Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Ribosomal DNA

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Genes coding for ribosomal RNA
This articleis missing information about bacteria/organelle, archaea (rDNA operons — the euk ones are technically polycistronic too); canonical inclusion of 5S in these groups; plastid 4.5S; occurrence of nonclassical "unlinked" variants (PMID 31712737). Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on thetalk page.(October 2021)

Theribosomal DNA (abbreviatedrDNA) consists of a group ofribosomal RNA encoding genes and related regulatory elements, and is widespread in similar configuration in alldomains of life. The ribosomal DNA encodes the non-codingribosomal RNA, integral structural elements in the assembly ofribosomes, its importance making it the most abundant section of RNA found in cells ofeukaryotes.[1] Additionally, these segments includesregulatory sections, such as apromotor specific to theRNA polymerase I, as well as both transcribed and non-transcribedspacer segments.

Due to their high importance in the assembly ofribosomes forprotein biosynthesis, the rDNA genes are generally highly conserved inmolecular evolution. The number of copies can vary considerably per species.[1] Ribosomal DNA is widely used forphylogenetic studies.[2][3]

Structure

[edit]
Genes of the ribosomal DNA
TypeSSU rRNALSU rRNA
Eukaryotes18S rRNA28S rRNA
5.8S rRNA
5S rRNA
Bacteria16S rRNA23S rRNA
5S rRNA
MitochondrialMT-RNR1 (12S rRNA)MT-RNR2 (16S rRNA)
Plastid16S rRNA23S rRNA
4.5S rRNA
5S rRNA

The ribosomal DNA includes all genes coding for the non-coding structuralribosomal RNA molecules. Across alldomains of life, these are the structural sequences of thesmall subunit (16S or18S rRNA) and thelarge subunit (23S or28S rRNA). The assembly of the latter also include the5S rRNA as well as the additional5.8S rRNA in eukaryotes.

The rDNA-genes are commonly present with multiple copies in the genome, where they are organized in linked groups in most species, separated by aninternal transcribed spacer (ITS) and preceded by theExternal transcribed spacer (ETS). The5S rRNA is also linked to these rDNA region inprokaryotes, while it is located in separate repeating regions in mosteukaryotes.[4] They are transcribed together to a precursor RNA which is then processed to equal amounts of each rRNA.

Prokaryotes

[edit]

The primary structural rRNA molecules inBacteria andArchaea are smaller than their counterparts in eukaryotes, grouped as16S rRNA and23S rRNA. Meanwhile, the5S rRNA also present in prokaryotes, is of a similar size to eukaryotes.

A notable amount of bacteria and archaea diverge from the canonical structure of the operon containing the rDNA genes, carrying the "unlinked" genes in different places of their genome.[5]

Plastids

[edit]

Ribosomal DNA inchloroplasts follows the structure of prokaryotic ribosomal DNA.

Eukaryotes

[edit]
The gene segment of eukaryotic rDNA contains 18S, 5.8S, and 28S tracts and forms a tandem repetitive cluster; the 5S rDNA is coded separately.NTS, nontranscribed spacer,ETS,external transcribed spacer,ITS,internal transcribed spacers 1 and 2, numbered from 5' end.
Nucleolus with pre-rRNA components called Introns and Exons.

The rDNA gene cluster of eukaryotes consists of the genes for the18S,5.8S and28S rRNA, separated by the twoITS-1 and ITS-2 spacers. The active genome of eukaryotes contains several hundred copies of the rDNA transcriptional unit astandem repeats, they are organized innucleolus organizer regions (NORs),[4] which in turn can be present at multipleloci in the genome.[6]

Similar to the structure of prokaryotes, the5S rRNA is appended to the rDNA cluster in theSaccharomycetes (Hemiascomycetes)[6] such asSaccharomyces cerevisiae.[4] Most eukaryotes however, carry the gene for the5S rRNA in separate gene repeats at different loci in the genome.[6][4]

5S rDNA is also present in independent tandem repeats as inDrosophila.[6] As repetitive DNA regions often undergo recombination events, the rDNA repeats have many regulatory mechanisms that keep the DNA from undergoing mutations,[example needed] thus keeping the rDNA conserved.[1]

In the nucleus, thenucleolus organizer regions give rise to thenucleolus, where the rDNA regions of the chromosome forms expanded chromosomal loops, accessible for transcription ofrRNA. In rDNA, the tandem repeats are mostly found in the nucleolus; but heterochromatic rDNA is found outside of the nucleolus. However, transcriptionally active rDNA resides inside of the nucleolus itself.[1]

Humans

[edit]

