Inchess, aqueen sacrifice is a move thatsacrifices aqueen. It is the rarest and most tactically significant sacrifice possible, as the queen is the most powerful piece and requires an exceptional tactical, material, or positional advantage in compensation.
A true sacrifice should not be confused with ablunder, the unintentional loss of a piece, or anexchange, where both players lose their queen in the same interaction.
In his bookThe Art of Sacrifice in Chess,Rudolf Spielmann distinguishes betweenreal andshamsacrifices. A sham sacrifice leads to aforced and immediate benefit for the sacrificer, usually in the form of a quickcheckmate (orperpetual check orstalemate if seeking adraw), or the recouping of the sacrificedmaterial after a forcedline. Since any amount of material can be sacrificed as long as checkmate will be achieved, the queen is not above being sacrificed as part of a combination.[1]
Possible reasons for a sham queen sacrifice include:
Despite the terminology "sham", sham queen sacrifices are still often considered brilliancies and are often featured in famous games.
On the other hand, "real" sacrifices, according to Spielmann, are those where the compensation is not immediate, but more positional in nature. Because the queen is the most powerful piece, positional sacrifices of the queen virtually always entail some partial material compensation (for example, sacrificing the queen for a rook and bishop).
Bent Larsen concurs on the distinction between a true sacrifice and a gain in material, namely when trading a queen for a rook and twominor pieces.[2] Manychess piece relative value schemes exist to estimate the exchange value of the queen against other pieces.
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
| 8 |             | 8 | |||||||
| 7 | 7 | ||||||||
| 6 | 6 | ||||||||
| 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| 4 | 4 | ||||||||
| 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| 2 | 2 | ||||||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
A celebrated game byAdolf Anderssen, theImmortal Game, featured a queen sacrifice as part of White's final mating combination. In the diagram position Anderssen gave up his queen with22.Qf6+! to deflect Black's knight: the game continued22...Nxf6 23.Be7#. This is an example of a sham queen sacrifice, as the sacrifice resulted in checkmate only one move later. White was able to mate since his minor pieces were clustered around the Black king, while Black's pieces were either undeveloped or trapped in the white camp and so unable to defend.
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
| 8 |  | 8 | |||||||
| 7 | 7 | ||||||||
| 6 | 6 | ||||||||
| 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| 4 | 4 | ||||||||
| 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| 2 | 2 | ||||||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
In another celebrated game by Anderssen, theEvergreen Game, Anderssen once again sacrificed his queen for a mating combination, playing21.Qxd7+!!. The game continued21...Kxd7 22.Bf5+ Ke8 23.Bd7+ Kf8 24.Bxe7#. The game is another example of a sham queen sacrifice. Although Black is on the verge of checkmating White, his defences around his king are weak, so White was able to mate.
White to move |
Position after 13.h4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For an example of a "real" (positional) queen sacrifice,Rudolf Spielmann presented this game againstJorgen Moeller in Gothenburg 1920. In the first diagram Black threatens 9...Bg4 winning the queen, since it must not leave the f2-square unguarded under threat of checkmate. But Spielmann played9.Nd2! allowing Black to win his queen, and after9...Bg4 10.Nxe4 Bxf3 11.Nxf3 Qh6 12.Nf6+ Kd8 13.h4 the position in the second diagram was reached. White has only a knight and bishop for his queen and pawn, but his minor pieces are very active and the black queen is out of play. White won on move 28.[3]
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
| 8 | | 8 | |||||||
| 7 | 7 | ||||||||
| 6 | 6 | ||||||||
| 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| 4 | 4 | ||||||||
| 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| 2 | 2 | ||||||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
A queen sacrifice can sometimes be used as a resource to draw. HereHermann Pilnik (White) is defending an endgame three pawns down, but playedQf2!, whenSamuel Reshevsky (Black) had nothing better than ...Qxf2 stalemate.[4]
Black to move |
Position after 25...Nxd1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
InThe Game of the Century,Bobby Fischer uncorked a queen sacrifice to obtain a winning material advantage. In the first diagram, White's king is stuck in the center and Black has control of the open e-file. Fischer ignored the threat to his queen and played17...Be6!!. The game continued18.Bxb6 Bxc4+ 19.Kg1 Ne2+ 20.Kf1 Nxd4+ 21.Kg1 Ne2+ 22.Kf1 Nc3+ 23.Kg1 axb6 24.Qb4 Ra4 25.Qxb6 Nxd1 and Black has emerged with a large material and positional advantage. He can threatenback-rank mate to win even more material; his pieces are coordinated and White's rook is trapped in the corner. Black went on to win the game.[5]
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
| 8 | | 8 | |||||||
| 7 | 7 | ||||||||
| 6 | 6 | ||||||||
| 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| 4 | 4 | ||||||||
| 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| 2 | 2 | ||||||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
In theWorld Chess Championship 2016,Magnus Carlsen defeatedSergey Karjakin in the final tie-break game with the queen sacrifice50.Qh6+!!. Either way the queen is captured, there is mate on the next move: 50...Kxh6 51.Rh8#, or 50...gxh6 51.Rxf7#.[6]
| Outline | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equipment | |||||||||
| History | |||||||||
| Rules | |||||||||
| Terms | |||||||||
| Tactics | |||||||||
| Strategy | |||||||||
| Openings |
| ||||||||
| Endgames | |||||||||
| Tournaments |
| ||||||||
| Art and media | |||||||||
| Related | |||||||||
