Die Rabenschlacht (The Battle of Ravenna) is an anonymous 13th-centuryMiddle High German poem about the heroDietrich von Bern, the counterpart of the historical Ostrogothic kingTheodoric the Great inGermanic heroic legend. It is part of the so-called "historical" Dietrich material and is closely related to, and always transmitted together with another Dietrich poem,Dietrichs Flucht. At one time, both poems were thought to have the same author, possibly a certainHeinrich der Vogler, but stylistic differences have led more recent scholarship to abandon this idea.[1]
Die Rabenschlacht concerns a failed attempt by the exiled Dietrich to reclaim his kingdom in Northern Italy from his treacherous uncleErmenrich, with the help of an army provided byEtzel, king of theHuns. In the course of this attempt, Dietrich's younger brother and Etzel's young sons by his wifeHelche are killed by Dietrich's former vassalWitege outside ofRavenna. Witege then flees into the sea and is rescued by a mermaid rather than fighting against Dietrich. The poem may be a dim reflection of the death of Attila's sonEllac at theBattle of Nedao in 454, combined with Theodoric the Great's siege of Ravenna in 491–493.[2] It would therefore be one of the oldest parts of the legends about Dietrich von Bern.
Die Rabenschlacht begins a year after the end ofDietrichs Flucht, with Dietrich still in exile at the court ofEtzel. Dietrich is still saddened by the loss of his men in the previous poem, especiallyAlphart. Etzel announces that he will give Dietrich a new army, and there is a large feast to celebrate Dietrich's marriage to Herrad, niece of his wife Helche. Helche, however, is troubled by a dream in which a wild dragon carries away her two sons and rips them to shreds. Meanwhile, a new army is assembled atEtzelburg. Helche and Etzel's sons Orte and Scharpfe beg Helche to be allowed to join the army. Etzel and Dietrich come in upon this conversation, and Etzel categorically refuses. Dietrich, however, promises to take good care of the young princes, so that Helche agrees and Orte and Scharpfe join the army.[3]
The army arrives in Italy, where it is greeted by Dietrich's loyal vassals who have remained there after the last campaign. Dietrich learns that Ermenrich has assembled a large army atRavenna. The army heads to Bern (Verona), where Dietrich's young brother Diether has remained. Dietrich decides to leave Etzel's children with Diether in the care of the older warrior Elsan, and marches to Ravenna. The children, however, under the pretext of viewing the city, convince a reluctant Elsan to let them leave the city. They get lost and end up on the road to Ravenna, while Elsan looks for them in despair. Once the young warriors have spent a night outside the city, they reach the shore of the sea. In the dawn they encounterWitege. Diether tells Etzel's children that Witege is a warrior who betrayed Dietrich, and the three young warriors attack. Witege slays each of them in difficult combat; he is deeply distressed and laments Diether's death especially.[3]
Meanwhile, Dietrich fights a gruelling twelve-day battle outside Ravenna, defeating Ermenrich, who escapes. His treacherous advisor Sibeche, however, is captured by Eckehart, who ties him naked to a horse and leads him across the battlefield to avenge the death of the Harlungen at Sibeche's advice. As the dead are gathered to be buried, Elsan arrives with news that Etzel's sons are missing. The warrior Helpfrich then comes with news of their deaths. Dietrich finds their bodies on the seashore and breaks into despairing laments. He recognizes that the wounds on the young warriors bodies could only have been made by Witege's sword Mimming. Witege is then spotted; Dietrich jumps on his horse to attack, but Witege flees on his horse Schemming. Witege's uncle Rienolt, however, is also with him, and he turns to fight Dietrich and is slain. Dietrich pursues Witege to the edge of the sea and very nearly catches him, but Witege rides into the sea where he is rescued by the sea-spirit/mermaid (MHGmerminne) Wâchilt who was his ancestress (identifiable more specifically as his great-grandmother in Swedish version of theÞiðreks saga). She tells him that