city of Constantinople. And a few scholars have gone so far as to call the Pandidakterion the first "university" in the world.[251]
The writings ofClassical antiquity never ceased to be cultivated in Byzantium. Therefore, Byzantine science was in every period closely connected withancient philosophy, andmetaphysics.[252]: 409 In the field of engineeringIsidore of Miletus, the Greek mathematician and architect of theHagia Sophia, produced the first compilation ofArchimedes works c. 530, and it is through this tradition, kept alive by the school of mathematics and engineering founded c. 850 during the "Byzantine Renaissance" byLeo the Geometer that such works are known today (seeArchimedes Palimpsest).[253] Indeed, geometry and its applications (architecture and engineering instruments of war) remained a specialty of the Byzantines.

Though scholarship lagged during the dark years following the Arab conquests, during the so-calledByzantine Renaissance at the end of the first millennium Byzantine scholars re-asserted themselves becoming experts in the scientific developments of the Arabs and Persians, particularly inastronomy andmathematics.[254]: 116–118 The Byzantines are also credited withseveral technological advancements, particularly in architecture (e.g. the pendentive dome) and warfare technology (e.g.Greek fire).
Although at various times the Byzantines made magnificent achievements in the application of thesciences (notably in the construction of theHagia Sophia), and although they preserved much of the ancient knowledge of science and geometry, after the 6th century Byzantine scholars made few novel contributions to science in terms of developing new theories or extending the ideas of classical authors.[255][256]
In the final century of the Empire, Byzantine grammarians were those principally responsible for carrying, in person and in writing, ancient Greek grammatical and literary studies to earlyRenaissance Italy.[257]: 8 During this period,astronomy and othermathematical sciences were taught in Trebizond; medicine attracted the interest of almost all scholars.[258]: 189
In the field of law,Justinian I's reforms had a clear effect on the evolution ofjurisprudence, and Leo III'sEcloga influenced the formation of legal institutions in the Slavic world.[259]: 340
In the 10th century,Leo VI the Wise achieved the complete codification of the whole of Byzantine law in Greek, which became the foundation of all subsequent Byzantine law, generating interest to the present day.

During the period of European history often called theDark Ages which followed the collapse of theWestern Roman Empire, Church scholars and missionaries played a vital role in preserving knowledge of Classical Learning. While the Roman Empire and Christian religion survived in an increasingly Hellenised form in theByzantine Empire centred at Constantinople in the East, Western civilisation suffered a collapse of literacy and organisation following the fall of Rome in 476AD. Monks sought refuge at the far fringes of the known world: like Cornwall, Ireland, or the Hebrides. Disciplined Christian scholarship carried on in isolated outposts likeSkellig Michael in Ireland, where literate monks became some of the last preservers in Western Europe of the poetic and philosophical works of Western antiquity.[260] By around 800AD they were producing illuminated manuscripts such as theBook of Kells, by which old learning was re-communicated to Western Europe. TheHiberno-Scottish mission led by Irish and Scottish monks like StColumba spread Christianity back into Western Europe during the Middle Ages, establishing monasteries through Anglo-Saxon England and the Frankish Empire during the Middle Ages.
Thomas Cahill, in his 1995 bookHow the Irish Saved Civilization, credited Irish Monks with having "saved" Western Civilization:[261]
[A]s the Roman Empire fell, as all through Europe matted, unwashed barbarians[dubious –discuss] descended on the Roman cities, looting artifacts and burning books, the Irish, who were just learning to read and write, took up the great labor of copying all western literature – everything they could lay their hands on. These scribes then served as conduits through which the Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian cultures were transmitted to the tribes of Europe, newly settled amid the rubble and ruined vineyards of the civilization they had overwhelmed. Without this Service of the Scribes, everything that happened subsequently would be unthinkable. Without theMission of the Irish Monks, who single-handedly re-founded European civilization throughout the continent in the bays and valleys of their exile, the world that came after them would have been an entirely different one-a world without books.[dubious –discuss] And our own world would never have come to be.
According to art historianKenneth Clark, for some five centuries after the fall of Rome, virtually all men of intellect joined the Church and practically nobody in western Europe outside of monastic settlements had the ability to read or write. While church scholars at different times also destroyed classical texts they felt were contrary to the Christian message, it was they, virtually alone in Western Europe, who preserved texts from the old society.[260]
As Western Europe became more orderly again, the Church remained a driving force in education, setting upCathedral schools beginning in the Early Middle Ages as centers of education, which becamemedieval universities, the springboard of many of Western Europe's later achievements.

The CatholicCistercian order used its ownnumbering system, which could express numbers from 0 to 9999 in a single sign.[262][263][264][265][266] According to one modern Cistercian, "enterprise and entrepreneurial spirit" have always been a part of the order's identity, and the Cistercians "were catalysts for development of a market economy" in 12th-century Europe.[267] Until theIndustrial Revolution, most of the technological advances in Europe were made in the monasteries.[267] According to the medievalist Jean Gimpel, their high level of industrial technology facilitated the diffusion of new techniques: "Every monastery had a model factory, often as large as the church and only several feet away, and waterpower drove the machinery of the various industries located on its floor."[268] Waterpower was used for crushing wheat, sieving flour, fulling cloth and tanning – a "level of technological achievement [that] could have been observed in practically all" of the Cistercian monasteries.[269] The English science historianJames Burke examines the impact of Cistercian waterpower, derived from Roman watermill technology such as that ofBarbegal aqueduct and mill nearArles in the fourth of his ten-partConnections TV series, called "Faith in Numbers". TheCistercians made major contributions to culture and technology in medieval Europe:Cistercian architecture is considered one of the most beautiful styles ofmedieval architecture;[270] and the Cistercians were the main force of technological diffusion in fields such as agriculture andhydraulic engineering.[270]

TheIndex Librorum Prohibitorum ("List of Prohibited Books") was a list of publicationsprohibited by theCatholic Church. While the promulgation of theIndex has been described by some as the "turning-point in the freedom of enquiry" in the Catholic world,[271] the actual effects of the Index were minimal and it was largely ignored. John Hedley Brooke explains:
It is important not to exaggerate the oppressive effects of Index and Inquisition. The Counter-Reformation did not prevent Italian scholars from making original contributions in classical scholarship, history, law, literary criticism, logic, mathematics, medicine, philology, and rhetoric. Nor were they isolated by the Index from European scholarship. Prohibited books entered private libraries where they would be consulted by those prepared to break the rules in the interests of learning. One such collection was in the hands of Galileo's Paduan friend, G. V. Pinelli. One can lose a sense of perspective if the condemnation of Galileo is taken to epitomize the attitude of Catholic authorities toward the natural sciences. Relatively few scientific works were placed on the Index. The attempt to put a stop to the moving earth stands out because it proved so tragic an aberration – a personal tragedy for Galileo and, in the long run, a tragedy for the Church, which overreached itself in securing a territory that would prove impossible to hold.[272]
The first Index was published in 1559 by the Sacred Congregation of the Roman Inquisition. The last edition of the Index appeared in 1948 and publication of the list ceased 1966.[273]
The avowed aim of the list was to protect the faith and morals of the faithful by preventing the reading ofimmoral books or works containingtheological errors. Books thought to contain such errors included some scientific works by leading astronomers such asJohannes Kepler'sEpitome astronomiae Copernicianae, which was on the Index from 1621 to 1835. The various editions of the Index also contained the rules of the Church relating to the reading, selling and pre-emptive censorship of books.
Canon law still recommends that works concerning sacred Scripture, theology, canon law, church history, and any writings which specially concern religion or good morals, be submitted to the judgement of the localOrdinary.[274]
Some of the scientific works that were on early editions of the Index (e.g. onheliocentrism) have long been routinely taught at Catholic universities worldwide.Giordano Bruno, whose works were on the Index, now has a monument in Rome,erected over the Church's objections at the place where he wasburned alive at the stake forheresy.
According to theMerton Thesis there was a positivecorrelation between the rise ofpuritanism andprotestantpietism on the one hand and earlyexperimental science on the other.[275] The Merton Thesis has two separate parts: Firstly, it presents a theory that science changes due to an accumulation of observations and improvement in experimental techniques andmethodology; secondly, it puts forward the argument that the popularity of science in 17th-century England and the religiousdemography of theRoyal Society (English scientists of that time were predominantly Puritans or other Protestants) can be explained by acorrelation between Protestantism and the scientific values.[276] In his theory,Robert K. Merton focused on English Puritanism andGerman Pietism as having been responsible for the development of thescientific revolution of the 17th and 18th centuries. Merton explained that the connection betweenreligious affiliation and interest in science was the result of a significant synergy between theascetic Protestant values and those of modern science.[277] Protestant values encouraged scientific research by allowing science to study God's influence on the world and thus providing a religious justification for scientific research.[275]

