Part of a series on |
Astrodynamics |
---|
![]() |
Gravitational influences |
Preflight engineering |
Efficiency measures |
Propulsive maneuvers |
Theclassical rocket equation, orideal rocket equation is a mathematical equation that describes the motion of vehicles that follow the basic principle of arocket: a device that can apply acceleration to itself usingthrust by expelling part of its mass with highvelocity and can thereby move due to theconservation of momentum.It is credited toKonstantin Tsiolkovsky, who independently derived it and published it in 1903,[1][2] although it had been independently derived and published byWilliam Moore in 1810,[3] and later published in a separate book in 1813.[4]Robert Goddard also developed it independently in 1912, andHermann Oberth derived it independently about 1920.
The maximum change ofvelocity of the vehicle, (with no external forces acting) is:
where:
Given the effective exhaust velocity determined by the rocket motor's design, the desired delta-v (e.g.,orbital speed orescape velocity), and a given dry mass, the equation can be solved for the required wet mass: The required propellant mass is then
The necessary wet mass grows exponentially with the desired delta-v.
The equation is named after Russian scientistKonstantin Tsiolkovsky who independently derived it and published it in his 1903 work.[5][2]
The equation had been derived earlier by the British mathematicianWilliam Moore in 1810,[3] and later published in a separate book in 1813.[4]
AmericanRobert Goddard independently developed the equation in 1912 when he began his research to improve rocket engines for possible space flight. German engineerHermann Oberth independently derived the equation about 1920 as he studied the feasibility of space travel.
While the derivation of the rocket equation is a straightforwardcalculus exercise, Tsiolkovsky is honored as being the first to apply it to the question of whether rockets could achieve speeds necessary forspace travel.
In order to understand the principle of rocket propulsion, Konstantin Tsiolkovsky proposed the famous experiment of "the boat".[citation needed] A person is in a boat away from the shore without oars. They want to reach this shore. They notice that the boat is loaded with a certain quantity of stones and have the idea of quickly and repeatedly throwing the stones in succession in the opposite direction. Effectively, the quantity of movement of the stones thrown in one direction corresponds to an equal quantity of movement for the boat in the other direction (ignoring friction / drag).
Consider the following system:
In the following derivation, "the rocket" is taken to mean "the rocket and all of its unexpended propellant".
Newton's second law of motion relates external forces () to the change in linear momentum of the whole system (including rocket and exhaust) as follows:where is the momentum of the rocket at time:and is the momentum of the rocket and exhausted mass at time:and where, with respect to the observer:
The velocity of the exhaust in the observer frame is related to the velocity of the exhaust in the rocket frame by:thus,Solving this yields:If and are opposite, have the same direction as, are negligible (since), and using (since ejecting a positive results in a decrease in rocket mass in time),
If there are no external forces then (conservation of linear momentum) and
Assuming that is constant (known asTsiolkovsky's hypothesis[2]), so it is not subject to integration, then the above equation may be integrated as follows:
This then yieldsor equivalently or orwhere is the initial total mass including propellant, the final mass, and the velocity of the rocket exhaust with respect to the rocket (thespecific impulse, or, if measured in time, that multiplied bygravity-on-Earth acceleration). If is NOT constant, we might not have rocket equations that are as simple as the above forms. Many rocket dynamics researches were based on the Tsiolkovsky's constant hypothesis.
The value is the totalworking mass of propellant expended.
(delta-v) is the integration over time of the magnitude of the acceleration produced by using the rocket engine (what would be the actual acceleration if external forces were absent). In free space, for the case of acceleration in the direction of the velocity, this is the increase of the speed. In the case of an acceleration in opposite direction (deceleration) it is the decrease of the speed. Of course gravity and drag also accelerate the vehicle, and they can add or subtract to the change in velocity experienced by the vehicle. Hence delta-v may not always be the actual change in speed or velocity of the vehicle.
The equation can also be derived from the basic integral of acceleration in the form of force (thrust) over mass.By representing the delta-v equation as the following:
where T is thrust, is the initial (wet) mass and is the initial mass minus the final (dry) mass,
and realising that the integral of a resultant force over time is total impulse, assuming thrust is the only force involved,
The integral is found to be:
Realising that impulse over the change in mass is equivalent to force over propellant mass flow rate (p), which is itself equivalent to exhaust velocity,the integral can be equated to
Imagine a rocket at rest in space with no forces exerted on it (Newton's First Law of Motion). From the moment its engine is started (clock set to 0) the rocket expels gas mass at aconstant mass flow rate R (kg/s) and atexhaust velocity relative to the rocket ve (m/s). This creates a constant forceF propelling the rocket that is equal toR ×ve. The rocket is subject to a constant force, but its total mass is decreasing steadily because it is expelling gas. According toNewton's Second Law of Motion, its acceleration at any timet is its propelling forceF divided by its current massm:
Now, the mass of fuel the rocket initially has on board is equal tom0 –mf. For the constant mass flow rateR it will therefore take a timeT = (m0 –mf)/R to burn all this fuel. Integrating both sides of the equation with respect to time from0 toT (and noting thatR = dm/dt allows a substitution on the right) obtains:
The rocket equation can also be derived as the limiting case of the speed change for a rocket that expels its fuel in the form of pellets consecutively, as, with an effective exhaust speed such that the mechanical energy gained per unit fuel mass is given by.
