Public Against Violence Verejnosť proti násiliu | |
|---|---|
| Leader | Fedor Gál,Ján Budaj |
| Founded | 19 November 1989 |
| Dissolved | 27 April 1991 |
| Succeeded by | Civic Democratic Union |
| Headquarters | Bratislava,Czechoslovakia |
| Ideology | Liberalism Pro-Europeanism |
| Political position | Centre |
 |
|---|
Legislature |
|
|
Public Against Violence (Slovak:Verejnosť proti násiliu,VPN) was a political movement established inBratislava,Slovakia in November 1989.[1] It was the Slovak counterpart of the CzechCivic Forum.[2]
Public Against Violence (VPN) was founded during theVelvet Revolution, which overthrew theCommunist Party rule inCzechoslovakia.[1] Afterriot police cracked down on astudent demonstration inPrague on the 17 November 1989 a growing series of demonstrations were held in Czechoslovakia.[1] On the 19 November Civic Forum was founded in Prague as a coalition of opposition groups demanding the removal of the Communist leadership.[1] The same evening a meeting was held in Bratislava, Slovakia attended by about 500 people where Public Against Violence was founded.[3] The following day a first meeting of the coordinating committee of Public Against Violence took place.[3]
Public Against Violence was similar to Civic Forum in being a broad movement in opposition to Communism.[4] The founders of Public Against Violence included actorMilan Kňažko, dissidentJán Budaj andsociologistFedor Gál,[1] and the movement included cultural figures, religious and intellectual dissidents.[5] Other early leaders included Catholic dissidentJán Čarnogurský whose trial was stopped during the revolution,[3]František Mikloško and Miroslav Kusy,[6]Vladimír Mečiar and the ex-leader of the Communist Party during thePrague SpringAlexander Dubček.[7] Like Civic Forum, Public Against Violence called for the dominant role of the Communist Party to be ended, with aprovisional government composed both of Communists and the opposition, leading to free elections.[5] However Public Against Violence also called for relations between the Czechs and Slovaks to be altered in a new democratic federation.[5]
Protests spread across Slovakia in November 1989 with branches of Public Against Violence being founded in many towns.[3] Civic Forum and Public Against Violence worked together in negotiations with the Communist government, with Ján Čarnogurský representing Public Against Violence at talks together withVáclav Havel for Civic Forum.[3] After a two-hourgeneral strike on 27 November demonstrated support for the opposition, agreement was reached on the 29 November for the leading role of the Communist Party to be ended.[3]
After the rejection by the opposition of an interim government which would have been largely Communist, another government of Czechoslovakia was formed on the 7 December 1989, with Slovak CommunistMarián Čalfa asPrime Minister of Czechoslovakia.[3] Čalfa went on to leave the Communist Party on the 18 January 1990 and would then join Public Against Violence.[4][8] The government initially had an 11 to 10 majority of non-Communists, but this grew as people left the Communist party, while Václav Havel was electedPresident of Czechoslovakia and Alexander Dubček became the chair of theFederal Assembly.[3]
In Slovakia a new government was also formed on the 12 December 1989 led by the CommunistMinister of JusticeMilan Čič, with equal numbers of Communists and non-Communists.[5] Members of Public Against Violence formed part of the government, includingVladimír Mečiar asinterior minister,[9] and like Marián Čalfa nationally, Milan Čič would leave the Communist party in 1990 and joined Public Against Violence.[10]
However Public Against Violence began to split even before the first democratic elections were held.[4] At the beginning of 1990 Ján Čarnogurský and advocates ofChristian democracy left Public Against Violence and founded theChristian Democratic Movement party in February 1990.[11]
Going into the firstfree elections in June 1990 Public Against Violence wanted greater powers for Slovakia, but backed continuing the union between the Czechs and Slovaks.[2] However they called for the emphasis to be on the economy and environment, rather than Slovak nationalism.[2]
Candidates for Public Against Violence at the 1990 election included theprime minister of CzechoslovakiaMarián Čalfa andAlexander Dubček, the ex-leader of theCommunist Party during thePrague Spring.[2]
In the lead up to the 1990 electionsopinion polls showed Public Against Violence with between 18 and 25% support in Slovakia, behind theChristian Democratic Movement on 25 to 30%.[2] Public Against Violence was reported to be suffering from an increase in Slovak nationalism[12] and many rural voters saw intellectuals from Public Against Violence as alien to them.[13] However Public Against Violence gained during the campaign on their anti-communist credentials withVáclav Havel being well received when he campaigned in Slovakia.[13] A poll on 1 June 1990 showed Public Against Violence ahead of the Christian Democratic Movement in Slovakia for the first time.[14]
