TheRashba effect, also calledBychkov–Rashba effect, is a momentum-dependent splitting ofspin bands in bulkcrystals^{[note 1]} and low-dimensionalcondensed matter systems (such asheterostructures andsurface states) similar to the splitting ofparticles andanti-particles in theDirac Hamiltonian. The splitting is a combined effect ofspin–orbit interaction and asymmetry of the crystal potential, in particular in the direction perpendicular to the two-dimensional plane (as applied to surfaces and heterostructures). This effect is named in honour ofEmmanuel Rashba, who discovered it with Valentin I. Sheka in 1959^[1] for three-dimensional systems and afterward with Yurii A. Bychkov in 1984 for two-dimensional systems.^[2][3][4]

Remarkably, this effect can drive a wide variety of novel physical phenomena, especially operating electron spins by electric fields, even when it is a small correction to the band structure of the two-dimensional metallic state. An example of a physical phenomenon that can be explained by Rashba model is the anisotropicmagnetoresistance (AMR).^{[note 2][5][6][7]}

Additionally, superconductors with large Rashba splitting are suggested as possible realizations of the elusiveFulde–Ferrell–Larkin–Ovchinnikov (FFLO) state,^[8]Majorana fermions andtopological p-wave superconductors.^[9][10]

Lately, a momentum dependent pseudospin-orbit coupling has been realized in cold atom systems.^[11]

The Rashba effect is most easily seen in the simple model Hamiltonian known as the Rashba Hamiltonian

${\displaystyle H_{\mathrm{R}}=\alpha (\hat{z}\times \mathbf{p})\cdot \mathit{\sigma }}$,

where${\displaystyle \alpha }$ is the Rashba coupling,${\displaystyle \mathbf{p}}$ is themomentum and${\displaystyle \mathit{\sigma }}$ is thePauli matrix vector.This is nothing but a two-dimensional version of the Dirac Hamiltonian (with a 90 degree rotation of the spins).

The Rashba model in solids can be derived in the framework of thek·p perturbation theory^[12] or from the point of view of atight binding approximation.^[13] However, the specifics of these methods are considered tedious and many prefer an intuitive toy model that gives qualitatively the same physics (quantitatively it gives a poor estimation of the coupling$\alpha$). Here we will introduce the intuitivetoy model approach followed by a sketch of a more accurate derivation.

The Rashba effect arises from the breaking of inversion symmetry in the direction perpendicular to a two-dimensional electron system. To illustrate this qualitatively, consider adding to the Hamiltonian an electric-field term that breaks this symmetry:

${\displaystyle H_{\mathrm{E}}=-e{E}_{0}z}$

Due to relativistic corrections, an electron moving with velocity${\displaystyle \mathbf{v}}$ in an electric field${\displaystyle \mathbf{E}}$ experiences an effective magnetic field in its rest frame, given by

${\displaystyle \mathbf{B}=-\frac{\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{E}}{c^2}}$

where${\displaystyle c}$ is the speed of light. This magnetic field couples to the electron spin through the spin–orbit interaction:

${\displaystyle H_{\mathrm{S}\mathrm{O}}=\frac{g{\mu }_{\mathrm{B}}}{2c^2}(\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{E})\cdot \mathit{\sigma }}$

where${\displaystyle \mathit{\sigma }}$ are the Pauli matrices and${\displaystyle -g{\mu }_{\mathrm{B}}\mathit{\sigma }/2}$ represents the electron magnetic moment.