Historically, the Catholic Church has been a major a sponsor of astronomy, not least due to the astronomical basis of the calendar by which holy days and Easter are determined. Nevertheless, the most famous case of a scientist being tried for heresy arose in this field of science: thetrial of Galileo.
The Church's interest in astronomy began with purely practical concerns, when in the 16th century Pope Gregory XIII required astronomers to correct for the fact that theJulian calendar had fallen out of sync with the sky. Since theSpring equinox was tied to the celebration of Easter, the Church considered that this steady movement in the date of the equinox was undesirable. The resultingGregorian calendar is the internationally acceptedcivil calendar used throughout the world today and is an important contribution of the Catholic Church to Western Civilisation.[278][279][280] It was introduced byPope Gregory XIII, after whom the calendar was named, by a decree signed on 24 February 1582.[281] In 1789, theVatican Observatory opened. It was moved toCastel Gandolfo in the 1930s and theVatican Advanced Technology Telescope began making observation in Arizona, US, in 1995.[282]


The famous astronomersNicholas Copernicus, who put the Sun at the centre of the heavens in 1543, andGalileo Galilei, who experimented with the new technology of thetelescope and, with its aid declared his belief that Copernicus was correct, were both practising Catholics – indeed Copernicus was a Catholic clergyman. Yet the church establishment at that time held to theories devised in pre-Christian Greece byPtolemy andAristotle, which said that the sky revolved around the Earth. When Galileo began to assert that the Earth in fact revolved around the Sun, he therefore found himself challenging the Church establishment at a time where the Church hierarchy also held temporal power and was engaged in the ongoing political challenge of the rise of Protestantism. After discussions withPope Urban VIII (a man who had written admiringly of Galileo before taking papal office), Galileo believed he could avoid censure by presenting his arguments in dialogue form, but the Pope took offence when he discovered that some of his own words were being spoken by a character in the book who was a simpleton and Galileo was called for a trial before the Inquisition.[283]
In this most famous example cited by critics of the Catholic Church's "posture towards science",Galileo Galileiwas denounced in 1633 for his work on theheliocentric model of theSolar System, previously proposed by the Polish clergyman and intellectual Nicolaus Copernicus. Copernicus's work had beensuppressed de facto by the Church, but Catholic authorities were generally tolerant of discussion of the hypothesis as long as it was portrayed only as a useful mathematical fiction, and not descriptive of reality. Galileo, by contrast, argued from his unprecedented observations of the Solar System that the heliocentric system was not merely an abstract model for calculating planetary motions, but actually corresponded to physical reality – that is, he insisted the planets really do orbit the Sun. After years of telescopic observation, consultations with the Popes, and verbal and written discussions with astronomers and clerics, a trial was convened by theTribunal of the Roman and Universal Inquisition. Galileo was found "vehemently suspect of heresy" (not "guilty of heresy", as is frequently misreported), placed underhouse arrest, and all of his works, including any future writings, were banned.[284][285] Galileo had been threatened with torture and other Catholic scientists fell silent on the issue. Galileo's great contemporaryRené Descartes stopped publishing in France and went to Sweden. According to Polish-Britishhistorian of scienceJacob Bronowski:[283]
The effect of the trial and imprisonment was to put a total stop to the scientific tradition in the Mediterranean.[dubious –discuss] From now on the Scientific Revolution moved to Northern Europe.
Pope John Paul II, on 31 October 1992, publicly expressed regret for the actions of those Catholics who badly treated Galileo in that trial.[286][287] CardinalJohn Henry Newman, in the nineteenth century, claimed that those who attack the Church can only point to the Galileo case, which to many historians does not prove the Church's opposition to science since many of the churchmen at that time were encouraged by the Church to continue their research.[288]
Since the publication ofCharles Darwin'sOn the Origin of Species in 1859, the position of theCatholic Church on the theory ofevolution has slowly been refined. For about 100 years, there was no authoritative pronouncement on the subject, though many hostile comments were made by local church figures. In contrast with many Protestant objections, Catholic issues with evolutionary theory have had little to do with maintaining the literalism of the account in theBook of Genesis, and have always been concerned with the question of how man came to have a soul. ModernCreationism has had little Catholic support. In the 1950s, the Church's position was one of neutrality; by the late 20th century its position evolved to one of general acceptance in recent years. However, the church insists that the human soul was immediately infused by God, and the reality of a single ancestor (commonly calledmonogenism) for the human race.[citation needed]
Today[update], the Church's official position is a fairly non-specific example oftheistic evolution,[289][290] stating thatfaith andscientific findings regardinghuman evolution are not in conflict, though humans are regarded as aspecial creation, and that the existence of God is required to explain bothmonogenism and thespiritual component of human origins. No infallible declarations by the Pope or anEcumenical Council have been made. The Catholic Church's official position is fairly non-specific, stating only that faith and the origin of man's material body "from pre-existing living matter" are not in conflict, and that the existence of God is required to explain the spiritual component of man's origin.[citation needed]
Recently, the Church has been criticized for its teaching thatembryonic stem cell research is a form ofexperimentation on human beings, and results in the killing of a human person. Much criticism of this position has been on the grounds that the doctrine hinders scientific research; even some conservatives, taking autilitarian position,have pointed out that most embryos from which stem cells are harvested are "leftover" fromin vitro fertilization, and would soon be discarded whether used for such research or not. The Church, by contrast, has consistently upheld its ideal of the dignity of each individual human life, and argues that it is as wrong to destroy an embryo as it would be to kill an adult human being; and that therefore advances in medicine can and must come without the destruction of human embryos, for example by using adult or umbilical stem cells in place of embryonic stem cells.



Byzantine art comprises the body of Christian Greek artistic products of theEastern Roman Empire,[291][292] as well as the nations and states that inherited culturally from the empire. Though the empire itself emerged from thedecline of Rome and lasted until theFall of Constantinople in 1453.[293]
ManyEastern Orthodox states in Eastern Europe, as well as to some degree theMuslim states of the easternMediterranean, preserved many aspects of the empire's culture and art for centuries afterward. A number of states contemporary with theByzantine Empire were culturally influenced by it, without actually being part of it (the "Byzantine commonwealth"). These includedBulgaria,Serbia, and theRus, as well as some non-Orthodox states like theRepublic of Venice and theKingdom of Sicily, which had close ties to the Byzantine Empire despite being in other respects part of western European culture. Art produced by Eastern Orthodox Christians living in theOttoman Empire is often called "post-Byzantine". Certain artistic traditions that originated in the Byzantine Empire, particularly in regard to icon painting and church architecture, are maintained in Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Russia and other Eastern Orthodox countries to the present day.
Several historians credit the Catholic Church for what they consider to be the brilliance and magnificence of Western art. "Even though the church dominated art and architecture, it did not prevent architects and artists from experimenting..."[102]: 225 Historians such asThomas Woods refer to the western Church's consistent opposition toByzantine iconoclasm, an eastern movement against visual representations of the divine, and the western church's insistence on building structures befitting worship. Important contributions include its cultivation and patronage of individual artists, as well as development of theRomanesque,Gothic andRenaissance styles of art and architecture.[212]: 115–27 Augustine's repeated reference toWisdom 11:20 (God "ordered all things by measure and number and weight") influenced the geometric constructions of Gothic architecture.[citation needed]
British art historianKenneth Clark wrote that Western Europe's first "great age of civilization" was ready to begin around the year 1000. From 1100, he wrote, monumental abbeys and cathedrals were constructed and decorated with sculptures, hangings, mosaics and works belonging to one of the greatest epochs of art, providing stark contrast to the monotonous and cramped conditions of ordinary living during the period. The Late Middle Ages produced ever more extravagant art and architecture, but also the virtuous simplicity of those such asSt Francis of Assisi (expressed in theCanticle of the Sun) and the epic poetry ofDante'sDivine Comedy.[102]: 248–250 Abbot Suger of theAbbey of St. Denis is considered an influential early patron of Gothic architecture. He believed that love of beauty brought people closer to God: "The dull mind rises to truth through that which is material". Clarke calls this "the intellectual background of all the sublime works of art of the next century and in fact has remained the basis of our belief of the value of art until today".[137]
Renaissance artists such asRaphael,Michelangelo,Leonardo da Vinci,Bernini,Botticelli,Fra Angelico,Tintoretto,Caravaggio, andTitian, were among a multitude of innovative virtuosos sponsored by the Church.[218]: 133 During bothThe Renaissance and theCounter-Reformation, Catholic artists produced many of the unsurpassed masterpieces ofWestern art – often inspired by Biblical themes: from Michelangelo'sDavid andPietà sculptures, to Da Vinci'sLast Supper and Raphael's variousMadonna paintings. Referring to a "great outburst of creative energy such as took place in Rome between 1620 and 1660", Kenneth Clarke wrote:
[W]ith a single exception, the great artists of the time were all sincere, conforming Christians.Guercino spent much of his mornings in prayer;Bernini frequently went into retreats and practised theSpiritual Exercises ofSaint Ignatius;Rubens attended Mass every morning before beginning work. The exception wasCaravaggio, who was like the hero of a modern play, except that he happened to paint very well.This conformism was not based on fear of the Inquisition, but on the perfectly simple belief that the faith which had inspired the great saints of the preceding generation was something by which a man should regulate his life.[137]
In music, Catholic monks developed the first forms of modern Western musical notation in order to standardize liturgy throughout the worldwide Church,[294]: 100 and an enormous body of religious music has been composed for it through the ages. This led directly to the emergence and development of European classical music, and its many derivatives. TheBaroque style, which encompassed music, art, and architecture, was particularly encouraged by the post-Reformation Catholic Church as such forms offered a means of religious expression that was stirring and emotional, intended to stimulate religious fervor.[295]: 45
The list of Catholic composers and Catholic sacred music which have a prominent place in Western culture is extensive, but includesWolfgang Amadeus Mozart'sAve Verum Corpus;Franz Schubert'sAve Maria,César Franck'sPanis angelicus, andAntonio Vivaldi'sGloria.