Dietrich was so hot with anger that his armor was soft, and Witige could have easily defeated him. Now, however, the armor had hardened, and thirty Witiges could not defeat Dietrich. Dietrich meanwhile mourns on the shore. He goes back to Ravenna, where Ermenrich has fortified himself, and storms the city. Ermernich escapes, however, and Dietrich orders the city burned, as the inhabitants surrender. Rüdiger rides back toHunland to bring Etzel the news of his sons deaths; however, Orte and Scharpfe's horses arrive at Etzelburg with bloody saddles. Helche is beside herself, but Rüdiger is able to calm her. Etzel sees that his sons deaths are not Dietrich's fault, and Dietrich returns to Etzel's court and back into Etzel and Helche's good graces.[4]
Die Rabenschlacht is transmitted together withDietrichs Flucht in four complete manuscripts and alone in one fragmentary manuscript:[5]
The origins of the earliest manuscripts as well as the dialect of the poem indicate that it was composed in Austria, sometime before 1300.[9] Most modern scholarship holdsDie Rabenschlacht to have been composed earlier than Dietrichs Flucht: Joachim Heinzle notes thatDie Rabenschlacht contains allusions toWolfram von Eschenbach'sWillehlam (c. 1220) and cannot have been composed any earlier than that.[9] Werner Hoffmann suggests thatDie Rabenschlacht may have been composed around 1270, before being reworked and placed together withDietrichs Flucht in the 1280s.[10] Victor Millet questions whetherDie Rabenschlacht is really an earlier work thanDietrichs Flucht,[11] and Elisabeth Lienert suggests that the poems were actually composed at roughly the same time, though older versions ofDie Rabenschlacht must have existed.[12]
As with almost all Germanheroic epic,Die Rabenschlacht is anonymous.[13] Early scholarship believed that bothDietrichs Fluch andDie Rabenschlacht had a single author,Heinrich der Vogler; however, the formal and stylistic differences between the two epics have caused this theory to be abandoned.[14] The manuscript transmission nevertheless makes clear thatDie Rabenschlacht andDietrichs Flucht were viewed as a single work by contemporaries.[11] Someone, perhaps Heinrich der Vogler, has also reworked both texts to an extent so that their contents do not contradict each other.[15]
Die Rabenschlacht consists of 1140 unique stanzas, in a form that is not found in any other poem.[16] Like other stanzaic heroic poems, it was probably meant to be sung,[17] but no melody survives.[18][16] Heinzle analyzes the stanza as consisting of three "Langzeilen" with rhymes at thecaesuras:a||b, a||b, c||c. The first line consists of three metrical feet before the caesura, then three additional feet; the second of three feet before the caesura, then four additional feet; and the third of three feet before the caesura, and five or even six additional feet.[19] Heinzle prints the following example as typical:
In some stanzas, the rhymes at the caesura in lines 1 and 2 are absent, giving a scheme: x|b, x|b, c|c.[20] It is also possible to interpret the stanza as consisting of six shorter lines, withrhyme scheme ABABCC.[16] Consequently, the same stanza as above is printed in the edition by Elisabeth Lienert and Dorit Wolter as:
Die Rabenschlacht has been described as "elegiac" and "sentimental," particularly in relation toDietrichs Flucht.[21] Stylistically, the poem is notable for its hyperbole in its depictions of violence—the battle at Ravenna takes twelve days and the warriors literally wade in blood among mountains of corpses—and emotions, particularly of grief.[22][23] The numbers of warriors involved are similarly exaggerated, with Ermenrich's army including 1,100,00 (eilf hundert tūsent) warriors or more.[23] Neither Werner Hoffmann nor Victor Millet see the poem as particularly heroic, with Millet nevertheless noting that the poem does not criticize the use of violence.[24][25]