Thehuman genome contains a total of 560 copies[4] of the rDNA transcriptional unit, spread across five chromosomes withnucleolus organizer regions. The repeat clusters are located on theacrocentric chromosomes 13 (RNR1), 14 (RNR2), 15 (RNR3), 21 (RNR4) and 22 (RNR5).[7]

Ciliates

[edit]

Inciliates, the presence of a generativemicronucleus next to the vegetativemacronucleus allows for the reduction of rDNA genes in the germline. The exact number of copies in the micronucleus core genome ranging from several copies inParamecium[8] as low as a single copy inTetrahymena thermophila[4] and otherTetrahymena species. Duringmacronucleus formation, the regions containing the rDNA gene clusters are amplified, dramatically increasing the amount of available templates for transcription up to several thousand copies. In some ciliate genera, such asTetrahymena or theHypotrich genusOxytricha,[8] extensive fragmentation of the amplified DNA leads to the formation of microchromosomes, centered on the rDNA transcriptional unit.[8] Similar processes are reported fromGlaucoma chattoni and to lesser extent fromParamecium.[8]

Sequence homogeneity

[edit]

In the large rDNA array, polymorphisms between rDNA repeat units are very low, indicating that rDNA tandem arrays are evolving throughconcerted evolution.[6] However, the mechanism of concerted evolution is imperfect, such that polymorphisms between repeats within an individual can occur at significant levels and may confoundphylogenetic analyses for closely related organisms.[9][10]

5S tandem repeat sequences in severalDrosophila were compared with each other; the result revealed thatinsertions anddeletions occurred frequently between species and often flanked by conserved sequences.[11] They could occur by slippage of the newly synthesized strand during DNA replication or by gene conversion.[11]

Sequence divergence

[edit]

The rDNA transcription tracts have low rate ofpolymorphism among species, which allows interspecific comparison to elucidate phylogenetic relationship using only a few specimens. Coding regions of rDNA are highly conserved among species but ITS regions are variable due to insertions, deletions, and point mutations. Between remote species as human and frog comparison of sequences at ITS tracts is not appropriate.[12] Conserved sequences at coding regions of rDNA allow comparisons of remote species, even between yeast and human. Human 5.8S rRNA has 75% identity with yeast 5.8S rRNA.[13]In cases for sibling species, comparison of the rDNA segment including ITS tracts among species and phylogenetic analysis are made satisfactorily.[14][15]The different coding regions of the rDNA repeats usually show distinct evolutionary rates. As a result, this DNA can provide phylogenetic information of species belonging to wide systematic levels.[2]

Recombination-stimulating activity

[edit]

A fragment of yeast rDNA containing the 5S gene, non-transcribed spacer DNA, and part of the 35S gene has localized cis-actingmitotic recombination stimulating activity.[16] This DNA fragment contains a mitoticrecombination hotspot, referred to as HOT1. HOT1 expresses recombination-stimulating activity when it is inserted into novel locations in the yeastgenome. HOT1 includes anRNA polymerase I (PolI) transcriptionpromoter that catalyzes 35Sribosomal rRNA gene transcription. In a PolI defective mutant, the HOT1 hotspot recombination-stimulating activity is abolished. The level of PolI transcription in HOT1 appears to determine the level ofrecombination.[17]

Clinical significance

[edit]

