Algebraic element satisfying some of the criteria of an inverse
"Pseudoinverse" redirects here. For the Moore–Penrose inverse, sometimes referred to as "the pseudoinverse", seeMoore–Penrose inverse.
Inmathematics, and in particular,algebra, ageneralized inverse (or,g-inverse) of an elementx is an elementy that has some properties of aninverse element but not necessarily all of them. The purpose of constructing a generalized inverse of a matrix is to obtain a matrix that can serve as an inverse in some sense for a wider class of matrices thaninvertible matrices. Generalized inverses can be defined in anymathematical structure that involvesassociative multiplication, that is, in asemigroup. This article describes generalized inverses of amatrix.
A matrix is a generalized inverse of a matrix if[1][2][3] A generalized inverse exists for an arbitrary matrix, and when a matrix has aregular inverse, this inverse is its unique generalized inverse.[1]
That is, is a solution of the linear system. Equivalently, we need a matrix of order such that
Hence we can define thegeneralized inverse as follows: Given an matrix, an matrix is said to be a generalized inverse of if[1][2][3] The matrix has been termed aregular inverse of by some authors.[5]
Some generalized inverses are defined and classified based on the Penrose conditions:
where denotes conjugate transpose. If satisfies the first condition, then it is ageneralized inverse of. If it satisfies the first two conditions, then it is areflexive generalized inverse of. If it satisfies all four conditions, then it is thepseudoinverse of, which is denoted by and also known as theMoore–Penrose inverse, after the pioneering works byE. H. Moore andRoger Penrose.[2][7][8][9][10][11] It is convenient to define an-inverse of as an inverse that satisfies the subset of the Penrose conditions listed above. Relations, such as, can be established between these different classes of-inverses.[1]
When is non-singular, any generalized inverse and is therefore unique. For a singular, some generalised inverses, such as the Drazin inverse and the Moore–Penrose inverse, are unique, while others are not necessarily uniquely defined.
Since, is singular and has no regular inverse. However, and satisfy Penrose conditions (1) and (2), but not (3) or (4). Hence, is a reflexive generalized inverse of.
The elementb is a generalized inverse of an elementa if and only if, in any semigroup (orring, since themultiplication function in any ring is a semigroup).
The generalized inverses of the element 3 in the ring are 3, 7, and 11, since in the ring:
The generalized inverses of the element 4 in the ring are 1, 4, 7, and 10, since in the ring:
If an elementa in a semigroup (or ring) has an inverse, the inverse must be the only generalized inverse of this element, like the elements 1, 5, 7, and 11 in the ring.
In the ring, any element is a generalized inverse of 0, however, 2 has no generalized inverse, since there is nob in such that.
Any generalized inverse can be used to determine whether asystem of linear equations has any solutions, and if so to give all of them. If any solutions exist for then ×m linear system
,
with vector of unknowns and vector of constants, all solutions are given by
,
parametric on the arbitrary vector, where is any generalized inverse of. Solutions exist if and only if is a solution, that is, if and only if. IfA has full column rank, the bracketed expression in this equation is the zero matrix and so the solution is unique.[12]
Conversely, any choice of,, and for matrix of this form is a generalized inverse of.[1] The-inverses are exactly those for which, the-inverses are exactly those for which, and the-inverses are exactly those for which. In particular, the pseudoinverse is given by:
In practical applications it is necessary to identify the class of matrix transformations that must be preserved by a generalized inverse. For example, the Moore–Penrose inverse, satisfies the following definition of consistency with respect to transformations involving unitary matricesU andV:
.
The Drazin inverse, satisfies the following definition of consistency with respect to similarity transformations involving a nonsingular matrixS:
.
The unit-consistent (UC) inverse,[13] satisfies the following definition of consistency with respect to transformations involving nonsingular diagonal matricesD andE:
.
The fact that the Moore–Penrose inverse provides consistency with respect to rotations (which are orthonormal transformations) explains its widespread use in physics and other applications in which Euclidean distances must be preserved. The UC inverse, by contrast, is applicable when system behavior is expected to be invariant with respect to the choice of units on different state variables, e.g., miles versus kilometers.