Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Robertson v. National Basketball Ass'n

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
American legal case
icon
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Robertson v. National Basketball Ass'n" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(April 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Robertson v. National Basketball Ass'n
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Full case name Robertson v. National Basketball Association
ArguedApril 7, 1977
DecidedJune 9, 1977
Citation556F.2d682
Court membership
Judges sittingJames Lowell Oakes,Charles Edward Wyzanski Jr.(D. Mass.),James Stuart Holden(D. Vt.)
Case opinions
MajorityOakes, joined byunanimous
Laws applied
Sherman Antitrust Act

Robertson v. National Basketball Association, 556F.2d 682 (2d Cir. 1977),[1] was anantitrust lawsuit filed byAmericanbasketball playerOscar Robertson against theNational Basketball Association (NBA). Filed in 1970, the lawsuit was settled in 1976 and resulted in the free agency rules now used in the NBA.[2]

Facts

[edit]

Robertson sought through his lawsuit to block any merger of the NBA with theAmerican Basketball Association (ABA), to end the option clause that bound a player to a single NBA teamin perpetuity, to end theNBA's college draft binding a player to one team, and to end restrictions on free-agent signings. The suit also sought damages for NBA players for past harm caused by the option clause.

Robertson's lawsuit prevented the planned 1970 merger of theNational Basketball Association with theAmerican Basketball Association.

Judgment

[edit]

The court issued an injunction against any merger. TheABA-NBA merger was thus delayed until 1976.

[icon]
This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(April 2013)

Significance

[edit]

In 1972,Congress came close to enacting legislation to enable a merger but the measure was not passed. As a result, the two leagues did not merge until 1976.

Although he wasn't playing anymore, Robertson was not out of sight. As president of theNBA players union, Robertson's 1970 suit against the NBA contended the draft, option clause and other rules restricting player movement were violations ofantitrust laws. The suit was settled in 1976, when the league agreed to let players becomefree agents in exchange for their old team's "right of first refusal" to match any offer they might receive.[3]

See also

[edit]
Sources on mergers
FTC v. Staples, Inc., 970 F. Supp. 1066 (1997)
Hospital Corp. of America v. FTC, 807 F. 2d 1381 (1986)
FTC v. H.J. Heinz Co., 246 F.3d 708 (2001)
US v. Oracle Corp, 331 F. Supp. 2d 1098 (2004)
Robertson v. NBA, 556 F.2d 682 (1977)

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Robertson v. National Basketball Ass'n, 556 F.2d 682 (2d Cir. 1977).
  2. ^Oscar Robertson, N.B.A. Should Honor Its History and Learn From It,The New York Times (December 24, 2011).
  3. ^Ron Flatter, Oscar defined the triple-double, ESPN (last visited June 20, 2018).

External links

[edit]
Statutes and
regulations
Supreme Court
case law
Sherman Antitrust Act
Section 1 case law
Sherman Antitrust Act
Section 2 case law
OtherSherman
Antitrust Act
cases
Interstate Commerce Act
case law
Clayton Antitrust Act
case law
FTC Act case law
Robinson–Patman Act
case law
Other cases
Other federal
case law
Ongoing
litigation ‡
Related topics
‡ date of filing
Eastern
Conference
Atlantic
Central
Southeast
Western
Conference
Northwest
Pacific
Southwest
Annual events
History
People
Awards
and honors
Others
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robertson_v._National_Basketball_Ass%27n&oldid=1286333725"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp