 Block III Ranger spacecraft | |
| Manufacturer | Jet Propulsion Laboratory |
|---|---|
| Country of origin | United States |
| Operator | NASA |
| Specifications | |
| Bus | Block I, Block II, Block III |
| Production | |
| Status | Retired |
| Launched | 9 |
| Failed | 5 |
| Maiden launch | August 23, 1961 |
| Last launch | March 21, 1965 |
| Related spacecraft | |
| Derivatives | Mariner |
| Configuration | |
 Block II Ranger spacecraft | |
TheRanger program was a series ofuncrewed space missions by theUnited States in the 1960s whose objective was to obtain the first close-up images of thesurface of the Moon. The Ranger spacecraft were designed to take images of the lunar surface, transmitting those images to Earth until the spacecraft were destroyed upon impact. A series of mishaps, however, led to the failure of the first six flights. At one point, the program was called "shoot and hope".[1] Congress launched an investigation into "problems of management" atNASA Headquarters andJet Propulsion Laboratory.[2] After two reorganizations of the agencies,[citation needed]Ranger 7 successfully returned images in July 1964, followed by two more successful missions.
Ranger was originally designed, beginning in 1959, in three distinct phases, called "blocks". Each block had different mission objectives and progressively more advanced system design. TheJPL mission designers planned multiple launches in each block, to maximize the engineering experience and scientific value of the mission and to assure at least one successful flight. Total research, development, launch, and support costs for the Ranger series of spacecraft (Rangers 1 through 9) was approximately $170 million (equivalent to $1.29 billion in 2024).[3]
Each of the block III Ranger spacecraft had six cameras on board. The cameras were fundamentally the same with differences in exposure times, fields of view, lenses, and scan rates. The camera system was divided into two channels, P (partial) and F (full). Each channel was self-contained with separate power supplies, timers, and transmitters. The F-channel had two cameras: the wide-angle A-camera and the narrow angle B-camera. The P-channel had four cameras: P1 and P2 (narrow angle) and P3 and P4 (wide angle). The final F-channel image was taken between 2.5 and 5 seconds before impact (altitude about 5 kilometres (3.1 mi)) and the last P-channel image 0.2 to 0.4 seconds before impact (altitude about 600 metres (2,000 ft)). The images provided better resolution than was available from Earth-based views by a factor of 1000. The design and construction of the cameras was led byLeonard R Malling.[4][5][6][7]
The Ranger program manager for the first five spacecraft wasJames D. Burke.[8] After all five missions failed,Harris Schurmeier was assigned as the project manager. Ranger 6 failed, but Rangers 7, 8, and 9 were successful.
The camera preamplifiers of the Ranger program usednuvistors.[9]
Block 1, consisting of two spacecraft launched into Earth orbit in 1961, was intended to test theAtlas-Agena launch vehicle and spacecraft equipment without attempting to reach the Moon.
Problems with the early version of the launch vehicle leftRanger 1 andRanger 2 in short-lived, low-Earth orbits in which the spacecraft could not stabilize themselves, collect solar power, or survive for long. In 1962, JPL utilized the Ranger 1 and Ranger 2 design for the failedMariner 1 and successfulMariner 2 deep-space probes toVenus.
Block 2 of the Ranger project launched three spacecraft to the Moon in 1962, carrying a TV camera, a radiation detector, and a seismometer in a separate capsule slowed by a rocket motor and packaged to survive its low-speed impact on the Moon's surface. The craft weighed 331 kg. The three missions together demonstrated good performance of the Atlas/Agena B launch vehicle and the adequacy of the spacecraft design, but unfortunately not both on the same attempt.Ranger 3 had problems with both the launch vehicle and the spacecraft, missed the Moon by about 36,800 km, and has orbited the Sun ever since.Ranger 4 had a perfect launch, but the spacecraft was completely disabled. The project team tracked the seismometer capsule to impact just out of sight on thelunar far side, validating the communications and navigation system.Ranger 5 missed the Moon and was disabled. No significant science information was gleaned from these missions.
Around the end of Block 2, it was discovered that a type of diode used in previous missions produced problematic gold-plate flaking in the conditions of space. This may have been responsible for some of the failures.[10]
Ranger's Block 3 embodied four launches in 1964-65. These spacecraft boasted a television instrument designed to observe the lunar surface during the approach; as the spacecraft neared the Moon, it would reveal detail smaller than the best Earth telescopes could show, and finallydishpan-sized craters.[11] The first of the new series,Ranger 6, had a flawless flight, except that the television system was disabled by an in-flight accident and could take no pictures.
The next three Rangers, with a redesigned television, were completely successful.Ranger 7 photographed its way down to target in a lunar plain, soon namedMare Cognitum, south of the craterCopernicus. It sent more than 4,300 pictures from six cameras to waiting scientists and engineers. The new images revealed that craters caused by impact were the dominant features of the Moon's surface, even in the seemingly smooth and empty plains. Great craters were marked by small ones, and the small with tiny impact pockmarks, as far down in size as could be discerned—about 50 centimeters (20 inches). The light-colored streaks radiating from Copernicus and a few other large craters turned out to be chains and nets of small craters and debris blasted out in the primary impacts.
In February 1965,Ranger 8 swept an oblique course over the south ofOceanus Procellarum andMare Nubium, to crash inMare Tranquillitatis about 70 kilometers (43 mi) distant from whereApollo 11 would land 4½ years later. It took more than 7,000 images, covering a wider area and reinforcing the conclusions from Ranger 7. About a month later,Ranger 9 came down in the 90-kilometer (56-mile) diameter craterAlphonsus. Its 5,800 images, nested concentrically and taking advantage of very low-level sunlight, provided strong confirmation of the crater-on-crater, gently rolling contours of the lunar surface.
Both links lead to a whole book on the program. For the HTML one, scroll down to see the table of contents link.
