 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Fundi" politics – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(January 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Fundis is short forfundamentalists. The term was used for afaction within theGerman Green Party. The faction was formed in conflict to theRealo-faction within their party. The term has also been applied to similar conflicts.
The abbreviationFundi is a label applied to members who tend towards afundamentalist interpretation of its common ideology (e.g. 'green' values), as opposed to the more "pragmaticrealism" of the Realo alternative. Other terms for green Fundis arewild greens ordeep greens. They tend towardsveganism,[citation needed] a stronganimal rights approach[citation needed] and an aversion to traditional political methods, rejecting more centralized systems of governance. Many Fundis believe that economic growth and industrialism are the root of ecological problems, and therefore advocate for an end to modern industry, instead proposing a system of decentralized rural communities driven by post-industrial economics.[1]
In the 1980s and 1990s, a conflict between the Fundis and the Realos with the German Green Party arose. While the Realos, the group aroundJoschka Fischer, were in favour ofcabinet cooperation, the Fundis opposed cabinet cooperation. The Fundis were composed of deep greens andeco-socialists. They did not only oppose cabinet cooperation, but were also in favour of strictterm limits.[citation needed] In addition to disagreements on party business, the conflict can be traced to ideological disputes. While the Realos were in favour of moderate policies and the notion of 'sustainable growth'–regulated economic growth within the limits of ecological sustainability–the Fundis took a more radical stance in dismissing the notion of economic growth altogether, seeing it as necessarily polluting.[1]
The term was first used within theHessen Green party. In the 1982 state elections the party gained 8% of vote, and neither theSPD or theCDU had a majority of their own. In their program Hessen Greens had claimed that there was a "fundamental opposition between the anti-life and anti-democratic politics of the SPD, CDU and FDP." Those who had opposed a coalition with the SPD were called Fundis. The Greens tolerated an SPD-minority government for three years and in 1985 they entered the coalition, a victory for the Realos. Joschka Fischer became their minister.
During the party congress on 22–23 June 1985 in Hagen, the Realos won a victory on the federal level when they adopted a motion, saying that the Greens could "use the full bandwidth of parliamentary possibilities, ranging from opposition to single-party government". At the end of the 1980s the Fundis founded the Left Forum. In 1990 a group of prominent eco-socialists left the party, in 1991 a group of deep greens also left. Some of those joined thePDS and others founded their own party.[specify]
In 1998 the Greens joined the federal cabinet, a final victory for the Realos. In the following years the division between realos and Fundis became less important.[citation needed]
 | This section needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(February 2024) |
In theGreen Party of Canada and theFlemish partyAgalev-party the term was also used to describe similar conflicts. InFrance conflicts between 'Fundi' and 'Realo' led to several splits within theGreen Party, resulting in a 'pleiade' of green parties.
In an article on theGreens/Green Party USA’s website, the organization characterized the split between itself and theGreen Party of the United States (GPUS) as akin to the fundi–realo split in the German Greens, with itself being the fundi wing and GPUS the realos.[2]
The term has been used to describe the ideological differences within theAustralian Greens and its member parties.[3]