Christian literature is writing that deals with Christian themes and incorporates theChristian world view. This constitutes a huge body of extremely varied writing.Christian poetry is any poetry that contains Christian teachings, themes, or references. The influence of Christianity on poetry has been great in any area that Christianity has taken hold. Christian poems often directly reference the Bible, while others provideallegory.
Similarly, the list of Catholic authors and literary works is vast. With a literary tradition spanning two millennia, the Bible andPapal Encyclicals have been constants of the Catholic canon but countless other historical works may be listed as noteworthy in terms of their influence on Western society. From late Antiquity,St Augustine's bookConfessions, which outlines his sinful youth and conversion to Christianity, is widely considered to be the first autobiography ever written in the canon ofWestern Literature. Augustine profoundly influenced the coming medieval worldview.[243] TheSumma Theologica, written 1265–1274, is the best-known work ofThomas Aquinas (c.1225–1274), and although unfinished, "one of the classics of the history of philosophy and one of the most influential works of Western literature."[296] It is intended as a manual for beginners in theology and a compendium of all of the maintheological teachings of the Church. It presents the reasoning for almost all points of Christian theology in the West. The epic poetry of the ItalianDante and hisDivine Comedy of the lateMiddle Ages is also considered immensely influential. The English statesman and philosopher,Thomas More, wrote the seminal workUtopia in 1516.St Ignatius Loyola, a key figure in the Catholic counter-reformation, is the author of an influential book of meditations known as theSpiritual Exercises.

Scholasticism was initially a program conducted by medieval Christian thinkers attempting to harmonize the various authorities of their own tradition, and to reconcile Christian theology with classical and late antiquity philosophy, especially that ofAristotle but also ofNeoplatonism.[297] Thescholastics' intellectual systems by Aquinas, called theSumma Theologiae, influenced the writings ofDante, and in turn, Dante's creation and sacramental theology has contributed to aCatholic imagination influencing writers such asJ. R. R. Tolkien[298] andWilliam Shakespeare.[299]
InCatholicism, "Doctor of the Church" is a name is given to a saint from whose writings the whole Church is held to have derived great advantage and to whom "eminent learning" and "great sanctity" have been attributed by a proclamation of a pope or of anecumenical council. This honour is given rarely, and only aftercanonization.
TheKing James Version, is anEnglish translation of the ChristianBible, has been described as one of the most important books in English culture and a driving force in the shaping of the English-speaking world.[300]
The arts have been strongly inspired by Protestant beliefs.Martin Luther,Paul Gerhardt,George Wither,Isaac Watts,Charles Wesley,William Cowper, and many other authors and composers created well-known church hymns. Musicians likeHeinrich Schütz,Johann Sebastian Bach,George Frederick Handel,Henry Purcell,Johannes Brahms, andFelix Mendelssohn-Bartholdy composed great works of music. Prominent painters with Protestant background were, for example,Albrecht Dürer,Hans Holbein the Younger,Lucas Cranach,Rembrandt, andVincent van Gogh. World literature was enriched by the works ofEdmund Spenser,John Milton,John Bunyan,John Donne,John Dryden,Daniel Defoe,William Wordsworth,Jonathan Swift,Johann Wolfgang Goethe,Friedrich Schiller,Samuel Taylor Coleridge,Edgar Allan Poe,Matthew Arnold,Conrad Ferdinand Meyer,Theodor Fontane,Washington Irving,Robert Browning,Emily Dickinson,Emily Brontë,Charles Dickens,Nathaniel Hawthorne,Thomas Stearns Eliot,John Galsworthy,Thomas Mann,William Faulkner,John Updike, and many others.

The notion ofChristian finance refers to banking and financial activities which came into existence several centuries ago.
Christian Churches, such as the Catholic Church and Reformed Church, traditionally prohibitusury as a sin against the eighth commandment.[301][302]
The activities of theKnights Templar (12th century),Mounts of Piety (appeared in 1462) or theApostolic Chamber attached directly to the Vatican, may have given rise to operations of a banking nature or a financial nature (issuance of securities, investments) is proved.[303]
Francisco de Vitoria, a disciple ofThomas Aquinas and a Catholic thinker who studied the issue regarding the human rights of colonized natives, is recognized by the United Nations as a father of international law, and now also by historians of economics and democracy as a leading light for the West's democracy and rapid economic development.[304]
Joseph Schumpeter, an economist of the twentieth century, referring to theScholastics, wrote, "it is they who come nearer than does any other group to having been the 'founders' of scientific economics."[305] Other economists and historians, such as Raymond de Roover, Marjorie Grice-Hutchinson, and Alejandro Chafuen, have also made similar statements. Historian Paul Legutko of Stanford University said the Catholic Church is "at the center of the development of the values, ideas, science, laws, and institutions which constitute what we call Western civilization."[306]
Catholicbanking families includesHouse of Medici,[307]Welser family,Fugger family,[308] andSimonetti family.