The poem makes numerous allusions to theNibelungenlied, beginning with the opening stanza, which cites the opening stanza of the C version of theNibelungenlied.[26] Edward Haymes and Susan Samples suggest that the poem exists as a kind of prequel to theNibelungenlied.[27] In the course of the poem, characters from theNibelungenlied fight on the side of Ermenrich, includingSiegfried, Gunther and Volker, as well as their enemies from theNibelungenlied, Liudegast and Liudeger. Siegfried is defeated by Dietrich and forced to plea for his life, confirming Dietrich's superiority.[28] Michael Curschmann holds the encounters between Dietrich and Siegfried here and in theRosengarten zu Worms to have their origins in an oral tradition.[29] However, Elisabeth Lienert sees the battles inDie Rabenschlacht as part of a literary rivalry between the two traditions, an intertextual relationship.[30] The poem includes allusions to other thirteenth-century literary texts as well,[31] including Wolfram von Eschenbach'sWillehalm.[9] This confirms its nature as a literary text, in dialogue with other literature.[31]
The general outline of the story told inDie Rabenschlacht, about the death of Etzel and Herche's sons, is often considered to be one of the oldest components of the legend of Theodoric. It is first alluded to in theNibelungenklage, a poem likely written shortly after theNibelungenlied (c. 1200).[32] Older scholarship proposed aGothic song as the earliest version.[33] According to this theory, the song was inspired by theBattle of Nedao (454), a rebellion of Germanic tribes after the death ofAttila the Hun, in which Attila's favorite son and successorEllac died.[34]Theodoric the Great's fatherTheodemar is thought to have fought on the side of the Huns in this battle, with his actions transferred to his more famous son in the oral tradition.[34][35] Elisabeth Lienert suggests the poem's location at Ravenna may have been influenced by the historical Theodoric the Great besieging his enemyOdoacer there from 491 to 493.[2] Witige's character is sometimes thought to have been influenced byWitigis, a Gothic king and usurper who surrenderedRavenna to theByzantine army.[36] Diether is similarly thought to have a connection to the historicalTheodahad, whom Witigis betrayed, usurping the Ostrogothic throne.[37] Werner Hoffmann suggests that Ermenrich's rather small role inDie Rabenschlacht is because the original tale of Witige killing Etzel's sons and Diether has been only roughly inserted into the larger framework of Dietrich's exile.[38] Joachim Heinzle largely dismisses such attempts at deducing the roots of the poem as unfruitful.[39]
An alternative version of the events of theRabenschlacht is found in the Old NorseThidrekssaga. There we are told that King Ermanrik was misled into attacking his nephew Didrik because of his counsellor Sifka (Sibeche in Middle High German), who was avenging Ermanrik's rape of his wife by leading him to his doom. Didrik goes into exile at Attila's court and makes an attempt to return to his kingdom with a Hunnish army, bringing along his brother Thether (Diether) and Attila's two sons Erp and Ortwin. The army fights a mighty battle against Ermanrik at Gronsport on theMosel and defeats him. During the battle, Wiðga (Witege) kills Thether, Erp, and Ortwin; Didrik pursues Wiðga, breathing fire, until the latter disappears in the (non-existent) mouth of the Mosel into the sea. Didrik throws his spear after Wiðga, and one can still see it today. Didrik then returns to exile. Joachim Heinzle notes that it is unclear how much of the variation between the version found inDie Rabenschlacht and that found in theThidrekssaga is the work of the latter's compiler or comes from alternative versions in oral circulation.[40] The late medievalHeldenbuch-Prosa corroborates theThidrekssaga's version of the story of why Sibeche betrayed Ermenrich, and it is clear that the composer of the Heldenbuch-Prosa did not have access to theThidrekssaga.[41] This indicates that at least some of theThidrekssaga's changes may come from oral tradition, indicating the existence of multiple versions of the story.[42] The scholar Norbert Voorwinden has suggested that the author ofDie Rabenschlacht was largely unaware of the oral tradition, creating an entirely new work on the basis of an allusion to the death of Etzel's sons in theNibelungenklage.[43]
Attempts have been made to connect the catalogues of warriors found in the work with signs oforal formulaic composition.[44]