Within this simplified “toy” model, the resulting Rashba Hamiltonian can be written as

${\displaystyle H_{\mathrm{R}}=-{\alpha }_{\mathrm{R}}(\hat{z}\times \mathbf{p})\cdot \mathit{\sigma }}$

with a coupling strength

${\displaystyle {\alpha }_{\mathrm{R}}=-\frac{g{\mu }_{\mathrm{B}}{E}_0}{2m{c}^2}.}$

This expression provides the correct functional form of the Rashba Hamiltonian but severely underestimates the coupling strength${\displaystyle {\alpha }_{\mathrm{R}}}$. A more realistic description shows that the effect originates from interband coupling (band mixing) in the crystal. The “toy” model above uses the Dirac energy gap${\displaystyle m{c}^2}$—on the order of MeV—as the denominator in the relativistic correction, which leads to an unrealistically small coupling. In actual materials, the relevant energy scales are the splittings between electronic bands, typically of order eV. This difference accounts for the much larger Rashba coupling observed experimentally.^[14]

Before continuing we make a comment about a common misconception regarding the Rashba effect. According to theEhrenfest theorem, the average electric field experienced by an electron bound to a two-dimensional layer should vanish, because the expectation value of the force on a bound particle is zero. Applied naively, this reasoning seems to imply that the Rashba effect should not occur—an argument that led to early controversy prior to experimental confirmation. However, this interpretation is incomplete: the Rashba effect depends not on the *spatially averaged* electric field, but on the *local asymmetry* of the confining potential, which gives rise to an effective field acting on the electron spin.

A microscopic estimate of the Rashba coupling constant${\displaystyle \alpha }$ can be obtained using a tight-binding model. In many semiconductors, the itinerant carriers forming the two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) originate from atomics andp orbitals. For simplicity, consider holes in the${\displaystyle p_z}$ band near the${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Gamma }}$ point.^[15]

Two ingredients are essential to obtain Rashba splitting:an atomic spin–orbit interaction

${\displaystyle H_{\mathrm{S}\mathrm{O}}={\mathrm{\Delta }}_{\mathrm{S}\mathrm{O}}\mathbf{L}\cdot \mathit{\sigma },}$

and an asymmetric potential in the direction perpendicular to the 2D plane,

${\displaystyle H_E=e{E}_{0}z.}$

The symmetry-breaking potential${\displaystyle H_E}$ lifts the degeneracy between the out-of-plane${\displaystyle p_z}$ orbital and the in-plane${\displaystyle p_x}$ and${\displaystyle p_y}$ orbitals, opening a gap${\displaystyle {\mathrm{\Delta }}_{\mathrm{B}\mathrm{G}}}$. At the same time, it allows mixing (hybridization) between these orbitals, which can be described within a tight-binding approximation. The hopping amplitude from a${\displaystyle p_z}$ state at site${\displaystyle i}$ with spin${\displaystyle \sigma }$ to a neighboring${\displaystyle p_{x,y}}$ state at site${\displaystyle j}$ with spin${\displaystyle {\sigma }^{\prime }}$ is

${\displaystyle t_{ij;\sigma {\sigma }^{\prime }}^{x,y}=⟨p_z,i;\sigma |H|p_{x,y},j;{\sigma }^{\prime }⟩,}$

where${\displaystyle H}$ is the full Hamiltonian. In the absence of inversion asymmetry (${\displaystyle H_E=0}$), this hopping vanishes by symmetry. When${\displaystyle H_E\ne 0}$, the matrix element becomes finite; for nearest neighbors one can write approximately

${\displaystyle t_{\sigma {\sigma }^{\prime }}^{x,y}=E_0⟨p_z,i;\sigma |z|p_{x,y},i+\hat{x},\hat{y};{\sigma }^{\prime }⟩=t_0\mathrm{s}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{n}(\hat{x},\hat{y}){\delta }_{\sigma {\sigma }^{\prime }},}$

where${\displaystyle {\delta }_{\sigma {\sigma }^{\prime }}}$ is theKronecker delta.

The Rashba interaction can then be viewed as a second-order process: a hole hops from${\displaystyle |p_z,i;\uparrow ⟩}$ to${\displaystyle |p_{x,y},i+\hat{x},\hat{y};\uparrow ⟩}$ via${\displaystyle t_0}$, then undergoes a spin flip through the atomic spin–orbit coupling${\displaystyle {\mathrm{\Delta }}_{\mathrm{S}\mathrm{O}}}$, returning to${\displaystyle |p_z,i+\hat{x},\hat{y};\downarrow ⟩}$. Overall, the carrier hops one lattice spacing while flipping its spin.