The election results saw Public Against Violence finish first in Slovakia, both in the federal and Slovak elections.[15] In the federal election together the combination of Civic Forum and Public Against Violence won a majority, while in theSlovak election Public Against Violence came first but short of a majority.[16] However, on election night one of the founders of Public Against Violence, deputy chairman Ján Budaj, announced his withdrawal from politics as he had been pressed to co-operate with thesecret police in the 1970s.[16][17][18]
Following the election Marián Čalfa of Public Against Violence continued to lead a coalition government nationally as Prime Minister of Czechoslovakia, whileVladimír Mečiar of Public Against Violence led a coalition government in Slovakia together with the Christian Democratic Movement.[19]
As time passed from the Velvet Revolution, the approval rating for both Civic Forum and Public Against Violence dropped from 60% in February 1990 to 38% in October 1990.[20] Inlocal elections held in November 1990 Public Against Violence came second to the Christian Democratic Movement in Slovakia.[21] Public Against Violence was reported to have won 20.4% of the vote in Slovakia, compared to 27.4% for the Christian Democratic Movement.[21] An opinion poll in November 1990 also showed support for Public Against Violence had fallen to 17%.[22]
Public Against Violence faced tensions over the amount of power that should be held centrally in Czechoslovakia and how much should be held in Slovakia.[23] This led to a split in March 1991 when the prime minister of Slovakia Vladimír Mečiar walked out of a leadership meeting of Public Against Violence and formed a rival wing of the party called PAV-Platform for Democratic Slovakia.[23] Mečiar and his supporters had accused the leadership, including the leader Fedor Gál of being too close to Prague and Mečiar called for economic reforms to be less vigorous due to fears that Slovakia would lose the most economically.[23][24] However the leadership of Public Against Violence accused Mečiar of wanting an independent Slovakia and of joining with Communists.[25]
On the 23 April 1991 Vladimír Mečiar was replaced as Prime Minister of Slovakia by the leader of the Christian Democratic MovementJán Čarnogurský.[26] This came after the majority of Public Against Violence joined with the Christian Democratic Movement to replace Mečiar.[27]
At an extraordinary party congress held on 27 April 1991, a new party calledMovement for a Democratic Slovakia split off from Public Against Violence.
Following the split the Movement for a Democratic Slovakia quickly became the most popular party in Slovakia and consistently led in the opinion polls in 1991 and 1992,[11] while Mečiar was the most popular politician.[3] Public Against Violence meanwhile dropped further in the polls to just 3% in July 1991, compared to 38% for the Movement for a Democratic Slovakia.[28]
Also in July 1991 Alexander Dubček quit the Public Against Violence movement, accusing Public Against Violence of having moved too far to the right.[29] Public Against Violence finally became a political party in October 1991 and renamed itself as Civic Democratic Union (Občianska demokratická únia, ODÚ) in March 1992.[30]
The Civic Democratic Union contested the1992 elections, but failed to win any seats.[31] It won 4.0% of the Slovak vote for the House of the People, 4.0% for the House of Nations and 4.0% in theelection for the Slovak National Council.[31][32] The Civic Democratic Union finally dissolved in November 1992 and many former members of Civic Democratic Union would go on to join theDemocratic Party in 1994.[3][5]
Public Against Violence has been seen to have failed due to an inability to establish a popular constituency; instead concentrating on government and parliamentary activities.[33] More nationalist politicians were able to exploit this and played on public distrust of a Public Against Violence, that was perceived to be composed of the elite.[33]
| Year | Vote | Vote % | Seats | Place | Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 1,104,125 | 10,4 | 19 / 150 | 3rd | Majority Government |
| Year | Vote | Vote % | Seats | Places | Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 1,262,278 | 11,9 | 33 / 150 | 3rd | Majority Government |
| Year | Vote | Vote % | Seats | Place | Cabinet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 991,285 | 29,35 | 48 / 150 | 1st | Mečiar I,Čarnogurský |
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Other | |