The rise ofProtestantism in the 16th century contributed to the development of banking in Northern Europe. In the late 18th century, Protestant merchant families began to move into banking to an increasing degree, especially in trading countries such as the United Kingdom (Barings,Lloyd),[309] Germany (Schroders,Berenbergs)[310] and the Netherlands (Hope & Co.,Gülcher & Mulder). At the same time, new types of financial activities broadened the scope of banking far beyond its origins. One school of thought attributesCalvinism with setting the stage for the later development of capitalism in northern Europe.[311] TheMorgan family is an AmericanEpiscopal Church family andbanking dynasty, which became prominent in the U.S. and throughout the world in the late 19th century and early 20th century.[312]
TheProtestant work ethic, theCalvinist work ethic,[313] or thePuritan work ethic[314] is awork ethic concept intheology,sociology,economics andhistory which emphasizes that hard work, discipline, andfrugality[315] are a result of a person's subscription to the values espoused by theProtestant faith, particularlyCalvinism. The phrase was initially coined in 1904–1905 byMax Weber in his bookThe Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.[316] Weber asserted that Protestant ethics and values along with the Calvinist doctrine ofasceticism andpredestination gave birth to capitalism.[317] It is one of the most influential and cited books in sociology although the thesis presented has been controversial since its release. In opposition to Weber, historians such asFernand Braudel andHugh Trevor-Roper assert that the Protestant work ethic did not createcapitalism and that capitalism developed in pre-Reformation Catholic communities. Just as priests and caring professionals are deemed to have avocation (or "calling" from God) for their work, according to the Protestant work ethic the lowly workman also has a noble vocation which he can fulfil through dedication to his work.
The Protestant concept of God and man allows believers to use all their God-given faculties, including the power of reason. That means that they are allowed to explore God's creation and, according to Genesis 2:15, make use of it in a responsible and sustainable way. Thus a cultural climate was created that greatly enhanced the development of thehumanities and thesciences.[318] Another consequence of the Protestant understanding of man is that the believers, in gratitude for their election and redemption in Christ, are to follow God's commandments. Industry, frugality, calling, discipline, and a strong sense of responsibility are at the heart of their moral code.[319][320] In particular, Calvin rejected luxury. Therefore, craftsmen, industrialists, and other businessmen were able to reinvest the greater part of their profits in the most efficient machinery and the most modern production methods that were based on progress in the sciences and technology. As a result, productivity grew, which led to increased profits and enabled employers to pay higher wages. In this way, the economy, the sciences, and technology reinforced each other. The chance to participate in the economic success of technological inventions was a strong incentive to both inventors and investors.[321][322][323][324] TheProtestant work ethic was an important force behind the unplanned and uncoordinatedmass action that influenced the development of capitalism and theIndustrial Revolution. This idea is also known as the"Protestant ethic thesis".[325]
Episcopalians andPresbyterians tend to be considerably wealthier[312] and better educated (having moregraduate and post-graduate degrees per capita) than most other religious groups inAmerica,[327] and are disproportionately represented in the upper reaches of American business,[328] law and politics, especially theRepublican Party.[329] Large numbers of the mostwealthy and affluent American families as theVanderbilts,Astors,Rockefellers,Du Ponts,[330]Whitneys,Morgans,Fords,[330]Mellons,[330]Van Leers,Browns,[330]Waynes andHarrimans areMainline Protestant families.[312][330] TheBoston Brahmins, who were regarded as the nation's social and cultural elites, were often associated with theAmerican upper class,Harvard University;[331] and the Episcopal Church.[332][333] TheOld Philadelphianss were often associated with theAmerican upper class and the Episcopal Church andQuakerism.[334] These families were influential in the development and leadership of arts, culture, science, medicine, law, politics, industry and trade in the United States.
Some academics have theorized thatLutheranism, the dominant traditional religion of the Nordic countries, had an effect on the development ofsocial democracy there and theNordic model. Schröder posits that Lutheranism promoted the idea of a nationwide community of believers and led to increased state involvement in economic and social life, allowing for nationwide welfare solidarity and economic co-ordination.[335][336][337] Esa Mangeloja says that the revival movements helped to pave the way for the modern Finnish welfare state. During that process, the church lost some of its most important social responsibilities (health care, education, and social work) as these tasks were assumed by the secular Finnish state.[338] Pauli Kettunen presents theNordic model as the outcome of a sort of mythical "Lutheran peasant enlightenment", portraying the Nordic model as the result of a sort of "secularized Lutheranism";[339] however, mainstream academic discourse on the subject focuses on "historical specificity", with the centralized structure of the Lutheran church being but one aspect of the cultural values and state structures that led to the development of the welfare state in Scandinavia.[340]

The Catholic Church has contributed to society through its social doctrine which has guided leaders to promote social justice and providing care to the sick and poor. In orations such as hisSermon on the Mount and stories such asThe Good Samaritan, Jesus called on followers to worship God, act without violence or prejudice and care for the sick, hungry and poor. Such teachings are the foundation of Catholic Church involvement insocial justice, hospitals and health care.
Today theRoman Catholic Church is the largest non-government provider ofhealth care services in the world.[341] It has around 18,000 clinics, 16,000 homes for the elderly and those with special needs, and 5,500 hospitals, with 65 percent of them located in developing countries.[342] In 2010, the Church'sPontifical Council for the Pastoral Care of Health Care Workers said that the Church manages 26% of the world's health care facilities.[343] The Church's involvement in health care has ancient origins.
Historians record that, prior to Christianity, the ancient world left little trace of any organized charitable effort.[344] Christian charity and the practice of feeding and clothing the poor, visiting prisoners, supporting widows and orphan children has had sweeping impact.[345]
Albert Jonsen, University of Washington historian of medicine, says "the second great sweep of medical history begins at the end of the fourth century, with the founding of the first Christian hospital at Caesarea in Cappadocia, and concludes at the end of the fourteenth century, with medicine well ensconced in the universities and in the public life of the emerging nations of Europe."[346] After the death of Eusebios in 370 and the election of Basil as bishop of Caesarea, Basil established the first formal soup kitchen, hospital, homeless shelter, hospice, poorhouse, orphanage, reform center for thieves, women's center for those leaving prostitution and many other ministries. Basil was personally involved and invested in the projects and process giving all of his personal wealth to fund the ministries. Basil himself would put on an apron and work in the soup kitchen. These ministries were given freely regardless of religious affiliation. Basil refused to make any discrimination when it came to people who needed help saying that "the digestive systems of the Jew and the Christian are indistinguishable."[347] "...there is a striking resemblance between [Basil's] ideals and those of modern times. ... certainly he was the most modern among the pioneers of monasticism, and for this reason, if for none other, his work has a permanent interest..."[348]
Charity has now become a universal practice.[dubious –discuss][349] Christianity played a key role in the building and maintaining of hospitals in theByzantine Empire. Many hospitals were built and maintained by bishops in their respective prefectures. Hospitals were usually built near or around churches, and great importance was laid on the idea of healing through salvation.[350] When medicine failed, doctors would ask their patients to pray. This often involved icons ofCosmas andDamian, patron saints of medicine and doctors. Christianity also played a key role in propagating the idea of charity. Medicine was made, according to Oregon State University historian,Gary Ferngren (professor of ancient Greek and Rome history with a speciality in ancient medicine) "accessible to all and... simple". In the actual practice ofmedicine there is evidence of Christian influence. John Zacharias Aktouarios recommends the use of Holy Water mixed with a pellitory plant to act as a way to cure epilepsy.[351]
The Catholic Church established a hospital system in medieval Europe that was different from the merely reciprocal hospitality of the Greeks and family-based obligations of the Romans. These hospitals were established to cater to "particular social groups marginalized by poverty, sickness, and age", according to historian of hospitals, Guenter Risse.[352]
TheFugger Family from Augsburg, Germany who were bankers, 500 years ago founded one of the first social housing projects in the world, which exists till today.[353][354][355]


TheIndustrial Revolution brought many concerns about the deteriorating working and living conditions of urban workers. Influenced by the German BishopWilhelm Emmanuel Freiherr von Ketteler, in 1891Pope Leo XIII published the encyclicalRerum novarum, which set in contextCatholic social teaching in terms that rejected socialism but advocated the regulation of working conditions.Rerum Novarum argued for the establishment of a living wage and the right of workers to form trade unions.[218]: 240
Quadragesimo anno was issued byPope Pius XI, on 15 May 1931, 40 years afterRerum novarum. Unlike Leo, who addressed mainly the condition of workers, Pius XI concentrated on the ethical implications of the social and economic order. He called for the reconstruction of the social order based on the principle ofsolidarity andsubsidiarity.[218]: 260 He noted major dangers for human freedom and dignity, arising from unrestrained capitalism and totalitarian communism.
The social teachings ofPope Pius XII repeat these teachings, and apply them in greater detail not only to workers and owners of capital, but also to other professions such as politicians, educators, house-wives, farmersbookkeepers,international organizations, and all aspects of life including the military. Going beyond Pius XI, he also defined social teachings in the areas of medicine,psychology, sport, TV, science, law and education. Pius XII was called "the Pope of Technology" for his willingness and ability to examine the social implications of technological advances. The dominant concern was the continued rights and dignity of the individual. With the beginning of thespace age at the end of his pontificate, Pius XII explored the social implications of space exploration and satellites on the social fabric of humanity asking for a new sense of community and solidarity in light of existingpapal teachings on subsidiarity.[356]
TheMethodist Church, among other Christian denominations, was responsible for the establishment of hospitals, universities, orphanages, soup kitchens, and schools to follow Jesus's command tospread theGood News andserve all people.[357][358] In Western nations, governments have increasingly taken up funding and organisation of health services for the poor but the Church still maintains a massive network of health care providers across the world. In the West, these institutions are increasingly run by lay-people after centuries of being run by priests, nuns and brothers, In 2009, Catholic hospitals in the US received approximately one of every six patients, according to the Catholic Health Association.[359]Catholic Health Australia is the largest non-government provider grouping of health, community and aged care services, representing about 10% of the health sector.[360] In 1968, nuns or priests were the chief executives of 770 of America's 796 Catholic hospitals. By 2011, they presided over 8 of 636 hospitals.[359]
As with schooling, women have played a vital role in running and staffing Christian care institutions – in Methodist hospitals,deaconesses who trained as nurses staffed the hospitals,[358] and in Catholic hospitals, through religious institutes like theSisters of Mercy,Little Sisters of the Poor andSisters of St. Mary – and teaching and nursing have been seen as "women's vocations". Seeking to define the role played byreligious in hospitals through American history, theNew York Times noted that nuns were trained to "see Jesus in the face of every patient" and that:[359]
Although their influence is often described as intangible, the nuns kept their hospitals focused on serving the needy and brought a spiritual reassurance that healing would prevail over profit, authorities on Catholic health care say.