Treating this sequence as a second-order perturbation, the resulting Rashba coupling constant scales as

${\displaystyle \alpha \approx \frac{a{t}_0{\mathrm{\Delta }}_{\mathrm{S}\mathrm{O}}}{{\mathrm{\Delta }}_{\mathrm{B}\mathrm{G}}},}$

where${\displaystyle a}$ is the lattice spacing. Because the relevant energy denominators are of order eV rather than MeV (as in the naive relativistic model), this estimate yields a Rashba coupling several orders of magnitude larger, in agreement with experimental observations.

Spintronics - Electronic devices are based on the ability to manipulate the electrons position by means of electric fields. Similarly, devices can be based on the manipulation of the spin degree of freedom. The Rashba effect allows to manipulate the spin by the same means, that is, without the aid of a magnetic field. Such devices have many advantages over their electronic counterparts.^[16][17]

Topological quantum computation - Lately it has been suggested that the Rashba effect can be used to realize a p-wave superconductor.^[9][10] Such a superconductor has very specialedge-states which are known asMajorana bound states. The non-locality immunizes them to local scattering and hence they are predicted to have longcoherence times. Decoherence is one of the largest barriers on the way to realize a full scalequantum computer and these immune states are therefore considered good candidates for aquantum bit.

Discovery of thegiant Rashba effect with${\displaystyle \alpha }$ of about 5 eV•Å in bulk crystals such as BiTeI,^[18] ferroelectric GeTe,^[19] and in a number of low-dimensional systems bears a promise of creating devices operating electrons spins at nanoscale and possessing short operational times.

The Rashba spin-orbit coupling is typical for systems with uniaxial symmetry, e.g., for hexagonal crystals of CdS and CdSe for which it was originally found^[20] and perovskites, and also for heterostructures where it develops as a result of a symmetry breaking field in the direction perpendicular to the 2D surface.^[2] All these systems lack inversion symmetry. A similar effect, known as the Dresselhaus spin orbit coupling^[21] arises in cubic crystals of A_IIIB_V type lacking inversion symmetry and inquantum wells manufactured from them.

• Electric dipole spin resonance
• Orbital Rashba effect

• Chu, Junhao; Sher, Arden (2009).Device Physics of Narrow Gap Semiconductors. Springer. pp. 328–334.ISBN 978-1-4419-1039-4.
• Heitmann, Detlef (2010).Quantum Materials, Lateral Semiconductor Nanostructures, Hybrid Systems and Nanocrystals. Springer. pp. 307–309.ISBN 978-3-642-10552-4.
• A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, S. M. Frolov, and R. A. Duine, New perspectives for Rashba spin–orbit coupling, Nature Materials14, 871-882 (2015),http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v14/n9/pdf/nmat4360.pdf, stacks.iop.org/NJP/17/050202/mmedia
• http://blog.physicsworld.com/2015/06/02/breathing-new-life-into-the-rashba-effect/
• E. I. Rashba and V. I. Sheka, Electric-Dipole Spin-Resonances, in: Landau Level Spectroscopy, (North Holland, Amsterdam) 1991, p. 131;https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.01721
• Rashba, Emmanuel I (2005). "Spin Dynamics and Spin Transport".Journal of Superconductivity.18 (2):137–144.arXiv:cond-mat/0408119.Bibcode:2005JSup...18..137R.doi:10.1007/s10948-005-3349-8.S2CID 55016414.

• Ulrich Zuelicke (30 Nov – 1 Dec 2009)."Rashba effect: Spin splitting of surface and interface states"(PDF). Institute of Fundamental Sciences andMacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Archived from the original on 2012-03-31. Retrieved2011-09-02.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)

• "Finding the beat: New discovery settles a long-standing debate about photovoltaic materials". DOE, Ames Laboratory, Division of Materials Sciences. April 7, 2020.

• Semiconductors
• Quantum magnetism
• Spintronics

• CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list
• CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list
• Articles with short description
• Short description is different from Wikidata
• CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown