The right is interconnected with other health-focused human rights, such as theright to water and sanitation,right to food andright to health.[7] The right to a healthy environment uses a human rights approach to protect environmental quality; this approach addresses the impact of environmental harm upon individual humans, as opposed to the more traditional approach of environmental regulation which focuses on impacts to other states or the environment itself.[8] Yet another approach to environmental protection isrights of nature which tries to extend the rights enjoyed by humans and corporations to nature as well.[9]
Slash and burn deforestation along the Rio Xingu, Brazil endangers bothindigenous rights to the land as well as the larger right to a healthy environment. Case law like the Colombian Climate case protecting the Amazon forest from deforestation have historically relied on the rights of nature and children,[10] the right to a healthy environment would provide additional protection.
The right creates an obligation of the state to regulate and enforceenvironmental laws, controlpollution, and otherwise provide justice and protections for communities harmed by environmental problems.[8] The right to a healthy environment has been an important right for creating environmental legal precedents forclimate change litigation and other environmental issues.[11][12]
The right to a healthy environment can be implemented into constitutional law other ways, such as written into constitutions in their drafting, such as inTunisia, or enforced throughclimate change litigation, such as in Colombia. In the United States, most advocates are focused on amending existing state constitutions or enforcing existing state constitutions, such as inHeld v. Montana, where youth won a trial court judgment for enforcement the existing state constitution.[15]
Global warming—the progression from cooler historical temperatures (blue) to recent warmer temperatures (red)—is being experienced disproportionately by younger generations.[16]
Successive generations are predicted to experience progressively greater unprecedented lifetime exposure (ULE) events such as heat waves.[17] About 111 million children born in 2020 will live with unprecedented heatwave exposure in a world that warms by 3.5 °C, compared with 62 million with only 1.5 °C of warming.[17]
The right to a healthy environment is at the core of the international approach tohuman rights and climate change.[24][25] The effects of climate change on human rights are presented by OHCHR in a fact sheet with the most frequently asked questions on the subject.[26]
In 2022 during its 76th session, theUnited Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution put forward by a core group including Costa Rica, Morocco, Slovenia, Switzerland, and the Maldives once again recognizing the human right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment.[29] Although General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding, this resolution was welcomed byUN High Commissioner for Human RightsMichelle Bachelet,[30] multiple special rapporteurs[6] and members of some civil society organizations.[31][32]
Theconcept of ahuman right to ahealthy environment has evolved over severaldecades, shaped by both international initiatives and nationallegislation. The earliest formal recognition can be traced to the 1972United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm,Sweden, which acknowledged that humans have a fundamental right to “freedom,equality, and adequate conditions of life, in an environment of a quality that permits a life ofdignity and well-being.” This conference laid the groundwork for integrating environmental concerns within human rights frameworks.[33]
In the following decades,regional and national instruments began to incorporateenvironmental rights. For example, several African constitutions, including those ofSouth Africa andTunisia, explicitly recognize the right to a healthy environment. Similarly, theAarhus Convention (1998) inEurope established procedural rights related to environmental protection, including access toinformation, public participation, and access to justice.[34]
Internationally,advocacy and legal scholarship have emphasized the interconnection between environmental protection and fundamental human rights such as theright to health,food,water, andlife. This culminated in theUnited Nations Human Rights Council Resolution 48/13 (2021), which recognized a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment as a human right. Subsequently, in 2022, the United Nations General Assembly formally adopted a resolution recognizing the right to a healthy environment, marking a significant milestone ininternational law.[35]
Today, the right to a healthy environment is increasingly referenced inclimate litigation, environmental policymaking, and human rights advocacy, reflecting its growing importance in addressing global environmental challenges, frompollution anddeforestation toclimate change andbiodiversity loss.[36]
^van Rossum, Maya K. (2017).The Green Amendment: Securing Our Right to a Healthy Environment (1st ed.). Austin, Texas and New York City, New York: Disruption Books.ISBN978-1-63331-021-6.
^abShelton, Dinah (2002).Human Rights, Health & Environmental Protection: Linkages in Law & Practice. Health and Human Rights Working Paper Series No 1. World Health Organization.