Protestant and Catholic physicians and surgeons of the 19th and early 20th centuries laid many foundations for modern medicine in China. Western medicalmissionaries established the first modern clinics and hospitals, provided the first training for nurses, and opened the first medical schools in China.[362] Work was also done in opposition to the abuse ofopium. Medical treatment and care came to many Chinese who were addicted, and eventually public and official opinion was influenced in favor of bringing an end to the destructive trade.[363] By 1901, China was the most popular destination for medical missionaries. The 150 foreign physicians operated 128 hospitals and 245 dispensaries, treating 1.7 million patients. In 1894, male medical missionaries comprised 14 percent of all missionaries; women doctors were four percent. Modern medical education in China started in the early 20th century at hospitals run by international missionaries.
Missionaries from otherChristian denominations came toBritish India;Lutheran missionaries, for example, arrived in Calcutta in 1836 and by "the year 1880 there were over 31,200 Lutheran Christians spread out in 1,052 villages".[364]Methodists began arriving in India in 1783 and establishedmissions with a focus on "education, health ministry, and evangelism".[365][366] In the 1790s, Christians from theLondon Missionary Society andBaptist Missionary Society, began doing missionary work in the Indian Empire.[367] InNeyoor, the London Missionary Society Hospital "pioneered improvements in the public health system for the treatment of diseases even before organised attempts were made by the colonial Madras Presidency, reducing the death rate substantially".[368]
| Institutions | # |
|---|---|
| Parishes and missions | 408,637 |
| Primary and secondary schools | 125,016 |
| Universities | 1,046 |
| Hospitals | 5,853 |
| Orphanages | 8,695 |
| Homes for the elderly and handicapped | 13,933 |
| Dispensaries, leprosaries, nurseries and other institutions | 74,936 |
Missionary activity for the Catholic Church has always incorporated education of evangelized peoples as part of its social ministry. History shows that in evangelized lands, the first people to operate schools were Roman Catholics. In some countries, the Church is the main provider of education or significantly supplements government forms of education. Presently, the Church operates the world's largest non-governmental school system.[370] Many of Western Civilization's most influential universities were founded by the Catholic Church.[371][372][373][374][375]
APew Center study aboutreligion and education around the world in 2016, found thatChristians ranked as the second most educated religious group around in the world afterJews with an average of 9.3 years of schooling,[376] and the highest of years of schooling among Christians found inGermany (13.6),[376]New Zealand (13.5)[376] andEstonia (13.1).[376]Christians were also found to have the second highest number ofgraduate andpost-graduate degrees per capita while in absolute numbers ranked in the first place (220 million).[376] Between the variousChristian communities,Singapore outranks other nations in terms of Christians who obtain a university degree in institutions ofhigher education (67%),[376] followed by theChristians of Israel (63%),[377] and theChristians of Georgia (57%).[376] According to the study, Christians inNorth America,Europe,Middle East,North Africa andAsia-Pacific regions are highly educated since many of the worlduniversities were built by the historicChristian Churches,[376] in addition to the historical evidence that "Christian monks built libraries and, in the days before printing presses, preserved important earlier writings produced in Latin, Greek and Arabic".[376] According to the same study, Christians have a significant amount ofgender equality in educational attainment,[376] and the study suggests that one of the reasons is the encouragement of theProtestant Reformers in promoting theeducation of women, which led to the eradication of illiteracy among females in Protestant communities.[376] According to the same study "there is a large and pervasive gap in educational attainment between Muslims and Christians in sub-Saharan Africa" asMuslim adults in this region are far less educated than theirChristian counterparts,[376] with scholars suggesting that this gap is due to the educational facilities that were created byChristian missionaries during the colonial era for fellow believers.[376]


The Catholic Church founded the West's first universities, which were preceded by the schools attached to monasteries and cathedrals, and generally staffed by monks and friars.[378]
In 530,Saint Benedict wrote hismonastic Rule, which became a blueprint for the organization ofmonasteries throughout Europe.[212]: 27 The new monasteries preserved classical craft and artistic skills while maintaining intellectual culture within their schools,scriptoria and libraries. As well as providing a focus for spiritual life, they functioned as agricultural, economic and production centers, particularly in remote regions, becoming major conduits of civilization.[379]: 120
TheCluniac reform of monasteries that had begun in 910 sparked widespread monastic growth and renewal.[218]: 88–89 Monasteries introduced new technologies and crops, fostered the creation and preservation of literature and promoted economic growth. Monasteries, convents and cathedrals still operated virtually all schools and libraries.[212]: 40–44 [379]: 80–82
Cathedral schools began in the Early Middle Ages as centers of advanced education, some of them ultimately evolving intomedieval universities. During the High Middle Ages,Chartres Cathedral operated the famous and influentialChartres Cathedral School.
Universities began springing up in Italian towns likeSalerno, whoseSchola Medica Salernitana, established in the 9th Century, became a leading medical school and translated the work of Greek and Arabic physicians into Latin.Bologna University founded in 1088 became the most influential of the early universities, which first specialised incanon law andcivil law.Paris University founded in 1150 but formed from a pre–existing cathedral school, specialising in such topics as theology, came to rival Bologna under the supervision ofNotre Dame Cathedral.Oxford University founded in 1096, later came to rival Paris in Theology, whileSalamanca University was founded in Spain in 1243. According to the historianGeoffrey Blainey, the universities benefited from the use of Latin, the common language of the Church, and its internationalist reach, and their role was to "teach, argue and reason within a Christian framework".[378] The medieval universities of Western Christendom were well-integrated across all of Western Europe, encouraged freedom of enquiry and produced a great variety of fine scholars and natural philosophers, includingRobert Grosseteste of theUniversity of Oxford, an early expositor of a systematic method of scientific experimentation;[380] and SaintAlbert the Great, a pioneer of biological field research[381]
In the 13th century,mendicant orders were founded byFrancis of Assisi andDominic de Guzmán which broughtconsecrated religious life into urban settings.[379]: 87 These orders also played a large role in the development of cathedral schools intouniversities, the direct ancestors of the modern Western institutions.[212]: 44–48 Notablescholastic theologians such as the DominicanThomas Aquinas worked at these universities, hisSumma Theologica was a key intellectual achievement in its synthesis ofAristotelian thought and Christianity.[12]: 158–159
The university reached central Europe by the 14th century, with the foundation of institutions likePrague University andCracow University.
The SpaniardSt Ignatius Loyola founded theSociety of Jesus (Jesuits) in 1540. Initially a missionary order, the Jesuits took Western learning and the Catholic faith to India, Japan, China, Canada, Central and South America and Australia.[382] The order became increasingly involved in education, founding schools, colleges and universities across the globe andeducating such notable Western scholars, intellectuals, artists and statesmen asRené Descartes,Matteo Ricci,Voltaire,Pierre de Coubertin,Sir Arthur Conan Doyle,James Joyce,Alfred Hitchcock,Bing Crosby,Robert Hughes andBill Clinton.
According to the historianGeoffrey Blainey, the university became a hallmark of Christian Civilisation, though, he writes, "in the most recent century perhaps no institution has done more to promote an alternative or secular view of the world".[378]

Education in Latin American began under the direction of missionaries who were sponsored by the Spanish crown. Royal policy stipulated that the Amerindians had to accept missionaries but they did not have to convert. Indians who agreed to listen to the missionaries were not subjected to work forencomenderos some of whom were notorious for brutal conditions.[176]: 450–1
A key role in the development of the university system in Latin America was played by theCatholic orders, especially by theJesuits, but also theDominicans andAugustinians.[383] The founding and operation of most universities resulted from the – usually local – initiative of one of these orders, which sometimes quarreled openly over the control of thecampus and the curriculum. The (temporary)dissolution of the Jesuit order in the late 18th century proved to be a major setback for the university landscape in Latin America, several of the suppressedJesuit universities were reopened only decades later.