Diseases can be associated with DNA mutations where DNA can be expanded, such asHuntington's disease, or lost due to deletion mutations. The same is true for mutations that occur in rDNA repeats; it has been found that if the genes that are associated with the synthesis of ribosomes are disrupted or mutated, it can result in various diseases associated with the skeleton or bone marrow. Also, any damage or disruption to the enzymes that protect the tandem repeats of the rDNA, can result in lower synthesis of ribosomes, which also lead to other defects in the cell. Neurological diseases can also arise from mutations in the rDNA tandem repeats, such asBloom syndrome, which occurs when the number of tandem repeats increases close to a hundred-fold; compared with that of the normal number of tandem repeats. Various types of cancers can also be born from mutations of the tandem repeats in the ribosomal DNA. Cell lines can become malignant from either a rearrangement of the tandem repeats, or an expansion of the repeats in the rDNA.[18]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdWarmerdam, Daniël O.; Wolthuis, Rob M. F. (2019-03-01)."Keeping ribosomal DNA intact: a repeating challenge".Chromosome Research.27 (1):57–72.doi:10.1007/s10577-018-9594-z.ISSN 1573-6849.PMC 6394564.PMID 30556094.
  2. ^abHillis DM, Dixon MT (December 1991). "Ribosomal DNA: Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetic Inference".The Quarterly Review of Biology.66 (4):411–53.doi:10.1086/417338.PMID 1784710.S2CID 32027097.
  3. ^Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (January 1991)."16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study".Journal of Bacteriology.173 (2):697–703.doi:10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991.PMC 207061.PMID 1987160.
  4. ^abcdefGraw, Jochen (2015).Genetik [Genetics] (in German) (6th ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44817-5.ISBN 978-3-662-44816-8.
  5. ^Brewer TE, Albertsen M, Edwards A, Kirkegaard RH, Rocha EP, Fierer N (February 2020)."Unlinked rRNA genes are widespread among bacteria and archaea".The ISME Journal.14 (2):597–608.Bibcode:2020ISMEJ..14..597B.doi:10.1038/s41396-019-0552-3.PMC 6976660.PMID 31712737.
  6. ^abcdeRichard GF, Kerrest A, Dujon B (December 2008)."Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes".Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.72 (4):686–727.doi:10.1128/MMBR.00011-08.PMC 2593564.PMID 19052325.
  7. ^Schmidt, Olaf (2017). Fritsche, Olaf (ed.).Genetik und Molekularbiologie [Genetics and molecular biology]. Kompaktwissen Biologie (in German). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.doi:10.1007/978-3-662-50274-7.ISBN 978-3-662-50273-0.
  8. ^abcdPrescott, David M. (June 1994)."The DNA of Ciliated Protozoa".Microbiological Reviews.58 (2):233–267.doi:10.1128/mr.58.2.233-267.1994.PMC 372963.PMID 8078435.
  9. ^Alvarez I, Wendel JF (December 2003). "Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference".Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.29 (3):417–34.Bibcode:2003MolPE..29..417A.doi:10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00208-2.PMID 14615184.
  10. ^Weitemier K, Straub SC, Fishbein M, Liston A (2015)."Intragenomic polymorphisms among high-copy loci: a genus-wide study of nuclear ribosomal DNA in Asclepias (Apocynaceae)".PeerJ.3: e718.doi:10.7717/peerj.718.PMC 4304868.PMID 25653903.
  11. ^abPäques F, Samson ML, Jordan P, Wegnez M (November 1995). "Structural evolution of the Drosophila 5S ribosomal genes".Journal of Molecular Evolution.41 (5):615–21.Bibcode:1995JMolE..41..615P.doi:10.1007/bf00175820.PMID 7490776.S2CID 6911205.
  12. ^Sumida M, Kato Y, Kurabayashi A (April 2004)."Sequencing and analysis of the internal transcribed spacers (ITSs) and coding regions in the EcoR I fragment of the ribosomal DNA of the Japanese pond frog Rana nigromaculata".Genes & Genetic Systems.79 (2):105–18.doi:10.1266/ggs.79.105.PMID 15215676.
  13. ^Nazar RN, Sitz TO, Busch H (February 1976). "Sequence homologies in mammalian 5.8S ribosomal RNA".Biochemistry.15 (3):505–8.doi:10.1021/bi00648a008.PMID 1252408.
  14. ^Fengyi MY, Jiannong X, Zheming Z (1998)."Sequence differences of rDNA-ITS2 and species-diagnostic PCR assay ofAnopheles sinensis andAnopheles anthropophagus from China"(PDF).J Med Coll PLA.13:123–128.
  15. ^Li, C; Lee, JS; Groebner, JL; Kim, HC; Klein, TA; O'Guinn, ML; Wilkerson, RC (2005)."A newly recognized species in theAnopheles hyrcanus group and molecular identification of related species from the Republic of South Korea (Diptera: Culicidae)"(PDF).Zootaxa.939:1–8.doi:10.11646/zootaxa.939.1.1.Archived from the original on October 1, 2012.
  16. ^Keil RL, Roeder GS (December 1984)."Cis-acting, recombination-stimulating activity in a fragment of the ribosomal DNA of S. cerevisiae".Cell.39 (2 Pt 1):377–86.doi:10.1016/0092-8674(84)90016-3.PMID 6094015.
  17. ^Serizawa N, Horiuchi T, Kobayashi T (April 2004). "Transcription-mediated hyper-recombination in HOT1".Genes to Cells.9 (4):305–15.doi:10.1111/j.1356-9597.2004.00729.x.PMID 15066122.S2CID 23978914.
  18. ^Warmerdam DO, Wolthuis RM (March 2019)."Keeping ribosomal DNA intact: a repeating challenge".Chromosome Research.27 (1–2):57–72.doi:10.1007/s10577-018-9594-z.PMC 6394564.PMID 30556094.
Repeated sequence
Tandem repeats
Interspersed
repeat
Other
Transposon
Retrotransposon
SINEs
LINEs
LTRs
DNA transposon
Gene duplication
See also
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ribosomal_DNA&oldid=1258494424"
Category:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp