Pskov Republic Псковская республика | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1348–1510 | |||||||||
 Coat of arms | |||||||||
 Pskov Republic in 1400 | |||||||||
| Capital | Pskov | ||||||||
| Common languages | Russian | ||||||||
| Religion | Russian Orthodoxy | ||||||||
| Demonym | Pskovian | ||||||||
| Government | Mixed | ||||||||
| History | |||||||||
• Established | 1348 | ||||||||
• Disestablished | 1510 | ||||||||
| |||||||||
| Today part of | Russia | ||||||||
ThePskov Republic (Russian:Псковская республика,romanized: Pskovskaya respublika) was acity-state innorthwestern Russia.[1] It is traditionally considered to have won its formal independence from theNovgorod Republic in 1348.[2][3] Its capital city wasPskov and its territory was roughly equivalent to modern-dayPskov Oblast.
After the disintegration ofKievan Rus' in the 12th century, the city ofPskov and its dependent territory became part of theNovgorod Republic, but it continued to enjoy self-government under the supervision of aposadnik, or chief executive, that was appointed by Novgorod.[4] Pskov had the status of a borough (Russian:пригород,romanized: prigorod), but was given the unique right to have boroughs of its own, withIzborsk being the most ancient among them.[5] The first period of self-declared independence lasted from 1228 to 1242, ending when the city was temporarily annexed by theLivonian Order.[6] After being liberated byAleksandr Nevsky, the city pledged its fealty to the grand prince and Novgorod.[7] Due to Pskov's leading role in the struggle against theLivonian Order, its influence grew significantly. The long reign ofDaumantas (r. 1266–1299), and especially his victory in theBattle of Rakvere in 1268, ushered in a period of significant autonomy, as well as a state of peace with the Livonian Order.[8][9] The expansion of theGrand Duchy of Lithuania began to penetrate Pskov when Grand DukeGediminas responded to the Pskovites' request to send a prince in 1323.[10][11]
PrinceAleksandr of Tver was granted sanctuary by the Pskovites in 1327 after he had fledTver following an anti-Tatar uprising that was subsequently crushed by a punitive force dispatched by the khan of theGolden Horde.[12][13] Aleksandr was appointed as the prince of Pskov and an agreement was reached in which the Pskovites promised "not to hand him over to the Russian princes".[12] At the behest ofIvan I of Moscow, the head of theRussian Orthodox Church excommunicated Aleksandr as well as the people of Pskov.[14][13] Aleksandr then fled to Lithuania and, after a treaty was signed between Pskov and the head of the church, the ban was lifted.[14] Aleksandr later returned to Pskov in 1331 and he once again served as their prince until he went to the Horde in 1337 to recover the principality ofTver.[15]
In August 1348,Magnus IV of Sweden captured the key fortress ofOrekhov located at the eastern end of theNeva.[16] The Pskovites sent a small detachment and took advantage of the situation by only agreeing to accompany the Novgorodian army on the condition that Pskov would be formally granted its independence.[16] Novgorod sent an allied force to lay siege to the fortress and signed theTreaty of Bolotovo on the way to Orekhov.[17] As per the terms of the treaty, theposadniki of Novgorod no longer had any administrative or judicial function in Pskov and the law-courts of the archbishop of Novgorod would only be run by representatives chosen by the Pskovites.[18] In return, Pskov pledged to aid Novgorod in the event that it was attacked.[18] Despite this, the Pskovites refused to aid Novgorod in its siege of Orekhov and the detachment left.[18]
The signing of the Treaty of Bolotovo has traditionally been regarded as the date when Pskov's independence was sealed; however, some modern historians have argued that the treaty was concluded earlier or that there is little evidence of Pskov's dependence on Novgorod in the 12th and 13th centuries.[2] Scholars have variously dated the treaty between 1329 and 1342.[19]Valentin Yanin argued that the treaty was concluded in 1329, only confirming previous agreements.[20] According to Yanin, Pskov was independent as early as 1137 and relations between the two cities were based on contracts.[20] Despite this, there is no trace of the Pskov magistrates' activities or legislation until the 14th century.[20]Sergei Beletzkiy has shown that Pskov's original seals appeared in the 14th century and that their design followed that of Novgorod's seals.[20]
In 1341, the chronicle of Novgorod states that the Pskovites had "betrayed themselves" (predashasia) to Lithuania when they invited Grand DukeAlgirdas to reign in the city.[19] Following the death of the Lithuanian governor in April 1349, the Pskovites decided to cut ties with Algirdas and his sonAndrei.[21] Algirdas declared war on Pskov but, due to a string of military defeats earlier, he was limited to arresting Pskovian merchants and sending Andrei to raid the territory of Pskov.[21] Although there is no mention of a Muscovite governor arriving in Pskov or negotiations with Moscow at the time in any of the sources, Pskov likely received military support from Moscow, and by the end of the decade, was within Moscow's sphere of influence.[22]Simeon of Moscow was also able to establish a dominant position in Novgorod, and as a result, he was able to eliminate Lithuania's influence innorthwest Russia for the time being.[23] In 1352, theBlack Death reached Pskov and subsequentlyspread to the rest of Russia;[24] the chronicles of Novgorod and Pskov say that hundreds died every day,[25] but it also weakened the ascendancy of Moscow for some time.[24]
For most of the second half of the 14th century, Pskov was in the sphere of influence of theGrand Duchy of Lithuania and the city continued to invite Lithuanian princes.[26] This changed after Grand DukeVytautas of Lithuania signed theTreaty of Salynas with theTeutonic Knights in 1398, in which he promised to help them conquer Pskov, while the Teutons promised to help Lithuania conquer Novgorod.[27] That same year, Vytautas shelteredTokhtamysh in exchange for military assistance.[28] Vyatautas was promised aid in conquering Moscow and he joined Tokhtamysh in his war againstTemür Qutlugh, but they were decisively defeated at theBattle of the Vorskla River in 1399.[28] After Prince Ivan Andreyevich left the city, Pskov sent emissaries to Grand PrinceVasily I of Moscow requesting a prince, and from then on, the prince of Pskov was a governor or viceroy (namestnik) under the overlordship of the grand prince.[29] The same year, Moscow signed an agreement with the prince of Tver, which consolidated cooperation between the two principalities.[30]
Lithuania attempted to bring Novgorod and Pskov into its sphere of influence again, leading to a Lithuanian attack on Pskov in 1406.[31] Grand PrinceVasily I of Moscow sent troops to aid Pskov, leading to a border war between Lithuania and Moscow until 1408.[31] The two sides stopped fighting as Vasily had to battle a Tatar invasion led byEdigu in 1408, while Vytautas joined the forces ofWładysław II Jagiełło to inflict a devastating defeat on the Teutonic Knights at theBattle of Grunwald in 1410.[31] Relations between Lithuania and Moscow resumed a more peaceful course; however, both sides continued to struggle for influence in the political affairs of Pskov and Novgorod.[31] Finally, in 1449, Grand PrinceVasily II signed treaties withCasimir IV Jagiellon which delineated their spheres of influence, with Casimir recognizing Pskov and Novgorod as dependencies of Moscow.[32] Pskov's dependence on Moscow increased as the grand prince's governor was now required to swear an oath to him as well.[33]
In the first half of the 15th century, the recognition of the suzerainty of the Muscovite grand prince was voluntary.[34] The city was also able to conclude treaties with other countries.[35] The 1417 peace treaty with the Livonian Order states: "We have been sent", declared the Pskov ambassadors, "by our authorities, the mayor and all Pskov (posadnik pskovskii i ves' Pskov), from the patrimony of our Lord, Russian prince (iz otchiny nashego gospodina, russkogo kniazia)..."[35][36] Although the grand prince was recognized as the suzerain (gospodin), and Pskov as his "patrimony" (otchina), the Pskovites did not need his approval for the treaty.[37] The status of Pskov until the mid-15th century has been compared to that of thefree cities of theHoly Roman Empire.[37] Pskov did not pay regular taxes to the suzerain, nor was it dependent on him for judicial matters.[37] However, the Muscovite court adopted the title of sovereign (gosudar) in the mid-15th century to reflect the grand prince's claim to hold supreme power over the Russian lands.[37]
In 1462, Grand Prince Vasily II appointed the prince Vladimir Andreyevich as his governor without requesting permission from Pskov first.[38] After his death the same year, the Pskovites dismissed Vladimir, and Grand PrinceIvan III reached an agreement with the city in which he promised to not appoint a new governor without the permission of Pskov, while the Pskovites promised not to dismiss a governor without the permission of the grand prince.[38] Five years later, Ivan appointed Fyodor Yuryevich as his governor and demanded that Pskov grant his governor the right to appoint representatives in all twelve boroughs, rather than the seven he had been allowed up to that point.[39] Pskov was forced to accept the demand, and some scholars view the enactment of thePskov Judicial Charter the same year as an attempt to define the distribution of judicial authority between the city and the grand prince.[40]
Starting in the 1460s, Pskov's foreign policy gradually fell under the control of the grand prince.[41] It is likely that the grand prince approved the terms of treaties with neighboring countries, while Pskov's authorities continued to handle minor trade disputes.[41] For instance, in a letter dating to 1463–1465 and addressed to the authorities inRiga, the prince,posadniki, boyars, merchants and "all Pskov" protested against the offenses faced by two Pskovite merchants in the city, without any reference to the grand prince's decision.[41] However, treaties between Moscow and other countries show that Pskov was no longer an active participant in international affairs.[42] In his 1494 peace treaty with Lithuania, Ivan III called Pskov his patrimony and guaranteed maintaining trade and justice in the city.[42] Although Pskov is indicated to have already lost its independence in the second half of the 15th century, its local administration and legal system remained intact.[43]
In 1501, the armies of Pskov and Moscow were defeated in theBattle of the Siritsa River by theLivonian Order, but the city withstood a subsequent siege. In the summer of 1503, the city concluded a six-year truce with the Livonian Order on the order of the grand prince of Moscow.[42] In the treaty, "tsar" Ivan III of Russia confirms an agreement in Novgorod by the representatives of the "respected prince of Livland,Walter von Plettenburg" on one side and Pskov on the other.[44] The title of tsar was used as part of Ivan's policy to gain international recognition as an equal to theemperor.[44] This was one of the last treaties concluded by Pskov before it completely lost its autonomy.[44]
Upon becoming the grand prince,Vasily III continued his father's policy of annexing the other remaining Russian states.[45] In the autumn of 1509, he visited Novgorod, where he received complaints from the Pskovveche against the Muscovite governor of the city.[45] At first, Vasily encouraged complaints against the governor, yet soon after, he demanded that the city abolish its traditional institutions, including the removal of theveche bell.[45] From that point on, Pskov was to be ruled exclusively by his governors and officials, and on 13 January 1510, theveche bell was removed and transported to Moscow.[45]
During an official visit to Pskov, Vasily held a large reception that was attended by city officials, merchants and representatives of other classes.[45] At the height of the reception, he had them arrested.[45] In total, around 300 families were deported and replaced with loyalists, as Vasily sought to remove any potential opposition to his direct rule.[46] Following its incorporation into the centralized Russian state, the city of Pskov and the lands around it continued to prosper, preserving some of its economic and cultural traditions that may have even spread to Moscow.[46] At the time of its incorporation, the city numbered 6,500 households, or about 30,000 people, according to the chronicle of Pskov.[2]
Despite being acity-state, Pskov, likeNovgorod, extended over a large amount of territory. It covered the territory between Novgorod and the lands inhabited by theBaltic peoples, reaching theGulf of Finland. As a result of its geographic position, Pskov made frequent contact withLithuania and theTeutonic Knights. TheHanseatic League also had an office in Pskov, which allowed the city to have commercial contacts with distant states. Pskov did not have a relatively empty hinterland, which prevented it from engaging in expansionism unlike Novgorod, which had a vast hinterland in theRussian North.[38]
The Pskov Republic had well-developedfarming,fishing,blacksmithing, jewellery-making and construction industries. Exchange of commodities within the republic itself and itstrade with Novgorod and other Russian cities, theBaltic region, andWestern Europe cities made Pskov one of the biggesthandicraft and trade centers of Rus'. As opposed to the Novgorod Republic, Pskov never had big feudallandowners:estates were smaller and even more scattered than of those in Novgorod.[47] The estates of Pskovian monasteries and churches were much smaller as well. Some land was owned bysmerdy while otherizorniki did not own the land they worked and were obliged to pay rent – between a quarter and a half of the harvest. A farmer who had no debts to his landlord could leave him only on a certain day of the year.[48][49]
The rural population was deprived of political rights as landowners were concentrated in towns.[50] As late as the 1480s, Pskovian peasants were referred to assmerdy, even though the term had disappeared from documents in other parts of Russia, reflecting the social polarization.[50] Representatives of thezemtsy (private landowners) held the positions of hundredmen and vicar of the archbishop, while merchants held the positions of merchant and trader elders.[51] The lower classes (chyornyye lyudi) selected street (ulichanskiye) elders.[52]
In contrast to the absolute power of princes in the structure of Russian princedoms, the republics of Novgorod and Pskov had structures that counterbalanced and complemented each other.[50] The government of the Pskov Republic consisted of theveche (popular assembly),posadnichestvo (mayoralty) and the prince (directly or through a viceroy). Mayors (posadniki) from all parts of the city, together with one or more lord mayors and former mayors formed theCouncil of Lords (sovet gospod,boyarskiy sovet), which was the main executive organ of the state. The mayoral offices (posadniki) became a privilege of several noble (boyar) families.[53] The first references toposadniki appear in the chronicle of Pskov in the early 14th century.[54] Formerposadniki kept their title, and so the incumbentposadnik was known as thestepennyi posadnik.[55]