A number of Catholic universities, schools and colleges have been formed in the United States. The religious tolerance established by theAmerican Revolution enabled the Catholic clergy of Maryland to foundGeorgetown University, America's oldest Catholic university, in 1789 and it became a Jesuit institution in 1805.[384] SaintKatharine Drexel inherited a fortune and established theSisters of the Blessed Sacramentfor Indians and Colored People (now known as the Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament), founded schools across America and startedXavier University of Louisiana in New Orleans in 1925 for the education of African Americans.[385]

From 19th-century foundations, theCatholic education system in Australia has grown to be the second biggest sector after government schools with around 21 per cent of all secondary school enrolments.[386] The Church has established primary, secondary and tertiary educational institutions. StMary MacKillop was a 19th-century Australian nun who founded an educational religious institute, theSisters of St Joseph of the Sacred Heart, and in 2010 became the first Australian to be canonised as a saint.[387] Catholic education is also significant in neighbouring South Pacific nations: 11% of New Zealand students attend Catholic schools[388]

By the close of the 19th century, European powers had managed to gain control of most of the African interior.[9]: 398 The new rulers introduced cash-based economies which created an enormous demand for literacy and a western education—a demand which for most Africans could only be satisfied by Christian missionaries.[9]: 398 Catholic missionaries followed colonial governments into Africa, and built schools, hospitals, monasteries and churches.[9]: 398
With a high number of adult baptisms, the Church is growing faster in Africa than anywhere else.[369]: 46 It also operates a greater number of Catholic schools per parish here (3:1) than in other areas of the world.[369]: 48
According toHeather Sharkey, the real impact of the activities of the missionaries is still a topic open to debate in academia today.[389] Sharkey asserted that "the missionaries played manifold roles in colonial Africa and stimulated forms of cultural, political and religious change." "Historians still debate the nature of their impact and question their relation to the system of European colonialism in the continent." She noted that the missionaries did great good in Africa, providing crucial social services such as modern education and health care that would have otherwise not been available. Sharkey said that, in societies that were traditionally male-dominated, female missionaries provided women in Africa with health care knowledge and basic education.[390] APew Center study aboutreligion and education around the world in 2016, found that "there is a large and pervasive gap in educational attainment between Muslims and Christians in sub-Saharan Africa" asMuslim adults in this region are far less educated than theirChristian counterparts,[376] with scholars suggesting that this gap is due to the educational facilities that were created byChristian missionaries during the colonial era for fellow believers.[376]

Christ Church College (1866) andSt. Stephen's College (1881) are two examples of prominent church-affiliated educational institutions founded during the British Raj.[391] Within educational institutions established during the British Raj, Christian texts, especially theBible, were a part of the curricula.[392] During the British Raj, Christian missionaries developed writing systems for Indian languages that previously did not have one.[393][394] Christian missionaries in India also worked to increase literacy and also engaged in social activism, such as fighting against prostitution, championing the right of widowed women to remarry, and trying to stop early marriages for women.[395]
In India, over 25,000 schools and colleges are operated by the Church.[396] The Jesuits' educational institutions have left a prestigious impact through their education institutions.[397] Education has become the major priority for the Church in India in recent years with nearly 60% of the Catholic schools situated in rural areas.[398] Even in the early part of the 19th century, Catholic schools had emphasised relief for the poor and their welfare.[399]

As the Reformers wanted all members of the church to be able to read the Bible, education on all levels got a strong boost. Compulsory education for both boys and girls was introduced. For example, thePuritans who establishedMassachusetts Bay Colony in 1628 foundedHarvard College only eight years later. Seven of the first nine of what are calledcolonial colleges were founded by Christians, includingColumbia University,[401][402]Brown University,Rutgers University andYale University (1701); a nineteenth-century book on "Colleges in America" says, "Eighty three percent of the colleges in [the U.S.] were founded by Christian philanthropy."[403]Pennsylvania also became a centre of learning as one of the colleges not specifically Christian.[404][405]Princeton University was aPresbyterian foundation.[402]
A large number ofmainline Protestants have played leadership roles in many aspects of American life, including politics, business, science, the arts, and education. They founded most of the country's leading institutes of higher education.[406]
Protestantism also initiated translations of the Bible into national languages and thereby supported the development of national literatures.[408][409]Episcopalians[312] andPresbyterians[328] tend to be considerably wealthier and better educated than most other religious groups.

The Bible has many rituals of purification relating tomenstruation, childbirth,sexual relations,nocturnal emission,unusual bodily fluids,skin disease, death, andanimal sacrifices. TheEthiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church prescribes several kinds ofhand washing for example after leaving the latrine, lavatory or bathhouse, or before prayer, or after eating a meal.[410] The women in the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church are prohibited from entering the church temple duringmenses; and the men do not enter a church the day after they have had intercourse with their wives.[411]
Christianity has always placed a strongemphasis on hygiene,[412] Despite the denunciation of themixed bathing style of Roman pools byearly Christian clergy, as well as the pagan custom of women naked bathing in front of men, this did not stop the Church from urging its followers to go to public baths for bathing,[413] which contributed to hygiene and good health according to theChurch Father,Clement of Alexandria. The Church also builtpublic bathing facilities that were separate for both sexes nearmonasteries and pilgrimage sites; also, thepopes situated baths within churchbasilicas and monasteries since the early Middle Ages.[414] PopeGregory the Great urged his followers on value ofbathing as a bodily need.[415]


Greatbathhouses were built inByzantine centers such asConstantinople andAntioch,[416] and thepopes allocated to the Romans bathing throughdiaconia, or privateLateran baths, or even a myriad of monasticbath houses functioning in eighth and ninth centuries.[415] ThePopes maintained their baths in their residences, andbath houses including hot baths incorporated into Christian Church buildings or those of monasteries, which known as "charity baths" because they served both the clerics and needy poor people.[417]Public bathing was common in medievalChristendom in larger towns and cities such asParis,Regensburg andNaples.[418][419] Catholic religious orders of theAugustinians' andBenedictines' rules containedritual purification,[420] and inspired byBenedict of Nursia encouragement for the practice of therapeutic bathing;Benedictine monks played a role in the development and promotion ofspas.[421]Protestant Christianity also played a prominent role in the development of the Britishspas.[421]
Contrary to popular belief[422]bathing andsanitation were not lost in Europe with the collapse of theRoman Empire.[423][424]Soapmaking first became an established trade during the so-called "Dark Ages". TheRomans usedscentedoils (mostly from Egypt), among other alternatives. By the 15th century, the manufacture of soap in theChristendom had become virtually industrialized, with sources inAntwerp,Castile,Marseille,Naples andVenice.[425] By the mid-19th century, the English urbanised middle classes had formed an ideology of cleanliness that ranked alongside typicalVictorian concepts, such as Christianity, respectability andsocial progress.[426]The Salvation Army has adopted the deployment ofpersonal hygiene,[427][428] and by providingpersonal hygiene products, such as atoothbrush,toothpaste, andsoap.[429][430][431]
Theuse of water in manyChristian countries is due in part to the Biblical toilet etiquette which encourages washing after all instances of defecation.[432] Thebidet is common in predominantlyCatholic countries where water is considered essential foranal cleansing,[433][434] and in some traditionallyOrthodox andProtestant countries such asGreece andFinland respectively, wherebidet showers are common.[435]
Christian influences in Islam could be traced back to theEastern Christianity, which surrounded the origins of Islam.[436] Islam, emerging in the context of the Middle East that was largely Christian, was first seen as a Christologicalheresy known as the "heresy of the Ishmaelites", described as such inConcerning Heresy bySaint John of Damascus, a Syriac scholar.[437]Eastern Christian scientists and scholars of the medieval Islamic world (particularlyNestorian Christians) contributed to the Arab Islamic civilization during theUmayyad and theAbbasid periods by translating works ofGreek philosophers toSyriac and afterwards toArabic.[33][438][439] During the 4th through the 7th centuries, scholarly work in the Syriac and Greek languages was either newly initiated, or carried on from the Hellenistic period. Centers of learning and of transmission of classical wisdom included colleges such as theSchool of Nisibis, and later theSchool of Edessa, and the renowned hospital and medicalacademy of Jundishapur; libraries included theLibrary of Alexandria and theImperial Library of Constantinople; other centers of translation and learning functioned atMerv,Salonika,Nishapur andCtesiphon, situated just south of what later became Baghdad.[440][441] TheHouse of Wisdom was alibrary,translation institute, and academy established inAbbasid-eraBaghdad,Iraq.[442][443] Nestorians played a prominent role in the formation of Arab culture,[37] with theJundishapur school being prominent in the lateSassanid, Umayyad and early Abbasid periods.[444] Notably, eight generations of the NestorianBukhtishu family served as private doctors to caliphs and sultans between the 8th and 11th centuries.[445][446] Scholars and intellectuals agreeChristians in the Middle East have made significant contributions to Arab and Islamic civilization since the introduction ofIslam, and they have had a significant impact contributing the culture of theMashriq,Turkey, andIran.[447][448][41]
Christians especiallyNestorian contributed to the Arab Islamic Civilization during theUmayyads and theAbbasids by translating works ofGreek philosophers toSyriac and afterwards toArabic.[33] They also excelled inphilosophy,science (such asHunayn ibn Ishaq,Qusta ibn Luqa,Masawaiyh,Patriarch Eutychius,Jabril ibn Bukhtishu etc.) andtheology (such asTatian,Bar Daisan,Babai the Great,Nestorius,Toma bar Yacoub etc.) and the personalphysicians of the Abbasid Caliphs were oftenAssyrianChristians such as the long servingBukhtishu dynasty.[36][37]