In the rocket's center-of-mass frame, if a pellet of mass is ejected at speed and the remaining mass of the rocket is, the amount of energy converted to increase the rocket's and pellet's kinetic energy is
Using momentum conservation in the rocket's frame just prior to ejection,, from which we find
Let be the initial fuel mass fraction on board and the initial fueled-up mass of the rocket. Divide the total mass of fuel into discrete pellets each of mass. The remaining mass of the rocket after ejecting pellets is then. The overall speed change after ejecting pellets is the sum[6]
Notice that for large the last term in the denominator and can be neglected to give where and.
As thisRiemann sum becomes the definite integral since the final remaining mass of the rocket is.
Ifspecial relativity is taken into account, the following equation can be derived for arelativistic rocket,[7] with again standing for the rocket's final velocity (after expelling all its reaction mass and being reduced to a rest mass of) in theinertial frame of reference where the rocket started at rest (with the rest mass including fuel being initially), and standing for thespeed of light in vacuum:
Writing as allows this equation to be rearranged as
Then, using theidentity (here "exp" denotes theexponential function;see alsoNatural logarithm as well as the "power" identity atlogarithmic identities) and the identity (seeHyperbolic function), this is equivalent to
Delta-v (literally "change invelocity"), symbolised asΔv and pronounceddelta-vee, as used inspacecraft flight dynamics, is a measure of theimpulse that is needed to perform a maneuver such as launching from, or landing on a planet or moon, or an in-spaceorbital maneuver. It is ascalar that has the units ofspeed. As used in this context, it isnot the same as thephysical change in velocity of the vehicle.
Delta-v is produced by reaction engines, such asrocket engines, is proportional to thethrust per unit mass and burn time, and is used to determine the mass ofpropellant required for the given manoeuvre through the rocket equation.
For multiple manoeuvres, delta-v sums linearly.
For interplanetary missions delta-v is often plotted on aporkchop plot which displays the required mission delta-v as a function of launch date.
Inaerospace engineering, the propellant mass fraction is the portion of a vehicle's mass which does not reach the destination, usually used as a measure of the vehicle's performance. In other words, the propellant mass fraction is the ratio between the propellant mass and the initial mass of the vehicle. In a spacecraft, the destination is usually an orbit, while for aircraft it is their landing location. A higher mass fraction represents less weight in a design. Another related measure is thepayload fraction, which is the fraction of initial weight that is payload.
The effective exhaust velocity is often specified as aspecific impulse and they are related to each other by:where
The rocket equation captures the essentials of rocket flight physics in a single short equation. It also holds true for rocket-like reaction vehicles whenever the effective exhaust velocity is constant, and can be summed or integrated when the effective exhaust velocity varies. The rocket equation only accounts for the reaction force from the rocket engine; it does not include other forces that may act on a rocket, such asaerodynamic orgravitational forces. As such, when using it to calculate the propellant requirement for launch from (or powered descent to) a planet with an atmosphere, the effects of these forces must be included in the delta-V requirement (see Examples below). In what has been called "the tyranny of the rocket equation", there is a limit to the amount ofpayload that the rocket can carry, as higher amounts of propellant increment the overall weight, and thus also increase the fuel consumption.[8] The equation does not apply tonon-rocket systems such asaerobraking,gun launches,space elevators,launch loops,tether propulsion orlight sails.
The rocket equation can be applied toorbital maneuvers in order to determine how much propellant is needed to change to a particular new orbit, or to find the new orbit as the result of a particular propellant burn. When applying to orbital maneuvers, one assumes animpulsive maneuver, in which the propellant is discharged and delta-v applied instantaneously. This assumption is relatively accurate for short-duration burns such as for mid-course corrections and orbital insertion maneuvers. As the burn duration increases, the result is less accurate due to the effect of gravity on the vehicle over the duration of the maneuver. For low-thrust, long duration propulsion, such aselectric propulsion, more complicated analysis based on the propagation of the spacecraft's state vector and the integration of thrust are used to predict orbital motion.
Assume an exhaust velocity of 4,500 meters per second (15,000 ft/s) and a of 9,700 meters per second (32,000 ft/s) (Earth toLEO, including to overcome gravity and aerodynamic drag).
In the case of sequentially thrustingrocket stages, the equation applies for each stage, where for each stage the initial mass in the equation is the total mass of the rocket after discarding the previous stage, and the final mass in the equation is the total mass of the rocket just before discarding the stage concerned. For each stage the specific impulse may be different.
For example, if 80% of the mass of a rocket is the fuel of the first stage, and 10% is the dry mass of the first stage, and 10% is the remaining rocket, then
With three similar, subsequently smaller stages with the same for each stage, gives:
and the payload is 10% × 10% × 10% = 0.1% of the initial mass.
A comparableSSTO rocket, also with a 0.1% payload, could have a mass of 11.1% for fuel tanks and engines, and 88.8% for fuel. This would give
If the motor of a new stage is ignited before the previous stage has been discarded and the simultaneously working motors have a different specific impulse (as is often the case with solid rocket boosters and a liquid-fuel stage), the situation is more complicated.