Although considered to be a republic, the head of state remained the prince; however, power was shared with the local authorities, and so a particular prince could be dismissed.[55] The best documented duties of the prince include him commanding the army and his judicial office.[55] As Pskov did not have its own princely dynasty, the prince was invited from Lithuania and then Moscow and other Russian principalities.[56] The prince of Pskov was more dependent on the grand prince compared to the prince of Novgorod, and so princes were often recruited from the ranks of service princes who had been accepted into the service of the grand prince, especially after 1399.[38] The role of the prince in Pskov has been compared to that of apodestà orcondottiero in Italian cities.[56] The prince was a military leader, accompanied by his retainers, but he also fulfilled judicial and police functions.[56]
The legal code of Pskov, known as thePskov Judicial Charter, was enacted by itsveche in 1397, with redactions until 1467.[57] The preamble says it was approved "by all Pskov at the assembly meeting"(vsem Pskovom na vechi).[54] Among medieval Russian cities, only Pskov and Novgorod had their own law codes.[54] Pskov's legal code is regarded as a monument ofRussian law.[57] The principal subjects of the code included commercial law, criminal law, debts, evidence, inheritance, the law of procedure, the legal position of certain peasant classes, as well as the rights of certain officials.[58] The Charter of Pskov was an important source for theSudebnik of 1497 underIvan III, the first collection of laws of the newly unified state.[59]
The Pskov Judicial Charter describes the legislative procedure: "If some line[a] in the customary charter is missing, the mayors should report to Lord Pskov at the assembly meeting (dolozhit' gospodina Pskova na vechi) and write this line down [into the Charter]. And if some line does not please Lord Pskov, it can be freely removed from the Charter".[61] Historians have compared the legislative procedure to those of medieval German towns.[56] The power of the prince was limited but – in contrast to the Novgorod Republic – he still retained important administrative and judicial functions, the latter carried out jointly with theposadnik.[62][63] The Pskov Judicial Charter required both officials to jointly preside over all trials.[56] It also prohibited legal meetings at theveche, specifying that all trials were to be conducted in the entrance hall of the prince's residence.[56] Both officials were expected to administer trials justly, according with their oath.[56]
Theveche had legislative powers; it could appoint military commanders and hear ambassadors' reports. It also approved expenses such as grants to princes and payments to builders of walls, towers and bridges.[64] Theveche gathered at theTrinity Cathedral, which held the archives of theveche and important private papers and state documents. Theveche assembly includedposadniki, as well as "middle" and common people.[65] Historians differ on the extent to which theveche was dominated by elites, with some saying that real power was in the hands of boyars, while others consider theveche to have been a democratic institution.[66] Conflicts were common and the confrontation between theveche and theposadniki in 1483–1484 led to the execution of oneposadnik and to the confiscation of property of three otherposadniki who fled to Moscow.[67]
Like Novgorod, Pskov was divided into severalkontsy (lit. 'ends'). There were fourkontsy in the 14th century, as the city was growing and a new wall was constructed in 1465 the new ends were created. Each end had its central church which housed the archive, treasury andrefectory where holiday feasts were held. The ends played a prominent role in the government: often delegations sent by Pskov had representatives from all the ends and each end administered a part of the territory of the republic outside of the capital city.[68]
The term "fragmented sovereignty" has been applied to Pskov, in which it was dependent on the archbishop of Novgorod and on the Russian metropolitan inecclesiastic affairs, and dependent on the Moscow grand principality in secular politics.[69] Pskov belonged to theeparchy of Novgorod, and so local clergy remained subordinate to the archbishop of Novgorod.[54]
The Pskovites are recorded to have unsuccessfully tried to obtain their own bishop several times.[54] The Novgorodians conceded the right to have court cases regarding ecclesiastical affairs held in Pskov.[54] The last attempt to establish a separate eparchy was in 1464, when the Pskovites petitioned Grand PrinceIvan III, requesting him to order the metropolitan to consecrate a bishop for Pskov.[60] However, this petition was declined on the grounds that a bishopric had never existed in Pskov.[60]
Unlike Novgorod, where the archbishop played an important role in political life, the church had a limited role in Pskov's politics as none of the local clergyman had been trusted to take part in the decision-making process or to represent the city.[60] A religious sect, whose followers were known as thestrigolniki, was active in the city from the second half of the 14th century.Metropolitan Dionisy was instructed byPatriarch Nilus to investigate the heresy in 1382.[70] Due to persecution by the authorities in Novgorod and Pskov, along with internal disagreements among thestrigolniki, the sect had disappeared by the early 15th century, only to be soon replaced with another sect, theJudaizers.[71]
Pskov, along withNovgorod, was an important center of trade betweenRussia andWestern Europe as it was one of the westernmost Russian cities.[72] The main export waswax.[73] The first mention of the Pskov wax trade was in the 1342 treaty between Novgorod and German merchants.[73] Because Pskov did not have a vast hinterland, unlike Novgorod, fur was never a significant export.[73] In 1448, Novgorod and Pskov signed a treaty with the cities ofLivonia as equal partners for the first time.[73]
Already in the 13th century, German merchants were present in theZapskovye area of Pskov and theHanseatic League had atrading post in the same area in the first half of the 16th century which moved toZavelichye after a fire in 1562.[74][75] Pskov's main trade partners wereRiga,Reval andDorpat.[76] The wars with theLivonian Order, Poland–Lithuania, andSweden interrupted trade but it was maintained until the 17th century, with Swedish merchants gaining the upper hand eventually.[75]
Pskov did not have akontor like Novgorod; instead, the city had special "German" districts where foreign merchants could rent housing, while Pskov merchants resided in "Russian" districts in Dorpat.[77] After Grand PrinceIvan III closed Novgorod'sHanseatic office in 1494, leading to a trade blockade, the cities of Livonia continued their trade through Pskov and explained toLübeck that Pskov was not formally part of theGrand Principality of Moscow.[78] From 1510, when grand princely customs were introduced in the city, the regulation of trade was decided by the local tsarist administration, and the governor of Pskov documented the entry and exit of all foreign merchants.[79]
The churches of Pskov feature many distinctive elements:corbel arches, churchporches, exterior galleries andzvonnitsa bell towers. These features were introduced by Pskovian masons toMuscovy, where they constructed numerous buildings during the 15th and 16th centuries. Out of all non-religious construction, only the fortresses inPskov,Izborsk andGdov have survived.
The literature of Pskov land was an integral part ofmedieval Russian literature. The chronicle-writing started in the 13th century, at first dealing mostly with topics of local interest. By the 15th century, the chronicles became more detailed and described events in Muscovy, Novgorod, Lithuania and the Golden Horde. The most important works written in Pskov are theStory ofDovmont describing the coming of Dovmont to the city, his baptism and subsequent victories,The Life ofSaint Euphrosynus andThe Address ofHegumen Pamfil which contains one of the earliest descriptions ofIvan Kupala rituals.[80]
The downfall of Pskov is recounted in theStory of the Taking of Pskov (1510), which was lauded byD. S. Mirsky as "one of the most beautiful short stories of Old Russia. The history of the Muscovites' leisurely perseverance is told with admirable simplicity and art. An atmosphere of descending gloom pervades the whole narrative: all is useless, and whatever the Pskovites can do, the Muscovite cat will take its time and eat the mouse when and how it pleases".[81]
The princely system of governance can be divided into two periods: 1137–1399 and 1399–1510.[82] During the first period, 24 princes sat on the throne, and they can be classified into two groups: independent dynasts and junior members of princely dynasties.[83] The former did not recognize the authority of Novgorod and its prince, while the latter typically served as deputies to their senior sovereigns.[83] When the head of a dynasty held the princely throne in Novgorod, he would oversee his deputy in Pskov.[83] During the second period, 26 princes sat on the throne, none of whom demonstrated political independence.[6]
Unlike Novgorod, where the prince was represented by a deputy and did not always hold a princely title, the prince of Pskov was enthroned in theTrinity Cathedral.[6] From 1467 onward, the prince, who was a deputy of the grand prince of Moscow, gained the authority to appoint his own deputies in all 12 boroughs.[6]
| Prince | Reign | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Andrei of Polotsk | 1342–1349 | of theGediminids clan |
| Eustaphy Feodorovich | 1349–1360 | also Prince of Izborsk |
| Alexander of Polotsk | 1360–1369 | |
| Matvei | 1375–1377 | |
| Andrei of Polotsk | 1377–1399 | second time |
| Ivan Andreyevich | 1386–1394 | |
| viceroys of theGrand Prince of Moscow | 1399–1510 |
Members of theHanseatic League by quarter, and trading posts of the Hanseatic League | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Wendish |
|   | ||
| Saxon | ||||
| Baltic | ||||
| Westphalian | ||||
| Kontore | ||||
| Vitten | ||||
| Factories | ||||