A hospital and medical training center existed atGundeshapur. The city ofGundeshapur was founded in 271 by the Sassanid kingShapur I. It was one of the major cities inKhuzestan province of the Persian empire in what is todayIran. A large percentage of the population wereSyriacs, most of whom were Christians. Under the rule ofKhosrau I, refuge was granted toGreekNestorian Christian philosophers including the scholars of the Persian School ofEdessa (Urfa) (also called the Academy ofAthens), aChristian theological and medical university. These scholars made their way to Gundeshapur in 529 following the closing of the academy by Emperor Justinian. They were engaged in medical sciences and initiated the first translation projects of medical texts.[444] The arrival of these medical practitioners from Edessa marks the beginning of the hospital and medical center at Gundeshapur.[449] It included a medical school and hospital (bimaristan), a pharmacology laboratory, a translation house, a library and an observatory.[450] Indian doctors also contributed to the school at Gundeshapur, most notably the medical researcher Mankah. Later after Islamic invasion, the writings of Mankah and of the Indian doctor Sustura were translated into Arabic atBaghdad.[451]Daud al-Antaki was one of the last generation of influential Arab Christian writers.

The one valuable item, sought for in Europe, which Iran possessed and which could bring in silver in sufficient quantities was silk, which was produced in the northern provinces, along the Caspian coastline. The trade of this product was done by Persians to begin with, but during the 17th century the ChristianArmenians became increasingly vital in the trade of this merchandise, asmiddlemen.[452][453]
Whereas domestic trade was largely in the hands of Persian and Jewish merchants, by the late 17th century, almost all foreign trade was controlled by theArmenians.[454] They were even hired by wealthy Persian merchants to travel to Europe when they wanted to create commercial bases there, and the Armenians eventually established themselves in cities likeBursa,Aleppo, Venice, Livorno, Marseilles and Amsterdam.[452] Realizing this, Shah Abbas resettled large numbers of Armenians from theCaucasus to his capital city and provided them with loans.[452] And as the shah realized the importance of doing trade with the Europeans, he assured that the Safavid society was one with religious tolerance. The Christian Armenians thus became a commercial elite in the Safavid society and managed to survive in the tough atmosphere of business being fought over by the British, Dutch, French, Indians and Persians, by always having large capital readily available and by managing to strike harder bargains ensuring cheaper prices than what, for instance, their British rivals ever were able to.[455]

Immediately after theConquest of Constantinople,Mehmet II released his portion of the city's captive Christian population with instructions to start the rebuilding of Constantinople which had been devastated by siege and war.[456] Afterwards, he began to also repopulate the city bringing new inhabitants – both Christian and Muslim – from the whole empire and from the newly conquered territories.[457] Phanar was then repopulated with Greeks deported from Mouchlion in thePeloponnese and,after 1461, with citizens ofTrebizond.[458]
The roots ofGreek ascendancy can be traced to the need of theOttomans for skilled and educated negotiators as the power of their empire declined and they were compelled to rely on treaties more than the force of arms. From the 17th century onwards theOttomans began facing problems in the conduct of their foreign relations, and were having difficulties in dictating terms to their neighbours; the Porte was faced for the first time with the need of participating in diplomatic negotiations. From 1669 until the Greek War of Independence in 1821,Phanariots made up the majority of thedragomans to the Ottoman government (thePorte) and foreignembassies due to the Greeks' higher level of education than the general Ottoman population.[459]
Given the Ottoman tradition of generally ignoringWestern European languages and cultures, officials found themselves unable to handle such affairs. The Porte subsequently assigned those tasks to the Greeks who had a long mercantile and educational tradition and could provide the necessary skills. As a result, the so−calledPhanariotes, Greek and Hellenized families mostly native toConstantinople, came to occupy high posts of secretaries and interpreters to Ottoman officials and officers. The roots of Greek success in the Ottoman Empire can be traced to the Greek tradition of education and commerce exemplified in thePhanariotes.[460] It was the wealth of the extensive merchant class that provided the material basis for the intellectual revival that was the prominent feature of Greek life in the half century and more leading to the outbreak of theGreek War of Independence in 1821.[460] Not coincidentally, on the eve of 1821, the three most important centres of Greek learning were situated inChios,Smyrna andAivali, all three major centres of Greek commerce.[460] Greek success was also favoured by Greek domination in the leadership of theEastern Orthodox church.
TheArmenians in the Ottoman Empire was made up of three religious denominations:Armenian Catholic,Armenian Protestant, andArmenian Apostolic, the Church of the vast majority of Armenians. The wealthy, Constantinople-basedAmira class, a social elite whose members included the Duzians (Directors of the Imperial Mint), theBalyans (Chief Imperial Architects) and theDadians (Superintendent of the Gunpowder Mills and manager of industrial factories).[461][462]

Scholars and intellectuals includingPalestinian-AmericanEdward Said affirm that Christians in the Arab world have made significant contributions to the Arab civilization since the introduction ofIslam.[463] The top poets inhistory were Arab Christians, and many Arab Christians are physicians, philosophers, government officials and people of literature. Arab Christians traditionally formed the educatedupper class and they have had a significant impact in the culture of theMashriq.[464] Some of the most influential Arab nationalists wereArab Christians, likeGeorge Habash, founder of thePopular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, andSyrian intellectualConstantin Zureiq. Many Palestinian Christians were also active in the formation and governing of thePalestinian National Authority since 1992. The suicide bomberJules Jammal, a Syrian military officer who blew himself up while ramming a French ship, was also an Arab Christian. WhileLebaneseMaronite Christian were among the Masters and Fathers of the Arabic RenaissanceAl-Nahda.[465]
BecauseArab Christians formed the educated class, they had a significant impact on the politics and culture of theArab World.[464] Christian colleges likeSaint Joseph University andAmerican University of Beirut (Syrian Protestant College until 1920) thrived in Lebanon,Al-Hikma University inBaghdad amongst others played leading role in the development of civilization and Arab culture.[466] Given this role in politics and culture, Ottoman ministers began to include them in their governments. In the economic sphere, a number of Christian families likeSursock became prominent. Thus, the Nahda led the Muslims and Christians to a cultural renaissance and national general despotism. This solidified Arab Christians as one of the pillars of the region and not a minority on the fringes.[467]
TodayMiddle Eastern Christians are relatively wealthy, well educated, and politically moderate,[468] as they have today an active role in various social, economical, sporting and political aspects in the Middle East.Arab Christians have significantly influenced and contributed to theArabic culture in many fields both historically and in modern times,[463] includingliterature,[463] politics,[463] business,[463]philosophy,[469] music, theatre and cinema,[470] medicine,[471] and science.[472]
It would be indefensible to maintain, withHooykaas andJaki, that Christianity was fundamentally responsible for the successes of seventeenth-century science. It would be a mistake of equal magnitude, however, to overlook the intricate interlocking of scientific and religious concerns throughout the century.
... Many of the scientists who contributed to these developments were Christians...
... the Christian contribution to science has been uniformly at the top level, but it has reached that level and it has been sufficiently strong overall ...
... . Many of the early leaders of the scientific revolution were Christians, including Roger Bacon, Copernicus, Kepler, Francis Bacon, Galileo, Newton, Boyle, Pascal, Descartes, Ray, Linnaeus, and Gassendi...
Many prominent Catholic physicians and psychologists have made significant contributions to hypnosis in medicine, dentistry, and psychology.
Virtually every major European composer contributed to the development of church music. Monteverdi, Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, Rossini, and Verdi are examples of composers who made significant contributions in this sphere. The Catholic Church was one of the most important patrons of musical developments, and a crucial stimulus to the development of the western musical tradition.
... The insights of Christian philosophy "would not have happened without the direct or indirect contribution of Christian faith" (FR 76). Typical Christian philosophers include St. Augustine, St. Bonaventure, and St. Thomas Aquinas. The benefits derived from Christian philosophy are twofold ...
... .Catholic thinkers contributed extensively to philosophy during the Nineteenth Century. Besides pioneering the revivals of Augustinianism and Thomism, they helped initiate such philosophical movements as Romanticism, Traditionalism, Semi-Rationalism, Spiritualism, Ontologism, and Integralism...
... Christians has also contributed greatly to the abolition of slavery, or at least to the mitigation of the rigour of servitude.
... In the centuries succeeding the Reformation the teaching of Protestantism was consistent on the nature of work. Some Protestant theologians also contributed to the study of economics, especially the nineteenth-century Scottish minister Thomas Chalmers ...
Christian contributions to art, culture, and literature in the Arab-Islamic world; Christian contributions education and social advancement in the region.
The Bible is the most globally influential and widely read book ever written. ... it has been a major influence on the behavior, laws, customs, education, art, literature, and morality of Western civilization.
... Christianity placed great emphasis on the family and on all members from children to the aged ...
... in cultures with stronger 'extended family traditions', such as Asian and Catholic countries...
{{cite web}}:|last= has generic name (help)Coptic Christians, Ethiopian Orthodox, and Eritrean Orthodox churches on the other hand, do observe the ordainment, and circumcise their sons anywhere from the first week of life to the first few years.
Uniformly practiced by Jews, Muslims, and the members of Coptic, Ethiopian, and Eritrean Orthodox Churches, male circumcision remains prevalent in many regions of the world, particularly Africa, South and East Asia, Oceania, and Anglosphere countries.
Christians in Africa, for instance, often practise infant male circumcision.
This practice is old and widespread among African Christians with very close links to their beliefs. It can be executed traditionally or in hospital.
Although it is stated that circumcision is not a sacrament necessary for salvation, this rite is accepted for the Ethiopian Jacobites and other Middle Eastern Christians.
On the Coptic Christian practice of male circumcision in Egypt, and on its practice by other Christians in western Asia.
However, the practice is still common among Christians in the United States, Oceania, South Korea, the Philippines, the Middle East and Africa. Some Middle Eastern Christians actually view the procedure as a rite of passage.
because Eastern Christian priests were allowed to marry and therefore the clergy soon became somewhat of a caste made up of a closely - knit families
In the Americas, the Catholic priest Bartolome de las Casas avidly encouraged enquiries into the Spanish conquest's many cruelties. Las Casas chronicled Spanish brutality against the Native peoples in excruciating detail.
The missionary Church opposed this state of affairs from the beginning, and nearly everything positive that was done for the benefit of the indigenous peoples resulted from the call and clamor of the missionaries. The fact remained, however, that widespread injustice was extremely difficult to uproot ... Even more important than Bartolome de Las Casas was the Bishop of Nicaragua, Antonio de Valdeviso, who ultimately suffered martyrdom for his defense of the Indian.
The conflict thesis, at least in its simple form, is now widely perceived as a wholly inadequate intellectual framework within which to construct a sensible and realistic historiography of Western science
..one of the most common myths widely held about the trial of Galileo, including several elements: that he "saw" the earth's motion (an observation still impossible to make even in the twenty-first century); that he was "imprisoned" by the Inquisition (whereas he was actually held under house arrest); and that his crime was to have discovered the truth. And since to condemn someone for this reason can result only from ignorance, prejudice, and narrow-mindedness, this is also the myth that alleges the incompatibility between science and religion.
Le nom "université" désigne au Moyen Âge occidental une organisation corporative des élèves et des maîtres, avec ses fonctions et privilèges, qui cultive un ensemble d'études supérieures. L'existence d'une telle institution est fort contestée pour Byzance. Seule l'école de Constantinople sous Théodose Il peut être prise pour une institution universitaire. Par la loi de 425, l'empereur a établi l'"université de Constantinople", avec 31 professeurs rémunérés par l'État qui jouissaient du monopole des cours publics.
The names of fashionable families who were already Episcopalian, like the Morgans, or those, like the Fricks, who now became so, goes on interminably: Aldrich, Astor, Biddle, Booth, Brown, Du Pont, Firestone, Ford, Gardner, Mellon, Morgan, Procter, the Vanderbilt, Whitney. Episcopalians branches of the Baptist Rockefellers and Jewish Guggenheims even appeared on these family trees.
By the late nineteenth century, one of the strongest bulwarks of Brahmin power was Harvard University. Statistics underscore the close relationship between Harvard and Boston's upper strata.
{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)Wesleyan institutions, whether hospitals, orphanages, soup kitchens, or schools, historically were begun with the spirit to serve all people and to transform society.
The new view of evangelism called for the denomination to undertake two new forms of activities: humanitarian aid and social witness. Humanitarian aid went beyond the individual help that many home missionaries were already providing to people within their care. It involved creating new structures that would augment the political, economic, and social systems so that those systems might be more humane. It included the establishment of Methodist hospitals in all the major cities in the United States. These hospitals were required to provide the best treatment possible free of charge to all who needed it, and were often staffed by deaconesses who trained as nurses. Homes for the aged and orphanages were also part of this work.
David W. Stevenson, M.D., of the Canadian Mission, writes as follows: ... ' 'Dr. Peter Parker, who went out in 1835, almost opened China to the Gospel at the point of his lancet. His great eye hospital become noted the world over.' ' ...
Charles Sumner Estes.
Many of the medieval universities in Western Europe were born under the aegis of the Catholic Church, usually as cathedral schools or by papal bull as Studia Generali.
All the great European universities-Oxford, to Paris, to Cologne, to Prague, to Bologna—were established with close ties to the Church.
Europe established schools in association with their cathedrals to educate priests, and from these emerged eventually the first universities of Europe, which began forming in the eleventh and twelfth centuries.
Of all these northern schools, only Columbia and the University of Pennsylvania were historically Anglican; the rest are associated with revivalist Presbyterianism or Congregationalism.
Princeton was Presbyterian, while Columbia and Pennsylvania were Episcopalian.
... From Fleming's perspective, the transition to Christianity required a good dose of personal and public hygiene ...
... Thus bathing also was considered a part of good health practice. For example, Tertullian attended the baths and believed them hygienic. Clement of Alexandria, while condemning excesses, had given guidelines for Christians who wished to attend the baths ...
... Clement of Alexandria (d. c. 215 CE) allowed that bathing contributed to good health and hygiene ... Christian skeptics could not easily dissuade the baths' practical popularity, however; popes continued to build baths situated within church basilicas and monasteries throughout the early medieval period ...
... but baths were normally considered therapeutic until the days of Gregory the Great, who understood virtuous bathing to be bathing "on account of the needs of body" ...
Public baths were common in the larger towns and cities of Europe by the twelfth century.
The evidence of early medieval laws that enforced punishments for the destruction of bathing houses suggests that such buildings were not rare. That they ... took a bath every week. At places in southern Europe, Roman baths remained in use or were even restored ... The Paris city scribe Nicolas Boileau noted the existence of twenty-six public baths in Paris in 1272
Douching is commonly practiced in Catholic countries. The bidet ... is still commonly found in France and other Catholic countries.